Statin use associated with lower risk of epilepsy after intracranial haemorrhage: A population-based cohort study

The State of Use and Utility of Negative Controls in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies

Uses of real-world data in drug safety and effectiveness studies are often challenged by various sources of bias. We undertook a systematic search of the published literature through September 2020 to evaluate the state of use and utility of negative controls to address bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Two reviewers independently evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data. Our search identified 184 eligible studies for inclusion. Cohort studies (115, 63%) and administrative data (114, 62%) were, respectively, the most common study design and data type used. Most studies used negative control outcomes (91, 50%), and for most studies the target source of bias was unmeasured confounding (93, 51%). We identified 4 utility domains of negative controls: 1) bias detection (149, 81%), 2) bias correction (16, 9%), 3) P-value calibration (8, 4%), and 4) performance assessment of different methods used in drug safety studies (31, 17%). The most popular methodologies used were the 95% confidence interval and P-value calibration. In addition, we identified 2 reference sets with structured steps to check the causality assumption of the negative control. While negative controls are powerful tools in bias detection, we found many studies lacked checking the underlying assumptions. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.

Epileptiform activity in the acute phase of stroke predicts the outcomes in patients without seizures

Background and purpose

The abnormalities in EEG of stroke-patients increase the risk of epilepsy but their significancy for poststroke outcome is unclear. This presented study was aimed at determining the prevalence and nature of changes in EEG recordings from the stroke hemisphere and from the contralateral hemisphere. Another objective was to determine the significance of abnormalities in EEG in the first days of stroke for the post-stroke functional status on the acute and chronic phase of disease.

Methods

In all qualified stroke-patients, EEG was performed during the first 3 days of hospitalization and at discharge. The correlation between EEG abnormalities both in the stroke hemisphere and in the collateral hemisphere with the neurological and functional state in various time points was performed.

Results

One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled to this study. Fifty-eight patients (44.27%) had abnormal EEG. The sporadic discharges and generalized rhythmic delta activity were the most common abnormalities in the EEG. The neurological status on the first day and the absence of changes in the EEG in the hemisphere without stroke were the independent factors for good neurological state (0–2 mRS) at discharge. The age-based analysis model (OR 0.981 CI 95% 0.959–1.001, p = 0.047), neurological status on day 1 (OR 0.884 CI 95% 0.82–0.942, p < 0.0001) and EEG recording above the healthy hemisphere (OR 0.607 CI 95% 0.37–0.917, p = 0.028) had the highest prognostic value in terms of achieving good status 90 days after stroke.

Conclusions

Abnormalities in EEG without clinical manifestation are present in 40% of patients with acute stroke. Changes in EEG in acute stroke are associated with a poor neurological status in the first days and poor functional status in the chronic period of stroke.

Beneficial Effects of Statins on Seizures Independent of Their Lipid-Lowering Effect: A Narrative Review

Among the many types of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, seizures and epilepsy severely affect the quality of life and routine daily activity of the sufferers. We aimed to review research studies that investigated the effect of statins on the prevention and treatment of seizures and epilepsy. Both animal models and human studies were included in this review. This article starts with a brief introduction about seizure, its prevalence, treatment, and various animal models of seizures and epilepsy. Next, we discuss statin's mechanism of action, side effects, and effects on neurological disorders with a specific focus on seizures. Finally, the effects of different types of statins on seizures are compared. The present review gives a better understanding of the therapeutic effects of statins on neurological disorders in animal models and human studies. This permits researchers to set up study designs to resolve current ambiguities and contradictions on the beneficial effects of statins on neurological disorders.

Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: analysing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin

Many brain insults and injuries are “epileptogenic”: they increase the risk of developing epilepsy. It is desirable to identify treatments that are “antiepileptogenic”: treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy, if administered after the occurrence of an epileptogenic insult. Current antiepileptic drugs are not antiepileptogenic, but evidence of antiepileptogenic efficacy is accumulating for a growing number of other compounds. From among these candidate compounds, statins are deserving of particular attention because statins are reported to be antiepileptogenic in more published studies and in a wider range of brain insults than any other individual or class of compounds. Although many studies report the antiepileptogenic effect of statins, it is unclear how many studies provide evidence that statins exhibit the following two essential features of a clinically viable antiepileptogenic drug: the drug must exert an antiepileptogenic effect even if it is initiated after the epileptogenic brain insult has already occurred, and the antiepileptogenic effect must endure even after the drug has been discontinued. In the current work, we interrogate published preclinical and clinical studies, to determine if statins fulfill these essential requirements. There are eight different statins in clinical use. To enable the clinical use of one of these statins for antiepileptogenesis, its antiepileptogenic effect will have to be established through future time‐ and resource‐intensive clinical trials. Therefore, it is desirable to review the published literature to determine which of the statins emerges as the most promising candidate for antiepileptogenic therapy. Hence, in the current work, we also collate and analyze published data—clinical and pre‐clinical, direct and indirect—that help to answer the question: Which statin is the most promising candidate to take forward into an antiepileptogenesis clinical trial?

Optimal Course of Statins for Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Longer Treatment Better? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Statins are used in clinical practice to prevent from complications such as cerebral vasospasm (CVS) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the efficacy and safety of statins are still controversial due to insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials and inconsistent results of the existing studies. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review the latest evidence on the time window and complications of statins in aSAH. The randomized controlled trials in the databases of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang from January 2005 to April 2021 were searched and analyzed systematically. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 16.0. The fixed-effects model (M-H method) with effect size risk ratio (RR) was used for subgroups with homogeneity, and the random-effects model (D-L method) with effect size odds ratio (OR) was used for subgroups with heterogeneity. The primary outcomes were poor neurological prognosis and all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were cerebral vasospasm (CVS) and statin-related complications. This study was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021247376). Nine studies comprising 1,464 patients were included. The Jadad score of the patients was 5–7. Meta-analysis showed that poor neurological prognosis was reduced in patients who took oral statins for 14 days (RR, 0.73 [0.55–0.97]; I² = 0%). Surprisingly, the continuous use of statins for 21 days had no significant effect on neurological prognosis (RR, 1.04 [0.89–1.23]; I² = 17%). Statins reduced CVS (OR, 0.51 [0.36–0.71]; I² = 0%) but increased bacteremia (OR, 1.38 [1.01–1.89]; I² = 0%). In conclusion, a short treatment course of statins over 2 weeks may improve neurological prognosis. Statins were associated with reduced CVS. Based on the pathophysiological characteristics of CVS and the evaluation of prognosis, 2 weeks could be the optimal time window for statin treatment in aSAH, although bacteremia may increase.

Impact of drug treatment and drug interactions in post-stroke epilepsy

Stroke is a huge burden on our society and this is expected to grow in the future due to the aging population and the associated co-morbidities. The improvement of acute stroke care has increased the survival rate of stroke patients, and many patients are left with permanent disability, which makes stroke the main cause of adult disability. Unfortunately, many patients face other severe complications such as post-stroke seizures and epilepsy. Acute seizures (ASS) occur within 1 week after the stroke while later occurring unprovoked seizures are diagnosed as post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Both are associated with a poor prognosis of a functional recovery. The underlying neurobiological mechanisms are complex and poorly understood. There are no universal guidelines on the management of PSE. There is increasing evidence for several risk factors for ASS/PSE, however, the impacts of recanalization, drugs used for secondary prevention of stroke, treatment of stroke co-morbidities and antiseizure medication are currently poorly understood. This review focuses on the common medications that stroke patients are prescribed and potential drug interactions possibly complicating the management of ASS/PSE.

