Early prediction of thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease

Early therapeutic drug monitoring helps to identify inflammatory bowel disease patients with a high risk to fail thiopurine treatment

AIMS

Conventional thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) remain standard therapy to maintain steroid sparing remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but are regularly discontinued due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Measurement of the metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) and the 6-MMPR/6-TGN ratio, may predict the development of these ADRs. Our aim was to evaluate whether early thiopurine metabolite measurements were associated with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis was conducted of a multicentre, prospective, observational study on thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity. IBD patients who initiated thiopurine therapy were included and thiopurine metabolite concentrations were assessed after 7 days (±1) (T1). Patients were monitored for 12 weeks to document the occurrence of ADRs, early treatment discontinuation and effectiveness.

RESULTS

In total, 181 patients were evaluated. At T1, 6-MMPR concentrations and 6-TGN/6-MMPR ratios were independently related to treatment discontinuation within 12 weeks after correction for sex, age and body mass index (BMI) (P = .034 and .002, respectively). The largest effects were observed for 6-MMPR ≥3000 pmol/8 × 108 RBC and 6-TGN/6-MMPR ratio ≥17. Furthermore, 6-MMPR concentrations and 6-TGN/6-MMPR ratios at T1 were independently related to skewed metabolism at steady state (Week 8, 6-MMPR/-6TGN ratio ≥11 and ≥20) (both P < .001). The occurrence of ADRs and effectiveness were not independently related to T1 thiopurine metabolite concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine metabolite concentrations at T1 were related to early treatment discontinuation and skewed metabolism at steady state, but not to effectiveness, helping to identify patients with a high risk of thiopurine treatment failure.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapies and Acute Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver disease (DILI) represents one of the main problems in the therapeutic field. There are several non-modifiable risk factors, such as age and sex, and all drugs can cause hepatotoxicity of varying degrees, including those for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The aim of this review is to illustrate the adverse effects on the liver of the various drugs used in the treatment of IBD, highlighting which drugs are safest to use based on current knowledge. The mechanism by which drugs cause hepatotoxicity is not fully understood. A possible cause is represented by the formation of toxic metabolites, which in some patients may be increased due to alterations in the enzymatic apparatus involved in drug metabolism. Various studies have shown that the drugs that can most frequently cause hepatotoxicity are immunosuppressants, while mesalazine and biological drugs are, for the most part, less associated with such complications. Therefore, it is possible to assume that in the future, biological therapies could become the first line for the treatment of IBD.

Mycophenolate and methotrexate are better tolerated than azathioprine in myasthenia gravis

Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as second-line choices despite widespread consensus on their efficacy. We aimed to gather real-world data comparing the tolerability and reasons for discontinuation for these agents, by performing a national United Kingdom survey of side effects and reasons for discontinuation of immunosuppressants in myasthenia gravis. Of 235 patients, 166 had taken azathioprine, 102 mycophenolate, and 40 methotrexate. The most common side effects for each agent were liver dysfunction for azathioprine (23 %), diarrhoea for mycophenolate (14 %), and fatigue for methotrexate (18 %). Women were generally more likely to experience side effects of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine was significantly more likely to be discontinued than mycophenolate and methotrexate due to side effects. There was no significant difference in treatment cessation due to lack of efficacy. This study highlights the significant side-effect burden of treatment for myasthenia gravis. Mechanisms to reduce azathioprine toxicity should be utilised, however mycophenolate and methotrexate appear to be good treatment choices if teratogenicity is not a concern. Women are disadvantaged due to higher frequency of side effects and considerations around pregnancy and breastfeeding. Treatments with improved tolerability are needed.

Synthesis and crystal structure of a silver(I) 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside complex

Silver nitrate reacts with 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside (6-MMPR) in aqueous solution containing methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide at room temperature to give a colourless crystalline complex, namely, bis(6-methylmercaptopurine riboside-κN7)(nitrato-κ2O,O')silver(I) 2.32-hydrate, [Ag(NO3)(C11H14N4O4S)2]·2.32H2O. The crystal structure, determined from synchrotron diffraction data, shows a central AgI ion on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis, coordinated in an almost linear fashion by two 6-MMPR ligands via atom N7 (purine numbering), with the nitrate counter-ion loosely coordinated as a bidentate ligand, forming a discrete molecular complex as an approximate dihydrate. The complex and water molecules are connected in a three-dimensional network by hydrogen bonding.

