Survival benefit of lymph node dissection in surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients: A multicenter propensity score-matched study in Japan

Factors influencing lymph node yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

In head and neck cancer surgery, several studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of lymph node yield (LNY). To our knowledge, no review has evaluated both the contributing factors to LNY and its impact on survival outcomes across all head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) subsites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review of LNY in HNSCC was conducted according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to answer the following research questions: 1) Which surgeon, pathologist, and patient characteristics influence LNY? 2) Which anatomic subsites does LNY impact survival?

RESULTS

Surgeon experience and variation in pathology protocols and personnel can impact LNY. Extent of nodal dissection, advanced tumor characteristics, and treatment at an academic facility are associated with increased LNY. Patient characteristics such as age <40, male gender, and BMI > 30 are associated with increased LNY. In the oral cavity, LNY > 18 is an independent predictor of improved overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). In the oropharynx, published studies show mixed results with regards to the impact of LNY on OS, DFS, and DSS. LNY has not been associated with OS or DFS in the larynx, irrespective of nodal threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Provider and patient characteristics may impact LNY. LNY ≥ 18 is associated with a survival benefit in the oral cavity and HNSCC overall. Further investigation of LNY particularly in prospective clinical trials is required prior to its adoption as a quality metric in HNSCC.

Right-sided versus left-sided colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a sub-analysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan

PURPOSE

This study investigated the impact of sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients on the prognosis.

METHODS

In a sub-analysis of a multicenter case-control study of CRC patients who underwent surgery at ≥ 80 years old conducted in Japan between 2003 and 2007, both short- and long-term outcomes were compared between right-sided colon cancers (RCCs) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCCs). RCCs were defined as those located from the cecum to the transverse colon.

RESULTS

Among the 1680 patients who underwent curative surgery, 812 and 868 had RCCs and LCCs, respectively. RCCs were more frequent than LCCs in those who were female, had renal comorbidities, and had a history of abdominal surgery. Regarding tumor characteristics, RCCs were larger, invaded more deeply, and were diagnosed as either mucinous or signet ring-cell carcinoma more frequently than LCCs. Regarding the prognosis, patients with RCCs had a significantly longer cancer-specific survival (CS-S) and cancer-specific relapse-free survival (CS-RFS) than those with LCCs. Furthermore, sidedness was determined to be an independent prognostic factor for CS-S and CS-RFS.

CONCLUSION

RCCs, which accounted for half of the cases in patients ≥ 80 years old, showed better long-term outcomes than LCCs.

Use of 3D-CT-derived psoas major muscle volume in defining sarcopenia in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is characterized by reduced skeletal muscle volume and is a condition that is prevalent among elderly patients and associated with poor prognosis as a comorbidity in malignancies. Given the aging population over 80 years old in Japan, an understanding of malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), complicated by sarcopenia is increasingly important. Therefore, the focus of this study is on a novel and practical diagnostic approach of assessment of psoas major muscle volume (PV) using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) in diagnosis of sarcopenia in patients with CRC.

METHODS

The subjects were 150 patients aged ≥ 80 years with CRC who underwent primary tumor resection at Juntendo University Hospital between 2004 and 2017. 3D-CT measurement of PV and conventional CT measurement of the psoas major muscle cross-sectional area (PA) were used to identify sarcopenia (group S) and non-sarcopenia (group nS) cases. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative results, postoperative complications, and prognosis were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The S:nS ratios were 15:135 for the PV method and 52:98 for the PA method. There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.66, p < 0.01) between PVI (psoas major muscle volume index) and PAI (psoas major muscle cross-sectional area index), which were calculated by dividing PV or PA by the square of height. Surgical results and postoperative complications did not differ significantly in the S and nS groups defined using each method. Overall survival was worse in group S compared to group nS identified by PV (p < 0.01), but not significantly different in groups S and nS identified by PA (p = 0.77). A Cox proportional hazards model for OS identified group S by PV as an independent predictor of a poor prognosis (p < 0.05), whereas group S by PA was not a predictor of prognosis (p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The PV method for identifying sarcopenia in elderly patients with CRC is more practical and sensitive for prediction of a poor prognosis compared to the conventional method.

