Non-invasive monitoring and treat-to-target approach are cost-effective in patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis

Non-Invasive Methods of Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

The global incidence and age-standardized prevalence rate of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing worldwide. It is a debilitating and lifelong inflammatory disease affecting both pediatric and adult patients. Thus, it is important to focus on modern treat-to-target approach, based on a tight control of the disease with close monitoring through interval assessments and modification of the treatment. Endoscopy remains the key method for UC assessment, but recent guidelines focus on implementation of non-invasive methods for UC diagnosis and management such as biomarkers (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactofferin) and imaging methods (intestinal ultrasound). We summarize the diagnostic performance of non-invasive tests and present current evidence-based non-invasive strategy recommendations for UC monitoring.

Artificial intelligence: A new tool in the pathologist's armamentarium for the diagnosis of IBD

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are classified into two entities, namely Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), which differ in disease trajectories, genetics, epidemiological, clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological aspects. As no single golden standard modality for diagnosing IBD exists, the differential diagnosis among UC, CD, and non-IBD involves a multidisciplinary approach, considering professional groups that include gastroenterologists, endoscopists, radiologists, and pathologists. In this context, histological examination of endoscopic or surgical specimens plays a fundamental role. Nevertheless, in differentiating IBD from non-IBD colitis, the histopathological evaluation of the morphological lesions is limited by sampling and subjective human judgment, leading to potential diagnostic discrepancies. To overcome these limitations, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are emerging to enable automated analysis of medical images with advantages in accuracy, precision, and speed of investigation, increasing interest in the histological analysis of gastrointestinal inflammation. This review aims to provide an overview of the most recent knowledge and advances in AI methods, summarizing its applications in the histopathological analysis of endoscopic biopsies from IBD patients, and discussing its strengths and limitations in daily clinical practice.

Clinical Trial: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Two Patient Management Strategies in Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis-The OPTIMISE Study

Background: Current management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) involves monitoring clinical markers of disease activity, such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB), and adjusting treatment accordingly. Our aim was to assess whether targeting treatment based on faecal calprotectin (FC) levels (treat-to-target; T2T) provides greater UC disease control versus a symptom-based approach. Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised (1:1) controlled study of patients with mild-to-moderate UC (global Mayo score 2-6) treated with ≤2.4 g/day 5-aminosalicylic acid that compared the effectiveness of two management strategies with (interventional arm) and without (reference arm) FC home monitoring over 12 months of follow-up. Treatment was optimised in the interventional arm using FC values and clinical symptoms (PRO-2), while the reference arm used only PRO-2. Results: 193 patients completed the study. No significant difference was found for the primary endpoint (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] = 0 at 12 months). A numerical advantage for the interventional arm over the reference arm for the primary endpoint (37.0% vs. 33.4%, respectively) and for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was found following imputation for missing data. The composite endpoint of MES = 0, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was achieved at a significantly higher rate in the interventional arm than the reference arm (effect size [ES]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.32; p < 0.05). A similar result was obtained for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0 and SF ≤ 1 (ES: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.37; p < 0.05). Conclusions: T2T using FC monitoring was effective in patients with mild-to-moderate UC at 12 months. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm the results.

Practical management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: an international expert consensus

INTRODUCTION

Although there are well-defined guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), there are still unmet needs. For this reason, we conducted an international expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild-to-moderate UC and provide practical guidance to clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

Based on Delphi methodology, 15 statements were approved after two rounds of voting, addressing several aspects of disease management from sequencing to treatment duration, from monitoring to optimization techniques and safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing knowledge of mild-to-moderate UC has led to the development of new ambitious outcomes such as histological remission and disease clearance. Furthermore, noninvasive tools for patient monitoring such as fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound are now available. Their implementation in clinical practice will allow clinicians to tightly monitor disease activity and promptly adapt treatment, avoiding complications and disease progression and targeting better disease control.

