Risk factors for polyuria in a cross-section of community psychiatric lithium-treated patients

ENaC inhibitors for the management of lithium related polyuria: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

By entering collecting duct principal cells via the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), lithium is capable of inducing vasopressin insensitivity, resulting in excessive urine production, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) and potential for other long-term forms of renal dysfunction. ENaC inhibitors (ENaC-I) such as amiloride have been shown in animal models to minimise this adverse effect, and while ENaC-I are often considered an effective strategy, the literature on ENaC-I for lithium-related polyuria has not yet been synthesised despite the importance of this topic. This review aimed to identify all published evidence for adjunctive use of an ENaC-I for lithium-related polyuria to estimate its effectiveness while also exploring potential moderators of effectiveness.

METHOD

The systematic search covered databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO complemented by handsearches, aiming to identify all studies of ENaC-I interventions in lithium-treated patients with pre- and post-ENaC-I polyuria as outcomes.

RESULTS

10 studies totalling 25 participants were eligible for inclusion and were synthesised narratively. Amiloride was the ENaC-I used in 24/25 participants, and triamterene in the other. 8/10 publications were single case reports, 4 of which presented substantial confounding issues. Clear improvements to polyuria were demonstrated in most papers, including the two larger studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it appears very likely that ENaC inhibitors help ameliorate polyuria in lithium-treated patients, the quantity and quality of evidence is low. Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, intervention characteristics and study designs limit conclusions regarding the contribution of factors likely to influence ENaC-I effectiveness for lithium-induced polyuria. Besides, adverse effects require further exploration.

Lithium Ions as Modulators of Complex Biological Processes: The Conundrum of Multiple Targets, Responsiveness and Non-Responsiveness, and the Potential to Prevent or Correct Dysregulation of Systems during Aging and in Disease

Lithium is one of the lightest elements on Earth and it has been in the environment since the formation of the galaxy. While a common element, it has not been found to be an essential element in biological processes, ranging from single cell organisms to Homo sapiens. Instead, at an early stage of evolution, organisms committed to a range of elements such as sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and iron to serve essential functions. Such ions serve critical functions in ion channels, as co-factors in enzymes, as a cofactor in oxygen transport, in DNA replication, as a storage molecule in bone and liver, and in a variety of other roles in biological processes. While seemingly excluded from a major essential role in such processes, lithium ions appear to be able to modulate a variety of biological processes and "correct" deviation from normal activity, as a deficiency of lithium can have biological consequences. Lithium salts are found in low levels in many foods and water supplies, but the effectiveness of Li salts to affect biological systems came to recent prominence with the work of Cade, who reported that administrating Li salts calmed guinea pigs and was subsequently effective at relatively high doses to "normalize" a subset of patients with bipolar disorders. Because of its ability to modulate many biological pathways and processes (e.g., cyclic AMP, GSK-3beta, inositol metabolism, NaK ATPases, neuro processes and centers, immune-related events, respectively) both in vitro and in vivo and during development and adult life, Li salts have become both a useful tool to better understand the molecular regulation of such processes and to also provide insights into altered biological processes in vivo during aging and in disease states. While the range of targets for lithium action supports its possible role as a modulator of biological dysregulation, it presents a conundrum for researchers attempting to elucidate its specific primary target in different tissues in vivo. This review will discuss aspects of the state of knowledge regarding some of the systems that can be influenced, focusing on those involving neural and autoimmunity as examples, some of the mechanisms involved, examples of how Li salts can be used to study model systems, as well as suggesting areas where the use of Li salts could lead to additional insights into both disease mechanisms and natural processes at the molecular and cell levels. In addition, caveats regarding lithium doses used, the strengths and weaknesses of rodent models, the background genetics of the strain of mice or rats employed, and the sex of the animals or the cells used, are discussed. Low-dose lithium may have excellent potential, alone or in combination with other interventions to prevent or alleviate aging-associated conditions and disease progression.

