Surgical techniques for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments between surgeons with high versus low single surgery success rates

Surgical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment and Fellow Eye Involvement in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the associations, fellow eye retinal tear or detachment, and surgical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in young adults.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients aged ≤ 30 years who underwent surgical repair for RRD between 2014 and 2021 at a single practice. The mean age was 23.85 years (range, 12-30 years).

METHODS

Data collected included demographics, preoperative clinical features of the RRD, visual acuity (VA), type of surgery performed, anatomic outcomes, OCT findings, fellow eye retinal tear or detachment, and postoperative complications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative VA and single-surgery anatomic success rate.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients (109 eyes) were included. Sixty-seven patients (74 eyes) and 17 patients (19 eyes) were followed for ≥ 1 year and 5 years, respectively. The most common associations were myopia (66 eyes, 60.6%), trauma (8 eyes, 7.3%), and prior ocular surgery (7 eyes, 6.4%). Median preoperative Snellen VA was 20/70. The macula was attached in 31 eyes. Scleral buckle (SB) alone was performed in 75 eyes, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) + SB was performed in 27 eyes, PPV alone was performed in 6 eyes, and cryotherapy with pneumatic retinopexy was performed in 1 patient. Single-surgery anatomical success was 88.7% for SB, 89.7% for PPV + SB, and 75% for PPV. The median final postoperative Snellen VA was 20/50. Twelve patients presented with bilateral RRDs, and sequential surgery was performed in 8 patients, followed by 4 patients who underwent surgery with fellow eye laser barricade. Fourteen patients (13.9%) developed a retinal tear or detachment in the fellow eye, with a mean interval of 8 months from presentation. Of the 17 patients who were followed for ≥ 5 years, 3 patients (17.6%) developed a fellow eye retinal tear or detachment. After initial anatomical success, 6 eyes (5.5%) developed proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common association of RRD in this study was myopia. Scleral buckle alone was the most common surgical intervention. However, outcomes were generally favorable with SB-only and PPV + SB. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the risk of bilateral retinal detachment and the risk of fellow eye retinal tear and detachment. These patients require long-term surveillance in both eyes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Two-year outcomes of different subretinal fluid drainage techniques during vitrectomy for fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: ELLIPSOID-2 Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to compare visual acuity, complications and outer retinal integrity following subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage from the peripheral retinal breaks (PRBs) versus posterior retinotomy (PR) versus perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) at 2 years post-surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive patients with primary RRD undergoing 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with SRF drainage through (1) PRB (n=100), (2) PR (n=100) or (3) with PFCL (n=100). Primary outcomes were visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)) and complications (cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and epiretinal membrane (ERM)). Secondary outcomes were discontinuity of the external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ) and interdigitation zone (IDZ) at 2 years post-surgery.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) logMAR BCVA at 24 months was better in the PRB compared with PR and PFCL, with PFCL having the worst BCVA (PRB 0.5±0.6; PR 0.7±0.5; PFCL 0.9±0.7, p=0.001). CMO was higher with PFCL (PRB 29.7%; PR 30.2%; PFCL 45.9%, p=0.0015) and ERM formation was higher in PR (PRB 62.6%; PR 93.0%; PFCL 68.9%, p=0.002). There were no differences in ELM or EZ discontinuity. However, IDZ discontinuity was higher in PFCL (PRB 34%; PR 27%; PFCL 46%, p=0.002) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity was worse and discontinuity of the IDZ and CMO was greater in eyes with PFCL-assisted drainage compared with PRB or PR. Drainage technique may impact long-term visual acuity and photoreceptor integrity.

Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study: summary of reports number 1 to number 18

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent work published from the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) Study Group.

RECENT FINDINGS

The PRO database was a large dataset made up of patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) who had surgical repair during 2015. The database was constituted of nearly 3000 eyes from 6 centers across the United States and included 61 vitreoretinal surgeons. Nearly 250 metrics were collected for each patient, creating one of the richest datasets of patients with primary rhegmatogenous detachments and their outcomes. The importance of scleral buckling was demonstrated, particularly for phakic eyes, elderly patients, and those with inferior breaks. 360° laser may result in poorer outcomes. Cystoid macular edema was common, and risk factors were identified. We also found risk factors for vision loss in eyes presenting with good vision. A PRO Score was devised, to predict outcomes based on presenting clinical characteristics. We also identified characteristics of surgeons with the highest single surgery success rates. Overall, there were no major outcome differences between viewing systems, gauges, buckles sutured vs. scleral tunnels, drainage method, and techniques to address proliferative vitreoretinopathy. All incisional techniques were found to be very cost-effective treatment modalities.

SUMMARY

Numerous studies resulted from the PRO database that significantly added to the literature regarding the repair of primary RRDs in the current era of vitreoretinal surgery.

PRO score: predictive scoring system for visual outcomes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare risk factors for poor visual outcomes in patients undergoing primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and to develop a scoring system.

