Inter‐rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are associated with disease severity and metabolic syndrome in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Background

Biomarkers associated with disease severity and comorbid metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are lacking.

Objective

To identify biomarkers associated with disease severity and comorbid MetS in patients with HS.

Methods

Data on hospital outpatients with HS were obtained through clinical examination and interviews. Indicators of systemic inflammation; C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation-rate (ESR), neutrophil/lymphocyte-ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte-ratio (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte-ratio (MLR), platelet/neutrophil-ratio (PNR), pan-immune-inflammation-value (PIV), and systemic-immune-inflammatory-index (SII), were calculated from blood samples.

Results

Seven hundred patients were included; of those 444 (63.4%) and 256 (36.6%) were female and male, respectively, with a median age of 38.3 years (IQR = 27.9-51.0). Increasing CRP, ESR, NLR, PIV, and SII (P < .001) were significantly associated with increasing Hurley-stage and international hidradenitis suppurativa severity score system 4 (IHS4)-score in adjusted analysis. A doubling in CRP (OR 1.59 (1.36-1.85), P < .001), ESR (OR 1.39 (1.17-1.66), P < .001) and PIV (OR 1.41 (1.12-1.77) P = .002) was associated with MetS in adjusted analysis. ESR was the best estimator for severe IHS4-score (AUC = 0.72 (0.66-0.77), P < .001) and Hurley III (AUC = 0.79 (0.73-0.85), P < .001) whereas CRP was best for MetS (AUC = 0.67 (0.62-0.72), P < .001).

Limitations

Patients in a hospital setting tend to have more severe disease.

Conclusion

Biomarkers like CRP, ESR, and PIV measuring systemic inflammation were associated with disease severity and comorbid MetS in patients with HS.

Discrepancies in hidradenitis suppurativa lesion characterization by providers and patients

BACKGROUND

The hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical response (HiSCR) has come under scrutiny as several HS clinical trials failed to meet primary endpoints with high placebo responses. This may be due to limitations of the tool and raters' ability to accurately characterize and count lesions, rather than lack of efficacy of the studied drug. Due to HS lesion complexity and potential differences in rater training, it was hypothesized that there would be discrepancies in how providers characterize and count lesions for HS clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how HS providers and patients name and count HS lesions and to identify discrepancies among providers to initiate the development of consensus-driven guidance for HS rater training.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to the members of HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). Respondents were asked to classify lesion images composed of multiple and different morphology types and answer questions regarding inclusion of associated dermatological conditions.

RESULTS

Forty-seven HISTORIC members responded (29 providers; 18 patients). There was variability in how respondents classified HS lesions. Of 12 questions containing images, four had ≥50% of respondents choosing the same answer. With an image of a lesion composed of different morphologies, 45% of providers counted it as a single lesion and 45% counted it as multiple distinct lesions. With an image of multiple interconnected draining tunnels, 7% of providers classified it as a single draining tunnel while 79% categorized it as multiple draining tunnels with the number estimated by visual inspection. There was also variability in deciding whether lesions occurring in associated conditions should be considered separately or included in HS lesion counts. Patient responses were also variable.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of the current study reaffirms the gap in how providers characterize and count HS lesions for clinical trials and the need to develop consensus-driven rater training related to HS outcome measures.

Severity rating of specific skin lesions in hidradenitis suppurativa: the ptient perspective

The assessment of physical signs in HS is a very complex matter. This qualitative study investigates how patients with HS themselves would rate the severity of different types of HS lesions, and suggests that the lesion severity weighting in currently used Outcome Measurement Instruments, do not match the patient experience of severity.

Automated classification of hidradenitis suppurativa disease severity by convolutional neural network analyses using calibrated clinical images

BACKGROUND

The assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) severity requires detailed, and error-prone lesion counts. This proof-of-concept study aimed to automatically classify HS disease severity using machine learning of clinical smartphone images.

METHODS

777 ambient-light and size-controlled images were used to build a class-balanced synthetic dataset (n = 7675). Convolutional neural networks (CNN) were used for automated severity classification (scale 0-3), and to assess disease-dynamics. International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) served as reference. A U-NET algorithm was implemented for automated localization of diseased skin.