Prognostic factors for liver, blood and kidney adverse events from glucocorticoid sparing immune-suppressing drugs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a prognostic systematic review

BACKGROUND

Immune-suppressing drugs can cause liver, kidney or blood toxicity. Prognostic factors for these adverse-events are poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To ascertain prognostic factors associated with liver, blood or kidney adverse-events in people receiving immune-suppressing drugs.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane library (01 January 1995 to 05 January 2023), and supplementary sources.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer using a modified CHARMS-PF checklist and validated by another. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias using Quality in Prognostic factor Studies tool and assessed the quality of evidence using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-informed framework.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies from 58 papers were included. High-quality evidence of the following associations was identified: elevated liver enzymes (6 studies) and folate non-supplementation (3 studies) are prognostic factors for hepatotoxicity in those treated with methotrexate; that mercaptopurine (vs azathioprine) (3 studies) was a prognostic factor for hepatotoxicity in those treated with thiopurines; that mercaptopurine (vs azathioprine) (3 studies) and poor-metaboliser status (4 studies) were prognostic factors for cytopenia in those treated with thiopurines; and that baseline elevated liver enzymes (3 studies) are a prognostic factor for hepatotoxicity in those treated with anti-tumour necrosis factors. Moderate and low quality evidence for several other demographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, baseline bloods/serologic or treatment-related prognostic factors were also identified.

LIMITATIONS

Studies published before 1995, those with less than 200 participants and not published in English were excluded. Heterogeneity between studies included different cut-offs for prognostic factors, use of different outcome definitions and different adjustment factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors for target-organ damage were identified which may be further investigated for their potential role in targeted (risk-stratified) monitoring.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020208049.

Risk-stratified monitoring for thiopurine toxicity in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: prognostic model development, validation, and, health economic evaluation

Background

Patients established on thiopurines (e.g., azathioprine) are recommended to undergo three-monthly blood tests for the early detection of blood, liver, or kidney toxicity. These side-effects are uncommon during long-term treatment. We developed a prognostic model that could be used to inform risk-stratified decisions on frequency of monitoring blood-tests during long-term thiopurine treatment, and, performed health-economic evaluation of alternate monitoring intervals.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study set in the UK primary-care. Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Gold formed development and validation cohorts, respectively. People age ≥18 years, diagnosed with an immune mediated inflammatory disease, prescribed thiopurine by their general practitioner for at-least six-months between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019 were eligible. The outcome was thiopurine discontinuation with abnormal blood-test results. Patients were followed up from six-months after first primary-care thiopurine prescription to up to five-years. Penalised Cox regression developed the risk equation. Multiple imputation handled missing predictor data. Calibration and discrimination assessed model performance. A mathematical model evaluated costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with lengthening the interval between blood-tests.

Findings

Data from 5982 (405 events over 16,117 person-years) and 3573 (269 events over 9075 person-years) participants were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Fourteen candidate predictors (21 parameters) were included. The optimism adjusted R2 and Royston D statistic in development data were 0.11 and 0.76, respectively. The calibration slope and Royston D statistic (95% Confidence Interval) in the validation data were 1.10 (0.84-1.36) and 0.72 (0.52-0.92), respectively. A 2-year period between monitoring blood-test was most cost-effective in all deciles of predicted risk but the gain between monitoring annually or biennially reduced in higher risk deciles.

