The first step to evaluate the usefulness of arterial occlusion in placenta accreta spectrum is to establish its indications

Local Resection After Cesarean Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and surgical outcomes between local resection and immediate hysterectomy after cesarean delivery in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

DATA SOURCES

Four public databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched for relevant publications up to July 31, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified clinical trials, it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov . The search strategy included the terms "placenta accreta" or "placenta accreta spectrum" and "pregnancy outcomes" and related key words about local resection and cesarean hysterectomy.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

With the use of established inclusion criteria, 4,889 studies were reviewed. The included studies evaluated surgical and maternal outcomes associated with immediate hysterectomy compared with local resection.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data extraction was conducted with the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design framework. Both fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to synthesize the findings. A total of 11 studies published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed (nine retrospective studies, one randomized controlled trial, and one prospective cohort study). The quality of the included studies was globally low, and 7 of 11 studies had severe bias. The immediate hysterectomy group had a significantly higher prevalence of placenta percreta compared with the local resection group (69.4% vs 44.3%, P <.01). In contrast to immediate hysterectomy, local resection yielded improved surgical outcomes, demonstrated by the following metrics: transfusion rate (six studies, 375 vs 205 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% CI, 0.29-0.75), estimated blood loss (seven studies, 416 vs 246 patients, mean difference -396 mL, 95% CI, -534 to -257), urologic complications (seven studies, 408 vs 241 patients, OR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.10-0.33), and intensive care unit admission (three studies, 87 vs 79 patients, OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07-0.53). One study recorded three maternal deaths: two in the immediate hysterectomy group and one in the local resection group. The results of subgroup analyses focused on patients with severe forms of PAS (placenta increta and percreta) were similar in the overall analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, eligible studies comparing the local resection with immediate hysterectomy at cesarean hysterectomy for PAS were overall low quality because of the lack of intention-to-treat information. Despite these limitations, local resection for PAS may possibly be an option for appropriately selected patients to reduce surgical morbidity. Because the indication criteria, safety, surgical techniques, and necessity of adjunctive therapies for local resection remain understudied, further prospective studies are warranted.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42024594315.

Association of the placenta accreta spectrum score and estimated blood loss in placenta accreta spectrum patients with placenta previa: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) score calculated by the scoring system may predict patients with PAS. We aim to find the relationship between estimated blood loss and the PAS score. Further, find the inflection point, identify PAS patients with placenta previa who were at risk for major bleeding.

METHODS

The PAS patients with placenta previa, as diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound, were divided into two groups according to their PAS scores using a new scoring system. Blood loss, transfusion requirements, the rate of Intra-Abdominal Balloon Occlusion (IABO), and other indicators were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

The estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, postoperative transfusion, operation time, and hospitalization time significantly increased in the group with a PAS score ≥ 9 (P < 0.05). The inflection point analysis revealed that a significant increase in estimated blood loss occurred when the PAS score was beyond 10 (crude) or 6 (adjusted for age, body mass index, and IABO).

CONCLUSION

There was a non-linear relationship between estimated intraoperative blood loss and PAS score. When the PAS score was greater than 9, hemorrhage, the risk of major bleeding, the need for transfusions, and the placement of an abdominal aortic balloon all increase significantly.