RESULTS

CNNs were able to distinguish no/mild from moderate/severe disease with an overall prediction accuracy of 78% [receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.85]. Correct IHS4 classification was achieved with an overall accuracy of 72% (AUC 0.84-0.89). In addition, disease dynamics using IHS4 numerical values aligned with CNN outputs (NRMSE 0.262). The UNET algorithm localized lesions with a pixel accuracy of 88.1% and test loss of 0.42.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations in assessing tattooed and hairy skin. Limited number of patients with dark skin colour and Hurley I.

CONCLUSION

CNNs were able to distinguish no/mild from moderate/severe disease, classify disease severity over time, and automatically identify diseased skin areas and the skin phototype. This study breaks new grounds for fast, reliable, reproducible and easy-to-use HS severity assessments using clinical images.

Guselkumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A phase 2 randomized study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that causes substantial physical, emotional and psychological burdens. Guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, has demonstrated high levels of efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on the treatment of HS, a phase 2, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, proof-of-concept study was conducted.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age with moderate-to-severe HS for ≥1 year were randomized to (1) guselkumab 200 mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36 (guselkumab SC); (2) guselkumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) q4w for 12 weeks, then switched to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w from Weeks 12 through 36 (guselkumab IV); or (3) placebo for 12 weeks, with re-randomization to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w at Weeks 16 through 36 (placebo → guselkumab 200 mg) or guselkumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32 (placebo → guselkumab 100 mg). End points included HS clinical response (HiSCR) and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Although guselkumab SC or guselkumab IV resulted in numerically higher HiSCR versus placebo at Week 16 (50.8%, 45.0%, 38.7%, respectively), statistical significance was not achieved. Numerically greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes were also observed for guselkumab SC and guselkumab IV versus placebo at Week 16. Through Week 40, no clear differences to suggest a dose response were observed for HiSCR and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite modest improvements, the primary end point was not met and the overall findings do not support the efficacy of guselkumab in the treatment of HS.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03628924.

Assessment tools and phenotype classification for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a heterogeneous chronic relapsing skin disease. Several assessment tools are used to assess disease severity and to classify disease phenotype; however, no consensus exists. This review evaluates the various assessment tools and phenotypes, assessing their validity and reliability. Numerous assessment tools and phenotype classifications have been proposed for identifying various subtypes within the hidradenitis suppurativa disease spectrum. Each has a different purpose, such as use in daily practice or in clinical trial settings. Several assessment tools and phenotype classifications have been validated but not always with satisfactory results and often with studies showing divergent intra-rater reliability results. A consensus is needed for a validated, easy-to-use, and timesaving assessment tool for routine daily practice. For clinical trials, a validated and extensive assessment tool that also measures response to treatment is also needed.

Cutaneous body image in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has been linked with body image (BI) impairment and reduced quality of life (QoL). We sought to evaluate the associations between Cutaneous Body Image Scale (CBIS) and disease severity in HS patients.Between July 2020 and January 2022, a cross-sectional study was carried out including consecutive HS patients above the age of 16 who attended a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Greece. Disease Severity was graded with the Hurley stage, HS-Physician's Global Assessment (HS-PGA) scale, and the Modified Sartorius scale (MSS). Patients completed at their first visit ten survey instruments including Patients' Severity of disease, pain and pruritus scale, CBIS, Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) including 5 subscales: Appearance Evaluation (AE), Appearance Orientation (AO), Body Areas Satisfaction Scale (BASS), Overweight Preoccupation (OWP), and Self Classified Weight (SCW) , Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI), Skindex-16, EQ5D 5L, EQ- visual analogue scale (VAS), PHQ9, and GAD7. In total, 70 HS patients above 16 years old participated, mean [SD] age, 34.44 [11.64] years; 49/70 (70%) males and 21/70 (30%) females. Mean ± SD CBI, DLQI, Skindex-16 total, EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS, PHQ9 and GAD7 were 5.59 ± 1.58, 11.70 ± 8.88, 52.90 ± 27.75, 0.75 ± 0.21, 62.48 ± 21.12, 7.64 ± 5.56, 7.87 ± 5.23 respectively. Moderate to severe CBI dissatisfaction was reported by 36/70 (51.42%) patients. CBI was correlated with appearance evaluation (AE) (p < 0.01, r = 0.544), body areas satisfaction (BASS) (p < 0.01, r = 0.481), and overweight preoccupation subscale (OWPS) (p < 0.01, r =  - 0.267), and Skindex-16 (p < 0.01, r =  - 0.288). HS patients with affected genital areas scored higher in disease patient's severity score (p = 0.015), and male patients scored higher in Skindex-16 than females(p < 0.01). Our study found that the mean of CBI in HS patients was 5.59 ± SD 1.58. Predictors for CBI dissatisfaction were low scores of MBSRQ Appearance Evaluation (AE) and Body Areas Satisfaction Subscale (BASS).