Psychotropic Drugs and Adverse Kidney Effects: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade of Research

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Psychotropic drugs are a heterogenous group of treatments prescribed for many psychiatric disorders, often for long periods. Their effects on the kidney and its functioning are complex and a source of significant research and debate. This article aims to review recent evidence of the acute and chronic kidney adverse events of diverse psychotropes.

METHODS

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials and large observational studies (n ≥ 100) reporting the effects of psychotropic drugs on the kidney was conducted. The MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and EMBASE databases from 2011 to 2021, inclusive, were broadly searched with few restrictions and no prespecified outcomes. Two or more independent reviewers assessed and summarized all eligible studies, including risks of bias and levels of evidence.

RESULTS

In all, 1999 abstracts were screened for eligibility and 47 articles were included, which examined lithium (33), antiepileptics (10), antipsychotics (13), and antidepressants (9). No studies examining kidney adverse effects of other psychotropes, such as benzodiazepines, met inclusion criteria. Study populations were adult (8), geriatric (9), and mixed (30). Lithium was almost unanimously associated with (1) chronic kidney disease and (2) nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in methodologically diverse studies. The most supported risk factors for declining kidney functioning with lithium were advanced age, duration of lithium treatment, acute lithium toxicity, female sex, medications with known renal interactions, diabetes mellitus/hyperglycemia, and overall medical comorbidity. Supratherapeutic lithium concentrations are both the causes and consequences of acute kidney injury. Once significant chronic kidney disease has developed, four studies found that replacing lithium with other mood stabilizers does not slow progression, and the evolution to end-stage kidney disease is rare overall with modern practices. Compared to lithium, fewer studies examined antipsychotics and antiepileptics but found relatively less direct kidney harms. Antidepressants were not associated with acute or chronic kidney harms.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the heterogeneity of findings, owing to varying methodologies and research challenges, recent studies strongly suggest that lithium is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, especially in older adults and long-term lithium users. Clinicians should balance the harms of lithium against its established benefits, and ensure adequate monitoring and management of comorbidities in all patients. Weaker evidence suggests that antiepileptics such as valproate and antipsychotics result in comparatively less harm to the kidney than lithium, but warrant monitoring because of multiple direct and indirect mechanisms for potential kidney adverse events. Antidepressants do not have clear kidney adverse effects and appear safe (though potentially less effective) in the setting of kidney disease. Other classes of psychotropic drugs have received little research interest. Further research is warranted, particularly into specific antiepileptics and antipsychotics, and careful attention should be paid to mitigating important sources of bias such as confounding by indication.

Chronic lithium therapy and urine concentrating ability in individuals with bipolar disorder: association between daily dose and resistance to vasopressin and polyuria

Introduction

Lithium treatment can induce nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI), but no consensus intervention is offered to date. We evaluated in these patients patterns of urine concentration and the correlates of 24-hour urine output.

Methods

Prospective, single-center, observational study of 217 consecutive lithium-treated individuals, with 24-hour urine collection, desmopressin (1-deamino-arginine vasopressin [DDAVP]) concentrating test, fasting plasma vasopressin measurement (copeptin measurement in n = 119), and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Maximal urine osmolality (MaxUosm) was the highest level during the DDAVP test.

Results

Of the individuals, 21% displayed polyuria (>3 l/d), but 55% displayed elevated fasting vasopressin level (>5 pg/ml). Uosm was significantly lower and urinary output and free water clearance were significantly higher in individuals treated for >10 years. MaxUosm was >600 mOsm/KgH₂O in 128 patients (59%), among which vasopressin was increased in 51%, associated with higher lithium dose (950 [750–1200] vs. 800 [500–1000] mg/d, P < 0.001). All patients with lithium daily dose ≥1400 mg/d had high vasopressin levels. In multivariable analysis, 24-hour urine output was associated with higher lithium daily dose (β 0.49 ± 0.17, P = 0.005), female sex (β −359 ± 123, P = 0.004), daily osmolar intake (β 2.21 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), MaxUosm (β −2.89 ± 0.35, P < 0.001), and plasma vasopressin level (β 10.17 ± 4.76, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Higher lithium daily dose was associated with higher vasopressin levels and higher urine output, independently of other factors. Daily osmolar intake was also associated with higher 24-hour urine output. These results suggest that controlled salt and protein intake and lithium dose might reduce polyuria in these patients.

