Further evidence for the hepatotoxic potential of metamizole

A brief overview of chikungunya-related pain

Pain is an important symptom associated with the arboviral disease caused by the Chikungunya virus (CHIKV). For a significant number of patients, this symptom can persist for months or even years, negatively affecting their quality of life. Unfortunately, pharmacological options for this condition are limited and only partially effective, as the underlying mechanisms associated with CHIKV-induced pain are still poorly understood. The re-emergence of CHIKV has led to new outbreaks, and the expected high prevalence of pain in these global events requires new scientific advances to find more effective solutions. Here we review the main aspects of pain caused by CHIKV infection, such as the anatomy of the affected sites, the prevalence and management of this symptom, the diversity of possible cellular and molecular mechanisms, and finally highlight a promising meningeal pathway to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the unsolved problem of CHIKV-associated pain.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Caused by Metamizole: Identification of a Characteristic Injury Pattern

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to metamizole has gained increasing attention. Causality assessment remains a challenge, especially in patients with co-medications. We therefore aimed to further characterise metamizole DILI cases.

METHODS

The data of patients with metamizole intake from our prospective study on acute liver injury with potential drug-related causes were analysed. Diagnosis and causality assessment were based on a thorough work-up and long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

DILI was associated with metamizole in 61 of 324 DILI patients (prevalence 18.8%). A highly characteristic clinical pattern was observed in 43 of the 61 patients, characterised by marked elevation of transaminases peaking at the time of DILI recognition and a more pronounced increase of bilirubin within the first 3 days of clinical presentation. Patients fitting this picture had higher rates of jaundice, coagulopathy, and acute liver failure, however outcomes did not differ significantly when compared to non-metamizole DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients. Overall, fatal adverse outcomes defined by death or liver transplantation were observed in 13.1% of metamizole DILI patients. On multivariate analysis, only aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and INR were independently associated with a fatal adverse outcome. INR, in particular, performed better than Hy's law, bilirubin, transaminases, and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), with a c-statistic of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70-1.0). At a cut-off of ≥ 2.1, sensitivity and specificity for a fatal adverse outcome were 75% and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Metamizole DILI can present with a characteristic pattern that can help clinicians to identify metamizole as the causative agent. Outcome, however, is not associated with this clinical picture and should rather be predicted by INR at onset.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02353455.

Metamizole in the Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Current Concept Review

Metamizole, or dipyrone, has been used for decades as a non-narcotic analgesic, providing pain relief from musculoskeletal disorders and antipyretic and antispasmolytic properties. Despite being in use since the 1920s, its mechanism of action still needs to be discovered. Despite causing fewer adverse effects when compared to other analgesics, its harmful effects on the blood and lack of evidence regarding its teratogenicity make the usage of the drug questionable, which has led to it being removed from the drug market of various countries. This narrative review aims to provide a detailed insight into the mechanism of action and efficacy, comparing its effectiveness and safety with other classes of drugs and the safety profile of metamizole.

Parenteral Ready-to-Use Fixed-Dose Combinations Including NSAIDs with Paracetamol or Metamizole for Multimodal Analgesia-Approved Products and Challenges

The combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with non-opioid analgesics is common in clinical practice for the treatment of acute painful conditions like post-operative and post-traumatic pain. Despite the satisfactory results achieved by oral analgesics, parenteral analgesia remains a key tool in the treatment of painful conditions when the enteral routes of administration are inconvenient. Parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combinations of non-opioid analgesics combinations, including NSAIDs and paracetamol or metamizole, could play a central role in the treatment of painful conditions by combining the advantages of multimodal and parenteral analgesia in a single formulation. Surprisingly, only in 2020, a parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combination of ibuprofen/paracetamol was launched to the market. This review aims to investigate the current availability of combinations of NSAIDs with paracetamol or metamizole in both European and American markets, and how the combination of such drugs could play a central role in a multimodal analgesia strategy. Also, we explored how the parenteral formulations of NSAIDs, paracetamol, and metamizole could serve as starting elements for the development of new parenteral ready-to-use fixed-dose combinations. We concluded that, despite the well-recognized utility of combining NSAIDs with paracetamol or metamizole, several randomized clinical trial studies demonstrate no clear advantages concerning their efficacy and safety. Future clinical trials specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pre-formulated fixed-dose combinations are required to generate solid evidence about their clinical advantages.

Marked Increase of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase as an Indicator of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients without Conventional Diagnostic Criteria of Acute Liver Injury

INTRODUCTION

Clinically significant drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is defined by elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 × ULN, or ALT ≥3 × ULN and total bilirubin TBIL >2 × ULN. However, DILI might also occur in patients who do not reach those thresholds and still may benefit from discontinuation of medication.

METHODS

Fifteen patients recruited for our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs were included. DILI diagnosis was based on RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and expert opinion and was supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells.

RESULTS

Median RUCAM score was 6 (range 4-8), indicating that DILI was possible or probable in all cases. The predominant types of liver injury were mixed (60%) and cholestatic (40%). While no elevation above 2 × ULN of ALP and TBIL was observed, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) above 2 × ULN was identified in 8 of the patients. Six of the 15 patients did not achieve full remission and showed persistent elevation of GGT, which was significantly associated with peak GGT elevation above 2 × ULN (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Here we present a case series of patients with liver enzyme elevation below the conventional thresholds who developed DILI with a predominant GGT elevation leading to drug withdrawal and/or chronic elevation of liver parameters, in particular of GGT. Thus, we propose that DILI should be considered in particular in cases with marked increase of GGT even if conventional DILI threshold levels are not reached, resulting in discontinuation of the causative drug and/or close monitoring of the patients.

Is There an Increased Risk of Hepatotoxicity with Metamizole? A Comparative Cohort Study in Incident Users

INTRODUCTION

The analgesic metamizole, which has been withdrawn from the market in several countries due to the risk of agranulocytosis but is still available on the market in Germany and some other countries, has been associated with liver injury in published case reports; however, epidemiological studies on the risk of liver injury are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of liver injury up to 270 days after the first start of treatment with metamizole with the corresponding risk in patients starting treatment with paracetamol, using a retrospective cohort incident user design.

METHODS

The first prescription for either metamizole or paracetamol in the Intercontinental Medical Statistics (IMS)^® Disease Analyzer Germany database during the study period (2009-2018) was identified in patients with at least 365 days of observation and no prior diagnosis of liver events, cancer or HIV, or treatment within the last 6 months with hepatotoxic drugs typically administered for chronic conditions. Each patient was followed for specific liver events for 90 days after the prescription. In case of a new prescription within 90 days, a new 90-day observation period started, up to a maximum of 270 days. Cox regression was used to compare the risk of liver injury in the two groups.

RESULTS

Metamizole was associated with a higher risk of liver injury compared with paracetamol (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.97). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of these findings. In all the sensitivity analyses, metamizole was still associated with a higher risk of liver injury, including an analysis where naproxen was used as a comparator instead of paracetamol.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study support previous studies suggesting that metamizole is associated with a significant risk of liver injury. Nevertheless, a possible impact of residual confounding cannot be excluded.