Inflammatory induration in hidradenitis suppurativa and application to severity assessment

Skin thickness, as known as inflammatory induration, is a component in several HS grading instruments including the HASI and HASI-R. This study sought to evaluate how thickest lesion measurement (mm) corresponds to HS severity. This study demonstrates that inflammatory induration has moderate association with HS severity, thickest lesion measurement (mm) demonstrates known-validity across Hurley stages, and cut-offs for thickest lesion measurement (mm) were determined for inflammatory induration grading for the purpose of HASI-R training.

Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data

Introduction

Partly due to its clinical heterogeneity, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult to score accurately; illustrated by the large number of disease scores. In 2016, a systematic review by Ingram et al. reported the use of about thirty scores, and since then, this number has increased further. Our aim is twofold: to provide a succinct but detailed narrative review of the scores used to date, and to compare these scores with each other for individual patients.

Materials and methods

The review of the literature was done among articles in English and French, on Google, Google scholar, Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane. To illustrate the differences between scores, data from some Belgian patients included in the European Registry for HS were selected. A first series of patients compares the severity of the following scores: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, three versions of Sartorius score (2003, 2007, 2009), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SAHS), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), Acne Inversa Severity Index (AISI), the Static Metascore, and one score that is not specific to HS: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A second set of patients illustrates how some scores change over time and with treatment: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, Sartorius 2003, Sartorius 2007, HS-PGA, IHS4, SAHS, AISI, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the very new iHS4-55, the Dynamic Metascore, and DLQI.

Results

Nineteen scores are detailed in this overview. We illustrate that for some patients, the scores do not predictably and consistently correlate with each other, either in an evaluation of the severity at a time-point t, or in the evaluation of the response to a treatment. Some patients in this cohort may be considered responders according to some scores, but non-responders according to others. The clinical heterogeneity of the disease, represented by its many phenotypes, seems partly to explain this difference.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate how the choice of a score can lead to different interpretations of the response to a treatment, or even potentially change the results of a randomized clinical trial.

Serum Immunoglobulin G Is a Marker of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Disease Severity

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the skin that is brought about by autoinflammation and hyperkeratosis at the pilosebaceous unit. The clinical severity of HS can be measured using static (Hurley Severity Scoring (HSS)) and/or dynamic (International HS Severity Scoring System (IHS4)) severity scoring instruments. However, few clinically available serological parameters have been found to correlate with disease severity. In this study, we sought to investigate the role of serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G, M and A levels as biomarkers of disease severity and to compare them with other, more conventional inflammatory indices, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, the platelet-lymphocyte ratio and the systemic immune-inflammation index. In this cross-sectional study, patients were recruited from the only dermatology referral centre in Malta, Europe, and subjected to clinical examination and the assessment of inflammatory and immunologic parameters. Serum IgG, M and A levels were assessed using the Atellica^® NEPH 630 System (SIEMENS-Healthineers AF, Erlangen, Germany) nephelometric analyser. Serum IgG, M and A levels correlate with both dynamic and static HS severity scoring systems. Serum IgG behaves as a marker of severe HS disease as categorised by HSS and the IHS4. Our findings suggest that the serum IgG level can be used in the clinical setting as a biomarker of disease severity and, therefore, as an adjunct to clinical severity scoring.

