Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients including those with decompensated cirrhosis who failed prior treatment with simeprevir/sofosbuvir

Direct antiviral therapy for hepatitis C cirrhotic patients in liver transplantation settings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C (HCV)-induced decompensated cirrhosis warrants liver transplantation (LT) as the only ultimate solution. These patients experience liver deterioration, while on the transplant waitlist. However, debate remains over the optimal timing for treating HCV relative to before or after LT.

METHODS

We performed a literature search between 1/2011 and 1/2022 on PubMed and OVID Medline. Data were extracted from direct antiviral agent (DAA) studies in English. The outcomes of interest included sustained virological response (SVR) rates from various cohorts as well as long- and short-term outcomes in the LT settings.

RESULTS

After screening, 54 studies were eligible and included into the review. In aligning with the EASL and AASLD guidelines and suggestions, many studies supported DAA therapy before LT in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores < 18 and DAA therapy post-LT in MELD scores > 20 through SVR rates, long-term survival factors, liver deterioration, and incidences of severe adverse events. However, uncertainty still lies in the guideline recommendations and unsettled issues remain for various patient cohorts that may benefit from opposing the guideline cutoffs. Based on the recent studies on predictors of treatment outcomes in decompensated patients and the impact of DAA on the waiting list for LT, we proposed an algorithm to manage patients with MELD scores between 18 and 20.

CONCLUSION

DAA therapy for decompensated patients must be personalized with consideration of different factors, particularly among those with MELD scores between the two cutoff-values proposed by the current associational guidelines.

Twelve weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir all-oral regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 2 infection: Integrated analysis of three clinical trials

AIM

The combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) has been approved for the treatment of various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes across many countries. This article presents an integrated analysis of three prospective phase II/III trials in the Asia-Pacific region to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of LDV/SOF in HCV genotype 2 patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients were included in the integrated analysis. The primary end-point was the rate of sustained virologic response for 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12), analyzed by fibrosis stage, treatment history, HCV genotype subtype, and presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). Safety was evaluated by adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.

RESULTS

Twelve weeks of treatment with LDV/SOF was associated with high SVR12 rates (overall 98%) in patients with genotype 2 HCV, irrespective of fibrosis stage, treatment history, genotype 2 subtype, and presence of baseline non-structural protein 5A resistance-associated substitution (NS5A RAS), and LDV/SOF was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve weeks of treatment with LDV/SOF provides a highly effective and safe treatment for patients with genotype 2 HCV, including those with advanced fibrosis. As a ribavirin-free and protease inhibitor-free regimen with minimal on-treatment monitoring requirements, LDV/SOF can potentially play a crucial role in achieving the WHO's goal of HCV elimination.

Health-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C with therapy with direct-acting antivirals agents interferon-free

INTRODUCTION

Interferon (IFN)-free regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C have shown high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) and improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue of patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treated with IFN-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents that achieved SVR following treatment and identify the predictive factors related to HRQoL.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study that included patients with HCV treated with DAA who obtained an SVR. The patients answered three self-reported questionnaires (PROs): Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Chronic Liver Diseases Questionnaire (CLDQ), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire at baseline, weeks 6 and 12 of treatment, and at 12 weeks after therapy. Patients were treated with DAA with or without ribavirin (RBV). The PRO scores were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). A comparison of PROs and serum hemoglobin levels was performed between the group that used ribavirin and the one that did not use ribavirin using the t student test. Predictive factors were calculated using a multiple linear regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 113 patients selected, 105 presented an SVR and were included in the study, in which, 54% men, 80% genotype 1, 44% cirrhosis and 46% with RBV. At 12 weeks after the end of treatment, there was a significant improvement in the scores of the patient self-reports (PROs) when compared with baseline for the CLDQ (+10.52%, p<0.001), SF-36-Physical Summary (+19%, p<0.001), and FACIT (+17.34%, p<0.001). Patients who used RBV had worse PROs and serum hemoglobin levels compared to the group that did not use RBV (p<0,05). As predictors of worsening of the PROs we had the presence of diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and HIV co-infected.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with IFN free regimens presents significant improvement in PROs. The presence of diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, and HIV co-infected has a negative effect on HRQoL before, during and after treatment of hepatitis C. The addition of ribavirin to the antiviral regimens used compromises the HRQoL indexes during antiviral therapy.