Interpretation

This prognostic model requires information that is readily available during routine clinical care and may be used to risk-stratify blood-test monitoring for thiopurine toxicity. These findings should be considered by specialist societies when recommending blood monitoring during thiopurine prescription to bring about sustainable and equitable change in clinical practice.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Safety and efficacy of personalized versus standard initial dosing of thiopurines: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Pretherapy assessment of specific genetic polymorphism (TPMT, NUDT15, FTO, RUNX1, etc) or enzyme levels (for TPMT) may help personalize the dose of thiopurines and avoid adverse effects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing personalized versus standard strategy for initial thiopurine dosing was performed. The electronic databases were searched on 27 September 2022. The outcomes were overall adverse effects, myelotoxicity, drug interruptions, and therapeutic efficacy with either strategy. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

We included six randomized trials, done dominantly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The personalized strategies were genotype testing in 4 trials (TPMT in three trials, NUDT15 in two) and enzyme levels for TPMT in two trials. The pooled risk of myelotoxicity in personalized dosing was lower [RR = 0.72 (95%CI, 0.55-0.94, I2 = 0%)]. The pooled risk of pancreatitis (RR = 1.10I, 0.78-1.56, I2 = 0%), hepatotoxicity (RR = 1.13, 0.69-1.88, I2 = 45), and GI intolerance (RR = 1.01, 0.92-1.10, I2 = 0) were similar in two groups. The pooled risk of drug interruption in individualized dosing was similar to the standard dosing group (RR = 0.97, I2 = 68%).

CONCLUSION

Personalized testing-based initial thiopurine dosing is protective against myelotoxicity as compared to standard weight-based dosing.

Predictive Algorithm for Thiopurine-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) discontinue azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine (MP) therapy within 3 months of treatment initiation because of adverse drug reactions. Of these side-effects, about half are because of hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study was to validate and (subsequently) optimize a previously reported predictive algorithm for thiopurine-associated hepatotoxicity by increasing the number of patients with IBD benefitting from conventional thiopurine therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter observational study included consecutive thiopurine-naive patients with IBD who received AZA or MP treatment. The primary outcome was hepatotoxicity within 12 weeks. The patients with and without hepatotoxicity were compared. Four determinants, namely, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T = 1) were used to validate and optimize 2 (1 dichotomous and 1 continuous) algorithms using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 229 patients, 21 (9%) developed hepatotoxicity and 93% of the patients received MP with a median dose of 0.7 mg/kg (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.4 mg/kg). A difference in BMI was found between with and without hepatotoxicity groups (median 27.6 versus 24.2, P = 0.022). Specificities of 68% (Algorithm 1) and 77% (Algorithm 2) and sensitivities of 56% (Algorithm 1) and 50% (Algorithm 2) were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Both algorithms demonstrated limited predictive accuracy for thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in the validation cohort. Relevant factors contributing to this outcome were changes in thiopurine prescription behavior over time, with more MP prescriptions at relatively lower dosages of MP.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Used in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been expanding in recent decades. New biological and small molecule therapies have been incorporated into the pharmacological arsenal, allowing a more personalized management, and seeking increasingly strict remission goals. However, the fear of developing adverse events represents one of the most important limitations in deciding its use by patients and by a multidisciplinary team. Despite the risk of hepatotoxicity of thiopurines and methotrexate, these drugs are still used either as monotherapy or as combined therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] biological agents. Although drug-induced liver injury [DILI] appears to be less frequent with anti-TNF agents, newer biologics and small molecules, liver tests should be considered in the follow-up of these patients, especially regarding future combined therapy of biologics or of these drugs with small molecules. The objective of this review is to show data on the risk of developing DILI in patients with IBD who are undergoing treatment with traditional therapy or new drugs, whether biological or small molecules.

Cytotoxicity of Thiopurine Drugs in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The effectiveness of thiopurine drugs in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was confirmed more than a half-century ago. It was proven that these can be essential immunomodulatory medications. Since then, they have been used routinely to maintain remission of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The cytotoxic properties of thiopurines and the numerous adverse effects of the treatment are controversial. However, the research subject of their pharmacology, therapy monitoring, and the search for predictive markers are still very relevant. In this article, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and findings in the field of thiopurines in IBD, focusing on the aspect of their cytotoxicity. Due to thiopurines’ benefits in IBD therapy, it is expected that they will still constitute an essential part of the CD and UC treatment algorithm. More studies are still required on the modulation of the action of thiopurines in combination therapy and their interaction with the gut microbiota.

