Precision and refractive predictability of a new nomogram for femtosecond laser-assisted corneal arcuate incisions

Refractive Astigmatism Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Arcuate Keratotomies Combined with Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: Two-Year Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and stability of refractive astigmatism reduction after penetrating femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy performed at the time of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

METHODS

Non-randomized retrospective data analysis of all patients that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy over a 4-year period with a non-toric monofocal intraocular lens (2017-2021) at a tertiary care academic center. Postoperative visual acuity, manifest refraction, and predicted residual refractive error were also recorded at 1 month, 3-6 months, 12-18 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative keratometric astigmatism was compared to postoperative refractive astigmatism using vector calculations and the ASCRS double-angle plot tool.

RESULTS

This study comprised 266 eyes (179 patients) that met inclusion criteria. The mean preoperative keratometric astigmatism magnitude was 0.99 ± 0.53 D. At 1 month, 3-6 months, 12-18 months, and 2 years postoperatively, the mean refractive cylinder was 0.49 ± 0.45 D, 0.49 ± 0.45 D, 0.55 ± 0.54 D, and 0.52 ± 0.46 D, respectively. Horizontal against-the-rule astigmatism showed a higher tendency toward undercorrection than vertical with-the-rule astigmatism, which had a slightly higher tendency toward overcorrection. With-the-rule astigmatism had smaller difference vectors between target-induced astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

Femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy performed at the time of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was an effective option for correcting low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism for up to 2 years.

Using Total Corneal Astigmatism With Femtosecond Laser Cataract Surgery and Arcuate Keratotomy(ies) to Treat Low Amounts of Astigmatism

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes using total corneal astigmatism (TCA) to calculate arcuate keratotomy(ies) (AK) parameters performed with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery to reduce low corneal astigmatism.

METHODS

Patients who had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and AK with 0.50 diopter (D) to 1.30 D of TCA were included. Exclusion criteria were intraoperative complications, preexisting corneal surgery, and comorbidities that might adversely affect outcomes. Corneal tomography (Galilei G4, Zeimer Ophthalmic Systems AG) was performed preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. TCA was input into the Donnenfeld limbal relaxing incisions nomogram to calculate the AK parameters. Preoperative and postoperative tomographic and subjective refractive measurements were compared. The Alpins method for vector analysis evaluated results.

RESULTS

Eighty-two eyes of 82 patients were included. Mean preoperative TCA was significantly reduced from 0.80 ± 0.19 D to 0.51 D ± 0.26 D ( P < 0.001). Preoperative posterior corneal astigmatism, -0.28 ± 0.13 D, was unchanged, postoperative posterior corneal astigmatism, -0.28 ± 0.14 D ( P = 0.653). Target-induced astigmatism arithmetic mean (0.82 ± 0.21 D) was greater than that of the surgically induced astigmatism (0.70 ± 0.40 D), resulting in an arithmetic mean difference vector of 0.51 ± 0.27 D with a summated mean at 0.16 D at 20 degrees. The correction index was 0.87, indicating undercorrection. Angle of error arithmetic mean, -1.27 ± 23.27 degrees, indicated good alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Inputting TCA for calculation of femtosecond laser AK parameters can reduce low amounts of preoperative corneal astigmatism, thereby improving uncorrected vision.

Characteristics of surgically induced astigmatism after standardized microincisional cataract surgery with a superior limbal incision

PURPOSE

To determine (1) if measurements of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) as measured by keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) differ (2) if SIA affects the magnitude and/or meridian of keratometric astigmatism (3) if SIA evolves over time.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis.

METHODS

A swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry dataset (IOLMaster700) consisting of 498 eyes (327 patients) from a tertiary care center was analyzed. For all eyes preoperative and postoperative biometric measurements at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-months postoperative visits were considered for vector analysis of SIA K and SIA TK .