Adalimumab Originator vs. Biosimilar in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

This study aimed to compare adalimumab originator vs. biosimilar in HS patients, and to evaluate the effect of a switch to a biosimilar, or a switch back to the originator, in terms of treatment ineffectiveness. Patients with a diagnosis of HS were enrolled from 14 Italian sites. Treatment ineffectiveness was measured using Hurley score. The major analyses were 1) comparison between the two treatment groups (non-switcher analysis), and 2) the cross-over trend of Hurley score between treatment switchers (switcher analysis). Cox and Poisson regression models were used to compare the treatment ineffectiveness between groups. A total of 326 patients were divided into four groups: 171 (52.5%) taking originator; 61 (18.7%) patients taking biosimilar; 66 (20.2%) switchers; 28 (8.6%) switchers from originator to biosimilar and switched. A greater loss of efficacy was observed in the group allocated to the biosimilar than the originator group. The switcher analysis showed an effectiveness loss in the biosimilar compared to the originator. These results seem to indicate that a switch from one drug to the other may lead to a greater risk of inefficacy. A return to the previous treatment also does not ensure efficaciousness.

Development and initial validation of the HS-IGA: a novel hidradenitis suppurativa-specific investigator global assessment for use in interventional trials

BACKGROUND

Few validated instruments exist for use in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) trials.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a novel HS Investigator Global Assessment (HS-IGA) and to validate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Development of HS-IGA involved discussion among stakeholders, including patients, within HISTORIC. Data from replicate phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating HS treatment were utilized. Multivariate models identified lesion type and body region as variables of importance. Classification and regression trees for ordinal responses were built. Validation included assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive validity, responsiveness and clinical meaningfulness.

RESULTS

There were 3024 unique measurements available in PIONEER I. Mean and median lesion counts by region were largely <10 and were highest in axillary and inguinal regions. The mean and median number of regions involved were ≤ 3 for individual lesions and combinations. Regardless of lesion type, axillary and inguinal regions most influenced the HS-IGA score. Accordingly, regions were combined into a six-point IGA based on the maximum lesion number in either upper or lower body regions with a score of 0 (0-1 lesions), 1 (2-5), 2 (6-10), 3 (11-15), 4 (16-20) and 5 (≥ 20 lesions). The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0·91 (95% confidence interval 0·87-0·94). Spearman's rank order correlations (SROCs) with HS-PGA and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) were 0·73 and 0·51, respectively (P < 0·001 for both comparisons). SROCs with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), pain numerical rating scale and HS-QoL were 0·42, 0·34 and -0·25, respectively (P < 0·001 for all comparisons). HS-IGA was responsive at weeks 12 and 36. Predictive convergent validity was very good with HS-PGA (area under the curve = 0·89) and with HiSCR (area under the curve = 0·82). Predictive divergent validity was low with DLQI and HS-QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

HS-IGA has moderate-to-strong psychometric properties and is simple to calculate.

Case Report: Comorbid Hyper-IgD Syndrome and Hidradenitis Suppurativa - A New Syndromic Form of HS? A Report of Two Cases

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a chronic suppurative disease of the pilosebaceous unit. The current model of HS pathophysiology describes the condition as the product of hyperkeratinisation and inflammation at the hair follicular unit. Environmental factors (such as smoking and obesity), gender, genetic predisposition, and skin dysbiosis are considered the main pathogenic drivers of the disease. Autoinflammatory syndromes associated with HS are rare but may help to highlight the potential roles of autoinflammation and dysregulated innate immune system in HS. Therefore, it is of major relevance to increase the awareness about these diseases in order to improve the understanding of the disease and to optimize the management of the patients. Herein, we report for the first time, to our knowledge, two clinical cases of Hyper-IgD syndrome-associated HS. Hyper-IgD is an autoinflammatory syndrome caused by a mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), a key kinase in the sterol and isoprenoid production pathway. We describe the potentially shared pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning comorbid MKD-HS and propose therapeutic options for the management of these patients.

