Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor

Episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander nulliparous individuals in California

Background

Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals have increased risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. The Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander population in the US is diverse yet few studies disaggregate results within specific ethnicity populations.

Objective

This study investigated the variability in risks for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 disaggregated Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander groups, compared to Non-Hispanic White nulliparous individuals, and assessed what factors may explain the variability in risk.

Study design

Birth and fetal death certificate files linked to hospital discharge records were used to identify nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex vaginal deliveries among California births, 2007 to 2020. Poisson regression models were used to examine risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration among 16 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ethnicity subgroups compared with Non-Hispanic White individuals. Sequential adjustment was utilized to assess if maternal social, health-related, and delivery-related factors may explain the variability in risk for episiotomy and severe perineal laceration.

Results

Among the 224,964 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals in this study cohort, the overall prevalence of episiotomy was 18.5% (N = 41,559) and prevalence of severe perineal laceration was 8.9% (N = 20,013); the prevalence of both outcomes declined during the study period. Within subgroups, prevalence of episiotomy ranged from 9.8% among Other-Pacific Islander individuals to 24.5% among Korean individuals. Prevalence of severe perineal laceration ranged from 3.4% in Guamanian individuals to 15.2% in Indian individuals. In fully adjusted models, risk ratios were greater than 1.0 (with confidence intervals excluding 1.0) for 6 subgroups for episiotomy and 9 subgroups for severe perineal laceration, compared to Non-Hispanic White individuals. After adjustment, Korean individuals were at highest risk of episiotomy (adjusted risk ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.75, 1.85]), and Indian individuals were at highest risk of severe perineal laceration (adjusted risk ratio 2.14 [95% CI 2.07, 2.21]). Adjustment for social factors (nativity; education; payer) tended to attenuate risk ratios; subsequent adjustment for maternal health and delivery-related factors including maternal age, height, pre-pregnancy body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, gestational weight gain, fetal stress/incomplete fetal head rotation (occiput transverse or posterior), large infant size or shoulder dystocia, and forceps/vacuum did not impact risk ratios substantially.

Conclusion

Prevalence and risks of episiotomy and severe perineal laceration varied widely among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander births in California from 2007 to 2020. The variability in risks was more influenced by differences in social rather than maternal health and delivery-related factors. This study adds to the growing understanding of disparities in health outcomes among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander subgroups.

Efficacy of intrapartum bundles and interventions in reducing vaginal delivery-related perineal trauma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence on preventive interventions and bundles, including combinations of multiple techniques, aimed at reducing vaginal delivery-related perineal injury.

METHODS

A systematic research of literature was independently conducted on different databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE) by the authors, using a combination of the identified keywords and index terms as per current PRISMA guidelines. The research was restricted to papers published in English starting by 2000. Similar papers as previously published reviews and metanalysis satisfying the inclusion criteria were used as cross-reference to check for potential further inclusions.

FINDINGS

In total 14 papers have been identified to be included in our review, divided into 2 randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies (4 prospective cohort studies, 6 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective case-control study and 1 multicenter step-wedge cluster study).

CONCLUSIONS

Bundles and interventions, including combinations of techniques and tools aimed at enhancing intrapartum perineal care are effective in reducing adverse perineal outcome after vaginal delivery. Most common features include training programs for labor professionals, pushing instructions and communication, hands-on technique for both reducing speed of delivery and perineal support, and restrictive use of medio-lateral episiotomy.

The association between waterbirth and perineal injury or other adverse outcomes among low-risk women with physiological birth: Results from the Nordic Home Birth Cohort Study

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

Immersion in water has known benefits, such as reducing pain and shortening the duration of labour. The relationship between waterbirth and perineal injury remains unclear.

AIM

To compare the incidence of perineal injury in waterbirth and birth on land among low-risk women. Secondary outcomes were postpartum haemorrhage and 5-minute Apgar scores <7.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 2875 low-risk women who planned a home birth in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden in 2008-2013 and had a spontaneous vaginal birth without intervention. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed.