Hepatobiliary manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical approach

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are associated with various hepatobiliary disorders. They can occur at any moment in the course of the disease or associated with the treatment. The prevalence of liver dysfunction can reach up to 50% in different studies. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is considered the most common hepatobiliary complication in IBD, while primary sclerosing cholangitis is the most specific. Management of hepatic manifestations in IBD involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes a high index of suspicion and joint management with hepatologists. The medical confrontation with abnormal liver tests must include an exhaustive study to determine if these patterns can be related to IBD, associated diseases or to the therapies used.

Current status and future perspectives on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated.

AREAS COVERED

Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.

Liver involvement in inflammatory bowel disease: What should the clinician know?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may show a wide range of extraintestinal manifestations. In this context, liver involvement is a focal point for both an adequate management of the disease and its prognosis, due to possible serious comorbidity. The association between IBD and primary sclerosing cholangitis is the most known example. This association is relevant because it implies an increased risk of both colorectal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Additionally, drugs such as thiopurines or biologic agents can cause drug-induced liver damage; therefore, this event should be considered when planning IBD treatment. Additionally, particular consideration should be given to the evidence that IBD patients may have concomitant chronic viral hepatitis, such as hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Chronic immunosuppressive regimens may cause a hepatitis flare or reactivation of a healthy carrier state, therefore careful monitoring of these patients is necessary. Finally, the spread of obesity has involved even IBD patients, thus increasing the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which has already proven to be more common in IBD patients than in the non-IBD population. This phenomenon is considered an emerging issue, as it will become the leading cause of liver cirrhosis.

More Than Meets the Eye?

Content available: Author Audio Recording.

Pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel diseases: efficacy performance and safety management

Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases IBD (Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis) is aimed at achieving clinical, endoscopic and histological remission, minimizing surgical complications, and ensuring a normal quality of life. However, the use of medical treatment is potentially associated with various adverse events, among which infectious complications, malignant neoplasms, as well as myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, skin lesions and others. The risk of side effects depends on the type of drug therapy (5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines, biologicals, etc.), the duration of treatment, the presence of extra-intestinal manifestations, etc. The article provides an overview of data on both the effectiveness and frequency of various side effects of the main classes of drugs in IBD, presents methods of investigation which can predict the effectiveness and development of side effects, the implementation of which can be considered as a variant of personalized therapy in IBD.

Towards personalised medicine in autoimmune hepatitis: Measurement of thiopurine metabolites results in higher biochemical response rates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) usually receive maintenance therapy with thiopurines, such as azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine. Genetic polymorphisms in AZA metabolism can lead to variations in thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine, both of which can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In inflammatory bowel disease, a therapeutic TGN range (225-450 pmol/8x10⁸ erythrocytes) has been identified to optimise effectiveness. We evaluated the benefits of a personalised medicine approach to thiopurine dosing, in comparison to standard weight-based dosing.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study of 214 patients with AIH who were seen at King's College between 1999-2019 was performed. Metabolite levels were measured in 109 patients. The control group included 105 patients on weight-based thiopurine dosing with no metabolite monitoring.

RESULTS

Biochemical response (BR) occurred more frequently at 6-month follow-up in patients with metabolite monitoring compared to those on a weight-based regimen (77% vs. 60%, p = 0.008). This remained true with data analysis based on clinicians who measure metabolites and those who do not (BR at 6 months: 84% vs. 64%, p = 0.016). Patients with BR had TGN levels within the therapeutic range of 225-450 pmol/8x10⁸ erythrocytes significantly more often than those who failed to achieve or lost BR (40% vs. 13%, p <0.0001). Moreover, TGN levels within the pre-defined therapeutic range predicted more stable disease within 6 months of testing compared to levels outside the range (p <0.0001). A high proportion of patients with sub-therapeutic TGN levels (75-225 pmol/8x10⁸ erythrocytes) remained in BR (75% vs. 81%, p = 0.589) with fewer ADRs (44% vs. 86%, p = 0.0002) when compared to patients with therapeutic TGN levels.

CONCLUSION

A strategy of personalised medicine using metabolite levels can optimise treatment regimens in AIH, resulting in fewer ADRs whilst maintaining BR.