Statins for the Prevention of Post-Stroke Seizure and Epilepsy Development: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of seizures and incident epilepsy of known etiology in older adults. Statins have increasingly garnered attention as a potential preventive strategy due to their pleiotropic effects beyond lipid-lowering, which may include neuroprotective and anti-epileptogenic properties. We aim to assess the evidence on statin use for prevention of post-stroke early-onset seizures and post-stroke epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, which was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019144916). PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to 05/2020 for English-language, full-text studies examining the association between statin use in adults and development of early-onset seizures (≤7 days post-stroke) or post-stroke epilepsy. Pooled analyses were based on random-effects models using the inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

Of 182 citations identified, 175 were excluded due to duplication or ineligibility. The 7 eligible publications were all cohort studies from East Asia or South America, with a total of 53,579 patients. Pre-stroke statin use was not associated with post-stroke epilepsy (3 studies pooled: OR 1.14, CI 0.91-1.42). However, post-stroke statin use was associated with lower risk of both early-onset seizures (3 studies pooled: OR 0.36, CI 0.25-0.53), and post-stroke epilepsy (6 studies pooled: OR 0.64, CI 0.46-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Review of 7 cohort studies suggested post-stroke, but not pre-stroke, statin use may be associated with reduced risk of early-onset seizures and post-stroke epilepsy. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in broader populations and better parse the temporal components of the associations.

Effect of acute and chronic exposure to lovastatin on the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

Numerous studies indicate neuroprotective activity of statins, commonly used cholesterol lowering drugs in epilepsy and several other neurological diseases. Promising anti-convulsant and neuroprotective effects of statins, attributed to their anti-excitotoxic and anti-inflammatory action were reported in several animals' seizure models. To determine the effects of acute (single) and chronic (once daily for 7 consecutive days) administration of lovastatin on the protective activity of four classical antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model. Seizure activity (maximal electroconvulsions) in mice were generated by alternating current delivered via ear-clip electrodes. Adverse-effect profile of lovastatin combinations with the tested antiepileptic drugs was assessed in the chimney test (motor performance). Total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were evaluated with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique as a measure of the pharmacokinetic interaction between drugs. Lovastatin administered acutely or chronically (5-20 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice. Acute lovastatin (10 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant effect of valproate, which was accompanied with a 34% significant increase in total brain concentration of valproate. Acute lovastatin in combination with phenytoin impaired motor performance by notably decreasing the TD₅₀ value of phenytoin. Chronic lovastatin (10 mg/kg) markedly enhanced the anticonvulsant potential of phenytoin. Acute lovastatin increased anticonvulsant action of valproate but also significantly raised level of valproate in brain after combined administration suggesting pharmacokinetic nature of interaction. The combinations of chronic lovastatin combined with phenytoin can potentially enhance the anticonvulsant potency of phenytoin.

Muscle relaxant use and the associated risk of incident frailty in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a longitudinal cohort study

Background:

Patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are at an increased risk of frailty. The exposure to muscle relaxants frequently leads to adverse effects despite their modest therapeutic efficacy, but whether muscle relaxants predispose users to frailty remains unclear.

Methods:

Patients with DKD from a population-based cohort, the Longitudinal Cohort of Diabetes Patients, were identified between 2004 and 2011 (N = 840,000). Muscle relaxant users were propensity score-matched to never-users in a 1:1 ratio based on demographic features, comorbidities, outcome-relevant medications, and prior major interventions. Incident frailty, the study endpoint, was measured according to a modified FRAIL scale. We used Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression to analyze the association between cumulative muscle relaxant use (⩾ 28 days) and the risk of incident frailty.

Results:

Totally, 11,637 users and matched never-users were enrolled, without significant differences regarding baseline clinical features. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that patients with DKD and received muscle relaxants had a significantly higher risk of incident frailty than never-users [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.53]. This increase in frailty risk paralleled that in cumulative muscle relaxant dosages (quartile 1 versus 2 versus 3 versus 4, HR 0.91 versus 1.22 versus 1.38 versus 1.45, p = 0.0013 for trend) and in exposure durations (quartile 1 versus 2 versus 3 versus 4, HR 1.12 versus 1.33 versus 1.23 versus 1.34, p = 0.0145 for trend) of muscle relaxants.

