Open-label, investigator-initiated, single-site exploratory trial evaluating secukinumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

Biologics for Hidradenitis suppurativa: evolution of the treatment paradigm

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an autoinflammatory skin disease with a high unmet need for effective medical management. Clinically, it is characterized by inflammatory nodules that may progress into abscesses, draining tunnels and extensive scarring, mainly affecting apocrine gland-bearing areas.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment options include topical and systemic medications and a variety of surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab and the anti-IL-17 secukinumab are the only two approved biologics for HS, showing moderate efficacy. HS research is a rapidly growing field, with a wide range of agents leveraging distinct mechanisms of action currently under development. Drugs targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathways are the most advanced in both ongoing and completed Phase 3 studies, promising deeper levels of response. Use of other, off-label biologics is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

A therapeutic algorithm is proposed based on comorbidities and existing evidence. Patient-tailored combinations between biologics and other biologics or small molecules will hopefully allow clinicians to target most events in HS pathophysiology in a complementary way while obtaining a meaningful effect on their devastating manifestations.

An evaluation of secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, biological therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa was limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade with adalimumab (ADA). However, not all patients respond to treatment with ADA. This highlighted the need for more therapeutic options. Interleukin (IL)-17/T-helper 17 (Th17) axis may play an important role in the pathophysiology of HS. Recently, the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab, which targets IL-17A specifically and prevents it from interacting with the IL-17 receptor, has been FDA-approved for HS.

AREAS COVERED

Secukinumab, represents a novel therapeutic strategy in HS management. An overview of structural and pharmacological characteristics is provided. Described efficacy in clinical trials and case reports and safety data from is presented.

EXPERT OPINION

As response to anti-TNFas is lost over time, secukinumab has provided an alternative HS treatment option in clinical practice. Overall, secukinumab has shown good efficacy and a favorable side effect profile in HS clinical trials but may be avoided in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Long-term and real-life data on the use of secukinumab are essential for improving decision-making in HS therapy.

Secukinumab in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients Who Failed Adalimumab: A 52-Week Real-Life Study

Background

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, adalimumab the only biologic drug approved for HS is adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, the approval of this drug dates to 2015, data provided by real life show an effectiveness rate of about 60% percent. Recently (31 October 2023) FDA approves secukinumab for moderate-severe HS. The treatment and management of HS is very challenging as available treatments are very limited and show very variable outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a prospective monocentric study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab treatment in HS patients in a real-life setting.

Results

The initial cohort of patients recruited included 21 HS patients including 12 females and 9 males. About 57.1% of patients achieved the primary endpoint and recorded significant decrease in all the severity assessment scales (IHS4, DLQI and VAS pain scale) at week 16 and 52, when HiSCR reached 71.4%.

Conclusion

The results of our study highlight that treatment with secukinumab in patients with severe HS who failed adalimumab may be a safe and effective therapeutic weapon.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Secukinumab in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

The IL-17 pathways are involved in the pathophysiology of many inflammatory skin conditions, including hidradenitis suppurativa. Secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, has been used for years in inflammatory skin disorders such as psoriasis. To date, the only US FDA-approved medication for hidradenitis suppurativa is adalimumab, a TNF-α inhibitor. Recently, secukinumab has demonstrated promising results in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa in the phase III SUNSHINE and SUNRISE clinical trials. This article reviews the mechanism of action of secukinumab and summarizes the available clinical efficacy and safety data regarding secukinumab in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa.

Is Exploration of Alternate Immune Pathways Needed in Hidradenitis Suppurativa? A Case of Atopic Dermatitis and Concurrent Hidradenitis Suppurativa Responding to Dupilumab