LAY SUMMARY

This study looked to see if measuring the breakdown products of a medication used in autoimmune hepatitis increases the chances of gaining good control of the disease, when compared to a group of patients who were on a dose of this medication based on their weight. A group of 214 patients with autoimmune hepatitis were split into 2 groups: roughly half had their medication dose adjusted according to measurements of breakdown products in the blood, whilst the other half received their weight-based dose as normal. The results confirmed that using a personalised approach and checking drug breakdown products resulted in fewer side effects and potentially improved control of disease.

Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. How to Optimize Thiopurines in the Biologic Era?

Thiopurines have been a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although they have been used for more than 50 years, there are still some unsolved issues about their efficacy and, also, some safety concerns, mainly the risk of myelosuppression and life-threatening lymphoproliferative disorders. Furthermore, the development of biological therapy raises the question whether there is still a role for thiopurines in the IBD treatment algorithm. On the other hand, limited cost and wide availability make thiopurines a reasonable option in settings of limited resources and increasing prevalence of IBD. In fact, there is a growing interest in optimizing thiopurine therapy, since pharmacogenomic findings suggest that a personalized approach based on the genotyping of some molecules involved in its metabolism could be useful to prevent side effects. Polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme (TPMT) that result in low enzymatic activity have been associated with an increased risk of myelotoxicity, especially in Caucasians; however, in Asians it is assumed that the variants of nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) are more relevant in the development of toxicity. Age is also important, since in elderly patients the risk of complications seems to be increased. Moreover, the primo-infection of Epstein Barr virus and cytomegalovirus under thiopurine treatment has been associated with severe lymphoproliferative disorders. In addition to assessing individual characteristics that may influence thiopurines treatment outcomes, this review also discusses other strategies to optimize the therapy. Low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol can be used in hypermethylators and in thiopurine-related hepatotoxicity. The measurement of metabolites could be useful to assess compliance, identify patients at risk of adverse events and also facilitating the management of refractory patients. Thioguanine is also a rescue therapy in patients with toxicity related to conventional thiopurine therapy. Finally, the current indications for thiopurines in monotherapy or in combination with biologics, as well as the optimal duration of treatment, are also reviewed.

Usefulness of Measuring Thiopurine Metabolites in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Autoimmunological Hepatitis, Treated with Azathioprine

Introduction

Thiopurines, such as azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), are immunomodulatory agents, used for the maintenance of remission in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), as well as with autoimmunological hepatitis (AIH). Measurements of thiopurine metabolites may allow identifying patients at risk for toxicity and nonadherence. It can also provide an explanation for the ineffectiveness of the treatment, observed in some patients. Patients and Methods. A retrospective analysis was carried out of sixty-eight patients (thirty-six patients with CD, eighteen with UC, and fourteen with AIH), treated with AZA. Thiopurine metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP), were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the AZA dose was adjusted when 6-TGN concentration was known.

Result

Only twenty-five (41%) children had therapeutic 6-TGN concentrations, ten (16%) subjects had suboptimal 6-TGN concentrations, and twenty-six subjects (43%) had 6-TGN concentrations above the recommended therapeutic range. 6-MMP was not above the therapeutic range in any case. Seven subjects revealed undetectable 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels, indicating nonadherence. The mean AZA dose after the 6-TGN concentration-related adjustment did not differ, in comparison to the initial dose, either in IBD or AIH groups. The mean AZA dose was lower in AIH than in IBD. The subjects with an optimal 6-TGN level presented with a higher ratio of remission (88%) than the under- or overdosed patients (60% and 69%), respectively (Chi − square test = 3.87, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Timely measurements of thiopurine metabolites can be a useful tool to identify nonadherent patients before a decision is taken to switch to another drug. We may also spot the patients who receive either too low or too high doses, compensating dose deviations in an appropriate way. The patients with optimal 6-TGN levels presented a higher percentage of remission than the under- or overdosed patients. In most patients, both initial and adjusted AZA doses, lower than suggested in guidelines, appeared to be sufficient to maintain remission.

