Optical coherence tomography evaluation of patients with macula-off retinal detachment after different postoperative posturing: a randomized pilot study

Face-down positioning or posturing after pars plana vitrectomy for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments

BACKGROUND

A macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is one of the most common ophthalmic surgical emergencies and causes significant visual morbidity. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with gas tamponade is often performed to repair primary macula-involving RRDs with a high rate of anatomical retinal reattachment. It has been advocated by some ophthalmologists that face-down positioning after PPV and gas tamponade helps reduce postoperative retinal displacement. Retinal displacement can cause metamorphopsia and binocular diplopia.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review is to determine whether face-down positioning reduces the risk of retinal displacement following PPV and gas tamponade for primary macula-involving RRDs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2022, Issue 11), MEDLINE (January 1946 to 28 November 2022), Embase.com (January 1947 to 28 November 2022), PubMed (1948 to 28 November 2022), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (1982 to 28 November 2022), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search. We last searched the electronic databases on 28 November 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which face-down positioning was compared with no positioning or another form of positioning following PPV and gas tamponade for primary macula-involving RRDs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence for the prespecified outcomes using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three RCTs (369 eyes of 368 participants) that met the eligibility criteria. Two RCTs provided data on postoperative retinal displacement, one reported on postoperative distortion and quality of life outcomes, two on postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR, and two on postoperative ocular adverse events such as outer retinal folds. Study characteristics and risk of bias All the trials involved predominantly male participants (range: 68% to 72%). Only one trial provided race and ethnicity information, was registered on a trial registry, and reported funding sources. Using the RoB 2 tool, we assessed the risk of bias for proportion of eyes with retinal displacement, mean change in visual acuity, objective distortion scores, quality of life assessments, and ocular adverse events, with most domains judged to be at low risk of bias. Findings Immediate face-down positioning may result in a lower proportion of participants with postoperative retinal displacement compared with support-the-break positioning at six months (risk ratio [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.99; 1 RCT; 239 eyes of 239 participants; very low certainty evidence). One study found no evidence of a difference in BCVA at three months when comparing postoperative face-up with face-down positioning with or without perfluorocarbon liquid (mean difference [MD] -0.03, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02; I2 = 0; 56 eyes of 56 participants; very low certainty evidence). Immediate face-down positioning appears to have little to no effect on postoperative distortion scores at week 26 (MD 1.80, 95% CI -1.92 to 5.52; 1 RCT; 219 eyes of 219 participants; very low certainty evidence) and postoperative quality of life assessment scores at week 26 (MD -1.80, 95% CI -5.52 to 1.92; 1 RCT; 217 eyes of 217 participants; very low certainty evidence). Adverse events One study that enrolled 262 participants with macula-involving RRDs suggested that immediate face-down positioning after PPV and gas tamponade may reduce the ocular adverse event of postoperative outer retinal folds at six months (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.90; 1 RCT; 262 eyes of 262 participants; very low certainty evidence) and binocular diplopia (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.90; 1 RCT; 262 eyes of 262 participants; very low certainty evidence) compared with support-the-break positioning. Immediate face-down positioning may increase the ocular adverse event of elevated intraocular pressure compared with support-the-break positioning (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.73; 1 RCT; 262 eyes of 262 participants; very low certainty evidence). Another study found no evidence of a difference in postoperative outer retinal folds when comparing face-down versus face-up positioning at one and three months (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.02; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.61; 1 RCT; 56 eyes of 56 participants; very low certainty evidence). No studies reported non-ocular adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low certainty evidence suggests that immediate face-down positioning after PPV and gas tamponade may result in a reduction in postoperative retinal displacement, outer retinal folds, and binocular diplopia, but may increase the chance of postoperative raised intraocular pressure compared with support-the-break positioning at six months. We identified two ongoing trials that compare face-down positioning with face-up positioning following PPV and gas tamponade in participants with primary macula-involving RRDs, whose results may provide relevant evidence for our stated objectives. Future trials should be rigorously designed, and investigators should analyze outcome data appropriately and report adequate information to provide evidence of high certainty. Quality of life and patient preferences should be examined in addition to clinical and adverse event outcomes.

Postoperative positioning regimens in adults who undergo retinal detachment repair: A systematic review

Little is known about the comparative benefit of different positioning regimens in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. We compared outcomes of different postoperative posturing regimens following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 2000 to February 2022 for original studies that compared at least 2 postoperative posturing regimens in adults who underwent PPV for RRD. Seven comparative studies and 703 eyes were included. There were no differences in final visual acuity between posturing regimens. Single-procedure reattachment rates were higher with alternative positioning compared to prone positioning in patients with inferior breaks. Prone and alternative positioning were associated with similar risks of complications. In contrast, prone posturing had a higher risk of neck pain and intraocular pressure elevation than support-the-break, which had a greater risk of retinal displacement, retinal folds, and binocular diplopia. Immediate prone positioning was superior to delayed prone for the risk of retinal displacement. The present review shows that prone positioning was associated with a lower reattachment rate than alternative positioning. There were trade-offs in complications between prone and support-the-break positioning. Retinal displacement could be mitigated when prone positioning is maintained immediately after surgery.