METHODS

Analysis of the Primary Retinal detachment Outcomes (PRO) study, a multicentre interventional cohort of consecutive primary RRD surgeries performed in 2015. The main outcome measure was a poor visual outcome (Snellen VA ≤20/200).

RESULTS

A total of 1178 cases were included. The mean preoperative and postoperative logMARs were 1.1±1.1 (20/250) and 0.5±0.7 (20/63), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression identified preoperative risk factors predictive of poor visual outcomes (≤20/200), including proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.40), history of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (1.38; 1.11 to 1.71), >1-week vision loss (1.17; 1.08 to 1.27), ocular comorbidities (1.18; 1.00 to 1.38), poor presenting VA (1.06 per initial logMAR unit; 1.02 to 1.10) and age >70 (1.13; 1.04 to 1.23). The data were split into training (75%) and validation (25%) and a scoring system was developed and validated. The risk for poor visual outcomes was 8% with a total score of 0, 17% with 1, 29% with 2, 47% with 3, and 71% with 4 or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent risk factors were compared for poor visual outcomes after RRD surgery, which included PVR, anti-VEGF injections, vision loss >1 week, ocular comorbidities, presenting VA and older age. The PRO score was developed to provide a scoring system that may be useful in clinical practice.

Scleral Buckling: A Look at the Past, Present and Future in View of Recent Findings on the Importance of Photoreceptor Re-Alignment Following Retinal Re-Attachment

Scleral buckling (SB) remains an important technique to master for those interested in treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Several ways to repair RRD include pneumatic retinopexy (PR), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), SB or a combination of these. There is a growing worldwide trend that favors PPV as the preferred method for retinal reattachment of primary uncomplicated RRD. Reimbursement issues, operating room access, and technological advances in PPV that improve retinal visualization and less exposure to SB during fellowship training may explain this trend. As the number of SB cases decreases over time, there is a risk that SB becomes a dying art and surgeons in training may not be trained in SB. SB is preferred in eyes with no posterior vitreous detachment and retinal dialysis. SB with minimal gas vitrectomy may be indicated for eyes with inferior pathology. Non-contact wide-angled visualization with chandelier assisted SB may be well suited for teaching new generations of aspiring vitreoretinal surgeons. Its functional and anatomic results compare favorably with conventional SB for primary uncomplicated primary RRD. The main advantage of this technique is the improved visualization even through small pupils. Better visualization ensures treatment of all breaks while avoiding complications during drainage of subretinal fluid and a safer placement of intrascleral sutures for scleral fixation of the buckling element. Recordings of the procedure are easily performed, allowing the surgeons involved to review the case and learn from it. The main disadvantage is the cost involved with the chandelier and the need to have a microscope or a 3D system with a wide angle viewing system. Photoreceptor re-alignment following retinal re-attachment is an important determinant of the post-operative functional outcomes. Different methods of retinal re-attachment apparently result in different degrees of photoreceptor re-alignment. SB may hold an advantage over PPV in this regard.

Evaluation of Subretinal fluid Drainage Techniques during Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment - ELLIPSOID study

PURPOSE

To compare visual acuity and photoreceptor integrity following vitrectomy (PPV) with drainage from the peripheral retinal break(s) (PRB) vs. posterior retinotomy (PR) vs. perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive interventional comparative clinical study.

METHODS

300 consecutive patients (300 eyes) with primary macula-off RRD underwent 23-gauge PPV with SRF drainage through 1) PRB (n=100), 2) PR (n=100), or 3) with PFCL (n=100). Visual acuity and SD-OCT were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were visual acuity and discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ELM; ellipsoid zone, EZ; interdigitation zone, IDZ; and retinal pigment epithelium, RPE at 1-year.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar. Single-operation reattachment rates were: PRB 86%; PR 85%; PFCL 83%,p=0.9. Mean(±SD) logMAR visual acuity at 1-year was greater with PRB and PR compared to PFCL (PRB=0.6±0.5;PR=0.7±0.6;PFCL=0.9±0.6,p=0.002). There was an association between drainage technique and discontinuity of the ELM (PRB 26%,PR 24%,PFCL 44%,p=0.001), EZ (PRB 29%,PR 31%,PFCL 49%,p<0.001) and IDZ (PRB 43%,PR 39%,PFCL 56%, p=0.004). There was an association between drainage technique and risk of cystoid macular edema (CME) (PRB 28%,PR 39%,PFCL 46%,p=0.003) and ERM (PRB 64%,PR 90%,PFCL 61%,P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PFCL-assisted drainage is associated with worse visual acuity and greater risk of outer retinal band discontinuity and CME compared with PRB or PR. PR had a greater risk of ERM compared with PRB and PFCL. PRB had the best outcomes overall. Drainage technique may impact long-term anatomic and functional outcomes.