Letter: anti-TNF dose de-escalation in Crohn's disease-a case-by-case decision

De-escalation of Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested.

AIM

To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was performed.

RESULTS

The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients' preferences.

One-year clinical outcomes with biologics in Crohn's disease: transmural healing compared with mucosal or no healing

BACKGROUND

While mucosal healing has been proved to predict relevant clinical outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD), little is known about the long-term significance of transmural healing.

AIMS

To prospectively assess the 1-year clinical outcomes in CD patients achieving transmural healing following treatment with biologics, and to compare them with those in patients reaching only mucosal healing or no healing.

METHODS

Observational longitudinal study, evaluating 1-year outcomes in terms of steroid-free clinical remission, rate of hospitalisation and need for surgery in a group of CD patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha for 2 years. Bowel sonography was used in all patients to determine transmural healing.

RESULTS

Of 218 patients who completed a 2-year treatment course with anti-TNF alpha, 68 (31.2%) presented transmural (plus mucosal) healing (bowel wall thickness ≤3 mm at bowel sonography), 60 (27.5%) mucosal healing only, and 90 (41.3%) did not achieve any intestinal healing. Transmural healing was associated with a higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission (95.6%), lower rates of hospitalisation (8.8%) and need for surgery (0%) at 1 year compared to mucosal (75%, 28.3% and 10%, respectively) and no healing (41%, 66.6% and 35.5%, respectively) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, transmural healing was associated with longer intervals until clinical relapse (HR, hazard ratio 0.87, P = 0.01), hospitalisation (HR 0.88, P = 0.002) and surgery (HR 0.94, P = 0.008) than mucosal healing. Also among patients discontinuing treatment with biologics, transmural healing predicted better clinical outcomes at 1 year than mucosal healing (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Transmural healing is an ambitious and powerful treatment goal associated, to a greater extent than mucosal healing, with improvement of all clinical outcomes. Additionally, transmural healing is associated with better long-term clinical outcomes than mucosal healing also after discontinuation of biologics.

Predictors of relapse following infliximab de-escalation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the value of a strategy based on therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

There are limited data concerning infliximab drug monitoring during de-escalation of the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIM

To define the rate and the predictors of relapse following infliximab de-escalation in IBD patients in remission.

METHODS

All IBD patients at a single referral centre in clinical and biological remission and in whom the dose of infliximab had been de-escalated were included. Patients in remission with a high trough level of infliximab (>7 mg/L) were considered to be trough level-based de-escalation patients. The data were retrieved from a prospective IBD database. Actuarial analysis was performed for statistical purposes.

RESULTS

A total of 146 de-escalations were performed in 96 patients (Crohn's disease/ulcerative colitis: 68%/32%); 54 (37%) were based on clinical remission only, and 92 (63%) were based on clinical remission associated with a trough level above 7 mg/L. The cumulative probabilities of relapse following infliximab de-escalation were 16% and 47% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Ulcerative colitis was associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR = 3.2, P = 0.005). Conversely, combination therapy at infliximab initiation (HR = 0.39, P = 0.0110) and trough level-based de-escalation were associated with decreased risk of relapse (HR = 0.45, P = 0.024). Trough levels before and after de-escalation were well correlated; a decrease by half was observed following a 2-week interval increase or a half-dose decrease.

CONCLUSION

The use of trough levels to assess the feasibility of dose de-escalation seems to be a prerequisite for decreasing the risk of relapse.

Combined Endoscopic/Sonographic-based Risk Matrix Model for Predicting One-year Risk of Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study of a Tertiary Centre Severe/Refractory Crohn's Disease Cohort

BACKGROUND

In the management of Crohn's disease [CD] patients, having a simple score combining clinical, endoscopic, and imaging features to predict the risk of surgery could help to tailor treatment more effectively.

AIMS

We aimed to prospectively evaluate the 1-year risk factors for surgery in refractory/severe CD and to generate a risk matrix for predicting the probability of surgery at 1 year.

METHODS

CD patients needing a disease re-assessment at our tertiary inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] centre underwent clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and bowel sonography [BS] examinations within 1 week. The optimal cut-off values in predicting surgery were identified using receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves for the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD], bowel wall thickness [BWT] at BS, and small bowel CD extension at BS. Binary logistic regression and Cox regression were then carried out. Finally, the probabilities of surgery were calculated for selected baseline levels of covariates and results were arranged in a prediction matrix.

RESULTS

Of 100 CD patients, 30 underwent surgery within 1 year. SES-CD ≥9 (odds ratio [OR] 15.3; p <0.001], BWT ≥7 mm [OR 15.8; p <0.001], small bowel CD extension at BS ≥33 cm [OR 8.23; p <0.001], and stricturing/penetrating behaviour [OR 4.3; p <0.001] were the only independent factors predictive of surgery at 1 year, based on binary logistic and Cox regressions. Our matrix model combined these risk factors, and the probability of surgery ranged from 0.48% to 87.5% [16 combinations].

CONCLUSIONS

Our risk matrix combining clinical, endoscopic, and ultrasonographic findings can accurately predict the 1-year risk of surgery in patients with severe/refractory CD requiring a disease re-evaluation. This tool could be of value in clinical practice, serving as the basis for a tailored management of CD patients.