Skipped exon in COL7A1 determines the clinical phenotypes of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Safe and Efficacious Permanent Removal of Large COL7A1 Exons for Gene Reframing as a Reliable Therapeutic Strategy for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Mutations leading to premature termination codons in COL7A1 are commonly associated with severe generalized recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). Previous research, including our own, has indicated that removing mutated COL7A1 exons along with the consequent reframing of COL7A1 may not pose noticeable impact on protein function, offering a potential therapeutic strategy. However, investigations into the long-term in vivo effects of genome editing-mediated removal of mutant exons have only focused on the small exon 80 thus far. Hence, this study focuses on exons 73 and 105 of COL7A1 to explore whether targeted exon removal, through a CRISPR/Cas9-assisted, Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated approach, could be extended to other larger exons. Introducing ribonucleoprotein complexes carrying Cas9 and optimized sgRNA guide pairs for each exon (73 and 105) through electroporation efficiently led to their removal, consequently restoring type VII collagen (C7) synthesis in RDEB primary patient cells carrying frameshift mutations in these exons. In vitro tests indicated the normal stability of the resulting C7 variants expressed at physiological levels, while in vivo analyses of regenerated skin grafted onto immunodeficient mice using E73 or E105 RDEB edited cells demonstrated the proper deposition of C7 at the basement membrane zone, thereby restoring normal dermo-epidermal adherence. This study enhances the broader potential of the exon deletion approach in the treatment of RDEB.

A Novel COL7A1 Mutation in a Patient With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. Successful Treatment With Upadacitinib

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a heterogeneous and rare genetic skin disease caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene, which encodes Type VII collagen. The absence or dysfunction of Type VII collagen can cause the dense lower layer of the basal membrane zone of the skin to separate from the dermis, leading to blister formation and various complications. In different DEB subtypes, the severity of the phenotype is associated, to some extent, with the outcome of Type VII collagen caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene, which may be reduced in expression, remarkably reduced, or completely absent. Here, we report a case of DEB caused by a mutation in the COL7A1 gene at a novel site, where the patient achieved favorable outcomes after treatment with upadacitinib. This study further expands the known COL7A1 gene mutation sites in the DEB subtype, providing new data for understanding the genotype-phenotype correlation and treatment of this disease.

Gene panel for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa: proposal for a viable and efficient approach

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa is characterized by cutaneous fragility and blistering. Historically, diagnosis is achieved by immunofluorescence mapping or transmission electron microscopy, both involving biopsy procedures. Genetic analysis, especially through next-generation sequencing, is an important tool for the diagnosis of this disease. In Brazil, access to diagnostic methods is limited, and consequently, most patients do not have an accurate diagnosis. Diagnosis allows the indication of prognosis and genetic counselling of the patient.

Objectives

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a gene panel compared to immunofluorescence mapping and transmission electron microscopy by analyzing its benefits, limitations, and economic aspects.

Methods

The gene panel included the 11 main genes associated with epidermolysis bullosa. The techniques were compared, assessing the average cost, advantages, and limitations, through a price survey and literature review.

Results

Both immunofluorescence mapping and transmission electron microscopy require skin biopsy, are dependent on the investigator’s expertise, and are subject to frequent inconclusive results. The gene panel is effective for the conclusive diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa, presents high efficiency and accuracy, is economically feasible, and excludes the need for biopsy. The gene panel allows for prognosis, prenatal genetic diagnosis, and genetic counseling.

Study limitations

It was not possible to find laboratories that perform transmission electron microscopy for epidermolysis bullosa diagnosis in Brazil.

Conclusion

This study supports the gene panel as the first-choice method for epidermolysis bullosa diagnosis.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: update on the clinical and genetic aspects

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa is a group of genetic diseases characterized by skin fragility and blistering on the skin and mucous membranes in response to minimal trauma. Epidermolysis bullosa is clinically and genetically very heterogeneous, being classified into four main types according to the layer of skin in which blistering occurs: epidermolysis bullosa simplex (intraepidermal), junctional epidermolysis bullosa (within the lamina lucida of the basement membrane), dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (below the basement membrane), and Kindler epidermolysis bullosa (mixed skin cleavage pattern). Furthermore, epidermolysis bullosa is stratified into several subtypes, which consider the clinical characteristics, the distribution of the blisters, and the severity of cutaneous and extracutaneous signs. Pathogenic variants in at least 16 genes that encode proteins essential for the integrity and adhesion of skin layers have already been associated with different subtypes of epidermolysis bullosa. The marked heterogeneity of the disease, which includes phenotypes with a broad spectrum of severity and many causal genes, hinders its classification and diagnosis. For this reason, dermatologists and geneticists regularly review and update the classification criteria. This review aimed to update the state of the art on inherited epidermolysis bullosa, with a special focus on the associated clinical and genetic aspects, presenting data from the most recent reclassification consensus, published in 2020.

