Foetal tachyarrhythmia treatment remains challenging even if the vast majority of cases have a favourable outcome

2023 HRS expert consensus statement on the management of arrhythmias during pregnancy

This international multidisciplinary expert consensus statement is intended to provide comprehensive guidance that can be referenced at the point of care to cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists, and other health care professionals, on the management of cardiac arrhythmias in pregnant patients and in fetuses. This document covers general concepts related to arrhythmias, including both brady- and tachyarrhythmias, in both the patient and the fetus during pregnancy. Recommendations are provided for optimal approaches to diagnosis and evaluation of arrhythmias; selection of invasive and noninvasive options for treatment of arrhythmias; and disease- and patient-specific considerations when risk stratifying, diagnosing, and treating arrhythmias in pregnant patients and fetuses. Gaps in knowledge and new directions for future research are also identified.

Efficacy and Safety of Various First-Line Therapeutic Strategies for Fetal Tachycardias: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Fetal arrhythmias are common cardiac abnormalities associated with high mortality due to ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, particularly when accompanied by hydrops. Although several types of common fetal tachycardias have been relatively identified medications, such as digoxin, flecainide, and sotalol, there is no first-line drug treatment protocol established for the treatment of various types of fetal tachycardias.

Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian hierarchical framework to obtain a model for integrating both direct and indirect evidence. All tachycardia types (Total group), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT subgroup), atrial flutter (AF subgroup), hydrops subgroup, and non-hydrops subgroup fetuses were analyzed, and five first-line regimens were ranked according to treatment outcomes: digoxin monotherapy (D), flecainide monotherapy (F), sotalol monotherapy (S), digoxin plus flecainide combination therapy (DF), and digoxin plus sotalol combination therapy (DS). Effectiveness and safety were determined according to the cardioversion rate and intrauterine death rate.

Results: The pooled data indicated that DF combination therapy was always superior to D monotherapy, regardless of the tachycardia type or the presence of hydrops: Total, 2.44 (95% CrI: 1.59, 3.52); SVT, 2.77 (95% CrI: 1.59, 4.07); AF, 67.85 (95% CrI: 14.25, 168.68); hydrops, 6.03 (95% CrI: 2.54, 10.68); and non-hydrops, 5.06 (95% CrI: 1.87, 9.88). DF and F had a similar effect on control of fetal tachycardias. No significant differences were observed when comparing S, DS with D therapies across the subgroup analyses for the SVT, hydrops, and non-hydrops groups. No significant differences in mortality risks were among the various treatment regimens for the total group. And no significant differences were found in rates of intrauterine death rates at the same cardioversion amount.

Conclusion The flecainide monotherapy and combination of digoxin and flecainide should be considered the most superior therapeutic strategies for fetal tachycardia.

Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=288997), identifier (288997).

Multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental treatments for fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is a common reason for referral to fetal cardiology. Multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental medications can be used to treat these diseases. Debates remain regarding the standardized therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched from inception to September 2020. A handsearching for gray literature, including unpublished conference articles, will be performed. The randomized control trials, case-control, and cohort studies will be accepted, no matter what the languages they were reported. We will first focus on the effectiveness of the therapy on fetal cardiac rhythm and/or heart rate. Then we will do further analysis of preterm delivery, fetal hydrops, intrauterine fetal demise, and maternal side effects. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale will be used to assess the risk of bias of the randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies, respectively. Two independent reviewers will carry out literature identification, data collection, and study quality assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Statistical analysis will be conducted using the STATA 13.0 software.

RESULT

The results will provide helpful information about the effect of multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental therapies in pregnancies with supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter, and demonstrate which therapy is more effective.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion drawn from this systematic review will benefit the patients with fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Feasibility of Non-invasive Fetal Electrocardiographic Interval Measurement in the Outpatient Clinical Setting

Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (ECG) is a promising method for evaluating fetal cardiac electrical activity. Despite advances in fetal ECG technology, its ability to provide reliable, interpretable results in a typical outpatient fetal cardiology setting remains unclear. We sought to determine the feasibility of measuring standard ECG intervals in an outpatient fetal cardiology practice using an abdominal fetal ECG device that employs blind source separation with reference, an innovative signal-processing technique for fetal ECG extraction. Women scheduled for clinically indicated outpatient fetal echocardiogram underwent 10 min of fetal ECG acquisition from the maternal abdomen using specialized gel electrodes. A bedside laptop computer performed fetal ECG extraction, allowing real-time visualization of fetal and maternal ECG signals. Offline post-processing of 1 min of recorded data yielded fetal P-wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, RR interval, QT interval, and QTc. Fifty-five fetuses were studied with gestational age 18-37 weeks, including 13 with abnormal fetal echocardiogram findings and three sets of twins. Interpretable results were obtained in 91% of fetuses, including 85% during the vernix period and 100% of twin fetuses. PR interval and RR interval of 18-24 week gestation fetuses were significantly shorter than those with gestational age 25-31 and 32-37 weeks. Of the six fetuses with abnormal rhythms on fetal echocardiogram, fetal ECG tracing was interpretable in five and matched the rhythm noted on fetal echocardiogram. Abdominal fetal ECG acquisition is feasible for arrhythmia detection and ECG interval calculation in a routine clinical setting.