FINDINGS

A total of 942 women had a waterbirth, and 1933 gave birth on land. The groups differed in their various background variables. Multiparous women had moderately lower rates of intact perineum (59.3% vs. 63.9%) and primiparous women had lower rates of episiotomies (1.1% vs. 4.8%) in waterbirth than in birth on land. No statistically significant differences were detected in adjusted regression analysis on intact perineum in waterbirth (primiparous women's aOR = 1.03, CI 0.68-1.58; multiparous women's aOR = 0.84, CI 0.67-1.05). The rates of sphincter injuries (0.9% vs. 0.6%) were low in both groups. No significant differences were detected in secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The decreased incidence of intact perineum among multiparous women was modest and inconclusive, and the prevalence of sphincter injury was low.

CONCLUSION

Low-risk women contemplating waterbirth should be advised to weigh the risks and benefits detected in this study against previously established benefits of waterbirth and should make an informed choice based on their values.

Influence of the maternity unit and region of delivery on episiotomy practice in France: a nationwide population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to identify factors associated with episiotomy practice in France, in particular, characteristics of the maternity units and regions of delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a national cross-sectional population-based study in all French maternity units in 2016 including 9284 women with vaginal delivery. Our outcome was the performance of an episiotomy. After stratification for parity, associations of episiotomy practice with individual and organizational characteristics and the region of delivery were estimated with multilevel logistic regression models. The variability in maternity unit episiotomy rates explained by the characteristics studied was estimated by the proportional change in variance.

RESULTS

A total of 19.9% of the women had an episiotomy. The principal factors associated with episiotomy practice were maternal and obstetric and delivery in a maternity unit with <2000 annual deliveries. After adjusting for individual, obstetric and organizational characteristics, the practice of episiotomy was strongly associated with women's region of delivery. Additionally, women's individual characteristics did not explain the significant variability in episiotomy rates between maternity units (P < 0.001) but maternity unit characteristics partly did (proportion of variance explained: 7.2% for primiparas and 13.6% for multiparas) and regional differences still more (18% and 30.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Episiotomy practices in France in 2016 varied strongly between maternity units, largely due to regional differences. Targeted actions by the regional perinatal care networks may reduce the national episiotomy rate and standardize practices.

"From hell to healed" - A qualitative study on women's experience of recovery, relationships and sexuality after severe obstetric perineal injury

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have investigated women's experiences of daily life after childbirth complicated by obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). The aim of the present study was to explore experiences related to recovery, sexual function, relationships and coping strategies among women affected by OASI.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of 11 women affected by OASI. Women were interviewed 1-2 years after their first childbirth. Inductive qualitative content analysis was applied.

RESULTS

The theme "From hell to healed" illustrates women's experiences of recovery, relationships and sexual function after OASI. Three categories addressing women's perceptions emerged: "Challenged to the core", "At the mercy of the care provider" and "For better or for worse". Support from partners and family and comprehensive care were important elements for the experiences of coping and healing from OASI. Elements that negatively influenced women's experiences were the pain and physical symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction, normalization of symptoms by heath care providers, and unrealistic expectations about how this period in life should be experienced.

CONCLUSION

OASI greatly affects women's experiences of their first years with their newborn child, relationships, social context and sexuality. For some women, OASI negatively affects everyday life for a long period after childbirth. However, others heal and cope quite quickly. Health care professionals need to identify and pay attention to women with persisting problems after OASI so that they can be directed to the right level of care.