RESULTS

Centroids in right and left eyes were 0.26 diopters (D) @5 degrees/0.31 D @1 degree for SIA K and 0.27 D @4 degrees/0.34 D @1 degree for SIA TK . Centroids for difference vectors K-TK in right and left eyes were 0.02 D @ 176 degrees/0.03 D @6 degrees. The mean SIA magnitudes in right and left eyes were 0.48 ± 0.41 D and 0.50 ± 0.37 D for SIA K and 0.53 ± 0.42 D and 0.54 ± 0.40 D for SIA TK . In eyes with ATR astigmatism, an increase in postoperative astigmatism magnitude was more common than a decrease. More than 30% of eyes showed changes in the meridian of more than 15 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we observed differences in K- and TK-derived SIA, and changes in SIA magnitude over time. For postsurgical interventions, postoperative astigmatism meridian values should be measured to base treatments. Astigmatism magnitude showed a tendency to decrease for steep-meridian incisions and to increase in flat-meridian incisions.

Managing low corneal astigmatism in patients with presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses: a narrative review

Cataract surgery has become a refractive procedure in which emmetropia is the goal, with the implantation of extended depth-of-focus or multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) being the commonly selected option to restore vision beyond the far distance. The selection criteria for implanting these lenses can differ from those for monofocal IOLs and even between technologies, as eye characteristics can affect postoperative visual performance. Corneal astigmatism is an eye characteristic that can affect visual performance differently, depending on the implanted IOL. The magnitude of corneal astigmatism, the tolerance of the IOL to this astigmatism, economic aspects, comorbidities, and the efficacy of astigmatism treatment are factors that can make surgeons' doubt as to what astigmatism treatment should be applied to each patient. This review aims to summarize the current evidence related to low astigmatism tolerance in presbyopia-correcting lenses, the efficacy achieved through corneal incisions, and their comparison with the implantation of toric IOLs.

Predictability of Astigmatism Correction by Arcuate Incisions with a Femtosecond Laser Using the Gaussian Approximation Calculation

Planning astigmatic correction is a complex task. Biomechanical simulation models are useful for predicting the effects of the physical procedure on the cornea. Algorithms based on these models allow preoperative planning and simulate the outcome of patient-specific treatment. The objective of this study was to develop a customised optimisation algorithm and determine the predictability of astigmatism correction by femtosecond laser arcuate incisions. In this study, biomechanical models and Gaussian approximation curve calculations were used for surgical planning. Thirty-four eyes with mild astigmatism were included, and corneal topographies were evaluated before and after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with arcuate incisions. The follow-up time was up to 6 weeks. Retrospective data showed a significant reduction in postoperative astigmatism. A total of 79.4% showed a postoperative astigmatic value less than 1 D. Clinical refraction was significantly reduced from -1.39 ± 0.79 D preoperatively to -0.86 ± 0.67 D postoperatively (p 0.02). A positive reduction in topographic astigmatism was also observed (p < 0.00). The best-corrected visual acuity increased postoperatively (p < 0.001). We can conclude that customised simulations based on corneal biomechanics are a valuable tool for correcting mild astigmatism with corneal incisions in cataract surgery to improve postoperative visual outcomes.

Accuracy of the LaserArcs Femtosecond Cataract Surgery Arcuate Incision Nomogram in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery and Astigmatism Reduction

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laserarcs.com nomogram in reducing astigmatism among cataract patients that underwent astigmatism reduction with laser arcuate incisions.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 50 patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery with laser arc incisions for the reduction of astigmatism with a single surgeon between the dates of January 23, 2021 and February 10, 2022 were evaluated in a single eye. Preoperative astigmatism was determined on the basis of keratometry from biometry (IOLmaster, Carl Zeiss Meditec or LenStar LS900, Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland) and was compared to the postoperative manifest astigmatism. The percent change in the absolute magnitude of astigmatism was calculated along with the percent of patients with various levels of postoperative astigmatism.

Results

Mean cylinder was 0.97 ± 0.49 D pre-op and 0.21 ± 0.28 D postop. Mean reduction in cylinder was 81.4 ± 47.7% (P < 0.00001, one-sample t-test compared to a hypothetical 60% reduction in cylinder). Residual cylinder was ≤0.5 D in 90%, 0.25 D in 72%, and 0 D in 58%. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/30 or better in 92% and 20/20 or better in 40%. Subgroup analysis showed that residual astigmatism was not affected by patient age, magnitude of preoperative astigmatism, preoperative spherical equivalent, or corneal curvature. No adverse events related to the laser arcuate incisions were noted.