New treatments and new assessment instruments for hidradenitis suppurativa

Research interest in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) has grown exponentially over the past decades. Several groups have worked to develop novel scores that address the drawbacks of existing investigator assessed and patient reported outcome measures currently used in HS trials, clinical practice and research. In clinical trial settings, the drawbacks of the HiSCR have become apparent; mainly it's lack of a dynamic measurement of draining tunnels. The newly developed (dichotomous) IHS4 and HASI-R are backed up by adequate validation data and are good contenders to become the new primary outcome measure in HS clinical trials. Patient reported outcomes, as well as physician reported measures, are being developed by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). For example, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL) score is a validated measure of HS-specific quality of life and is already being used in many HS trials. Magnitude of pain measurement via a 0-10 numerical rating scale is well-established, however consensus is still required to ensure consistent administration and interpretation of the instrument. A longitudinal measurement over multiple days rather than at one time point, such as for example the Pain Index could provide increased reliability and reduced recall bias. Ultimately, these newly developed scores and tools can be included in a standardized registry to be used in routine clinical practice.

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in Patients with Epilepsy

Background

Adult eating behavior questionnaire (AEBQ) is an age upward extension tool that measures appetite traits in individuals. This instrument was developed by Hunot in 2016. The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of AEBQ in adults with epilepsy.

Methods

The current research is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 in Iran. 700 adults with epilepsy completed the 35-item AEBQ. Qualitative face validity, qualitative content and structure validity (exploratory factor analysis [EFA], N=400, and confirmatory factor analysis [CFA], N=300) appetitive traits were evaluated. Reliability was also measured using Cronbach's alpha, Construct reliability (CR), and Intra-Class Correlation (ICC). The SPSS 26-AMOS24 software was employed to analyze the data with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The EFA and CFA results comprised eight factors, namely enjoyment of food, emotional over-eating, food responsiveness, hunger, satiety responsiveness, emotional under-eating, food fussiness, and eating slowly. Indices of root mean square error of approximation=0.068, parsimonious normed fit index=0.644, parsimonious comparative fit index=0.671, adjusted goodness of fit index=0.618, goodness of fit index=0.911, and Chi square degree-of-freedom ratio (normalized Chi square CMIN/DF=2.842) confirmed the fitness of the final model. Convergent and divergent validity was acceptable for all the factors. The results revealed that the internal stability>0.8 and CR>0.7 of the eight extracted AEBQ structures are confirmed. The ICC was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.878-0.917; P<0.001). The results also showed that AEBQ has acceptable convergent and divergent validity.

Conclusion

The eight-factor structure of AEBQ can measure eating behavior traits and is of good validity and reliability for assessing the eating behavior of Iranian adults with epilepsy.

Damage in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Narrative Review Emphasizing the Need for a Novel Outcome Measure

Cutaneous damage caused by hidradenitis suppurativa is an important contributor to disease burden, independent of active lesions. Outcome measures used to specifically assess damage are becoming commonplace in assessment of inflammatory diseases. However, no standardized method for assessing HS damage currently exists. The purpose of this study was to review outcome measures in HS that include constructs of both active disease and damage, review damage-specific instruments used in other inflammatory and destructive diseases, and review instruments used to assess scars of various etiologies. This ultimately provides insight into how attributes of different tools can be applied to develop an outcome measure specific to HS damage.

Use of thermal imaging and a dedicated wound imaging smartphone app as an adjunct to staging hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) presents with painful nodules, draining tunnels, abscesses, ulcers, and fistula formation¹ . Grading systems, (e.g. Hurley Staging System, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score (HS-PGA score), and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI)) assess disease severity in terms of lesion count, extension and morphology.

Quantifying the natural variation in lesion counts over time in untreated hidradenitis suppurativa: Implications for outcome measures and trial design

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) demonstrates high placebo response rates in clinical trials, possibly due to the natural variability of the disease. No quantification of variability in lesion counts of untreated disease has been undertaken.

Objective

To quantify the variability of untreated HS.

Methods

Deidentified individual patient data from the placebo arms of PIONEER studies were analyzed, and measurements of within-subject coefficients of variation were examined. Variability was stratified by disease-associated variables (Hurley stage, BMI, sex, smoking, family history) and body site.

Results

Analysis of within-subject coefficients of variation demonstrated that half of the participants had a middle spread [difference between 75^th and 25^th percentiles of the subject's abscess and nodule counts] greater than 33% and 40% of their median abscess and nodule counts, and 25% of the subjects had a middle spread greater than 70% and 78% of their median abscess and nodule counts in PIONEER I and II, respectively. Hurley stage 2 participants had significantly greater within-subject variation than Hurley stage 3 patients. Variation was greater in the axillary and groin regions than in other anatomical locations.