Cross-sectional study of early postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and related bother in primiparous women 6-10 weeks postpartum

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To study the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction and related bother in primiparous women 6-10 weeks postpartum, comparing vaginal and cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of 721 mothers with singleton births in Reykjavik, Iceland, 2015 to 2017, using an electronic questionnaire. Information on urinary and anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual dysfunction with related bother (trouble, nuisance, worry, annoyance) was collected. Main outcome measures were prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction and related bother.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of urinary and anal incontinence was 48% and 60%, respectively. Bother regarding urinary symptoms was experienced by 27% and for anal symptoms by 56%. Pelvic organ prolapse was noted by 29%, with less than half finding this bothersome. Fifty-five percent were sexually active, of whom 66% reported coital pain. Of all the women, 48% considered sexual issues bothersome. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse were more prevalent in women who delivered vaginally compared to cesarean section, but no differences were observed for anal incontinence and coital pain. Compared to women with BMI < 25, obesity was a predictor for urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.20-3.14). Birthweight > 50th percentile was predictive for urgency incontinence after vaginal delivery (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.05-2.21). Episiotomy predicted more anal incontinence (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.30-3.67). No associations between maternal and delivery characteristics were found for pelvic floor dysfunction after cesarean section.

CONCLUSIONS

Bothersome pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms are prevalent among first-time mothers in the immediate postpartum period.

Key indicators influencing management of prolonged second stage labour by midwives in freestanding birth centres: Results from an ethnographic interview study

PROBLEMS

Complications for newborns and postpartum clients in the hospital are more frequent after a prolonged second stage of labour. Midwives in community settings have little research to guide management in their settings.

AIM

We explored how US birth centre midwives identify onset of second stage of labour and determine when to transfer clients to the hospital for prolonged second stage.

METHODS

Ethnographic interviews of midwives with at least 2 years' experience in birth centres and participant observation of birth centre care.

FINDINGS

We interviewed 21 midwives (18 CNMs, 3 CPMs/equivalent) from 18 birth centres in 11 US states, 45% with hospital practice privileges. Midwives relied on and engaged in embodied practice in evaluating each labour and making decisions concerning management of labour. Midwives considered time a useful but limited measure as a guiding factor in management. Though ideas of time and progress do play an important role in the decision-making process of midwives, their usefulness is limited due to the continual, multifactorial, and multisensory nature of the assessment. Relationship with the transfer hospital structured midwives' decision-making about transfers.

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION

These findings can inform future robust multivariate evaluation of factors, including but not limited to time, in guidelines for management of second stage of labour. Optimal management may require formal consideration of more than just time and parity. Our findings also suggest the need for evaluation of how structural issues involving hospital privileges for midwives and relationships between birth centre and hospital staff affect the well-being of childbearing families.

Selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized whether a non-episiotomy protocol or administration of selective episiotomy as an intrapartum intervention would modify the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

We registered this systematic review with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018111018). Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included from databases until February 2019. The primary outcome was OASIS, and the secondary outcomes were any perineal trauma, duration of the second stage of labor, instrumental delivery, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of bias (Cochrane Handbook) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the RCTs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,833 results (PubMed 650, SCOPUS 1,144, Cochrane Library 33, LILACS 6) were obtained. However, only 2 studies fulfilled the criteria for quantitative analysis and meta-analysis (n = 574). The non-episiotomy arm included two episiotomies (1.7% of deliveries), whereas the selective episiotomy included 33 episiotomies (21.4%). Performance of selective episiotomy demonstrated no difference compared with that of the non-episiotomy group with regard to OASIS (OR = 0.46 [0.15-1.39]; n = 543; I² = 0%,p = 0.17), any perineal trauma (OR = 0.90 [0.61-1.33]; I² = 0%, n = 546, p = 0.59), instrumental delivery (OR = 1.40 [0.80-2.45]; I² = 0%, n = 545, p = 0.24), duration of the second stage of labor (MD = -3.71 [-21.56, 14.14]; I² = 72%,n = 546, p = 0.68), perineal pain (MD = 0.59 [0.01-1.17]; I² = 0%,p = 0.05), and post-partum hemorrhage (OR = 1.75 [0.87-3.54]; I² = 0%,n = 546,p = 0.12). The evaluated studies displayed a low risk of bias in at least four of the seven categories analyzed. GRADE demonstrated a low certainty for severe perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, duration of the second stage of labor, and a moderate certainty for any perineal tear.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between non-episiotomy and selective episiotomy regarding OASIS. No RCT was able to confirm a benefit of the non-performance of episiotomies in the non-episiotomy arm.