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory dermatosis associated with overactive T helper 1/T helper 17 (Th1/Th17) cells. HS has been effectively treated with biologic medications; however, many such biologics lack large randomized controlled trials. Only one such biologic, adalimumab, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HS. Other such biologics currently being studied for HS downregulate Th1/Th17 inflammatory pathways. We describe a patient with atopic dermatitis (AD) and comorbid HS, both of which improved several months into treatment with dupilumab. Interestingly enough, dupilumab targets Th2-mediated inflammatory skin conditions through the inhibition of IL-4/IL-13 cytokines. While dupilumab is known for its success in treating Th2-mediated inflammation, this presents a paradox as HS is a Th1/Th17 inflammatory condition. This case highlights how the inflammatory process of HS is not fully understood and how biologic pharmacologic interventions need to be further studied to determine their efficacy in treating HS.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Existing Trials and Real-Life Data

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, the only biologic drugs approved for HS are adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, authorized in 2015, and secukinumab, recently licensed. The management of this condition is challenging as the available treatments show variable results, and the course of the condition is often chronic-recurrent; therefore, it will be necessary for the future to identify new therapeutic targets for HS. In recent years, studies have focused on the development towards new therapeutic targets. The purpose of our review was to perform a comprehensive literature review of real-life data on anti-IL23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) in HS to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. We selected 64 articles, among which 32 had the characteristics that we were looking for in our review. To date, the positive data expressed in real-life experiences contrast with the three existing Phase 2 studies conducted so far, where it seems that these drugs may be useful only for a subgroup of patients with HS whose features need to be elucidated. Data from Phase 3 studies and other real-life experiences, perhaps more detailed and with higher numbers, will certainly be needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs.

Emerging Treatments and the Clinical Trial Landscape for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Part I: Topical and Systemic Medical Therapies

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an oftentimes debilitating condition that presents with painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts. This condition is challenging to treat, in part because the pathogenesis of the condition is incompletely understood but also because there are limited therapeutic options. HS research is undergoing explosive growth with multiple new molecular pathways under study, which will hopefully lead to improved disease control for patients. Part I of this review will provide an overview of the emerging topical and systemic therapies under investigation for HS.

The Current Clinical Trial Landscape for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Narrative Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a skin disease resulting from chronic, recurrent inflammation around hair follicles, characterized by proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α. While adalimumab, a TNF-α targeting human IgG monoclonal antibody, is the only approved treatment for HS, there are many other therapies being investigated now targeting other key players in inflammatory pathways such as the cytokines listed above, C5a in the complement pathway, and Janus kinase (JAK). This review discusses current clinical trials for biologics and small molecules, procedures, and wound dressings undergoing study in hidradenitis suppurativa.

New Insight into the Molecular Pathomechanism and Immunomodulatory Treatments of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder characterized by deep-seated nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts and scars localized in the intertriginous areas. It is accompanied by pain, malodourous secretion and a dramatically decreased quality of life. Although the pathogenesis has not been entirely elucidated, the primary event is follicular hyperkeratosis of the pilosebaceous apocrine unit. Since the registration of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor Adalimumab in 2015, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research of novel therapeutic targets has been intensified. We provide an update on the inflammatory cytokines with a central role in HS pathogenesis and the most promising target molecules of future HS management.

Hidradenitis suppurativa and the risk of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and peripheral vascular disease: a population-based study

Previous studies have identified an association between myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). To evaluate the risk and prognostic outcomes of MI, CVA, and PVD in patients with HS. A population-based retrospective cohort study using the computerized database of Clalit Health Services (CHS), the largest managed care organization in Israel, was conducted to compare the incidence of MI, CVA, and PVD among patients with HS (N = 6779) with age-, sex- and ethnicity-matched control subjects (N = 33,260). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The overall incidence rates of MI, CVA, and PVD were estimated at 2.9 (2.3-3.4), 1.3 (0.9-1.7), and 0.8 (0.6-1.1) per 1000 person-year, respectively. Patients with HS were at an increased risk of developing MI (fully-adjusted HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.04-1.68; P = 0.021), but the risk of CVA (fully-adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.59-1.14; P = 0.245) and PVD (fully-adjusted HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.80-1.87; P = 0.355) was comparable relative to controls. Compared to other patients with HS, increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among patients with HS and comorbid MI (HR 12.56; 95% CI 7.59-20.80; P < 0.001), CVA (HR 13.33; 95% CI 7.29-24.37; P < 0.001), and PVD (HR 7.11; 95% CI 2.61-19.32; P < 0.001). Patients with HS are at an increased risk of MI, but not CVA and PVD. Awareness of these epidemiological findings is of importance for clinicians managing patients with HS.

