Uncertain diagnosis and prognosis in advanced melanoma: a qualitative study of the experiences of bereaved carers in a time of immune and targeted therapies

The Symptom Experience of Patients with Advanced Melanoma Undergoing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy

OBJECTIVES

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has vastly improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma. However, the symptom burden and intensity with their impact on quality-of-life (HRQoL) and functionality are heterogeneous and unpredictable. We used descriptive exploratory content analysis from interviews to capture the patient experience after they had completed quantitative data collection of their symptom burden and interference with the use of two patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments.

DATA SOURCES

Participants from a single center with advanced melanoma (n = 19) who are undergoing ICI therapy completed the Modified MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma and recorded semistructured interviews. Interpretive description informed the inductive and iterative analysis approach.

CONCLUSION

Participants had a heterogenous experience of ICI and melanoma-related symptoms: distress (84%), fatigue (68%), rash or skin changes (53%), pain (30%), diarrhea (30%), itching (26%), and shortness of breath (21%), with varying interference within HRQoL domains, mood (47%), relations with other people (26%), and activity (21%). Some noted a lack of physical interference (79%). Uncertainty was a pervasive theme in the interviews (68%) despite the majority having positive thoughts about ICI therapy (58%) and expectations of the success of therapy (53%). The physical and emotional burden of a melanoma diagnosis, undergoing therapy, and the uncertainty of the outcomes are pervasive for patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Communication surrounding the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, and outcomes need to be clear and acknowledge there are unknowns. Nurses may benefit from using a validated PRO instrument to help document and understand the patient's symptom experience while undergoing ICI therapy.

Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the supportive care needs of Australian melanoma patients and their caregivers to form the basis for improving services.

METHODS

General and melanoma-related supportive care needs in melanoma patients were measured using the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-M12 respectively, whereas caregivers completed the SCNS-P&C. Patients also completed the MCQ-28 and FCRI-9, with all participants completing the QLQ-C30, DASS-21, and questions measuring utilisation and preference for supportive health services. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with unmet needs in melanoma patients.

RESULTS

A total of 56 early-stage patients, 100 advanced-stage patients, and 37 caregivers participated. At least three-quarters ([Formula: see text] 75%) of each participant group reported at least one unmet need. Of the ten most reported unmet needs in each participant group, at least six ([Formula: see text] 60%) were related to psychological and emotional well-being, with access to a psychologist the most desired service (> 25%). Fear of cancer recurrence was equally prevalent in both patient groups at a level indicative of need for intervention. Advanced-stage patients reported significantly (p < 0.05) more unmet psychological, physical and daily living, and sexuality needs, and significantly (p < 0.05) worse functioning than early-stage patients.

CONCLUSION

Australian melanoma patients and caregivers report substantial unmet supportive care needs, particularly regarding their psychological and emotional well-being. Psychological and emotional well-being services, such as access to a clinical psychologist or implementation of patient-reported outcome measures, should be incorporated into routine melanoma care to address unmet patient and caregiver needs and improve well-being.

"One more chance to survive": the experiences of patients with advanced melanoma and their partners with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy-a qualitative study and recommendations for future care

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced melanoma refractory to first-line treatment have a need for effective second-line treatment options. A recent phase 3 trial showed promising results for adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. However, it remains unknown how patients and their partners experience TIL therapy, which is key to evaluate and improve the quality of care.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews about the experience of TIL therapy were conducted with patients with advanced melanoma and their partners 2-4 weeks post-treatment (short term) and >6 months after treatment (long term).

RESULTS

In total, 25 interviews were conducted with advanced melanoma patients treated with TIL (n=13) and their partners (n=12), with the majority being short-term interviews (n=17). Overall, patients and partners experienced TIL therapy as intense (uncertainty of successful TIL culture, multiple treatment-related toxicities, and extensive hospitalization). Patients and partners with young children or other caregiving responsibilities encountered the most challenges during TIL therapy. All patients, however, reported a recovery of all treatment-related toxicities within 2-4 weeks (except fatigue).

CONCLUSION

Clinical data justify the role of TIL therapy in the treatment of advanced melanoma. With the distinct nature of TIL therapy compared to the current standard of care, we have provided patient-centered recommendations that will further enhance the quality of TIL therapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

As more patients with advanced melanoma are expected to receive TIL therapy in the future, our findings could be incorporated into survivorship care plans for this novel group of advanced melanoma survivors treated with TIL.

End-of-Life Use of Systemic Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE:

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies improved the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma. It is not known how often these costly treatments with potential serious side effects are ineffectively applied in the last phase of life. This study aimed to investigate the start of a new systemic therapy within 45 and 90 days of death in Dutch patients with advanced melanoma.

METHODS:

We selected patients who were diagnosed with unresectable IIIC or stage IV melanoma, registered in the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry, and died between 2013 and 2019. Primary outcome was the probability of starting a new systemic therapy 45 and 90 days before death. Secondary outcomes were type of systemic therapy started, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), and the total costs of systemic therapies.

