Clinical prospects for laparoscopic stoma closure of a temporary loop ileostomy: Initial experience and report

Laparoscopic vs. open loop ileostomy reversal: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies

PURPOSE

The present meta-analysis compares laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (LLIR) with open loop ileostomy reversal (OLIR) to evaluate the advantages of the laparoscopic technique compared to the traditional open technique in ileostomy reversal.

METHODS

Primary endpoints were hospital stay and overall complications. Secondary endpoints were operative time, EBL, readmission, medical complications, surgical complications, reoperation, wound infection, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction, and cost of the procedures. The included studies were also divided based on the type of anastomotic approach: extracorporeal laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (ELLIR) and intracorporeal laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (ILLIR).

RESULTS

In the analysis, 4 studies were included. Three hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled. As primary outcomes, a significant difference was found in hospital stay between the LLIR and OLIR groups (MD = -0.67, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.19, P = 0.007). The overall complications outcome resulted in favor of the LLIR group (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, P = 0.03). As secondary outcomes, the operative time was in favor of the OLIR group (MD = 19.18, 95% CI 10.20-28.16, P < 0.001). Surgical complications were lower in the LLIR group than in the OLIR group. No other differences between the secondary endpoints were found. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in hospital stay between the ILLIR and OLIR groups (MD = -0.92, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.30, P = 0.004). The overall complications outcome significantly favored the ILLIR group (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.96, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis shows an advantage in terms of shorter post-operative hospitalization and reduction of complications of LLIR compared to OLIR. The sub-group analysis shows that performing an extracorporeal anastomosis exposes the same risks of the open technique.

A multidimensional learning curve analysis of totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal using a single surgeon' s experience

Purpose

Recently, totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal (TLAP) has received increasing attention and exhibited promising short-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to detail the learning process of the TLAP technique.

Methods

Based on our initial experience with TLAP from 2018, a total of 65 TLAP cases were enrolled. Demographics and perioperative parameters were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM), moving average, and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) analyses.

Results

The overall mean operative time (OT) was 94 min and the median postoperative hospitalization period was 4 days, and there was an estimated 10.77% incidence rate of perioperative complications. Three unique phases of the learning curve were derived from CUSUM analysis, and the mean OT of phase I (1-24 cases) was 108.5 min, that of phase II (25-39 cases) was 92 min, and that of phase III (40-65 cases) was 80 min, respectively. There was no significant difference in perioperative complications between these 3 phases. Similarly, moving average analysis indicated that the operation time was reduced significantly after the 20th case and reached a steady state after the 36th case. Furthermore, complication-based CUSUM and RA-CUSUM analyses indicated an acceptable range of complication rates during the whole learning period.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated 3 distinct phases of the learning curve of TLAP. For an experienced surgeon, surgical competence in TLAP can be grasped at around 25 cases with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

Satisfactory short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal compared to open surgery in colorectal cancer patients

Background

Recently, totally laparoscopic (TLAP) surgery has suggested its potential on ileostomy reversal. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between TLAP and traditional open ileostomy reversal.

Patients and methods

From September 2016 to September 2021, 107 eligible patients underwent TLAP (n = 48) or open (n = 59) loop ileostomy reversal were retrospectively enrolled. Surgical parameters, postoperative recovery and complications were identified and compared between TLAP technique vs. open surgery.

Results

The operation time and estimated blood loss showed no obvious difference between TLAP and open group. However, TLAP reversal significantly decreased the incision length (4.5cm vs. 6cm, P < 0.001). Furthermore, patients underwent TLAP surgery showed quicker first ground activities (1 day vs. 2 days, P < 0.001), faster first flatus passage (2 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.004) and shorter postoperative stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P = 0.007). More importantly, postoperative complications were significantly reduced after TLAP reversal (3 cases vs. 10 cases, P = 0.026). Further logistic regression analyses also indicated the TLAP technique was associated with lower incidence of complications (OR=3.316, CI, 1.118-9.835; P = 0.031).

Conclusions

TLAP surgery is competitive in promoting postoperative recovery as well as reducing complications compared to the traditional open ileostomy reversal.

Clinical prospects for laparoscopic stoma closure of a temporary loop ileostomy: Initial experience and report

INTRODUCTION

In closure of a stoma, the small working space and adhesions hinder a precise surgical procedure, compared with conventional approaches to digestive surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to introduce a new technique of laparoscopic stoma closure (LASC).

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

After starting with three trocars, it is a priority to dissect around the arising ileum; a linear stapler is precisely inserted in both orifices of the loop stoma and applied two times, extracorporeally. Ultimately, both the oral and anal sides of the loop ileum are cut and closed using a linear cutter stapler in a delta-shaped manner just under the abdominal wall, intracorporeally. Eventually, the arising stoma is removed using an intra-abdominal and cutaneous approach.

DISCUSSION

LASC for patients with a temporary loop ileostomy is safe and feasible. More data and experience will be required to verify the benefits of this new technique.

Satisfactory short-term outcome of total laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal in obese patients: a comparative study with open techniques

Reversal of loop ileostomy after colorectal surgery in obese patients can be challenging and total laparoscopic (TLAP) approach may be beneficial. This study aims to compare short-term outcomes of TLAP and open approaches in obese patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery previously and underwent loop ileostomy reversal between January 2017 and April 2020. TLAP and open cases performed in obese patients were identified and compared for the following outcomes: baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. TLAP or open-loop ileostomy reversal was performed on 30 and 34 patients, respectively. TLAP approach was associated with a similar operation time and blood loss compared with an open approach (P > 0.05). The median length of incision for stoma removal was significantly shorter in the TLAP group than in the open group (6.5 cm vs. 8.5 cm; P < 0.05), and a lower incidence of incisional infection was also noted in the TLAP group (6.7% vs. 26.5%; P < 0.05). The groups were comparable as regards the time to ground activities and length of hospitalization (P > 0.05), but the time to first flatus was decreased (2.0 vs. 3.0 days; P < 0.05). This retrospective study demonstrated that TLAP loop ileostomy reversal may have a satisfactory short-term outcome for obese patients after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, with a shorter incisional length and a lower incidence of incisional infection as well as an earlier time to first flatus.