Short-Term Effectiveness, Safety, and Potential Predictors of Response of Secukinumab in Patients with Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Refractory to Biologic Therapy: A Multicenter Observational Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Biologic drugs have a key role in the long-term anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate to severe patients due to their immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe HS after 16 weeks of treatment, and to explore potential predictors of clinical response to the drug.

METHODS

Multicenter observational retrospective study. Patients treated with secukinumab 300 mg every 2 or 4 weeks who had completed at least 16 weeks of follow-up from nine hospitals based in southern Spain (Andalusia) were included in this study. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Information about adverse events was collected, the therapeutic burden of the patients was calculated as the summation of systemic medical treatments and surgical interventions (excluding incision and drainage) experienced until the start of secukinumab treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with severe HS were included for analysis. At week 16, 48.9% (23/47) of patients achieved HiSCR. Adverse events were present in 6.4% (3/47) of the patients. The multivariate analysis showed that female sex and, to a lesser extent, lower body mass index (BMI) and a lower therapeutic burden were potentially associated with a higher probability of HiSCR achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable short-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of severe HS patients were observed. Female sex, lower BMI and a lower therapeutic burden may be associated with a higher probability of achieving HiSCR.

Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (SUNSHINE and SUNRISE): week 16 and week 52 results of two identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Few therapeutic options are available for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa in two randomised trials.

METHODS

SUNSHINE and SUNRISE were identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials done in 219 primary sites in 40 countries. Patients aged 18 years old or older with the capacity to provide written informed consent and with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (defined as a total of ≥5 inflammatory lesions affecting ≥2 distinct anatomical areas) for at least 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Included patients also agreed to daily use of topical over-the-counter antiseptics on the areas affected by hidradenitis suppurativa lesions while on study treatment. Patients were excluded if they had 20 or more fistulae at baseline, had ongoing active conditions requiring treatment with prohibited medication (eg, systemic biological immunomodulating treatment, live vaccines, or other investigational treatments), or met other exclusion criteria. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by means of interactive response technology to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, or subcutaneous placebo all via a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a double-dummy method as per treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response, defined as a decrease in abscess and inflammatory nodule count by 50% or more with no increase in the number of abscesses or in the number of draining fistulae compared with baseline, at week 16, assessed in the overall population. Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response was calculated based on the number of abscesses, inflammatory nodules, draining fistulae, total fistulae, and other lesions in the hidradenitis suppurativa affected areas. Safety was assessed by evaluating the presence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events, which were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. Both the SUNSHINE, NCT03713619, and SUNRISE, NCT03713632, trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 2019, and June 7, 2021, 676 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNSHINE trial, of whom 541 (80%; 304 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·1 years [SD 11·7]) were included in the analysis (181 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 180 [33%] in the placebo group). Between the same recruitment dates, 687 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNRISE trial, of whom 543 (79%; 306 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·3 [11·4] years) were included in the analysis (180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 183 [34%] in the placebo group). In the SUNSHINE trial, significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (rounded average number of patients with response in 100 imputations, 81·5 [45%] of 181 patients) compared with the placebo group (60·7 [34%] of 180 patients; odds ratio 1·8 [95% CI 1·1-2·7]; p=0·0070). However, there was no significant difference between the number of patients in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (75·2 [42%] of 180 patients) and the placebo group (1·5 [1·0-2·3]; p=0·042). Compared with the placebo group (57·1 [31%] of 183 patients), significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group (76·2 [42%] of 180 patients; 1·6 [1·1-2·6]; p=0·015) and the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (83·1 [46%] of 180 patients; 1·9 [1·2-3·0]; p=0·0022) had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the SUNRISE trial. Patient responses were sustained up to the end of the trials at week 52. The most common adverse event by preferred term up to week 16 was headache in both the SUNSHINE (17 [9%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 20 [11%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 14 [8%] in the placebo group) and SUNRISE (21 [12%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 17 [9%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 15 [8%] in the placebo group) trials. No study-related deaths were reported up to week 16. The safety profile of secukinumab in both trials was consistent with that previously reported, with no new or unexpected safety findings detected.

