Information about foot care provided to people with diabetes with or without their partners: Impact on recommended foot care behavior

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, McCoy RG, Aleppo G, Balapattabi K, Beverly EA, Briggs Early K, Bruemmer D, Callaghan BC, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Ekhlaspour L, Frykberg RG, Garg R, Garg SJ, Giurini JM, Khunti K, Lal R, Lingvay I, Matfin G, Pandya N, Pekas EJ, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Bannuru RR. 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Factors associated with foot self-care behaviour and foot screening attendance in people with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in primary care

OBJECTIVES

To assess the factors associated with foot self-care behaviour and non-adherence to foot screening among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A multicentre cross-sectional study was undertaken in seven primary care polyclinics in Singapore between October 2020 and December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOMES

275 adults (male 55.3%) with T2DM were included and assessed with the foot self-care behaviour questionnaire, including two aspects of foot care behaviour-preventative behaviour and potential damaging behaviour, and foot care confidence scale. Non-adherence to diabetic foot screening (DFS) attendance was also collected and assessed.

RESULTS

The average preventive behaviour score was 0.65 (SD 0.13, range 0-1) and potential damaging behaviour score was 0.43 (SD 0.09, range 0-1). Patients with greater foot care confidence (β=0.272) and being married (β=0.141) were more likely to adopt preventive behaviours, while patients aged between 21 and 45 years (β=0.136), having shorter DM duration (<5 years) (β=0.142) and moderate foot risk category (β=0.138) were more likely to adopt potential damaging behaviours. Non-adherence to DFS attendance was prevalent up to 43.3%. Non-adherence was higher in patients with higher HbA1c ≥7% (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.878, 95% CI 1.090 to 3.235) and moderate foot risk category (AOR 2.935, 95% CI 1.426 to 7.744).

CONCLUSION

Self-efficacy and being married are associated with preventive behaviours, while clinical parameters (eg, HbA1c, duration of DM and foot risk category) and age were associated with potential damaging behaviours and non-adherence to DFS appointments. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the findings for developing foot behavioural education to support foot care behaviours for primary care patients with T2DM.

Story completion (SC) - an epistemological approach to the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantitative data are increasingly accompanied by qualitative narrative data, which does not always provide the insights required to inform healthcare.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective considers how story completion (SC) may be used to gain a deeper insight on people's experiences and guide interpretation of the meaning of PROM responses.

EXPERT OPINION

Story completion (SC) is an epistemological approach involving participants telling a story in response to a pre-determined 'stem' they have been presented with.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Gibbons CH, Giurini JM, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Silva PS, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Collaboration and Partnership in a 5-Level Engagement Framework for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management: A Patient-oriented Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

The management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is complex, and patient engagement is essential for DFU healing, but it often comes down to the patient's consultation. Therefore, we sought to document patients' engagement in terms of collaboration and partnership for DFUs in 5 levels (direct care, organizational, policy level, research, and education), as well as strategies for patient engagement using an adapted engagement framework.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature from inception to April 2022 using the Joanna Briggs Institute method and a patient-oriented approach. We also consulted DFU stakeholders to obtain feedback on the findings. The data were extracted using PROGRESS+ factors for an equity lens. The effects of engagement were described using Bodenheimer's quadruple aims for value-based care.

RESULTS

Of 4,211 potentially eligible records, 15 studies met our eligibility criteria, including 214 patients involved in engagement initiatives. Most studies were recent (9 of 15 since 2020) and involved patient engagement at the direct medical care level (8 of 15). Self-management (7 of 15) was the principal way to clinically engage the patients. None of the studies sought to define the direct influence of patient engagement on health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Very few studies described patients' characteristics. Engaged patients were typically men from high-income countries, in their 50s, with poorly managed type 2 diabetes. We found little rigorous research of patient engagement at all levels for DFUs. There is an urgent need to improve the reporting of research in this area and to engage a diversity of patients.

12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.