Limitations

Limitations include the use of precollected clinical trial data.

Conclusion

The within-subject variability of the lesion counts in untreated HS was greater than previously appreciated. This has profound effects on outcome measures and the conduct of future clinical trials of HS.

Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability of Clinical Hidradenitis Suppurativa Outcome Measures Using Ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) staging and severity is typically based upon physical examination findings which can result in misclassification of severity based on subclinical disease activity and significant variation between healthcare providers. Ultrasound (US) is an objective tool to help evaluate subclinical disease and more accurately classify severity of disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability in HS disease severity assessment using clinical and US techniques.

METHODS

Twenty subjects underwent clinical evaluation of HS using clinical outcome measures including Hurley, Sartorius, HS Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) independently by two physicians. US was subsequently performed, and clinical assessments were repeated. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were obtained to evaluate inter-rater agreement of each outcome measure before and after US.

RESULTS

Pre- to post-US improvement in ICC was seen with the Sartorius, HiSCR nodule and abscess count, and HiSCR draining fistula count. The scores went from having "good" rater agreement for Sartorius and HiSCR nodule and abscess count and "poor" rater agreement for HiSCR draining fistula count to "excellent" rater agreement amongst these scores.

CONCLUSIONS

US improved inter-rater agreement and should be used in conjunction with physical examination findings to evaluate disease severity to ensure uniform staging.

Treatment Outcomes of IL-17 Inhibitors in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

The IL-17 pathway is a potential therapeutic target shown to be implicated in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), however, it remains unclear whether evidence from mechanistic studies may translate into clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes available treatment outcomes of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with HS. Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov were comprehensively searched on February 26, 2021 to include 16 original studies representing 128 patients with HS (mean age: 36.5 years; age range: 21-47 years; male: 50.0%). Treatment outcomes were reported for the following biologics: secukinumab (n = 105), brodalumab (n = 22), and ixekizumab (n = 1). Patients were classified as responders or non-responders according to achievement of a positive response/improvement based on criteria established for each included study. For secukinumab 57.1% (n = 60/105) of patients were responders in a mean response period of 16.2 weeks and 42.9% (n = 45/105) were non-responders; for brodalumab, 100.0% (n = 22/22) of patients were responders within 4.4 weeks; and the one patient treated with ixekizumab was a responder within 10 weeks. In conclusion, IL-17 inhibitors may serve as an effective therapeutic target in approximately two-thirds of patients with HS and can be considered in those who are refractory to other treatment modalities. We also stress the importance of consistent outcome measures to enhance evidence synthesis, decrease reporting bias, provide potential for future meta-analysis, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes for patients with HS.

Sonographic Evaluation of Hidradenitis Suppurativa with Smartphone-Linked Portable Ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Clinical staging systems for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have poor interrater reliability and may underestimate disease activity. Sonographic staging systems may overcome these challenges, but conventional ultrasound (US) machines are expensive and bulky. Portable (p)US may facilitate the integration of sonography into routine practice.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of a novel smartphone-linked pUS device to identify key sonographic lesions of HS.

METHODS

The charts of 16 patients with HS who were assessed with pUS at the outpatient Dermatology and Wound Care Clinics of a university hospital center were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and sonographic images of the affected areas were examined. The main outcome measures were the number of patients with identifiable sonographic lesions and the number of patients with subclinical lesions detected by pUS.

RESULTS

All 3 key sonographic lesions of HS were identifiable with pUS. Sonographic lesions were identified in 10 patients (62.5%). Subclinical lesions were identified in 2 patients (12.5%); in both cases, this affected management decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the ability of pUS to identify the key sonographic lesions of HS. pUS is a simple and affordable way to integrate HSUS into clinical and research settings, with clear potential benefits to patients.

A growing family of outcome measurement proposals for hidradenitis suppurativa

Linked Article: Goldfarb et al. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:905–912.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index Revised (HASI-R): psychometric property assessment

BACKGROUND

Validated, reliable, globally accepted outcome measurement instruments for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are needed. Current tools to measure the physical signs domain for HS rely on lesion counts, which are time-consuming and unreliable.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability and validity of the Hidradenitis suppurativa Area and Severity Index Revised (HASI-R) tool, a novel method for assessing HS severity, incorporating signs of inflammation and body surface area involved.