INTERPRETATION

When given every 2 weeks, secukinumab was clinically effective at rapidly improving signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa with a favourable safety profile and with sustained response up to 52 weeks of treatment.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma.

Dysregulated CD38 expression in blood and skin immune cells of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a multifactorial, inflammatory skin disease. Increased systemic inflammatory comorbidities and serum cytokines highlight systemic inflammation as a feature of HS. However, the specific immune cell subsets contributing to systemic and cutaneous inflammation have not been resolved. Here, we generated whole-blood immunomes by mass cytometry. We performed a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data, immunohistochemistry, and imaging mass cytometry to characterize the immunological landscape of skin lesions and perilesions from patients with HS. Blood from patients with HS exhibited lower frequencies of natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and classical (CD14+CD16-) and nonclassical (CD14-CD16+) monocytes, as well as higher frequencies of Th17 cells and intermediate (CD14+CD16+) monocytes than blood from healthy controls. Classical and intermediate monocytes from patients with HS had increased expression of skin-homing chemokine receptors. Furthermore, we identified a CD38+ intermediate monocyte subpopulation that was more abundant in the immunome of blood from patients with HS. Meta-analysis of RNA-seq data found higher CD38 expression in lesional HS skin than in perilesional skin, and markers of classical monocyte infiltration. Imaging mass cytometry showed that CD38+ classical monocytes and CD38+ monocyte-derived macrophages were more abundant in lesional HS skin. Overall, we report targeting CD38 may be worth pursuing in clinical trials.

Dysregulated CD38 expression in blood and skin immune cells of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a multifactorial, inflammatory skin disease. Increased systemic inflammatory comorbidities and serum cytokines highlight systemic inflammation as a feature of HS. However, the specific immune cell subsets contributing to systemic and cutaneous inflammation have not been resolved.

Objective

Identify features of peripheral and cutaneous immune dysregulation.

Methods

Here, we generated whole-blood immunomes by mass cytometry. We performed a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data, immunohistochemistry, and imaging mass cytometry to characterize the immunological landscape of skin lesions and perilesions from patients with HS.

Results

Blood from patients with HS exhibited lower frequencies of natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and classical (CD14+CD16-) and nonclassical (CD14-CD16+) monocytes, as well as higher frequencies of Th17 cells and intermediate (CD14+CD16+) monocytes than blood from healthy controls. Classical and intermediate monocytes from patients with HS had increased expression of skin-homing chemokine receptors. Furthermore, we identified a CD38+ intermediate monocyte subpopulation that was more abundant in the immunome of blood from patients with HS. Meta-analysis of RNA-seq data found higher CD38 expression in lesional HS skin than in perilesional skin, and markers of classical monocyte infiltration. Imaging mass cytometry showed that CD38+ classical monocytes and CD38+ monocyte-derived macrophages were more abundant in lesional HS skin.

Conclusion

Overall, we report targeting CD38 may be worth pursuing in clinical trials.

Key Messages

3.Monocyte subsets express markers of activation in circulation and HS lesionsTargeting CD38 may be a viable strategy for treating systemic and cutaneous inflammation in patients with HS.

Capsule Summary

4.Dysregulated immune cells in patients with HS express CD38 and may be targeting by anti-CD38 immunotherapy.

Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, and Secukinumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of the Real-Life Experience

To date, adalimumab (ADA) is the only biotechnology drug approved for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), an inflammatory skin condition. However, it quickly became apparent that the efficacy of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. In our review, we highlighted the current evidence from literature on the use of biologics in HS in a real-life setting, particularly adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. Data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs in HS management have been analyzed. Even if the results are promising, more studies are needed. In our opinion, the armamentarium of drugs for HS management is increasing, and treatment will be based on a tailored-tail approach, minimizing the risk of adverse events. In this context, we want to point out the reported effectiveness and safety data concerning adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab as well as ixekizumab.

