Role of HPV DNA, HPV mRNA and cytology in the follow-up of women treated for cervical dysplasia

European consensus statement on expert colposcopy

BACKGROUND

Following the publication of the European consensus statement on standards for essential colposcopy in 2020, the need for standards relating to more complex and challenging colposcopy practice was recognised. These standards relate to colposcopy undertaken in patients identified through cervical screening and tertiary referrals from colposcopists who undertake standard colposcopy only. This set of recommendations provides a review of the current literature and agreement on care for recognised complex cases. With good uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) immunisation, we anticipate a marked reduction in cervical disease over the next decade. Still, the expert colposcopist will continue to be vital in managing complex cases, including previous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)/complex screening histories and multi-zonal disease.

AIMS

To provide expert guidance on complex colposcopy cases through published evidence and expert consensus.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Members of the EFC and ESGO formed a working group to identify topics considered to be the remit of the expert rather than the standard colposcopy service. These were presented at the EFC satellite meeting, Helsinki 2021, for broader discussion and finalisation of the topics.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The agreed standards included colposcopy in pregnancy and post-menopause, investigation and management of glandular abnormalities, persistent high-risk HPV+ with normal/low-grade cytology, colposcopy management of type 3 transformation zones (TZ), high-grade cytology and normal colposcopy, colposcopy adjuncts, follow-up after treatment with CIN next to TZ margins and follow-up after treatment with CIN with persistent HPV+, and more. These standards are under review to create a final paper of consensus standards for dissemination to all EFC and ESGO members.

HPV16 E7 oncoprotein test as a triage strategy for HPV16-positive women in cervical cancer screening: long-term follow-up outcome

Background

Colposcopy is recommended once human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18 infection is detected. However, not all HPV16/18-positive women will necessarily develop cervical lesions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the application of quantitative HPV16 E7 oncoprotein detection as a cervical cancer screening method for more efficient screening while minimizing unnecessary colposcopy.

Methods

E7 oncoprotein (HPV16) was quantitatively detected in cervical exfoliated cells of HPV16-positive women. The levels of HPV16 E7 oncoprotein in different degrees of cervical lesions were compared, and the optimal cut-off value for identifying HSIL+ was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. With a pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Kappa value were calculated to verify the diagnostic value of the method. Women diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and normal women were followed up for 5 years to evaluate the predictive value of HPV16 E7 protein for disease progression/persistent infection.

Results

The expression level of HPV16 E7 oncoprotein was positively correlated with the degree of the cervical lesion (r = 0.589, P < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.817 (confidence interval: 0.729-0.904). The cut-off value of E7 oncoprotein for identifying HSIL+ was 8.68 ng/ml. The SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, and Kappa values of HPV16 E7 oncoprotein for the identification of HSIL+ were 87.1%,70.0%, 87.1%, 70.0%, and 0.571, respectively, which were higher than those of ThinPrep cytology test (TCT). The SEN, SPE, PPV, and NPV of HPV16 E7 oncoprotein in predicting disease progression/persistent infection were 93.75%, 91.30%, 88.24%, and 95.45%, respectively.

Conclusion

The quantitative detection of HPV 16 E7 oncoprotein can not only accurately screen cervical lesions but also achieve efficient colposcopy referral. Additionally, HPV16 E7 oncoprotein can accurately predict the progression of cervical lesions and persistent HPV infection.

Effect of Condom Use after CIN Treatment on Cervical HPV Biomarkers Positivity: Prolonged Follow Up Study

Background: Several factors contribute in the cervical healing process following local surgical treatment; in a previous work our group has documented a beneficial mid-term role of regular condom use immediately postoperatively in terms of CIN relapse prevention and expression of active viral biomarkers. Materials and Methods: Aiming to investigate whether the favorable contribution of consistent condom use could be extrapolated in the longer term, we conducted a prospective single center observational study including women scheduled to undergo conservative excisional treatment for CIN (LLETZ procedure). In all women a strong recommendation for consistent use for the first 6 months was given. For 204 women who underwent the procedure and completed successfully the two-year follow up a complete dataset of HPV biomarkers’ results obtained six months and two years postoperatively was available. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess condom use compliance. A 90% compliance rate represented the threshold for consistent use. An LBC sample was obtained and tested for HPV genotyping, E6 & E7 mRNA by NASBA technique as well as flow cytometry, and p16 at 0 (pre-treatment), 6 and 24 months. HPV DNA and other related biomarkers status at 6 and 24 months, treatment failures at 24 months and condom use compliance rates represented study outcomes. Results: Six months post-operatively we documented a reduction in the rates of HPV DNA positivity, which was detected in only 23.2% of compliant condom users in comparison to 61.9% in the non-compliant group (p < 0.001, OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.1−0.36). For the HPV mRNA test, either assessed with the NASBA method or with flow cytometry, reduced positivity percentages were observed in the compliant group, in particular 1.6% vs. 8% for NASBA and 7.1% vs. 16.4% using flow cytometry, although these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.1039 and 0.0791, respectively). Finally, reduced p16 positivity rates were documented in the compliant group. At the two year follow up, a more pronounced difference in HPV DNA positivity rates was observed, specifically only 13% positivity among the compliant women compared with 71% of the non-compliant (p < 0.0001); this illustrates a further decreasing trend compared with the 6th month in the compliant group as opposed to an increasing tendency in the non-compliant group, respectively (difference: 9.0%, 95% CI: 0% to 20.6%, p = 0.1523). At that time, 80% of the failed treatments were HPV mRNA positive compared to 10% positivity for the cases treated successfully (OR: 34, 95%CI: 6.8−173, p < 0.0001), a finding indicative that HPV mRNA E6 & E7 positivity accurately predicts treatment failure; p16 positivity was also observed at higher rates in cases with treatment failure. Conclusions: Consistent condom use following conservative excisional CIN treatment appears to significantly reduce rates of CIN recurrence and biomarkers of HPV expression. Additional HPV vaccination at the time of treatment could further enhance the positive effect of consistent condom use.