METHODS

The measurement properties of the HASI-R tool were evaluated. The tool was created by combining the previously published HASI and Severity and Area Score for Hidradenitis instruments. Twenty raters evaluated 15 patients with HS in a hospital-based ambulatory dermatology clinic. The objectives of the study were to assess inter- and intra-rater reliability of the HASI-R and its components, as well as its construct and known-groups validity. Existing lesion count-based clinician-reported measures of HS and their components were also assessed. Raters were also asked their preferences regarding the various HS severity assessment tools.

RESULTS

The HASI-R had moderate inter-rater reliability [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 0·60]. This was better than all other HS physical sign outcome measures evaluated, which had poor inter-rater reliability (ICC < 0·5). HASI-R had the highest intra-rater reliability (ICC 0·91). The HASI-R had good construct validity and demonstrated known-groups validity. The HASI-R was also the most preferred tool by all raters.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the clinometric assessment of the HASI-R are encouraging, and support continued evaluation of this clinician-reported outcome measure.

The most recent advances in understanding and managing hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicle unit that typically develops after puberty. HS has a significant negative impact on both the quality of life (QOL) of patients affected by this disease as well as family members and caregivers. However, the pathogenesis of HS is multifactorial and still remains to be fully elucidated, which makes the development of treatments difficult. The last 10 years have seen a surge in HS research, and many new findings have come to light, yet much more remains to be elucidated. Physicians must employ a multidisciplinary approach to maximally address all facets of HS. Clinical characteristics of the disease that differ between females and males as well as across different races and ethnic groups must be considered. Targeted topical, oral, and injectable therapies continue to be developed for HS as a greater understanding of the pathogenesis is reached. However, randomized controlled trials regarding dietary factors that may contribute to HS are needed to meet our patients’ growing concerns and questions about the role of diet in HS pathogenesis. Finally, improved outcome measures are needed to standardize HS severity and grading between physicians and clinical trials, and a more diverse representation of HS populations is needed in clinical trials.

Could Residents Adequately Assess the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa? Interrater and Intrarater Reliability Assessment of Major Scoring Systems

A wide variety of assessment tools have been proposed for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) until now, but none of them meets the criteria for an ideal score. Because there is no gold standard scoring system, the choice of the measure instrument depends on the purpose of use and even on the physician’s experience in the subject of HS. The aim of this study was to assess the intrarater and interrater reliability of 6 scoring systems commonly used for grading severity of HS: the Hurley Staging System, the Refined Hurley Staging, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), the Sartorius Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician’s Global Assessment Scale (HS-PGA). On the scoring day, 9 HS patients underwent a physical examination and disease severity assessment by a group of 16 dermatology residents using all evaluated instruments. Then, intrarater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and interrater variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). In all 6 scorings the ICCs were >0.75, indicating high intrarater reliability of all presented scales. The study has also demonstrated moderate agreement between raters in most of the evaluated measure instruments. The most reproducible methods, according to CVs, seem to be the Hurley staging, IHS4, and HSSI. None of the 6 evaluated scoring systems showed a significant advantage over the other when comparing ICCs, and all the instruments seem to be very reliable methods. The interrater reliability was usually good, but the most repeatable results between researchers were obtained for the easiest scales, including Hurley scoring, IHS4 and HSSI.

Severity and Area Score for Hidradenitis (SASH): a novel outcome measurement for hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease with a large impact on patients' health-related quality of life. However, reliable and consistent outcome measures to assess body surface area (BSA) of HS have not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and assess the reliability and validity of a novel outcome instrument for assessment of HS BSA in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted from July to August 2015 and October 2017 to January 2018. Evaluation of the measurement was assessed during a single-day grading session with patients in April 2018. Participants, who included clinicians or patients, were recruited from academic medical centres in the U.S. mid-Atlantic region.