Hepatotoxicty of Agents Used in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a 2020 Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continue to expand, the opportunity for hepatotoxicity remains a clinical concern. This review looks to update the current literature on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and liver-related complications from current and emerging treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

RECENT FINDINGS

An extensive literature review on currently used medications to treat IBD and their liver-related side effects that includes mesalamine, thiopurines, certain antibiotics, methotrexate, anti-TNF agents including recently introduced biosimilars, anti-integrin therapy, anti-IL 12/IL 23 therapy, and small molecule JAK inhibitors. Hepatotoxicity remains an important clinical issue when managing patients with IBD. Clinicians need to remain aware of the potential for liver-related adverse events with various medication classes and adjust their clinical monitoring as appropriate based on the agents being used.

Thiopurines' Metabolites and Drug Toxicity: A Meta-Analysis

Many questions remain unanswered regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) utility with thiopurines. This study aims to establish a relationship between thiopurines' metabolites and drug toxicity. We performed a systematic review with inclusion of studies evaluating the relationship between thiopurines' metabolites and drug toxicity. Meta-analysis of mean difference (MD), correlations and odds ratio (OR) was performed. We identified 21,240 records, 72 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) were higher in patients with leukopenia (MD 127.06 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC) and gastrointestinal intolerance (MD 201.46 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC), and lower in patients with hepatotoxicity (MD -40.6 pmol × 10⁸ RBC). We established a significant correlation between 6-TGN and leukocytes (r = -0.21), neutrophils (r = -0.24) and alanine aminotransferase levels (r = -0.24). OR for leukopenia in patients with elevated 6-TGN was 4.63 (95%CI 2.24; 9.57). An optimal cut-off of 135 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC for leukopenia was calculated (sensitivity 75.4%; specificity 46.4%). 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity (MD 3241.2 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC; OR 4.28; 95%CI 3.20; 5.71). Levels of 6-MMPR measured in the first 8 weeks of treatment were associated with leukopenia. We conclude that TDM could be used to prevent thiopurines' toxicity. As optimal metabolites level may vary according to indication, physicians may adapt posology to decrease toxicity without compromising efficacy.

Review article: opportunities to improve and expand thiopurine therapy for autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines in combination with glucocorticoids are used as first-line, second-line and maintenance therapies in autoimmune hepatitis and opportunities exist to improve and expand their use.

AIMS

To describe the metabolic pathways and key factors implicated in the efficacy and toxicity of the thiopurine drugs and to indicate the opportunities to improve outcomes by monitoring and manipulating metabolic pathways, individualising dosage and strengthening the response.

METHODS

English abstracts were identified in PubMed by multiple search terms. Full-length articles were selected for review, and secondary and tertiary bibliographies were developed.

RESULTS

Thiopurine methyltransferase activity and 6-tioguanine (6-thioguanine) nucleotide levels influence drug efficacy and safety, and they can be manipulated to improve treatment response and prevent myelosuppression. Methylated thiopurine metabolites are associated with hepatotoxicity, drug intolerance and nonresponse and their production can be reduced or bypassed. Universal pre-treatment assessment of thiopurine methyltransferase activity and individualisation of dosage to manipulate metabolite thresholds could improve outcomes. Early detection of thiopurine resistance by metabolite testing, accurate estimations of drug onset and strength by surrogate markers and adjunctive use of allopurinol could improve the management of refractory disease. Dose-restricted tioguanine (thioguanine) could expand treatment options by reducing methylated metabolites, increasing the bioavailability of 6-tioguanine nucleotides and ameliorating thiopurine intolerance or resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of thiopurines in autoimmune hepatitis can be improved by investigational efforts that establish monitoring strategies that allow individualisation of dosage and prediction of outcome, increase bioavailability of the active metabolites and demonstrate superiority to alternative agents.

Can We Predict the Toxicity and Response to Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?

