Bilateral uveal melanomas with different gene expression detected with 7 years interval

Multiple Uveal Melanoma

Introduction

Multiple uveal melanoma is a rare occurrence and includes bilateral melanoma, unilateral multiple/multifocal melanoma, or melanoma with metastasis to the ipsilateral or contralateral eye.

Methods

A chart review of patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma between January 2013 and January 2019 at the Duke University Eye Center Ophthalmic Oncology Service was performed.

Results

Three patients with multiple, sequential melanoma were identified; patient 1 had bilateral choroidal melanoma and patients 2 and 3 had 2 choroidal melanomas occurring in the same eye. In all 3 patients, both the first and sequential choroidal melanomas were treated with I-125 radioactive plaque brachytherapy (PBT). Two patients were found to have developed secondary metastatic uveal melanoma as a presenting sign of systemic metastases. Patient 4, initially treated with PBT, was diagnosed with ipsilateral metastatic choroidal melanoma, also treated with PBT. Patient 5 had right eye enucleation for choroidal melanoma and developed vision-threatening metastasis in the left eye, which was treated with PBRT. None of the patients had history of cancer prior to their first diagnosis. Patients 1 and 5 were tested with a systemic melanoma panel; both were negative for BAP1, but patient 1 had a variant of unknown significance in BRCA2. Patient 3 had oculodermal melanocytosis, an established risk factor of uveal melanoma.

Conclusion

Although rare, the possibility of multiple uveal melanoma does exist. Examination of the treated and contralateral eye on a regular basis is crucial, not only to identify local failure but also new metastases from the primary tumor and additional primary tumors.

BAP1 Germline Mutation Associated with Bilateral Primary Uveal Melanoma

Purpose

To describe the occurrence of bilateral primary uveal melanoma in 2 patients with mutation on the gene encoding BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1).

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients with bilateral primary uveal melanoma and subsequent positive germline BAP1 mutation.

Results

There were 2 patients with bilateral uveal melanoma and BAP1 germline positivity. Neither patient demonstrated oculodermal melanocytosis. Patient 1 underwent enucleation of his right eye (OD) at the age of 44 years for a 9.6-mm-thick choroidal melanoma. He returned 4 years later with a 10.0-mm-thick choroidal melanoma in his left eye (OS) and was treated with plaque radiotherapy. He had a strong family history of cancer, and clinical testing for germline BAP1 mutation identified a pathogenic mutation in BAP1. At the 18-month follow-up, visual acuity was 20/200 OS without evidence of systemic metastasis. Patient 2 initially presented at age 54 years with extensive, diffuse iris melanoma OD, initially treated with plaque radiotherapy, but local recurrence after 3 years necessitated enucleation. Four years later, a 6.0-mm-thick ciliary body melanoma OS was found and successfully treated with plaque radiotherapy. Clinical testing for germline BAP1 mutation identified a pathogenic mutation in BAP1. At the 8-year follow-up, visual acuity was 20/40 OS without evidence of local recurrence or systemic metastasis. The patient expired secondary to an unrelated brain infarction.

Conclusion

Bilateral uveal melanoma is exceedingly rare. Patients with bilateral uveal melanoma, especially when coincident with remote systemic cancers or a family history of cancer, should be evaluated for germline BAP1 mutation. Lifelong monitoring for related systemic malignancies is advised.

MOLECULAR PROGNOSTICS FOR UVEAL MELANOMA

PURPOSE

To review laboratory methods, currently available commercial tests, caveats and clinical tips regarding prognostic analysis of uveal melanoma tissue.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed focused on the genetic abnormalities found in uveal melanoma cells, their correlation to the development of metastases, the validity of various laboratory approaches in their detection, and the existing commercially available tests for uveal melanoma prognostication.

RESULTS

Numerous laboratory methods exist for analyzing genetic material obtained from uveal melanoma cells. Older tests have been gradually replaced with contemporary methods that are simpler with greater accuracy. Two commercially available assays exist which have not been directly compared-a gene expression profiling test has been validated directly through a large, prospective multicenter study and a DNA-based test which uses laboratory methods supported by extensive historical data.