Conclusion:

We found that cumulative muscle relaxant exposure might increase frailty risk. It is prudent to limit muscle relaxant prescription in patients with DKD.

Plain language summary

Does cumulative muscle relaxant exposure increase the risk of incident frailty among patients with diabetic kidney disease?

Background: Frailty denotes a degenerative feature that adversely influences one’s survival and daily function. Patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease are at a higher risk of developing frailty, but whether concurrent medications, especially muscle relaxants, aggravate this risk remains undefined.

Methods: In this population-based study including 11,637 muscle relaxant users and matched never-users with diabetic kidney disease, we used a renowned frailty-assessing tool, FRAIL scale, to assess frailty severity and examined the incidence of frailty brought by muscle relaxant exposure.

Results: We found that users exhibited a 26% higher risk of developing incident frailty compared with never-users, and the probability increased further if users were prescribed higher doses or longer durations of muscle relaxants.

Conclusion: We concluded that in those with diabetic kidney disease, cumulative muscle relaxant use was associated with a higher risk of incident frailty, suggesting that moderation of muscle relaxant use in this population can be of potential importance.

Effects of double-dose statin therapy for the prevention of post-stroke epilepsy: A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

To determine treatment effects on the incidence of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) using different doses of statin, a prospective hospital-based cohort study was designed to explore whether a double-dose statin treatment can better prevent the occurrence of PSE.

METHODS

A total of 1152 patients with newly diagnosed ischemic stroke admitted to our hospital from March to August 2017 were selected, 1033 of whom were followed-up. Patients were divided into two treatment groups:(1) standard-dose (20 mg atorvastatin or 10 mg rosuvastatin,daily oral; 788 patients); and (2) double-dose (40 mg atorvastatin or 20 mg rosuvastatin, daily oral; 245 patients).At 18 months follow-up was conducted to compare the incidence of PSE between groups.

RESULTS

In general, in the standard-dose group we observed two cases of early seizure (ES) (0.25%), 22 cases oflate seizure (LS) (2.79%) and 20 cases of PSE (2.54%). In the double-dose group, onepatient had ES (0.41%), two patients had LS (0.82%), and onepatient had PSE (0.41%). The incidence of PSE was significantly lower in the double-dose group as compared to the standard-dose group. There was a higher proportion of PSE in patients younger than 65 years and in males. Three patients had ES; one presented with focal aware seizure (FAS), and two had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (FBTCS). Among the 21 patients with PSE, there were two cases of FAS, five cases of focal impaired awareness seizure (FIAS), five cases of FBTCS, and nine cases of GTCS, suggesting that partial seizure is the most common type of PSE. Cerebral cortex was involved in 85.75% of cases with PSE, and multiple lobes were involved in 61.9% of cases with PSE.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose of statin treatment during the acute phase of ischemic stroke reduces the incidence of PSE. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the potential preventative effects of statins against PSE.

Impact of Statins on Hematoma, Edema, Seizures, Vascular Events, and Functional Recovery After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The impact of statins on hematoma characteristics, perihemorrhagic edema (PHE), cardiovascular events, seizures, and functional recovery in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is insufficiently studied.

METHODS

Patients with ICH of the prospective UKER-ICH (Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Cohort of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage) study (URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03183167) were analyzed by multivariable regression modeling and propensity score matching, and PHE volumes were volumetrically assessed. Outcomes comprised hematoma characteristics, the impact of continuation, discontinuation, and initiation of statins on peak PHE extent, and the influence of statin treatment on the occurrence of seizures, cardiovascular adverse events, and functional recovery after ICH.

