Fluoroquinolones as a trigger for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A case-crossover analysis

Fluoroquinolones and the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection: A population-based propensity score-matched German cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection associated with fluoroquinolone (FQ) prescription compared to macrolides in German routine health care data in order to replicate the recent study (Pharmacotherapy 2023;43:883) extending the results by contributing evidence for six additional broad-spectrum antibiotic classes as active comparators.

DESIGN

Cohort study in active comparator new user design comparing FQ with macrolides, tetracyclines, penicillins with extended spectrum, penicillins and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, second- and third-generation cephalosporins, sulfonamide and trimethoprim combinations, and lincosamides.

SETTING

German statutory health insurance, the "Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse" (AOK), January 2013 to December 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with at least one new prescription fill for FQ or active comparator antibiotics. New users were defined as individuals without antibiotic prescription fills, aortic aneurysm or dissection diagnoses, and hospitalization within 365 days prior to the cohort entry date. Users of FQ and active comparators were matched by nearest neighbor 1:1 propensity score matching.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incident inpatient aortic aneurysm or dissection was observed within a 60-day risk window. In sensitivity analyses, an extended risk window of 90 days was applied, and specific FQ agents, dosages, and diagnoses were stratified.

RESULTS

FQ episodes were associated with an increased risk for aortic aneurysm or dissection compared to macrolides (aHR = 1.52 [1.33; 1.74]), which replicates the risk estimate of Garg et al. (aHR = 1.34 [1.17; 1.54]). This association was robust in a 90-day risk window and for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin comprised the greatest risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection compared to macrolides (aHR = 2.13 [1.64; 2.77]). Moreover, we observed similar associations when comparing FQ to tetracyclines, penicillins with extended spectrum, cephalosporins, and lincosamides (aHR = 1.86 [1.54; 2.24], aHR = 1.45 [1.28; 1.65], aHR = 1.23 [1.10; 1.37], and aHR = 1.73 [1.43; 2.11]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a German cohort study, FQ use was associated with a 52% increased risk for aortic aneurysm or dissection within 60 days compared with macrolide use. The risk of FQ-associated aortic aneurysm or dissection compared to macrolides can be replicated in German routine health care data. Extending the analysis, we provided new insights that the effect size may depend on the chosen AC.

Exploring Drug Re-Purposing for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) present a significant mortality risk. While numerous medical interventions have been proposed, no drugs have convincingly reduced AAA progression, rupture rates, or repair risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of re-purposed drugs or dietary supplements on slowing expansion rates, reducing the risk of rupture, or minimising the risk of repair for individuals with AAA.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in five databases. Both observational studies and randomised controlled trials were included. Unpublished data from two screening trials were incorporated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed for each identified drug subclass and were stratified by overall risk of bias. Results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 7 484 screened studies, 39 met the inclusion criteria. No studies on dietary supplements were included. A total of 84 cohorts were derived from the included studies, and twelve distinct drug groups underwent meta-analyses. Two drug groups, metformin and statins, were statistically significant in slowing AAA growth. No low risk of bias studies were included for these two drug groups, and the results had very high heterogeneity (I2 > 80%). Both groups had a GRADE certainty of very low. Metformin, excluding high risk of bias studies, presented an estimated mean growth difference of AAA diameter between users and non-users of -0.73 mm/year, whilst statins had an overall estimated mean difference of -0.84 mm/year.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that metformin and statins may provide some effect in slowing AAA progression. However, no definitive evidence was found for any of the investigated drugs included in this study. Further research is needed to identify effective medical treatments for AAA progression with more robust methodology.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Evaluating the use of methods to mitigate bias from non-transient medications in the case-crossover design: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The case-crossover design is a self-controlled study design used to compare exposure immediately preceding an event occurrence with exposure in earlier control periods. The design is most suitable for transient exposures in order to avoid biases that can be problematic when using the case-crossover design for non-transient (i.e., chronic) exposures. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review of case-crossover studies and its variants (case-time-control and case-case-time-control) in order to compare design and analysis choices by medication type.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search to identify recent case-crossover, case-time-control, and case-case-time-control studies focused on medication exposures. Articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE using these study designs that were published between January 2015 and December 2021 in the English language were identified. Reviews, methodological studies, commentaries, articles without medications as the exposure of interest, and articles with no available full text were excluded. Study characteristics including study design, outcome, risk window, control window, reporting of discordant pairs, and inclusion of sensitivity analyses were summarized overall and by medication type. We further evaluated the implementation of recommended methods to account for biases introduced by non-transient exposures among articles that used the case-crossover design on a non-transient exposure.