Managing polyuria during lithium treatment: a preliminary prospective observational study

Objectives:

Lithium-treated patients with polyuria are at increased risk of lithium toxicity. We aimed to describe the clinical benefits and risks of different management strategies for polyuria in community lithium-treated patients.

Methods:

This is a naturalistic, observational, prospective 12-month cohort study of lithium-treated patients with polyuria attending a community mental health service in Dublin, Ireland. When polyuria was detected, management changed in one of four ways: (a) no pharmacological change; (b) lithium dose decrease; (c) lithium substitution; or (d) addition of amiloride.

Results:

Thirty-four participants were diagnosed with polyuria and completed prospective data over 12 months. Mean 24-hour urine volume decreased from 4852 to 4344 ml (p = 0.038). Mean early morning urine osmolality decreased from 343 to 338 mOsm/kg (p = 0.823). Mean 24-hour urine volume decreased with each type of intervention but did not attain statistical significance for any individual intervention group. Mean early morning urine osmolality decreased in participants with no pharmacological change and increased in participants who received a change in medication but these changes did not attain statistical significance. Only participants who discontinued lithium demonstrated potentially clinically significant changes in urine volume (mean decrease 747 ml in 24 hours) and early morning urine osmolality (mean increase 31 mOsm/kg) although this was not definitively proven, possibly owing to power issues.

Conclusions:

Managing polyuria by decreasing lithium dose does not appear to substantially improve objective measures of renal tubular dysfunction, whereas substituting lithium may do so. Studies with larger numbers and longer follow-up would clarify these relationships.

Atorvastatin in the treatment of Lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: the protocol of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lithium is the gold-standard treatment for bipolar disorder, is highly effective in treating major depressive disorder, and has anti-suicidal properties. However, clinicians are increasingly avoiding lithium largely due to fears of renal toxicity. Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus (NDI) occurs in 15-20% of lithium users and predicts a 2-3 times increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We recently found that use of statins is associated with lower NDI risk in a cross-sectional study. In this current paper, we describe the methodology of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to treat lithium-induced NDI using atorvastatin.

METHODS

We will conduct a 12-week, double-blind placebo-controlled RCT of atorvastatin for lithium-induced NDI at McGill University, Montreal, Canada. We will recruit 60 current lithium users, aged 18-85, who have indicators of NDI, which we defined as urine osmolality (UOsm) < 600 mOsm/kg after 10-h fluid restriction. We will randomize patients to atorvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. We will examine whether this improves measures of NDI: UOsm and aquaporin (AQP2) excretion at 12-week follow-up, adjusted for baseline.

RESULTS

Not applicable.

CONCLUSION

The aim of this clinical trial is to provide preliminary data about the efficacy of atorvastatin in treating NDI. If successful, lithium could theoretically be used more safely in patients with a reduced subsequent risk of CKD, hypernatremia, and acute kidney injury (AKI). If future definitive trials confirm this, this could potentially allow more patients to benefit from lithium, while minimizing renal risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02967653 . Registered in February 2017.

Ginsenoside-Rb1 ameliorates lithium-induced nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity: Differential regulation of COX-2/PGE2 pathway