Conclusion

Use of the LaserArcs nomogram yielded a significant reduction in preoperative astigmatism. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was substantially similar to best-corrected visual acuity, suggesting that many patients undergoing treatment will function without correction for distance tasks.

Prediction of corneal astigmatism based on corneal tomography after femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy using a pix2pix conditional generative adversarial network

Purpose

This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to generate a postoperative corneal axial curvature map of femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy (FLAK) based on corneal tomography using a pix2pix conditional generative adversarial network (pix2pix cGAN) for surgical planning.

Methods

A total of 451 eyes of 318 nonconsecutive patients were subjected to FLAK for corneal astigmatism correction during cataract surgery. Paired or single anterior penetrating FLAKs were performed at an 8.0-mm optical zone with a depth of 90% using a femtosecond laser (LenSx laser, Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Corneal tomography images were acquired from Oculus Pentacam HR (Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) before and 3 months after the surgery. The raw data required for analysis consisted of the anterior corneal curvature for a range of ± 3.5 mm around the corneal apex in 0.1-mm steps, which the pseudo-color corneal curvature map synthesized was based on. The deep learning model used was a pix2pix conditional generative adversarial network. The prediction accuracy of synthetic postoperative corneal astigmatism in zones of different diameters centered on the corneal apex was assessed using vector analysis. The synthetic postoperative corneal axial curvature maps were compared with the real postoperative corneal axial curvature maps using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR).

Results

A total of 386 pairs of preoperative and postoperative corneal tomography data were included in the training set, whereas 65 preoperative data were retrospectively included in the test set. The correlation coefficient between synthetic and real postoperative astigmatism (difference vector) in the 3-mm zone was 0.89, and that between surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was 0.93. The mean absolute errors of SIA for real and synthetic postoperative corneal axial curvature maps in the 1-, 3-, and 5-mm zone were 0.20 ± 0.25, 0.12 ± 0.17, and 0.09 ± 0.13 diopters, respectively. The average SSIM and PSNR of the 3-mm zone were 0.86 ± 0.04 and 18.24 ± 5.78, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results showed that the application of pix2pix cGAN can synthesize plausible postoperative corneal tomography for FLAK, showing the possibility of using GAN to predict corneal tomography, with the potential of applying artificial intelligence to construct surgical planning models.

Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to compare corneal astigmatism correction in cataract surgery through corneal relaxing incision, manually and femtosecond laser assisted.

METHODS

The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. We used PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) as databases from January 2010 to March 30, 2021. Patients with keratoconus, corneal ectasia, and a previous history of eye surgery were excluded because our aim was to analyze only healthy eyes.

RESULTS

A total of 1025 eyes were evaluated from 946 patients (mean age was 68.90 ± 5.12) in manual incision group articles, while 1905 eyes of 1483 patients (mean age was 65.05 ± 4.57) were evaluated in femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy (FLAK) articles. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.19 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.05 logMAR for manual incision and FLAK articles, respectively (p = 0.39). The mean correction index (CI) was similar in both groups: 0.77 ± 0.18 in manual incision and 0.79 ± 0.17 in femtosecond laser assisted incision (p = 0.70). Refractive stability was found after 3 months and no serious complications were reported during the follow-up in any group.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques are safe and moderately effective in corneal astigmatism correction in cataract surgery. FLAK represents a more precise and predictable approach. However, since visual and refractive outcomes appear to be similar in both cases, the cost-benefit analysis is controversial.

Toric intraocular lens implantation vs. femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy for correction of moderate astigmatism in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare toric intraocular lens (TIOL) implantation and femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) during phacoemulsification surgery in correction of moderate astigmatism.

SETTING

Clinical research study.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized comparison study.