RESULTS

A total of 1275 patients with ICH with information on statin treatment were analyzed. Statin treatment on hospital admission (21.7%) was associated with higher rates of lobar versus nonlobar ICH (odds ratio, 1.57 [1.03-2.40]; P=0.038). Initiation of statins after ICH was associated with increased peak PHE (β=0.12, SE=0.06, P=0.008), whereas continuation versus discontinuation of prior statin treatment was not significantly associated with edema formation (P>0.10). There were no significant differences in the incidence of remote symptomatic seizures according to statin exposure during follow-up (statins: 11.5% versus no statins: 7.8%, subdistribution hazard ratio: 1.15 [0.80-1.66]; P=0.512). Patients on statins revealed less cardiovascular adverse events and more frequently functional recovery after 12 months (functional recovery: 57.7% versus 45.0%, odds ratio 1.67 [1.09-2.56]; P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Among statin users, lobar ICH occurs more frequently as compared with nonstatin users. While continuation of prior statin treatment appears to be safe regarding PHE formation, the initiation of statins during the first days after ICH may increase PHE extent. However, statins should be initiated thereafter (eg, at hospital discharge) to prevent cardiovascular events and potentially improve functional recovery.

Statins in primary prevention of poststroke seizures and epilepsy: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cerebrovascular disease is the most common cause of seizures in adults and the elderly. So far, no drug is recommended as primary prevention of acute symptomatic poststroke seizures (ASPSS) or poststroke epilepsy (PSE). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association between the use of statins after stroke and the risk of developing ASPSS or PSE following cerebral infarct or hemorrhage (primary prevention).

METHODS

We included studies evaluating the poststroke use of statins as primary prevention of ASPSS or PSE, irrespective of stroke type. We excluded uncontrolled studies and studies with prestroke statin use. The main outcome included the occurrence of ASPSS or PSE and the effect of statins by type and dose. The odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the measures of association between treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

Four studies were included. One study showed a reduced risk of ASPSS after ischemic stroke (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10-0.59; p = 0.0016). Three studies consistently reported a reduced risk of PSE after ischemic stroke, and one study a reduced risk of PSE after hemorrhagic stroke (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.90; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the literature suggest an association between statin use and a reduced risk of ASPSS after ischemic stroke and a reduced risk of PSE after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Although the certainty of the evidence is low, these findings appear promising and worthy of further investigation.

Statin use and the risk of post-stroke seizures: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The magnitude of association between statin use and post-stroke seizures (PSS) risk remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate this issue.

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic libraries, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases, for relevant clinical studies. The main outcome was the risk of early PSS and the risk of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). The pooled relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the association between statin treatment and risks of early PSS and PSE.

RESULTS

A total of 7 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included. For early PSS risk, statin use was associated with a lower risk of early PSS (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25-0.53; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on the prescribing timing of statins showed that pre-stroke statin use was not associated with the risk of early PSS; post-stroke statin use was associated with a lower risk of early PSS (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.54; p < 0.001). For PSE risk, statin use was associated with a lower risk of PSE (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92; p = 0.017). Further subgroup analyses based on the prescribing timing of statins indicated that pre-stroke statin use was not associated with the risk of PSE; post-stroke statin use was associated with a lower risk of PSE (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.70; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin treatment, especially the post-statin treatment, was associated with lower risks of early PSS and PSE.

The influence of statins on the risk of post-stroke epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Currently, statins are widely used for secondary prevention of stroke due to their pleiotropic neuroprotective effects. Epilepsy is a common complication of cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on the occurrence of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients who suffered an ischemic stroke and without history of epilepsy before stroke were enrolled. At baseline, patients were classified according to the particularities of statin therapy. Statin use onset and adherence to treatment were registered as well. After a follow-up period of 1 year, we assessed the occurrence of seizures and PSE.