A Practical Guide for Primary Care Providers on Timely Diagnosis and Comprehensive Care Strategies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disease of the skin with many systemic implications. Hidradenitis suppurativa is frequently underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, particularly because of heterogeneity in presentation and low disease recognition. Patients can see multiple types of health care providers, including primary care providers, along their journey to an accurate diagnosis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical presentation, associated comorbidities, and life impact associated with hidradenitis suppurativa. Disease features described here can facilitate earlier identification of hidradenitis suppurativa, differentiation from common mimickers, and timely referrals for multidisciplinary management when needed. Engagement of the medical community will also support comprehensive care strategies necessary in hidradenitis suppurativa.

Current Medical and Surgical Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa-A Comprehensive Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with recurrent inflammatory lesions in intertriginous body regions. HS has a pronounced impact on patients' quality of life and is associated with a variety of comorbidities. Treatment of HS is often complex, requiring an individual approach with medical and surgical treatments available. However, especially in moderate-to-severe HS, there is an urgent need for new treatment approaches. In recent years, increased research has led to the identification of new potential therapeutic targets. This review aims to give a comprehensive and practical overview of current treatment options for HS. Furthermore, the clinically most advanced novel treatment approaches will be discussed.

IL-17A is a pertinent therapeutic target for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Combined results from a pre-clinical and phase II proof-of-concept study

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory, follicular skin disease whose pathology is complex and not fully understood. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of IL-17A in moderate-to-severe HS. Transcriptomic and histological analyses were conducted on ex vivo HS (n = 19; lesional and non-lesional) and healthy control (n = 8) skin biopsies. Further, a Phase II exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in moderate-to-severe HS patients. Patients were treated with either CJM112 300 mg (n = 33), a fully human anti-IL-17A IgG1/κ monoclonal antibody, or placebo (n = 33). The main outcome of the translational analyses was to identify IL-17A-producing cells and indications of IL-17A activity in HS lesional skin. The primary objective of the clinical study was to determine the efficacy of CJM112 in moderate-to-severe HS patients by HS-Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA) responder rate at Week 16. Transcriptomic and histopathologic analyses revealed the presence of heterogeneous cell types in HS lesional skin; IL-17A gene signatures were increased in HS lesional vs non-lesional or healthy skin. High expression of IL-17A was localized to T cells, neutrophils, and mast cells, confirming the transcriptional data. Clinically, the proportion of Week 16 HS-PGA responders was significantly higher (p = 0.03) in the CJM112 group vs placebo (32.3% vs 12.5%). This study elucidated the role of the IL-17A pathway in HS pathogenesis and clinically validated the IL-17A pathway in moderate-to-severe HS patients in a proof-of-concept study using the anti-IL-17A-specific antibody CJM112.

The road to biologics in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a nationwide drug utilization study

BACKGROUND

Prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment is often a part of management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although biologic therapies are now available, the patient's treatment journey leading to biologic therapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment patterns and duration of systemic treatment use in patients with HS preceding biologic therapy.

METHODS

We identified all patients with HS receiving treatment with biologics in the Danish National Patient Registry from 2010 to 2018 and extracted their entire prescription history of specific systemic treatments from the Danish National Prescription Registry since its inception in 1995. The patients' treatment journeys are graphically displayed through Sankey diagrams and box plots generated to show temporal distributions. Descriptive patient characteristics were presented as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables and as means with SDs or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients with HS were included. Patients had most frequently been treated with penicillin (n = 214; 95·1%), dicloxacillin (n = 194; 86·2%), tetracycline (n = 145; 64·4%) and rifampicin/clindamycin (n = 111; 49·3%), as well as the retinoids isotretinoin and acitretin, and dapsone. Prior to biologic therapy, patients received a mean of 4·0 (SD 1·3) different systemic therapies, across a mean of 16·9 (SD 11·3) different treatment series. The mean time from first systemic therapy until biologic therapy was initiated was 15·3 (SD 5·1) years [8·2 (SD 5·9) years when excluding penicillin and dicloxacillin].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HS who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS. Delay in the initiation of biologic therapy may represent a missed opportunity to prevent disease progression. What is already known about this topic? The treatment journey leading to biologic therapy in patients with HS has not previously been investigated. What does this study add? Our data from 225 patients with HS illustrate that patients who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS.