Clinical and imaging characteristics of outer retinal folds in eyes with retinitis

Purpose

To describe clinical and imaging characteristics of the outer retinal folds (ORF) in cases of retinitis, retinochoroiditis, and chorioretinitis.

Methods

Retrospective review of retinitis cases with presence of ORFs either at presentation or during follow up.

Results

ORFs were seen adjacent to retinitis lesions in 16 eyes of 14 cases (retinitis post-febrile illness n = 10, toxoplasma retinochoroiditis n = 2, fungal chorioretinitis n = 2) either at presentation (n = 2) or during follow up (n = 14). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) appearance was outer retinal vertical stout lesions involving ellipsoid, external limiting membrane, and outer nuclear layer. All the cases had a presence of past or concurrent subretinal fluid and/or subretinal hyperreflective material when ORF was seen. ORF resolved with variable outer retinal atrophy over a mean period of 2.86 months.

Conclusion

ORF is observed in cases of retinitis with subretinal fluid either at presentation or during resolution. It is not specific to any etiological disease. Differentiation of this sign from vertical outer retinal stripes in viral retinitis on OCT is important to avoid misinterpretation.

[Macular folds after surgical repair of retinal detachment]

The incidence of retinal folds following surgical repair of retinal detachment is underestimated. The extent of retinal folds is variable and can include the complete retina with all layers and an apposition of the photoreceptor outer segments or only partially affect the outer or inner retinal layers. While complete folds can be relatively easily detected by clinical examination, discrete partial folds are sometimes difficult to assess biomicroscopically. In these cases, high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) plays an important role as a tool for differential diagnosis. If macular translocation occurs during the formation of folds, mostly in associated with inferior retinal folds, patients often complain of binocular double vision. A significant reduction of visual acuity and metamorphopsia occur in cases where the folding involves the fovea. In general, retinal folds tend to resolve spontaneously over a prolonged period of follow-up of several months; however, in cases of foveal involvement and corresponding symptoms, a surgical revision can be indicated, although the surgical procedure is not standardized.

Outer Retinal Folds Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy vs Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment Repair: Post Hoc Analysis from PIVOT

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of post-operative outer retinal folds (ORFs) in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) vs pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and to determine the association of ORFs with functional outcomes at 1 year.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary macula-off RRD meeting PIVOT trial criteria randomly assigned to PPV vs PnR.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of the PIVOT trial. Incidence and quantitative morphological features of ORFs were assessed with en face and cross-sectional OCT at 1 month post-operatively by two masked graders. ETDRS letter score and quantitative metamorphopsia were measured at 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of patients with ORFs following PPV vs PnR at 1 month post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include the association of ORFs with visual acuity (ETDRS letter score) and metamorphopsia (M-CHARTS) at 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight of the 176 participants enrolled in PIVOT were macula-off RRD. 94.3% (83/88) of these macula-off eyes had month 1 post-operative OCT scans that were gradable, 93.2% (41/44) in the PPV group and 95.5% (42/44) in the PnR group. The incidence of ORFs formation was 34.1% (14/41) in the PPV group and 14.3% (6/42) in the PnR group (p=0.034). ETDRS letter score at 1 year was 65.7±6.6 letters in patients with ORFs versus 75.1±1.4 letters in those without ORFs (difference=9.4 letters, 95% CI=7.5-11.3, p=0.047). Among patients in the PPV group only, mean ETDRS letter score at 1 year in patients with ORFs was 62.8 ± 24.7 letters compared to 75.4 ± 9.2 letters in patients without ORF formation (difference=12.6 letters, 95% CI=0.05-24.59, p=0.04). Horizontal and vertical metamorphopsia scores were similar in patients with vs without ORFs: horizontal: 0.35 ± 0.12 versus 0.29 ± 0.07 (difference=0.06, 95% CI=0.01-0.11, p=0.69) and vertical: 0.25±0.07 versus 0.29±0.07 (difference=0.04, 95%CI=0-0.08, p=0.60) respectively. There was a negative correlation between the closest distance of the ORFs from the fovea and the vertical metamorphopsia score (r=-0.507, p=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a greater risk of developing ORFs following PPV compared to PnR for RRD. ORFs at 1 month are associated with significantly worse ETDRS visual acuity letter score at 1 year.

Peripapillary Vessel Density in Eyes with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment after Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Purpose

To investigate the vascular density of the optic nerve head (ONH) and macula using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients undergoing vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to evaluate associations with visual outcomes.

Methods

Patients with RRD, successfully treated with a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and a minimum three-month follow-up were included in this study. The vessel density (VD) of the ONH and peripapillary regions, foveal avascular zone (FAZ), foveal flow density (FFD), and parafoveal flow density (PFD) were evaluated using OCTA and compared to the fellow eye. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine correlations with visual outcomes.