Drug Optimization in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Global Survey

Background/Objectives: The treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) is challenging. Although there are commonly used guidelines, therapy optimization is not standardized. We conducted a survey to investigate the management and treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate UC. Methods: Physicians with experience in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were invited to participate in an anonymous, multiple-choice survey between June and July 2023. The survey addressed various issues of patient care such as patient monitoring, treatment optimization, follow-up, treatment decision making, and therapy de-escalation. Results: The survey included 222 physicians (59.9% men; mean age = 50.4 years) from 66 countries worldwide. Gastroenterologists were the most represented specialists (89.6%), followed by surgeons (3.2%), and internal medicine doctors (2.7%). Two-thirds of the participants (66.7%) had >10 years of experience in the field of IBD. The combination of oral (≥4 g/day) and rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was the preferred choice when optimizing therapy. Budesonide MMX (41.8%) and systemic steroids (39.9%) were preferred in patients who failed 5-ASA. Treatment decisions were predominantly based on endoscopic (99.0%) or clinical (59.8%) activity. A significant percentage of clinicians did not optimize therapy in the case of increased fecal calprotectin alone (45.1%) or radiological/ultrasound activity (39.8%) alone. Conclusions: The guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate UC are well accepted in clinical practice. Endoscopic remission remains the main therapeutic target, followed by clinical remission. Fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound still elicit complaints from physicians.

Construction of a molecular inflammatory predictive model with histone modification-related genes and identification of CAMK2D as a potential response signature to infliximab in ulcerative colitis

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong inflammatory disease affecting the rectum and colon with numerous treatment options that require an individualized treatment plan. Histone modifications regulate chromosome structure and gene expression, resulting in effects on inflammatory and immune responses. However, the relationship between histone modification-related genes and UC remains unclear.

Methods

Transcriptomic data from GSE59071 and GSE66407 were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), encompassing colonic biopsy expression profiles of UC patients in inflamed and non-inflamed status. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analyses, functional enrichment analyses, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and random forest were performed to identify histone modification-related core genes associated with UC inflammation. Features were screened through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), establishing a molecular inflammatory predictive model using logistic regression. The model was validated in the GSE107499 dataset, and the performance of the features was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of colonic biopsy tissues from UC patients treated with infliximab was used to further confirm the clinical application value. Univariate logistic regression on GSE14580 highlighted features linked to infliximab response.

Results

A total of 253 histone modification-related DEGs were identified between inflammatory and non-inflammatory patients with UC. Seven key genes (IL-1β, MSL3, HDAC7, IRF4, CAMK2D, AUTS2, and PADI2) were selected using WGCNA and random forest. Through univariate logistic regression, three core genes (CAMK2D, AUTS2, and IL-1β) were further incorporated to construct the molecular inflammatory predictive model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.943 in the independent validation dataset. A significant association between CAMK2D protein expression and infliximab response was observed, which was validated in another independent verification set of GSE14580 from the GEO database.

Conclusion

The molecular inflammatory predictive model based on CAMK2D, AUTS2, and IL-1β could reliably distinguish the mucosal inflammatory status of UC patients. We further revealed that CAMK2D was a predictive marker of infliximab response. These findings are expected to provide a new evidence base for personalized treatment and management strategies for UC patients.

Review article: Translating STRIDE-II into clinical reality - Opportunities and challenges

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of novel therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), 'treat-to-target' strategies are increasingly discussed to improve short- and long-term outcomes in patients with IBD.

AIM

To discuss opportunities and challenges of a treat-to-target approach in light of the current 'Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease' (STRIDE-II) consensus METHODS: The 2021 update of STRIDE-II encompasses 13 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for treat-to-target strategies in adults and children with IBD. We highlight the potential implications and limitations of these recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

STRIDE-II provides valuable guidance for personalised IBD management. It reflects scientific progress as well as increased evidence of improved outcomes when more ambitious treatment goals such as mucosal healing are achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective studies, objective criteria for risk stratification, and better predictors of therapeutic response are needed to potentially render 'treating to target' more effective in the future.