RESULTS

Of the 2036 articles initially identified, 114 articles were included. The case-crossover was the most common study design (88%), followed by the case-time-control (17%), and case-case-time-control (3%). Fifty-three percent of the articles included only transient medications, 35% included only non-transient medications, and 12% included both. Across years, the proportion of case-crossover articles evaluating a non-transient medication ranged from 30% in 2018 to 69% in 2017. We found that 41% of the articles that evaluated a non-transient medication did not apply any of the recommended methods to account for biases and more than half of which were conducted by authors with no previous publication history of case-crossover studies.

CONCLUSION

Using the case-crossover design to evaluate a non-transient medication remains common in pharmacoepidemiology. Researchers should apply appropriate design and analysis choices when opting to use a case-crossover design with non-transient medication exposures.

A hiPSC-derived lineage-specific vascular smooth muscle cell-on-a-chip identifies aortic heterogeneity across segments

Aortic aneurysm (AA), a potentially lethal condition with the characteristic of aortic dilatation, can only be treated by surgical or endovascular procedures. The underlying mechanisms of AA are unclear and early preventive treatment is still insufficient due to segmental aortic heterogeneity and the limitations of current disease models. Here, we firstly established a comprehensive lineage-specific vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC)-on-a-chip model using human induced pluripotent stem cells to yield cell lineages representing different segments of the aorta and tested the constructed organ-on-a-chip model under various tensile stress conditions. Bulk RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence, western blot and FACS analyses were performed to discover the segmental aortic heterogeneity of response for tensile stress and drug testing. The appropriate stretching frequency for all lineages of SMCs was 1.0 Hz, paraxial mesoderm (PM) SMCs were more sensitive to tensile stress than lateral mesoderm (LM) SMCs and neural crest (NC) SMCs. These differences may be related to the different transcriptional profiles of the tension-stressed distinct lineage-specific vascular SMCs, specifically in relation to the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Also, the organ-on-a-chip displayed contractile physiology, perfect fluid coordination, and was conducive to drug testing, displaying heterogeneous segmental aortic responses. Compared with LM-SMCs and NC-SMCs, PM-SMCs were more sensitive to ciprofloxacin. The model is evaluated as a novel and suitable supplement to AA animal models for determining differential physiology and drug response in different parts of the aorta. Furthermore, this system could pave the way for disease modeling, drug testing, and the personalized treatment of patients with AA in the future.

Research advances in drug therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysms over the past five years: An updated narrative review

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) rupture can lead to patient death. Surgical treatment is currently the optimal treatment for AAA with large diameter (≥50 mm). For AAA with small diameter (30-50 mm), how to administer effective pharmacological treatment to reduce aneurysm expansion rate and rupture risk is the current focus in the field of vascular surgery. There is still no effective drug for the treatment of asymptomatic AAA.

METHODS

This article searches the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for clinical studies on the drug treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the past 5 years. The latest progress in the drug treatment of AAA was reviewed, including antibiotics, antihypertensive drugs, antiplatelet drugs, hypoglycemic drugs, hypolipidemic drugs, mast cell inhibitors and corticosteroids.

RESULTS

25 studies were included in this narrative review. Among them, metformin revealed therapeutic effect in 2 prospective cohort study and 3 retrospective cohort study. The therapeutic effect of statins was controversial in 3 retrospective cohort study. However, the definite therapeutic effects of antihypertensive agents, antibiotics, mast cell inhibitors, antiplatelet agents and corticosteroids on abdominal aortic aneurysms have not been verified in prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

Metformin provided a positive effect in reducing expansion rate, rupture risk, and perioperative mortality. The therapeutic effect of statins was controversial, which warrant further validation in prospective cohorts. However, there is still a lack of effective agents for the treatment of AAA based on recent studies.

Do fluoroquinolones increase aortic aneurysm or dissection incidence and mortality? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the association between fluoroquinolones (FQs) use, the risk of de novo aortic aneurysm or dissection (AAD), and the prognosis of patients with pre-existing AAD.

Materials and methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science on 31 March 2022. Observational studies that evaluated the association of FQs with AAD risk in the general population or FQs with the prognosis of patients with preexisting AAD and presented adjusted effect estimates were included. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results

Of the 13 included studies, 11 focused on the association of FQs with de novo AAD incidence, and only one study investigated the association of FQs with the patient with AAD prognosis. FQ use was associated with an increased risk of de novo AAD within 30 days (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.11-1.81; very low certainty) and 60 days (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.26-1.64; low certainty). Specifically, the association was significant when compared with amoxicillin, azithromycin, doxycycline, or no antibiotic use. Furthermore, patients with preexisting AAD exposure to FQ had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.50-1.73; moderate certainty) and aortic-specific mortality (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.50-2.15; moderate certainty), compared to the non-exposed FQ group within a 60-day risk period.

Conclusion

FQs were associated with an increased incidence of AAD in the general population and a higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients with preexisting AAD. Nevertheless, the results may be affected by unmeasured confounding factors. This should be considered by physicians contemplating using FQs in patients with aortic dilation and those at high risk of AAD.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021230171].