METHODS

Patients with age-related cataract and moderate preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.25 to 3.0 diopters (D) were randomized into a TIOL implant group and an FSAK group with symmetrical paired corneal arcuate keratotomies. The preoperative evaluation included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal topography, autokeratometry and ocular biometry. Postoperative examinations were performed at 1 and 3 months and included CDVA and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, autokeratometry and corneal topography. Vector analysis of astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins vector method.

RESULTS

This study comprised 75 eyes from 67 patients. Mean residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months was -0.63 ± 0.55 D in the TIOL group and -0.90 ± 0.53 D in the FSAK group (P = 0.037) and was ≤ 1.00 D in 32 eyes (84%) and 25 eyes (64%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in difference vector (DV), angle error (AE), magnitude error (ME) or correction index (CI) in the 3-month follow-up. The index of success (IS) was 0.32 ± 0.33 D in the TIOL group and 0.48 ± 0.29 D in the FSAK group (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

TIOL implantation showed better results in correcting moderate astigmatism. Despite this, FSAK is shown to be a safe technique for reducing astigmatism.

Lasting Effects: Seven Year Results of the Castrop Nomogram for Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Paired Corneal Arcuate Incisions

PURPOSE

Long-term results of arcuate incisions are rarely reported. This is unfortunate as long-term stability of astigmatic correction is of great interest to surgeons performing astigmatic correction. This study investigates the 7 year stability of results after application of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate incisions with the Castrop nomogram.

METHODS

Prospective interventional case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Single site, single surgeon study. Seven year results of cataract patients with low to moderate corneal astigmatism receiving femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate incisions using a TechnolasVictus SW 2.7 (Bausch & Lomb Inc, Dornach, Germany) were assessed and compared to 1 year results. Outcome evaluation was based on astigmatic vector analysis, manifest refraction, and visual acuity.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 19 eyes of 19 patients 7 years after surgery. Ocular residual astigmatism changed from -0.26 to -0.39 D. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.51 D. Correction Index changed from 1.0 to 1.16. The magnitude of difference vector changed from 0.26 to 0.39 D. The index of success changed from 0.20 to 0.29. Spherical equivalent remained stable. A slight tendency to change toward astigmatic overcorrection was mainly observed for patients with preoperative with the rule astigmatism, but not with patients with against the rule astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

The Castrop nomogram showed stable results 7 years after surgery. Similar to toric IOL surgery, it is advisable to be less aggressive when correcting with the rule astigmatism, to avoid overcorrection over a long period.

Clinical Outcomes After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Arcuate Corneal Incisions versus Manual Incisions

Purpose

To compare the relative effectiveness of Verion-LenSx guided femtosecond arcuate incisions and manual incisions in reducing postoperative refractive astigmatism.

Patients and Methods

This was a contralateral eye, prospective study that included subjects with 0.50 D to 1.75 D of corneal astigmatism who wanted less refractive astigmatism post cataract surgery. The surgeon used anterior keratometry and the Woodcock astigmatism nomogram for preoperative planning, while the LenSx femtosecond laser with the Verion Image Guided System was used to create all laser arcuate incisions. Manual incisions were planned using the Donnenfeld nomogram and made with a fixed-depth diamond knife. The primary outcome measure was the residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months postoperative. Secondary outcome measures included the manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity and the change in corneal astigmatism from 1 to 3 months postoperative.

Results

Forty-one subjects were successfully enrolled in the study, with data from 38 subjects available at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in refractive astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity or manifest refraction between the Manual and Femto groups at either 1 month or 3 months. Significant changes in refractive and corneal astigmatism were noted between 1 months and 3 months. Ninety percent of eyes in both groups had ≤0.50 D of refractive astigmatism at 3 months. Two minor non-serious adverse events (full-thickness incisions of the cornea) occurred in two eyes of two different subjects in the Manual group; they were resolved without incident.

Conclusion

Laser arcuate incisions appear to be an effective means of reducing postoperative refractive astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. No significant clinical differences were observed between incisions made manually and those made with an image-guided femto-second laser system. The lower number of minor adverse events experienced with the femtosecond laser system is an apparent advantage.