Extent of Lymph Node Harvest: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Right Hemicolectomy

Background: Minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to have clear advantages in colon cancer management, with a decrease in the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery. With the introduction of intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), the entire mesenteric dissection and division is performed under vision laparoscopically and may lead to superior lymph node harvest. The aim of our study is to evaluate lymph node harvest in patients undergoing totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with ICA compared to laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA). Methods: This is a single institution retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at our institution between 2012 and 2022. Patients were identified using a hospital database, and surgeon office databases. Patients included underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for neoplastic lesions (colon cancer/unresectable polyps), or benign etiologies. We excluded patients who underwent laparotomy (intra-operative conversion), resection without anastomosis, resection for IBD, or lack of documented lymph node number. Data were compared using two-sided t-test evaluation with a 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 679 patients were included, 493 ECA (72.6%) and 186 ICA (27.4%). Patient demographics (age, biologic sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists and body mass index) were not significantly different. Lymph node harvest was significantly higher in those with ICA (24 ± 14 versus 21 ± 1, P < .05). In subgroup analysis, this difference was maintained in patients with malignant processes (27 ± 14 versus 23 ± 10, P < .05). Conclusions: In our experience, ICA has higher lymph node harvest in comparison to ECA. This may improve outcomes and options for adjuvant therapies in malignant indications.

Lymph node yield in the pathological staging of resected nonmetastatic colon cancer: The more the better?

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend regional lymphadenectomy with a lymph node yield (LNY) of at least 12 lymph nodes (LN) for adequate colon cancer (CC) staging. LNY ≥22LN may improve survival, especially in right-sided CC [Lee et al., Surg Oncol, 27(3), 2018]. This multicentric retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of LNY and tumor laterality on CC staging and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-III CC that underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 were grouped according to LNY: <22 and ≥ 22. Primary outcomes were LN positivity (N+ rate) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome. Exploratory analyses were performed for laterality and stage.

RESULTS

We included 795 patients (417 < 22LN, 378 ≥ 22LN); 53% had left-sided CC and 29%/37%/38% had stage I/II/III tumors. There was no association between LNY ≥22LN and N+ rate after adjustment for grade, T stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion; a trend for a higher N+ rate in left-sided CC was identified (interaction p = 0.033). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months for DFS and 73.2 months for OS, 254 patients (31.9%) relapsed and 207 (26.0%) died. In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, ASA score, laparoscopic approach, T/N stage, mucinous histology, LVI and adjuvant chemotherapy, LNY ≥22LN was significantly associated with both DFS (HR 0.75, p = 0.031) and OS (HR 0.71, p = 0.025). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a more significant benefit for right-sided CC.

CONCLUSION

LNY ≥22LN was associated with longer DFS and OS in patients with operable CC, especially for right-sided CC.

Surgical Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery for ≥ 85-year-old Patients in Our Hospital: Retrospective Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes with Younger Patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate future problems in colorectal cancer surgery for elderly patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients receiving colorectal cancer surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2018. Patients were divided into the ≥ 85-year-old patient group and the younger patient group. We compared patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes (surgical procedure, reduction of lymph node dissection range, operative duration, and blood loss), postoperative short-term outcomes (mortality, morbidity, and postoperative length of stay) and prognosis.

RESULTS

We performed colorectal cancer surgery on 1,240 patients during the study period. Of them, 109 (8.7%) were ≥ 85 years old, and 1,131 (91.2%) were < 85 years old. The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) was significantly poorer in the elderly group than in the younger group and patients with a history of cardiac disease and anticoagulant use were significantly more in the elderly group. The rate of reduction of lymph node dissection range was significantly higher in the elderly group (16.8% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.05). Overall morbidity was significantly higher in the elderly group (42.2% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.05), as were the respective frequencies of pneumonia and thromboembolism (8.2% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05 and 3.6% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the elderly group (17 vs. 12 days, p < 0.05). Overall survival was significantly lower in the elderly group (p < 0.05), but relapse-free survival and colorectal cancer-specific survival were not statistically different between the groups (p = 0.05 and p = 0.15, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of postoperative pneumonia and thromboembolism remains a problem. After proper assessment and careful management of peri-operative surgical risks, surgery can be indicated in elderly patients.