Immunomodulatory Drugs in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa—Possibilities and Limitations

Hidradenitis suppurativa, also known as acne inversa, is a chronic, progressive, debilitating, recurrent inflammatory skin disease characterized by the occurrence of very severe, persistent, painful nodules, abscesses, and fistulas, most commonly found in the skin folds of the axilla, groin, gluteal, and perianal areas. Treatment is rather difficult and typically requires the use of multiple modalities. Regardless of the presence of several therapeutic options, treatment often turns out to be ineffective or poorly selected concerning the clinical picture of the disease. Thus, the search for new biologics and other target treatments of hidradenitis suppurativa is ongoing. The safety and efficacy of adalimumab, still the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved biologic in the hidradenitis suppurativa treatment, paved the way for new drugs to be compared with it. Several more drugs with new immunological targets are currently under investigation for the treatment of acne inversa. The aim of the article was to present the current and future targets of acne inversa treatment, simultaneously providing insights into the molecular pathomechanisms of the disease.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts in the axillary, inframammary, groin, and gluteal areas. Up to 3.8% of the Canadian population has HS, though due to a lack of awareness of HS, many patients are initially misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate treatment early on in the disease course. Once a diagnosis of HS is made, developing an effective management plan can be a dilemma for many providers. There is significant variability in response to any given therapy within the HS patient population and many HS patients have other medical comorbidities which must be taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all healthcare providers to diagnose and manage HS and its associated comorbidities. A sample electronic medical record template for HS management was developed by the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Executive Board and is intended for use in clinical settings. This will help to increase collaboration between primary healthcare providers, dermatologists, and other medical specialists and ultimately improve the quality of care that HS patients receive.

Certolizumab Pegol in the Treatment of Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa After Adalimumab Failure: A Real-Life Experience

INTRODUCTION

There exists an unmet need to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) despite several approved therapeutic agents for its treatment. We sought to investigate the role of certolizumab pegol in severe, recalcitrant HS patients unresponsive to adalimumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort includes HS patients over 18 years of age who had a history of unresponsiveness to adalimumab and whose treatments were switched to certolizumab pegol with dosing similar to psoriasis (400 mg every two weeks). For subjects who achieved a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) following 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, dermatological life quality index (DLQI), abscess, inflammatory nodule count (AN count), and International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) were evaluated as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Eleven severe, recalcitrant HS patients with Hurley stage III HS were enrolled for this study. All patients were male and had a history of prior adalimumab exposure. Only three (27.2%) patients also had a history of using biologic agents other than adalimumab for HS. Six of 11 patients (54.5%) achieved HiSCR at week 12. However, two among these six responders lost response at week 24 despite continued therapy (HiSCR at week 24: 33.3%). The decrease in DLQI (p: 0.017 and 0.021) and IHS4 (p: 0.008 and 0.007) scores of the patients at weeks 12 and 24 showed a significant difference compared to the baseline.

CONCLUSION

Certolizumab pegol is a promising treatment option for severe, recalcitrant HS patients who are unresponsive to adalimumab. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Innate immunity and microbial dysbiosis in hidradenitis suppurativa – vicious cycle of chronic inflammation

Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory skin disease with incompletely understood mechanisms of disease pathology. HS is characterized by aberrant activation of the innate immune system, resulting in activation of pathways that aim to protect against pathogenic microorganisms, and also contribute to failure to resolve inflammation. Imbalance in innate immunity is evident in deregulation of host antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and the complement system associated with the microbiome dysbiosis. The pathology is further complicated by ability of pathogens associated with HS to overcome host immune response. Potential roles of major AMPs, cathelicidin, defensins, dermcidin, S100 proteins, RNAse 7 and complement proteins are discussed. Dysregulated expression pattern of innate immunity components in conjunction with bacterial component of the disease warrants consideration of novel treatment approaches targeting both host immunity and pathogenic microbiome in HS.

