Marasco SF, Fuller L, Zimmet A, McGiffin D, Seitz M, Ch'ng S, Gangahanumaiah S, Bailey M. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of polymer cable ties versus standard wire closure of midline sternotomy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;
156:1589-1595.e1. [PMID:
29778340 DOI:
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.025]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Midline sternotomy remains the most common access incision for cardiac operations. Traditionally, the sternum is closed with stainless steel wires. Wires are well known to stretch and break, however, leading to pain, nonunion, and potential deep sternal wound infection. We hypothesized that biocompatible plastic cable ties would achieve a more rigid sternal fixation, reducing postoperative pain and analgesia requirements.
METHODS
A prospective, randomized study compared the ZIPFIX (De Puy Synthes, West Chester, Pa) sternal closure system (n = 58) with standard stainless steel wires (n = 60). Primary outcomes were pain and analgesia requirements in the early postoperative period. Secondary outcome was sternal movement, as assessed by ultrasound at the postoperative follow-up visit.
RESULTS
Groups were well matched in demographic and operative variables. There were no significant differences between groups in postoperative pain, analgesia, or early ventilatory requirements. Patients in the ZIPFIX group had significantly more movement in the sternum and manubrium on ultrasound at 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
ZIPFIX sternal cable ties provide reliable closure but no demonstrable benefit in this study in pain or analgesic requirements relative to standard wire closure after median sternotomy.
Collapse