RESULTS

Concept elicitation included input from 10 providers, of which 60% (n = 6) were female, 80% (n = 8) dermatology specialists and 20% (n = 2) gynaecology specialists. Cognitive debriefing was conducted with 11 providers, of which 82% (n = 9) were dermatologists and 18% (n = 2) gynaecologists. The evaluation stage included 10 clinicians and 23 patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability was 0·60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·44-0·74]. The ICC for intrarater reliability was 0·98 (95% CI 0·94-1·00). Transformation of the BSA score resulted in an increase in inter-rater reliability to 0·75 (95% CI 0·62-0·85) or 0·76 (95% CI 0·62-0·85). Scores all demonstrated concurrent validity, with statistically significant correlations with extant scoring methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel scale is a reliable and valid HS outcome instrument and may capture a wide range of patients by assessing BSA. Future research is necessary to demonstrate its responsiveness. What's already known about this topic? The major HS disease activity scales rely on lesions counts and have moderate-to-good reliability. Body surface area (BSA) is one of the physical signs included in the Core Outcome Set for HS, but is not a part of existing HS disease activity scales. What does this study add? A novel disease severity scale, the Severity and Area Score for Hidradenitis (SASH), was developed and the psychometric properties assessed. There was high inter-rater reliability of 0·75 and 0·76 when BSA was scored on an ordinal scale, and an excellent intrarater reliability of 0·98. The SASH score also demonstrated convergent validity with extant instruments. What are the clinical implications of this work? The ability of clinicians to accurately assess disease status will be improved. Implementation of the SASH score will help guide and assess the effectiveness of appropriate treatment choice.

A narrative review of the definition of 'flare' in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory condition that can have periodic worsening or flares. Measurement of flare is important because it can inform treatment efficacy; however, it is unclear how HS flare should be defined.

OBJECTIVES

This study reviewed the literature for definitions of HS flare.

METHODS

The PubMed MEDLINE online database was searched on 10 January 2018 and the search was repeated on 8 December 2018 for new publications. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion. Subsequently, full articles were screened for inclusion. Papers were included if the publication was a systematic review, clinical trial, cohort study, case report or series, or cross-sectional study. Studies were excluded if they were journalistic reviews, did not discuss clinical findings of HS or did not use the words 'flare', 'exacerbation', 'relapse' or 'recurrence'.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four papers were identified and 154 fulfilled the study criteria. Of these, 27 (17.5%) included the term 'flare' and 16 (10.4%) included the term 'exacerbation'. Two of the 27 papers (7%) defined the term flare and both included patient report of changes in symptoms or signs. One of 16 papers (6%) defined exacerbation, which was taken as one new HS lesion. The terms 'recurrence' and 'relapse' were more apt to be defined: 13% (13 of 100) and 14% (six of 44), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a specific and measurable definition of HS flare is a barrier to assessment of this important outcome. Once a specific and measurable definition is established, validated and reliable measures of HS flare can be incorporated into future studies. What's already known about this topic? Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin condition. The ability to assess flares is important to people who have HS; however, it is unclear how this is defined. HS flare is one of the core outcomes in the core outcome set for HS clinical trials; however, it is unclear how this should be assessed. What does this study add? This literature review reveals the paucity of measurable definitions associated with the use of the term 'flare' in the HS literature. It also highlights the variation and lack of a validated and reliable measure of HS flare.

Validation of a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Self-Assessment Tool

Background:

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating dermatologic condition presenting with recurrent abscesses. While there are multiple scales to determine HS severity, none are designed for self-administration. A validated severity self-assessment tool may facilitate survey research and improve communication by allowing patients to objectively report their HS severity between clinic visits.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to assess a self-administered HS measure.

Methods:

An HS self-assessment tool (HSSA) with 10 photographs of different Hurley stages was developed. The tool was administered to patients diagnosed with HS who visited the Wake Forest Baptist Health dermatology clinic over a span of 2 months. Physician-administered Hurley stage was recorded to determine criterion validity. To assess test-retest reliability of the measure, patients completed the HSSA again at least 30 minutes after the first completion.

Results:

Twenty-four patients completed the measure, and 20 of these patients completed it twice. Agreement between physician-determined Hurley stage and self-determined Hurley stage was 66.7% with a weighted kappa of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.84). The weighted kappa for agreement between patients’ initial and second completion of the HSSA was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64-0.99).

Conclusions:

The self-administered measure provides moderate agreement with physician-determined Hurley stage and good test-retest reliability.