Fetal dysrhythmias

Fetal dysrhythmias are common abnormalities, usually manifesting as irregular rhythms. Although most irregularities are benign and caused by isolated atrial ectopics, in a few cases, rhythm irregularity may indicate partial atrioventricular block, which has different etiological and prognostic implications. We provide a flowchart for the initial management of irregular rhythm to help select cases requiring urgent specialist referral. Tachycardias and bradycardias are less frequent, can lead to hemodynamic compromise, and may require in utero therapy. Pharmacological treatment of tachycardia depends on the type (supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter) and presence of hydrops, with digoxin, flecainide, and sotalol being commonly used. An ongoing randomized trial may best inform about their efficacy. Bradycardia due to blocked bigeminy normally resolves spontaneously, but if it is due to established complete heart block, there is no effective treatment. Ongoing research suggests hydroxychloroquine may reduce the risk of autoimmune atrioventricular block. Sinus bradycardia (rate <3rd centile) may be a prenatal marker for long-QT syndrome.

Transplacental treatment of fetal tachycardia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple transplacental medications can be used to treat fetal tachycardia. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether digoxin, flecainide, or sotalol was the most efficacious therapy for converting fetal tachycardia to sinus rhythm.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare digoxin, flecainide, or sotalol as first-line therapy for fetal tachycardia. Studies were identified by a search of PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and Scopus.

RESULTS

There were 21 studies included. Flecainide (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-2.0, I²  = 60%, P = 0.03) and sotalol (OR:1.4, 95% CI:1.1-2.0, I²  = 30%, P = 0.02) were superior to digoxin for conversion of fetal tachycardia to sinus rhythm. In those with hydrops, the benefit over digoxin was more notable for both flecainide (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 2.5-10.0, I²  = 0%, P < 0.001) and sotalol (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.7-5.0, I²  = 0%, P < 0.001). When limited to atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, flecainide was superior to digoxin (OR:1.7, 95% CI:1.1-3.3, I²  = 62%, P = 0.03) and sotalol (OR:1.3, 95% CI:1.1-1.7, I²  = 0%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Digoxin should not be first-line therapy for fetal tachycardia, particularly in the presence of hydrops fetalis. Flecainide should be the first-line therapy of choice in atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Further study may identify further sub-populations responding differently.

First-Line Antiarrhythmic Transplacental Treatment for Fetal Tachyarrhythmia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

There is no consensus on the most effective and best tolerated first‐line antiarrhythmic treatment for fetal tachyarrhythmia. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and fetal–maternal tolerance of first‐line monotherapies for fetal supraventricular tachycardia and atrial flutter.

Methods and Results

A comprehensive search of several databases was conducted through January 2017. Only studies that made a direct comparison between first‐line treatments of fetal tachyarrhythmia were included. Outcomes of interest were termination of fetal tachyarrhythmia, fetal demise, and maternal complications. Ten studies met inclusion criteria, with 537 patients. Overall, 291 patients were treated with digoxin, 137 with flecainide, 102 with sotalol, and 7 with amiodarone. Digoxin achieved a lower rate of supraventricular tachycardia termination compared with flecainide (odds ratio [OR]: 0.773; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.605–0.987; I²=34%). In fetuses with hydrops fetalis, digoxin had lower rates of tachycardia termination compared with flecainide (OR: 0.412; 95% CI, 0.268–0.632; I²=0%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of maternal side effects between digoxin and flecainide groups (OR: 1.134; 95% CI, 0.129–9.935; I²=80.79%). The incidence of maternal side effects was higher in patients treated with digoxin compared with sotalol (OR: 3.148; 95% CI, 1.468–6.751; I²=0%). There was no difference in fetal demise between flecainide and digoxin (OR: 0.767; 95% CI, 0.140–4.197; I²=44%).

Conclusions

Flecainide may be more effective treatment than digoxin as a first‐line treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia.

Hemodynamics in fetal arrhythmia

Fetal arrhythmias are among the few conditions that can be managed in utero. However, accurate diagnosis is essential for appropriate management. Ultrasound-based imaging methods can be used to study fetal heart structure and function noninvasively and help to understand fetal cardiovascular pathophysiology, and they remain the mainstay of evaluating fetuses with arrhythmias in clinical settings. Hemodynamic evaluation using Doppler echocardiography allows the elucidation of the electrophysiological mechanism and helps to make an accurate diagnosis. It can also be used as a tool to understand fetal cardiac pathophysiology, for assessing fetal condition and monitoring the effect of antiarrhythmic treatment. This narrative review describes Doppler techniques that are useful for evaluating fetal cardiac rhythms to refine diagnosis and provides an overview of hemodynamic changes observed in different types of fetal arrhythmia.