RESULTS

Among the 477 patients included in our cohort, there were 91 (19.1%) patients without statins, 160 (33.5%) with simvastatin 20 mg, 180 (37.7%) with simvastatin 40 mg, and 46 (9.6%) with high-potency statins. Overall, PSE emerged in 53 (11.1%) patients. PSE was significantly more prevalent among those who did not receive statins and those with lower doses of simvastatin. Acute onset of statin use was associated with reduced odds of having PSE.

CONCLUSION

Adequate treatment with statins after stroke may lower the risk of PSE.

Statin treatment can reduce incidence of early seizure in acute ischemic stroke: A propensity score analysis

A previous study showed early statin administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was associated with a lower risk of early-onset seizure (ES), which is a high risk of epilepsy, but this retrospective study design may not have eliminated confounding factor effects. We aimed to verify the determinants and prognostic significance of ES and clarify the effects of statin administration. Consecutive AIS patients without a history of epilepsy were enrolled. The relationship between ES (within 7 days of index-stroke) and statin treatment was assessed using multivariate and propensity scores (PS). Of 2,969 patients with AIS, 1,623 (54.6%) were treated with statin, and 66 (2.2%) developed ES. In logistic regression models, cortical stroke lesion [odds ratio (OR), 2.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29–7.28) and pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale (per 1 point) (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18–1.65) were higher risks for ES, while statin significantly reduced the risk of ES (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24–0.79). In accordance with PS-matching, statin treatment produced consistent results for ES after adjusting by inverse probability of treatment-weighting PS (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22–0.75). In conclusion, as previously, statin treatment was independently associated with a lower risk of ES in AIS.

Early in-hospital exposure to statins and outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage - Results from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive

Introduction

Recent data suggest that statin use after intracerebral haemorrhage might be beneficial. However, data on the effects of early in-hospital statin exposure are lacking. Therefore, we sought to assess whether (1) early statin exposure during the acute phase after intracerebral haemorrhage and (2) early continuation of prevalent statin use are associated with favourable functional outcome.

Patients and methods

Data were obtained from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. Patients were categorised according to use patterns of statins during this early in-hospital phase (continuation, discontinuation or new initiation of statins). Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to explore the association between early statin exposure and functional outcome.

Results

A total of 919 patients were included in the analysis. Early in-hospital statin exposure (n = 89, 9.7%) was associated with better functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) compared with 790 patients without statin exposure before or early after the event (66% versus 47%, adjusted OR 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.6). Compared with patients without exposure to statins before and early after the event, early continuation of statin therapy (n = 57) was associated with favourable functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.2). The association between early continuation of statins and outcome remained robust in sensitivity analyses restricted to patients able to take oral medication within 72 h and one-week survivors.

Discussion

It is possible that part of the observed associations are not due to a protective effect of statins but are confounded by indication bias.

Conclusion

Statin exposure and continuation of prevalent statin therapy early after intracerebral haemorrhage are associated with favourable functional outcome after 90 days.

Statin use associated with lower risk of epilepsy after intracranial haemorrhage: A population-based cohort study

AIMS

To examine the association between statin use before and after intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and the risk of poststroke epilepsy (PSE).

METHODS

Patients with new-onset ICH between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The main outcome was the occurrence of epilepsy after stroke. Multivariable Cox regression modelling was used to estimate the association between statin use and the risk of PSE, with poststroke medication exposures being treated as time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 7435 patients with ICH were enrolled with a median follow-up of 17.6 months. Within the study cohort, 709 patients developed PSE. Poststroke, but not prestroke, stain use was associated with a reduced risk of PSE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.90, P = 0.01). In subanalyses, a trend of a dose-response relationship was observed. A significant PSE risk reduction was correlated with a higher cumulative statin dose. Moreover, the risk of PSE was lower in patients receiving moderate-to-high-intensity statin therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.75, P = 0.01). Lipophilic and hydrophilic statins were similar with regard to their associations with the reduced risk of PSE.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy may reduce the risk of PSE after ICH, especially with moderate-to-high therapy intensity. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the potential protective effects of statins against PSE in this patient population.