Advances in biologic and small molecule therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disorder characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and scarring with a predilection for flexural regions. Several biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the data available from clinical trials and smaller, high-quality studies for existing and emerging biologic and small molecule inhibitor therapies for treatment of HS. Biologics discussed include TNFα, IL-17, IL-23, IL-12/23, and IL-1 inhibitors. Small molecule inhibitors discussed include PDE4, JAK, TYK, IFX-1, and complement cascade inhibitors. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for these drugs are also described.

EXPERT OPINION

Trial data and our own experience have shown that about half of HS patients experience improvement with adalimumab. However, there is a significant need for pharmacotherapies with higher efficacy goals as in those used for psoriasis. Many biologics and small molecule inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials. The landscape of upcoming therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa appears promising.

New and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease deriving from the hair follicles. The formation of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and sinus tracts is characterized by a large inflow of key pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-17, and IL-12/23. Adalimumab is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biologic therapy for moderate to severe HS in adults and adolescents. However, the long-term effectiveness of this TNF-α inhibitor in HS patients has shown to be highly variable. This review aims to review the evidence for emerging therapies that target the main pro-inflammatory cytokines in HS pathogenesis. A review of the literature was conducted, using the PubMed and Google Scholar repositories, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov. Presently, the most promising biologics in phase III trials are anti-IL-17 antibodies, secukinumab, and bimekizumab. Furthermore, an anti-IL-1 biologic, bermekimab, is currently in phase II trials, and shows encouraging results. Overall, the clinical efficacies of all new targeted therapies published up to this point are limited. More studies need to be performed to clarify the precise molecular pathology, and assess the efficacy of biological therapies for HS.

IL-17RA blockade by brodalumab decreases inflammatory pathways in hidradenitis suppurativa skin and serum

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease with dysregulation of the IL-17 axis. Recently we reported clinical benefit of brodalumab, a human anti-IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) monoclonal antibody, in moderate-to-severe HS.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the molecular response to brodalumab in HS skin and serum, and to identify biomarkers of treatment response.

METHODS

Ten participants that received 210 mg/1.5mL brodalumab subcutaneously at week 0, 1, 2, 4 and every 2 weeks after were included in this molecular profiling study (NCT03960268). RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry of nonlesional, perilesional and lesional HS skin biopsies, and Olink high throughput proteomics of serum at baseline, week 4 and week 12 were assessed.

RESULTS

At week 12, brodalumab led to a decrease of overall inflammation, and improvement of psoriasis-, keratinocyte- and neutrophil-related pathways. Despite perilesional and lesional skin having no differentially expressed genes at baseline, treatment response was best assessed in perilesional skin. In serum, brodalumab treatment decreased pathways involved in neutrophil inflammation. Patients with higher baseline expression of neutrophil-associated Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) in the skin and IL-17A in the serum demonstrated greater decreases of HS-related inflammatory cytokines as measured in skin biopsies at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-17RA inhibition by brodalumab impacts several pathogenic inflammatory axes in HS. Perilesional skin provides a valid and robust assessment of treatment response. Expression of LCN2 in skin and IL-17A in serum may be used as biomarkers to stratify patients that may have a superior molecular response to brodalumab =.

The inflammatory proteome of hidradenitis suppurativa skin is more expansive than that of psoriasis vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Although hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) shares some transcriptomic and cellular infiltrate features with psoriasis, their skin proteome remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To define and compare inflammatory protein biomarkers of HS and psoriasis skin.

METHODS

We assessed 92 inflammatory biomarkers in HS (n = 13), psoriasis (n = 11), and control skin (n = 11) using Olink high-throughput proteomics. We also correlated HS skin and blood biomarkers using proteomics and RNA sequencing.

RESULTS

We identified 57 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in lesional psoriasis and 64 DEPs in lesional HS skin, compared to healthy controls. Both HS and psoriasis lesional skin demonstrated a significant upregulation of T helper 1 and T helper 17 proteins. Healthy-appearing perilesional HS skin had 63 DEPs compared to healthy controls. Nonlesional HS and psoriasis skin had 24 and 7 DEPs, respectively, compared to healthy controls. Tumor necrosis factor and 8 other proteins were significantly correlated with clinical severity in perilesional HS skin (2 cm from a nodule).