Thiopurines are a cheap, effective treatment option in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with the growing choice of targeted therapies available, as well as the well-documented toxicities of thiopurines, the role of thiopurines has been questioned. Nevertheless, given their inexpense in an era of spiraling healthcare costs, thiopurines remain an attractive option in the right patients. In the age of personalized medicine, being able to predict patients who will respond as well as those that will develop toxicity to a treatment is vital to tailoring therapy. This review will summarize the available literature with respect to predictors of response and toxicity to thiopurines in order to guide management in IBD. Specifically, toxicities addressed will include myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, alopecia, gastrointestinal and flu-like symptoms, and complications associated with Epstein-Barr virus. While more work needs to be done to further our ability to predict both response to and side effects from therapies, pharmacogenomic research shows significant promise in its ability to personalize our use of thiopurines.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

According to recent clinical consensus, pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is, or should be, personalized medicine. IBD treatment is complex, with highly different treatment classes and relatively few data on treatment strategy. Although thorough evidence-based international IBD guidelines currently exist, appropriate drug and dose choice remains challenging as many disease (disease type, location of disease, disease activity and course, extraintestinal manifestations, complications) and patient characteristics [(pharmaco-)genetic predisposition, response to previous medications, side-effect profile, necessary onset of response, convenience, concurrent therapy, adherence to (maintenance) therapy] are involved. Detailed pharmacological knowledge of the IBD drug arsenal is essential for choosing the right drug, in the right dose, in the right administration form, at the right time, for each individual patient. In this in-depth review, clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations are provided for tailoring treatment with the most common IBD drugs. Development (with consequent prospective validation) of easy-to-use treatment algorithms based on these considerations and new pharmacological data may facilitate optimal and effective IBD treatment, preferably corroborated by effectiveness and safety registries.

Highly sensitive and rapid determination of azathioprine metabolites in whole blood lysate by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Individualized therapy involves genetic test of drug metabolism, which provides information about the initial dose and therapeutic drug monitoring for adjusting the subsequent dose. Consequently, toxic side effects are expected to be minimized and therapeutic effects to be maximized. In this study, an ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method that was specific, accurate and sensitive was developed to simultaneously determine azathioprine two metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methyl-mercaptopurine riboside (6-MMPr) in the whole blood lysate. We precipitated the sample by trifluoroacetic acid under the protection of dithiothreitol, with 6-MMPr and 6-TGN being hydrolyzed to produce 6-methymercaptopurine and 6-thioguanine. In the chromatographic separation, Waters ACQUITY BEH C18 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm) chromatographic column was applied and gradient elution was conducted with 0.02 mol/L ammonium acetate buffer (which contains 0.3% formic acid) and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode was applied for detection via electrospray ionization source in positive ionization mode. The analyzing process lasted for no more than 2 min. The calibration curve for each metabolite fitted a least squares model (weighed 1/X) from 1.25 to 5000 ng/ml (r² > 0.99). The ion pairs were detected as 6-MMP m/z 167.07 → 152.15, 6-TG m/z 168.06 → 134.13, and internal standard m/z 171.07 → 137.14. Under the guidance of FDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation, we carried out validation and obtained satisfactory results. The method was successfully utilized for monitoring the concentrations of each metabolite from 65 affected patients who had received azathioprine maintenance therapy and achieved optimal results.

Clinical experience of optimising thiopurine use through metabolite measurement in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Thiopurine therapy can be optimised by determining the concentration of the drug's metabolites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis on a prospective database of 31 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who failed therapy with thiopurines. Thiopurine metabolites (6-thioguanine, 6-TGN and 6-methylmercaptopurine, 6-MMP) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Laboratorios Cerba, Barcelona) and treatment was duly adjusted in accordance with the results. Clinical response was reassessed after six months.

RESULT

Despite the appropriate theoretical dose of thiopurines being administered, the dose was insufficient in 45.6% of patients (nonadherence to treatment suspected in 6.45%) and 16.2% received an excessive dose or the drug was metabolised by other metabolic pathways. After treatment was optimised based on metabolite levels, only 25.8% (8/31) were prescribed a biological agent, while 74.2% of cases (23/31) were managed through dose optimisation alone.

DISCUSSION

Monitoring thiopurine metabolite levels may help clinicians to assess non-responsive patients before adding or switching to another drug (generally a biological agent), thereby avoiding any additional costs or potential toxicity. This strategy may also help to identify patients receiving an insufficient dose and those with an alternative metabolic pathway, who could be candidates for low-dose AZA with allopurinol, as well as patients who are suspected of being non-adherent. In three out of four patients, switching to a biological agent can be avoided.

Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: New Findings and Perspectives

Thiopurines, available as azathioprine, mercaptopurine, and thioguanine, are immunomodulating agents primarily used to maintain corticosteroid-free remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To provide a state-of-the-art overview of thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease, this clinical review critically summarises the available literature, as assessed by several experts in the field of thiopurine treatment and research in inflammatory bowel disease.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 6-Thioguanine Nucleotide Levels and Clinical Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines are widely used in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, their minimum effective dose and dose-response relationship remain undefined, and evidence about their use in clinical practice is mostly heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: i] to assess the clinical value of 6-thioguanine nucleotide thresholds; and ii] to compare mean 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations between patients in clinical remission vs. those with active disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out using four databases. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic followed by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Odds ratios were computed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1384 records were identified in the systematic search, of which 25 were retained for further analysis: 22 were used in the cut-off comparisons and 12 were used in the 6-thioguanine nucleotide mean differences analysis. The global odds ratio for remission in patients with 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels above the predefined thresholds was 3.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-5.94; p < 0.001]. When considering the different thresholds individually, the odd ratios were significant for values above 235 pmol/8 × 108 and 250 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [2.25 and 4.71, respectively]. Mean 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels were higher among patients in clinical remission, with a pooled difference of 63.37 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [95% CI, 31.81-94.93; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces the link between 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels and clinical remission in inflammatory bowel diseases, also exploring the validity of specific 6-thioguanine nucleotide thresholds to predict clinical outcomes.

More Dose-dependent Side Effects with Mercaptopurine over Azathioprine in IBD Treatment Due to Relatively Higher Dosing

BACKGROUND

There are substantial global differences in the preference for mercaptopurine (MP) or its prodrug azathioprine (AZA) as first-choice thiopurine to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. Studies comparing both agents are scarce. Our aim was to compare AZA and MP in thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease for the frequency of side effects and efficacy.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the "Thiopurine response Optimization by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics" (TOPIC) trial, in which thiopurine-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease with an indication for a thiopurine were randomized for a genotype-based dose versus standard of care. For this study, Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare AZA and MP for discontinuation rates within 5 months, incidence of hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal side effects. Treatment efficacy was compared by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar for patients treated with AZA (n = 494, 64.4%) and MP (n = 273, 35.6%), yet patients with MP were relatively higher dosed compared with those on AZA. Discontinuation rates within 5 months were not different, 39.3% (AZA) and 38.1% (MP), HR 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.17; P = 0.50); however, patients on MP were more often subjected to dose reductions (30% versus 14%, P < 0.01). Higher rates of hepatotoxicity, HR 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.76; P < 0.01) and leukopenia, HR 2.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-4.30; P < 0.01) were observed with MP, which annulled in a secondary analysis with adjustment for the higher dose and metabolite levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with MP were relatively higher dosed, which resulted in more dose-dependent side effects and a higher rate of dose reductions.

Risk of liver disease in methotrexate treated patients

Methotrexate is the first line drug treatment for a number of rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases. It is effective in controlling disease activity and preventing disease-related damage, and significantly cheaper than many alternatives. Use in rheumatoid arthritis infers a significant morbidity and mortality benefit. Methotrexate is generally well tolerated but can cause symptomatic adverse events. Multiple serious adverse events have been attributed to methotrexate, based largely on older reports using high or daily doses, and subsequent case reports and circumstantial evidence. The risk with modern dosing regimens: Lower doses, weekly schedules, and concomitant folic acid is less clear. Clarification and dissemination of the actual risk is crucial so appropriate judgements can be made for patients who may benefit from this treatment. Methotrexate has been associated with a range of liver related adverse events ranging from asymptomatic transaminase elevations to fibrosis and fatal hepatic necrosis. Concern over potential liver toxicity has resulted in treatment avoidance, cessation, or recommendations for investigations which may be costly, invasive and unwarranted. Modern laboratory monitoring of liver blood tests may also influence the risk of more serious complications. The majority of present day studies report an approximate doubling of the relative risk of elevated transaminases in methotrexate treated patients but no increased risk of symptomatic or severe liver related adverse events. In this article we will review the evidence around methotrexate and liver related adverse events.