Natural Exon Skipping Sets the Stage for Exon Skipping as Therapy for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a devastating blistering disease affecting skin and mucous membranes. It is caused by pathogenic variants in the COL7A1 gene encoding type VII collagen, and can be inherited dominantly or recessively. Recently, promising proof-of-principle has been shown for antisense oligonucleotide (AON)-mediated exon skipping as a therapeutic approach for DEB. However, the precise phenotypic effect to be anticipated from exon skipping, and which patient groups could benefit, is not yet clear. To answer these questions, we studied new clinical and molecular data on seven patients from the Dutch EB registry and reviewed the literature on COL7A1 exon skipping variants. We found that phenotypes associated with dominant exon skipping cannot be distinguished from phenotypes caused by other dominant DEB variants. Recessive exon skipping phenotypes are generally relatively mild in the spectrum of recessive DEB. Therefore, for dominant DEB, AON-mediated exon skipping is unlikely to ameliorate the phenotype. In contrast, the overall severity of phenotypes associated with recessive natural exon skipping pivots toward the milder end of the spectrum. Consequently, we anticipate AON-mediated exon skipping for recessive DEB caused by bi-allelic null variants should lead to a clinically relevant improvement of this devastating phenotype.

A comprehensive next-generation sequencing assay for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Historically, diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa has required skin biopsies for electron microscopy, direct immunofluorescence to determine which gene(s) to choose for genetic testing, or both.

METHODS

To avoid these invasive tests, we developed a high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic assay called EBSEQ that allows simultaneous detection of mutations in 21 genes with known roles in epidermolysis bullosa pathogenicity. Mutations are confirmed with traditional Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

We present our EBSEQ assay and preliminary studies on the first 43 subjects tested. We identified 11 cases of epidermolysis bullosa simplex, five cases of junctional epidermolysis bullosa, 11 cases of dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, 15 cases of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, and one case that remains without diagnosis. We also found an additional 52 variants of uncertain clinical significance in 17 of the 21 epidermolysis bullosa-associated genes tested. Three of the variants of uncertain clinical significance were also found in three other patients, for a total of 49 unique variants of uncertain clinical significance. We found the clinical sensitivity of the assay to be 75% to 98% and the analytical sensitivity to be 99% in identifying base substitutions and small deletions and duplications. Turnaround time was 3 to 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

EBSEQ is a sensitive, relatively rapid, minimally invasive, comprehensive genetic assay for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa.

Therapies for genetic extracellular matrix diseases of the skin

A specialized, highly developed dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) provides the skin with its unique mechano-resilient properties and is vital for organ function. Accordingly, genetically acquired deficiency of dermal ECM proteins or proteins essential for the post-translational modification and homeostasis of the dermal ECM, results in diseases affecting the skin. Some of these diseases are lethal or lead to severe complications for the affected individuals. At present limited efficient and evidence-based treatment options exist for genetic ECM diseases of the skin. There is thus a high unmet medical need, creating an urgent demand to develop improved care for these diseases. Here, by drawing examples from the wealth of research on epidermolysis bullosa, we present the current status of biological and small molecule therapies for genetic ECM diseases with skin manifestations. We discuss challenges, and using existing data to propose strategies and future directions allowing development of more efficacious therapies and advancement of them into clinical practice.

Antisense Oligonucleotide-mediated Exon Skipping as a Systemic Therapeutic Approach for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

The "generalized severe" form of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB-gen sev) is caused by bi-allelic null mutations in COL7A1, encoding type VII collagen. The absence of type VII collagen leads to blistering of the skin and mucous membranes upon the slightest trauma. Because most patients carry exonic point mutations or small insertions/deletions, most exons of COL7A1 are in-frame, and low levels of type VII collagen already drastically improve the disease phenotype, this gene seems a perfect candidate for antisense oligonucleotide (AON)-mediated exon skipping. In this study, we examined the feasibility of AON-mediated exon skipping in vitro in primary cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and systemically in vivo using a human skin-graft mouse model. We show that treatment with AONs designed against exon 105 leads to in-frame exon 105 skipping at the RNA level and restores type VII collagen protein production in vitro. Moreover, we demonstrate that systemic delivery in vivo induces de novo expression of type VII collagen in skin grafts generated from patient cells. Our data demonstrate strong proof-of-concept for AON-mediated exon skipping as a systemic therapeutic strategy for RDEB.

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a review

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a rare inherited blistering disorder caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene encoding type VII collagen. The deficiency and/or dysfunction of type VII collagen leads to subepidermal blistering immediately below the lamina densa, resulting in mucocutaneous fragility and disease complications such as intractable ulcers, extensive scarring, malnutrition, and malignancy. The disease is usually diagnosed by immunofluorescence mapping and/or transmission electron microscopy and subsequently subclassified into one of 14 subtypes. This review provides practical knowledge on the disease, including new therapeutic strategies.