RESULTS:

Between 2013 and 2019, 3,797 patients with unresectable IIIC or stage IV melanoma were entered in the registry and died. The percentage of patients receiving a new systemic therapy within 45 and 90 days before death was significantly different between Dutch melanoma centers (varying from 6% to 23% and 20% to 46%, respectively). Thirteen percent of patients (n = 146) developed grade 3/4 AEs in the last period before death. The majority of patients with an AE required hospital admission (n = 102, 69.6%). Mean total costs of systemic therapy per cohort year of the patients who received a new systemic therapy within 90 days before death were 2.3%-2.8% of the total costs spent on melanoma therapies.

CONCLUSION:

The minority of Dutch patients with metastatic melanoma started a new systemic therapy in the last phase of life. However, the percentages varied between Dutch melanoma centers. Financial impact of these therapies in the last phase of life is relatively small.

Experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ExCIm)-insights of people affected by cancer and healthcare professionals: a qualitative study protocol

INTRODUCTION

There is a global interest in cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trials have found that one group, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has demonstrated clinical benefits across various cancers. However, research focused on the experiences of people affected by cancer who have undergone this treatment using qualitative methodology is currently limited. Moreover, little is known about the experiences and education needs of the healthcare staff supporting the people receiving these immunotherapies. This study therefore seeks to explore the experiences of using ICIs by both the people affected by cancer and the healthcare professionals who support those people, and use the findings to make recommendations for ICI supportive care guidance development, cancer immunotherapy education materials for healthcare professionals, cancer policy and further research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patient participants (n=up to 30) will be recruited within the UK. The sample will incorporate a range of perspectives, sociodemographic factors, diagnoses and ICI treatments, yet share some common experiences. Healthcare professionals (n=up to 15) involved in supporting people receiving immunotherapy will also be recruited from across the UK. Data will be generated through in-depth, semistructured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis will be used to obtain thorough understanding of individual's perspectives on, and experiences of, immunotherapy. Study dates are as follows: December 2019-March 2022.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The research will be performed in accordance with the UK Policy for Health and Social Care Research and Cardiff University's Research Integrity and Governance Code of Practice (2018). The study received ethical approval from the West Midlands and Black Country Research Ethics Committee in October 2019. Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales approvals were confirmed in December 2019. All participants will provide informed consent. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, non-academic platforms, the Macmillan Cancer Support website, disseminated at relevant national and international conferences and presented via a webinar. The study is listed on the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network Central Portfolio.

Palliative care in the context of immune and targeted therapies: A qualitative study of bereaved carers' experiences in metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Immune and targeted therapies continue to transform treatment outcomes for those with metastatic melanoma. However, the role of palliative care within this treatment paradigm is not well understood.

AIM

To explore bereaved carers' experiences of immune and targeted therapy treatment options towards end of life for patients with metastatic melanoma.

DESIGN

An interpretive, qualitative study using a social constructivist framework was utilised. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory methods.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Participants (n = 20) were bereaved carers of patients who had received some form of immune and/or targeted therapy at one of three Australian metropolitan melanoma treatment centres.

RESULTS

Carers struggled to reconcile the positive discourse around the success of immune and targeted therapies in achieving long-term disease control, and the underlying uncertainty in predicting individual responses to therapy. Expectations that immune and targeted therapies necessarily provide longer-term survival were evident. Difficulty in prognostication due to clinical uncertainty and a desire to maintain hope resulted in lack of preparedness for treatment failure and end of life.

CONCLUSION

Immune and targeted therapies have resulted in increased prognostic challenges. There is a need to engage, educate and support patients and carers to prepare and plan amid these challenges. Educational initiatives must focus on improving communication between patients, carers and clinicians; the differences between palliative and end-of-life care; and increased competency of clinicians in having goals-of-care discussions. Clinicians must recognise and communicate the benefit of collaborative palliative care to meet patient and family needs holistically and comprehensively.

An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility

PURPOSE

People with advanced melanoma face an uncertain trajectory as new treatments now have the potential to provide longer-term survival for some. However, the disease course is variable and unpredictable, with many expressing a need for better supportive care. This study aimed to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of extending an existing melanoma-specific self-referral or 'passive' telephone consultation support service to an 'active' outreach call to offer a supportive care program tailored to the needs of the patient.

METHOD

Participants were enrolled by their oncology nurse into a single group pre-post intervention study. Participants received an outreach telephone call focused on knowledge and skill development. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and four weeks post-intervention. Post-intervention interviews with patients and involved staff were used to explore acceptability and feasibility of the outreach service call.

RESULTS

Of 18 participants approached, 15 enrolled and 14 received the intervention. Staff time required for intervention delivery provided evidence for feasibility. Participants perceived the intervention as acceptable, and beneficial. In interviews, having someone with melanoma-specific knowledge to talk with was a key benefit of the outreach call program. Many participants expressed that they would have wished to receive the outreach call at an earlier stage, for example at the time of recurrence of/progression to advanced melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending an existing self-referral support service model to use a more 'active' outreach approach is acceptable and feasible. The next step in the evaluation process for this intervention is a randomised controlled trial to determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.