Treatment and re-treatment results of HCV patients in the DAA era

Background

Re-treatment in patients with a chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a previous failure to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment remains a challenge. Therefore, we investigated the success rate of treatment and re-treatment regimens used at our center from October 2011 to March 2018.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of DAA-based HCV therapies of 1096 patients was conducted. Factors associated with a virological relapse were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression, treatment success of the re-treatment regimens was evaluated by an analysis of sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients with a documented follow-up 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

Results

Of 1096 patients treated with DAA-based regimens, 91 patients (8%) were lost to follow-up, 892 of the remaining 1005 patients (89%) achieved an SVR12. Most patients (65/113, 58%) who experienced a virological relapse received an interferon-based DAA regimen. SVR rates were comparable in special cohorts like liver transplant recipients (53/61, 87%) and people with a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection (41/45, 91%). On multivariable analysis, interferon-based DAA therapy was associated with treatment failure (odds ratio 0.111, 95%-confidence interval 0.054–0.218) among others. One hundred seventeen patients with multiple DAA treatment courses were identified, of which 97 patients (83%) experienced a single relapse, but further relapses after two (18/117, 15%) or even three (2/117, 2%) treatment courses were also observed. Eighty-two of 96 (85%) re-treatment attempts with all-oral DAA regimens were successful after an initial treatment failure.

Conclusion

Overall, DAA re-treatments were highly effective in this real-world cohort and only a minority of patients failed more than two treatment courses. Switching to–or addition of–a new drug class seem to be valid options for the re-treatment of patients especially after failure of an interferon-based regimen.

Impact of Sustained Virological Response for Gastroesophageal Varices in Hepatitis-C-Virus-Related Liver Cirrhosis

We aimed to clarify the relationship between sustained virological response (SVR) and gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) progression among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver cirrhosis (LC) patients treated with interferon (IFN)-based therapies (n = 18) and direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based therapies (n = 37), and LC patients with no SVR (n = 71) who had already developed GEVs. Factors influencing GEVs progression were also examined. During the follow-up period, GEVs progression was observed in 50 patients (39.7%). The 3-year cumulative GEVs progression rates in the DAA-SVR group, the IFN-SVR group, and the non-SVR group were 32.27%, 5.88%, and 33.76%, respectively (overall p value = 0.0108). Multivariate analysis revealed that sex (p = 0.0430), esophageal varices (EVs) F2 or more (p < 0.0001), and DAA-SVR (p = 0.0126, IFN-SVR as a reference) and non-SVR (p = 0.0012, IFN-SVR as a reference) were independent predictors for GEVs progression. The proportion of GEVs progression in patients with no or F1 EVs was significantly lower than that in patients with F2 or F3 EVs (33.9% (38/112) vs. 85.7% (12/14), p = 0.0003). In conclusion, IFN-based therapies can have a favorable impact for preventing GEVs progression in HCV-related LC patients with GEVs. Clinicians should be aware of a point of no return where SVR is no longer capable of avoiding GEVs progression.

Viral Hepatitis C Therapy: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations: A 2019 Update

It has been estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that over 71 million people were infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2015. Since then, a number of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have been licensed for the treatment of chronic HCV infection: sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. With these treatment regimens, almost all chronic HCV-infected patients, even including prior DAA failures, can be treated effectively and safely. It is therefore likely that further development of DAAs will be limited. In this descriptive review we provide an overview of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of currently available DAAs by describing their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Potential drug-drug interactions with the DAAs are briefly discussed. Furthermore, we summarize what is known about the pharmacodynamics of the DAAs in terms of efficacy and safety. We briefly discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of the DAAs and efficacy or toxicity in special populations, such as hard to cure patients and patients with liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation, renal impairment, hepatitis B virus or HIV co-infection, bleeding disorders, and children. The aim of this overview is to educate/update prescribers and pharmacists so that they are able to safely and effectively treat HCV-infected patients even in the presence of underlying co-infections or co-morbidities.

Real World Experience of Chronic Hepatitis C Retreatment with Genotype Specific Regimens in Nonresponders to Previous Interferon-Free Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The development of interferon- (IFN-) free regimens substantially improved efficacy of treatment for HCV, but despite excellent effectiveness the failures still occur. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of retreatment with genotype specific direct acting antivirals- (DAA-) based regimens in nonresponders to previous IFN-free therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysed population consisted of 31 nonresponders to IFN-free regimen, which received second IFN-free rescue therapy, selected from 6228 patients included in a national database EpiTer-2.

RESULTS

Age and gender distribution were similar, whereas proportion of genotype 1b was slightly higher and genotype 4 lower in the whole population compared to studied one. Patients included in the study demonstrated much more advanced fibrosis. Primary therapy was discontinued in 12 patients, which were recognized as failures due to nonvirologic reason, whereas virologic reason of therapeutic failure was recognized in 19 patients which completed therapy. Overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 81% and 86% in intent-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT analysis, respectively (74% and 78% in virologic failures, 92% and 100% in nonvirologic failures). Resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) testing was carried out in 8 patients from the group of completed primary therapy and three of them had potential risk for failure of rescue therapy due to NS5A association, while two of them achieved SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated moderate effectiveness of genotype specific rescue therapy in failures due to virologic reason and high in those who discontinued primary therapy. Therefore rescue therapy with genotype specific regimens should be considered always if more potent regimens are not available.