Results

Thirty-one patients with macula-off RRD were included in the study. Compared with the fellow eyes, eyes after RRD surgery had a lower peripapillary VD (P < 0.01). No significant difference in superficial and deep FFD, PFD, and FAZ area was found compared to the fellow eyes. Postoperative peripapillary VD and baseline BCVA were significantly associated with BCVA three months after PPV (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment eyes successfully treated with PPV had lower peripapillary vessel density than fellow healthy eyes. Postoperative BCVA was related to postoperative peripapillary VD.

Effect of Face-Down Positioning vs Support-the-Break Positioning After Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment Repair: The PostRD Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

A lack of consensus exists with regard to the optimal positioning regimen for patients after macula-involving retinal detachment (RD) repair.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of face-down positioning vs support-the-break positioning on retinal displacement and distortion after macula-involving RD repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective 6-month single-masked randomized clinical trial was conducted at a multicenter tertiary referral setting from May 16, 2016, to May 1, 2018. Inclusion criteria were fovea-involving rhegmatogenous RD; central visual loss within 14 days; patients undergoing primary vitrectomy and gas surgery, under local anesthetic; patients able to give written informed consent; and 18 years old and older. Analysis was conducted following a modified intention-to-treat principle, with patients experiencing a redetachment or failure to attach the macula being excluded from analysis.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive face-down positioning or support-the-break positioning for a 24-hour period postoperatively. Positioning compliance was not monitored.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The proportion of patients with retinal displacement on autofluorescence imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients with displacement at 2 months; amplitude of displacement at 2 and 6 months; corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity; objective Distortion Scores; and quality of life questionnaire scores at 6 months.

Results

Of the 262 randomized patients, 239 were analyzed (171 male [71.5%]; mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.8] years). At 6 months, retinal displacement was detected in 42 of 100 (42%) in the face-down positioning group vs 58 of 103 (56%) in the support-the-break positioning group (odds ratio, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.01-3.11; P = .04). The degree of displacement was lower in the face-down group. Groups were similar in corrected visual acuity (face-down, 74 letters vs support-the-break, 75 letters), objective D Chart Distortion Scores (range: 0, no distortion to 41.6, severe distortion; with face-down at 4.5 vs support-the-break at 4.2), and quality of life scores (face-down 89.3 vs support-the-break 89.0) at 2 and 6 months. Retinal redetachment rate was similar in both groups (face-down group, 12.2% and support-the-break group, 13.7%). Retinal folds were less common in the face-down positioning group vs the support-the-break positioning group (5.3% vs 13.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4; P = .03). Binocular diplopia was more common in the support-the-break group compared with the face-down positioning group (7.6% vs 1.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3-24.6; P = .03). Amplitude of displacement was associated with worse visual acuity (r = -0.5; P < .001) and distortion (r = 0.28; P = .008).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, findings suggest that face-down positioning was associated with a reduction in the rate and amplitude of postoperative retinal displacement after macula-involving RD repair and with a reduction in binocular diplopia. No association was found with visual acuity or postoperative distortion.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02748538.

A possible strategic role of air during pars plana vitrectomy for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

AIM

To evaluate the advantages and safety of vitrectomy under air for treating macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with macula-involving RRD who underwent vitrectomy under air were recruited. Demographic and clinical data were: age, gender, eye, lens status, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), axial length, intraocular pressure (IOP). RRD parameters were: RRD extent, retinal breaks number. Surgical data were: cataract surgery, tamponade used. Postoperative parameters were: BCVA, IOP at first, third, sixth month, recurrent RD, incidence of retinal folds, subretinal fluid (SRF) persistence, macular displacement.

RESULTS

Seventy-one eyes (71 patients) were recruited. Cataract surgery was performed in 32 of 45 phakic patients. The tamponade used was: sulfur hexafluoride 18% (41), silicon oil (SO) (26), high-density SO (4). BCVA improved significantly from baseline (1.2 ± 0.4 logMAR) to the last control (0.8 ± 0.7 logMAR) (P = 0.03285). Recurrent RD incidence was 14.1%. Postoperative complications were: retinal folds (2), SRF persistence (3), macular displacement (2).

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy under air is a safe alternative technique for treating macula-involving RRD. Vitrectomy under air allows surgeon to remove accurately the vitreous from the peripheral retina and facilitates the removal of SRF reducing the complications related to its postoperative persistence.

Inner, outer, and full-thickness retinal folds after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A review

Partial-thickness folds of the inner retina and outer retina, as well as full-thickness retinal folds, may occur after the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Although these can look similar on clinical examination, imaging with optical coherence tomography facilitates differentiation. With optical coherence tomography analysis, inner retinal folds exhibit corrugations of the inner retina while outer retinal folds display hyperreflective lesions located just above the retinal pigment epithelium that may extend into the outer nuclear layer. In the case of a classic full-thickness retinal fold, all layers of the neurosensory retina may separate together from the retinal pigment epithelium with retinal reduplication and base-to-base photoreceptor orientation. We review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and management options of retinal folds. As the terminology for retinal folds is diverse, we highlight optical coherence tomography-based descriptions for retinal folds that have been used in the literature. Factors predicting visual recovery, mechanisms of spontaneous fold regression, and the effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on the incidence of folds are potential areas of future study.