CONCLUSION

There are myriad laboratory methods for prognostic analysis of uveal melanoma tissue. These tests were historically only available to those with access to an outfitted laboratory. Newer commercially available assays have increased the accessibility of prognostic biopsy for uveal melanoma. The various caveats that exist when considering and performing prognostic biopsy of uveal melanoma are discussed.

Successive Uveal Melanomas with Different Gene Expression Profiles in an Eye with Ocular Melanocytosis

Ocular melanocytosis portends a higher risk of uveal melanoma. Multifocal uveal melanoma has been described previously and has been associated with ocular melanocytosis. Historically, histopathology has been used to differentiate tumors; however, molecular profiling now allows for better prognostication and determination of metastatic risk. The present case describes a patient with ocular melanocytosis who developed two sequential uveal melanomas in the same eye separated by 4 years. The uveal melanoma-specific gene expression profile (GEP) testing for the first tumor was class 1A and the second tumor was class 2. While the first tumor had low metastatic risk, the second tumor had a higher risk of metastasis, demonstrating the importance of GEP testing in cases of multifocal disease.

Primary bilateral uveal melanoma: a population-based study and systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Primary bilateral uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare and incompletely described entity. It is not known how these patients compare to those with unilateral UM.

BACKGROUND

We sought to comprehensively characterize and compare patients with primary bilateral and unilateral UM.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based and systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with bilateral (n = 52) and unilateral UM (n = 8915).

METHODS

We analysed cases of primary bilateral UM from three data sources: (i) the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center pathology database from 1996 to 2016 (n = 1); (ii) the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-18 database from 1973 to 2013 (n = 5) and (iii) a systematic review of the English language literature (n = 46). Cases of unilateral UM were obtained from the SEER-18 database from 1973 to 2013 for comparison (n = 8915).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and survival.

RESULTS

There were no differences in sex, race, mean age at diagnosis, site of uveal involvement, metastases at diagnosis, or treatment among patients with bilateral as compared to unilateral UM. Additionally, there were no clinicopathological differences between the two UMs in each patient with bilateral disease. Overall survival did not differ between unilateral and bilateral UM patients, or between bilateral UM patients who presented with, or subsequently developed, bilateral disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Bilateral and unilateral UM patients share similar demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and prognoses. Moreover, the development of bilateral disease does not portend a poorer prognosis and patients should be treated similarly to those with unilateral disease.

The Results of Stricter Inclusion Criteria in an Immunomagnetic Detection Study of Micrometastatic Cells in Bone Marrow of Uveal Melanoma Patients - Relevance for Dormancy

Approximately 50% of uveal melanoma patients develop metastases. We want to evaluate the effect of stricter criteria on our data from our previous study correlating survival and bone marrow (BM) micrometastasis results using our immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method. Mononuclear cell fractions (MNC) isolated from BM were examined for tumour cells and the patients were classified as BM positive (BM+) or BM negative (BM-). The study originally included 328 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma from 1997 to 2006. The cohort was limited to 217 patients when we introduced cyto- or histopathological verification of melanoma cells in the patient as a main new criterion for inclusion. Tumour cells were found in BM-samples in 38.7% (95% CI, 32-45) at enrolment. Until the latest work-up 43.8% (95% CI, 38-50) of patients had developed melanoma metastases. After a minimum follow-up time of 8.5 years, 60.4% (95% CI, 54-66) of patients had died. The causes were: melanoma metastases 69.5%, another type of cancer 5.4% and non-cancerous causes 19.5%. Overall median survival was shorter for the BM- patients (11.3 years) (95% CI, 10-12) compared to the BM+ (16.5 years) (95% CI, 12-14), p = 0.04, log rank test. All-cause mortality and specific melanoma mortality estimated after 12 year follow-up showed a highly significant difference comparing BM- and BM+, p = 0.010 and p = 0,017, respectively. IMS yields a high fraction of BM+ samples due to micrometastasis at diagnosis and these cells appear to have a positive prognostic impact strengthening our previous report. The late recurrences support the concept of tumour dormancy.