Early initiation of physical and occupational therapy while on extracorporeal life support improves patients' functional activity

Impella 5.5 as Heart Transplant Bridge Facilitated Rehabilitation and Improves Post-Transplant Outcomes: Retrospective Cohort Study

Heart transplantation is a well-established treatment for end-stage heart failure, but many patients present in poor physical condition, complicating outcomes. The Impella 5.5 device, used in cardiogenic shock, may support pretransplant rehabilitation by stabilizing organ function and promoting functional improvement. This retrospective cohort study assessed the relationship between functional status, measured by standardized Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Basic Mobility (AM-PAC) scores, and days alive outside the hospital within 30 days post-transplant (DAOH-30). Patients who received Impella 5.5 support before transplantation between January 2019 and October 2023 were included, excluding those without AM-PAC scores within 24 hours pretransplant. Among 65 patients, the median DAOH-30 was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8-19). Higher pretransplant standardized AM-PAC scores correlate with increased DAOH-30 (adjusted coefficient 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.6; p = 0.04), as did AM-PAC score improvement during rehabilitation (adjusted coefficient 0.35; 95% CI = 0.01-0.6; p = 0.04). Extended rehabilitation was associated with greater functional gains. These findings suggest that better pretransplant functional status and rehabilitation-related improvements were associated with increased DAOH-30. The Impella 5.5 device facilitates rehabilitation and may enhance post-transplant outcomes. Further research should refine strategies to optimize rehabilitation and recovery in this high-risk population.

Enhancing lung transplantation with ECMO: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, outcomes, and future considerations

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical intervention for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, challenges such as donor organ scarcity and post-transplant complications significantly affect its success. Recent advancements in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) have shown promise in improving the outcomes and expanding eligibility for LTx.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies that explore the use of ECMO in lung transplantation. A thorough search of relevant studies on ECMO and LTx was conducted using multiple scholarly databases and relevant keywords, resulting in 73 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Sources included peer-reviewed journals and clinical trial results, with emphasis on articles captured recent advancements in ECMO technology and techniques.

RESULTS

ECMO has been crucial in supporting patients before, during, and after LTx. It serves as a bridge to transplantation by maintaining pulmonary and circulatory stability in critically ill patients awaiting donor organs. ECMO also aids in the evaluation of marginal donor lungs and supports patients through acute post-transplant complications. Recent technological advancements have improved the safety and efficacy of ECMO, further solidifying its role in LTx.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this review underscores ECMO's critical role in enhancing outcomes across all stages of lung transplantation. Its various configurations and strategies have shown promise in stabilizing critically ill patients and improving transplant success rates. Looking ahead, it's important to gather more information about the long-term outcomes and potential complications associated with ECMO use. More research and data collection will help us understand the benefits and risks better, leading to improved decision-making and patient care in this field.

Right Heart Recovery Post Lung Transplant With COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Right heart remodeling is noted in patients with severe COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There is limited information regarding right heart recovery following lung transplantation in this cohort. Methods: Retrospective review of institutional transplant database from June 2020 to June 2022 was performed at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois. Demographic, laboratory, histopathologic, lung transplant outcomes, and pre- and postoperative echocardiographic data were recorded and analyzed. Results: Of the 42 patients who underwent lung transplantation for COVID-19-related ARDS, 6 patients were excluded due to having either a single-lung transplant (n = 2), lobar transplant (n = 1), or dual-organ transplant (n = 1) or for missing postoperative TTE data (n = 2) and 36 were included in the study; there were no 90-day deaths, and the 1-year survival rate was 88.8%. Intraoperative hemodynamics data showed a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 49 ± 23 mm Hg. Preoperative echocardiography was evaluated at a median of 15.5 (10-34.3) (IQR) days preoperatively and 140 (108-201) days (IQR) postoperatively. RV size grade improved from an average of 1.7 ± 0.85 to 1.3 ± 0.6 (p < 0.05), while RV function improved from an average of 2.2 ± 1.2 to 1 ± 1 (p < 0.05). There was a reduction in RVSP from 46.5 ± 18 mmHg to 30.1 ± 7.8 mmHg (p < 0.05) and RV free wall strain showed improvement from -13.9 ± 6.1% to -18.5 ± 5.4% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results showed that the RV size and systolic function demonstrate improvement with normalization in a relatively short period following lung transplantation for patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS.

Impact of bridging veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to COVID-19 lung transplantation

Background

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) therapy is being increasingly used as respiratory support for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the long-term outcome of VV-ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation in COVID-19-associated ARDS remains unclear, hence the purpose of this study aimed to evaluate its long-term outcome, safety, and feasibility.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study from an institutional lung transplantation database between June 2020 and June 2022. Data on demographics, pre-transplantation laboratory values, postoperative outcomes, preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography findings, and survival rates were collected. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, Kaplan-Meier, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for analysis.