To investigate the effect of Ginsenoside-Rb1 (GRb1) on lithium (Li⁺)-induced toxicity, GRb1 was given to rats orally (100mg/kg) for 14days. In independent groups, lithium chloride (4meq/kg/day i.p.) was administered at day 4 of the experiment for 10days, with or without GRb1. Li⁺ caused significant deterioration of behavioral responses including righting reflex, spontaneous motor activity and catalepsy. Li⁺ also caused distortion in normal renal, cerebral and cerebellum architecture and significantly worsened all kidney functional parameters tested compared to control. In addition, Li caused oxidative stress in both kidney and brain, evident by significant increase in malondialdehyde and nitric oxide levels, with decrease in reduced glutathione and catalase activity. Administration of GRb1 prior to Li⁺ significantly improved behavioral responses, renal and brain histopathological picture, kidney function tests and oxidative stress markers compared to sole Li⁺-treated group. Concomitant administration of GRb1 decreased Li⁺ levels by about 50% in serum, urine and brain and by 35% in the kidney. Interestingly, Li⁺ had a differential effect on cyclooxygenase (COX)-2/prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) pathway, as it significantly increased COX-2 expression and PGE₂ level in the kidney, while decreasing them in the brain compared to control. On the other hand, administering GRb1 with Li⁺ suppressed COX-2/PGE₂ pathway in both kidney and brain compared to Li⁺ alone. In conclusion, GRb1 can alter Li⁺ pharmacokinetics resulting in extensively decreasing its serum and tissue concentrations. Furthermore, COX-2/PGE₂ pathway has a mechanistic role in the nephro- and neuro-protective effects of GRb1 against Li⁺-induced toxicity.

TCF7L2 mediates the cellular and behavioral response to chronic lithium treatment in animal models

The mechanism of lithium's therapeutic action remains obscure, hindering the discovery of safer treatments for bipolar disorder. Lithium can act as an inhibitor of the kinase GSK3α/β, which in turn negatively regulates β-catenin, a co-activator of LEF1/TCF transcription factors. However, unclear is whether therapeutic levels of lithium activate β-catenin in the brain, and whether this activation could have a therapeutic significance. To address this issue we chronically treated mice with lithium. Although the level of non-phospho-β-catenin increased in all of the brain areas examined, β-catenin translocated into cellular nuclei only in the thalamus. Similar results were obtained when thalamic and cortical neurons were treated with a therapeutically relevant concentration of lithium in vitro. We tested if TCF7L2, a member of LEF1/TCF family that is highly expressed in the thalamus, facilitated the activation of β-catenin. Silencing of Tcf7l2 in thalamic neurons prevented β-catenin from entering the nucleus, even when the cells were treated with lithium. Conversely, when Tcf7l2 was ectopically expressed in cortical neurons, β-catenin shifted to the nucleus, and lithium augmented this process. Lastly, we silenced tcf7l2 in zebrafish and exposed them to lithium for 3 days, to evaluate whether TCF7L2 is involved in the behavioral response. Lithium decreased the dark-induced activity of control zebrafish, whereas the activity of zebrafish with tcf7l2 knockdown was unaltered. We conclude that therapeutic levels of lithium activate β-catenin selectively in thalamic neurons. This effect is determined by the presence of TCF7L2, and potentially contributes to the therapeutic response.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Tests for Polyuria in Lithium-Treated Patients

In lithium-treated patients, polyuria increases the risk of dehydration and lithium toxicity. If detected early, it is reversible. Despite its prevalence and associated morbidity in clinical practice, it remains underrecognized and therefore undertreated. The 24-hour urine collection is limited by its convenience and practicality. This study explores the diagnostic accuracy of alternative tests such as questionnaires on subjective polyuria, polydipsia, nocturia (dichotomous and ordinal responses), early morning urine sample osmolality (EMUO), and fluid intake record (FIR). This is a cross-sectional study of 179 lithium-treated patients attending a general adult and an old age psychiatry service. Participants completed the tests after completing an accurate 24-hour urine collection. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual tests was explored using the appropriate statistical techniques. Seventy-nine participants completed all of the tests. Polydipsia severity, EMUO, and FIR significantly differentiated the participants with polyuria (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.646, 0.760, and 0.846, respectively). Of the tests investigated, the FIR made the largest significant change in the probability that a patient experiences polyuria (<2000 mL/24 hours; interval likelihood ratio, 0.18 and >3500 mL/24 hours; interval likelihood ratio, 14). Symptomatic questioning, EMUO, and an FIR could be used in clinical practice to inform the prescriber of the probability that a lithium-treated patient is experiencing polyuria.