Results

Twenty-five patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS underwent lung transplant surgery with VV-ECMO bridge. Unfortunately, six patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS using VV-ECMO died while waiting for transplantation during the same study period. Patients with VV-ECMO bridge were a more severe cohort than 16 patients without VV-ECMO bridge (lung allocation score: 88.1 vs. 74.9, P<0.001). These patients had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively) and a higher incidence of complications after lung transplantation. The one-year survival rate of patients with VV-ECMO bridge was lower than that of patients without (78.3% vs. 100.0%, P=0.06), but comparable to that of patients with other lung transplant indications (84.2%, P=0.95). Echocardiography showed a decrease in the right ventricular systolic pressure (P=0.01), confirming that lung transplantation improved right heart function.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that VV-ECMO can be used to safely bridge patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS with right heart failure.

Physical Rehabilitation and Mobilization in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Life Support: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

We planned to synthesize evidence examining the potential efficacy and safety of performing physical rehabilitation and/or mobilization (PR&M) in adult patients receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

DATA SOURCES

We included any study that compared PR&M to no PR&M or among different PR&M strategies in adult patients receiving any ECLS for any indication and any cannulation. We searched seven electronic databases with no language limitations.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened all citations for eligibility. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tools to assess individual study risk of bias. Although we had planned for meta-analysis, this was not possible due to insufficient data, so we used narrative and tabular data summaries for presenting results. We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 17 studies that enrolled 996 patients. Most studies examined venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or venoarterial ECMO as a bridge to recovery in the ICU. We found an uncertain effect of high-intensity/active PR&M on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, or quality of life compared with low-intensity/passive PR&M in patients receiving ECLS (very low certainty due to very serious imprecision). There was similarly an uncertain effect on safety events including clinically important bleeding, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, limb ischemia, accidental decannulation, or ECLS circuit dysfunction (very low certainty due to very serious risk of bias and imprecision).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available summary of evidence, there is an uncertain effect of high-intensity/active PR&M on patient important outcomes or safety in patients receiving ECLS. Despite indirect data from other populations suggesting potential benefit of high-intensity PR&M in the ICU; further high-quality randomized trials evaluating the benefits and risks of physical therapy and/or mobilization in this population are needed.

Rehabilitation for adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current information on the latest rehabilitative practices is limited, with previous reviews only covering data up to October 2021, and some considering only patients on awake ECMO or with COVID-19. This review aims to present a concise overview of the latest findings on rehabilitation and highlight emerging trends for patients undergoing ECMO support.

METHODS

This integrative review was conducted by searching the National Library of Medicine - PubMed database. Two different search strings "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation" AND "rehabilitation" and "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation" AND "physiotherapy" were used to search the published literature. Articles that did not describe rehabilitation techniques, editorials, conference proceedings, letters to editor, reviews and research protocols were excluded. Studies conducted on pediatric populations were also excluded. The search process was completed in December 2023.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included in the final analysis. Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients aged between 27 and 63 years were included; 428 were men (51%). In 31% of the included studies, patients had COVID-19; nevertheless, rehabilitative activities did not differ from non-COVID-19 patients. In most studies, rehabilitation commenced within the first 48-96 h and consisted of progressive exercise and out-of-bed activities such as sitting, standing and walking.

CONCLUSION

Current practice focuses on rehabilitative protocols that incorporate exercise routines with progressive intensity, greater emphasis on out-of-bed activities, and a multidisciplinary approach to patient mobilization.

After ECMO Decannulation, Are Patients Thriving or Just Surviving?

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to support patients with cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome is rising worldwide.1 While ECMO may save the lives of some of our sickest patients, the outlook of ECMO survivorship remains uncertain. Defining longer-term functional and neuropsychiatric outcomes in ECMO survivors is important for 3 reasons. First, critically ill patients are at high risk of experiencing postintensive care syndrome (PICS), defined as new physical, cognitive, or psychological impairments that present in survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge.2 PICS is associated with more severe illness and longer intensive care unit length of stay.3 Because ECMO is reserved for patients with refractory shock or hypoxia, patients treated with ECMO represent a severely ill patient population with prolonged length of stay, putting them at particularly high risk of developing PICS. Second, ECMO is associated with direct neurologic injury, including both macrohemorrhages and microhemorrhages, infarcts, and diffuse hypoxic-ischemic brain injury that likely contribute to long-term outcomes.4 Finally, ECMO is very expensive. A recent study determined that the average cost per admission for patients with COVID-19 placed on ECMO was nearly $850,000 more than those who received only mechanical ventilation.5 Understanding patient-centered outcomes will be an integral part of future cost-effectiveness analyses.