LIMITATIONS

Inclusion of only moderate-to-severe patients and the cohort size.

CONCLUSION

HS has a greater inflammatory profile and is more diffusely distributed compared with psoriasis. Proteins correlated with disease severity are potential disease mediators. Perilesional skin is comparably inflamed to lesional skin, suggesting the need to treat beyond skin nodules.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Comorbid Disorder Biomarkers, Druggable Genes, New Drugs and Drug Repurposing-A Molecular Meta-Analysis

Chronic inflammation and dysregulated epithelial differentiation, especially of hair follicle keratinocytes, have been suggested as the major pathogenetic pathways of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). On the other hand, obesity and metabolic syndrome have additionally been considered as an important risk factor. With adalimumab, a drug has already been approved and numerous other compounds are in advanced-stage clinical studies. A systematic review was conducted to detect and corroborate HS pathogenetic mechanisms at the molecular level and identify HS molecular markers. The obtained data were used to confirm studied and off-label administered drugs and to identify additional compounds for drug repurposing. A robust, strongly associated group of HS biomarkers was detected. The triad of HS pathogenesis, namely upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial differentiation and dysregulated metabolism/hormone signaling was confirmed, the molecular association of HS with certain comorbid disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus and lipids/atherosclerosis/adipogenesis was verified and common biomarkers were identified. The molecular suitability of compounds in clinical studies was confirmed and 31 potential HS repurposing drugs, among them 10 drugs already launched for other disorders, were detected. This systematic review provides evidence for the importance of molecular studies to advance the knowledge regarding pathogenesis, future treatment and biomarker-supported clinical course follow-up in HS.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Host-Microbe and Immune Pathogenesis Underlie Important Future Directions

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the skin with a chronic, relapsing-remitting course. The pathogenesis of the disease is poorly understood and involves multiple factors, including genetics, environment, host-microbe interactions, and immune dysregulation. In particular, the composition of the cutaneous microbiome shifts as the disease progresses, although it is unclear whether this is a primary or secondary process. Trials with immunomodulatory therapy elucidate the role of specific immune pathways and cytokine signaling in disease mechanism, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, and complement. Future studies should continue examining the causes of and contributing factors to microbial changes and immune dysregulation in HS pathogenesis.

New perspectives on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of painful nodules, abscesses, chronically draining fistulas, and scarring in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body. The exact pathogenesis of HS is not yet well understood, but there is a consensus in considering HS a multifactorial disease with a genetic predisposition, an inflammatory dysregulation, and an influence of environmental modifying factors. Therapeutic approach of HS is challenging due to the wide clinical manifestations of the disease and the complex pathogenesis. This review describes evidence for effectiveness of current and emerging HS therapies. Topical therapy, systemic treatments, biological agents, surgery, and light therapy have been used for HS with variable results. Adalimumab is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biologic agent for moderate-to-severe HS, but new therapeutic options are being studied, targeting different specific cytokines involved in HS pathogenesis. Comparing treatment outcomes between therapies is difficult due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Treatment strategy should be selected in concordance to disease severity and requires combination of treatments in most cases.

Vulvoperineal Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Deformities

Importance

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory disorder affecting skin of intertriginous areas that is often encountered and treated by nondermatologic specialists.

Objective

The purpose of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive, clinical source of information on HS as it relates to incidence of disease, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and overall management of this condition.

Evidence Acquisition

Sources were obtained through a comprehensive literature search using PubMed and PMC. Various terms were used to query the database, including "hidradenitis suppurativa," "pathogenesis," "prevalence," "management," "surgery," "perineal," and "vulva."

Results

Underreported prevalence and unknown pathogenesis have subsequently led to variable approaches in clinical management, often employing a combination of medical and surgical management.

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and treatment of HS may lead to better disease control and minimize patients' associated morbidity related to disease.

Relevance

Knowledge of vulvoperineal hidradenitis is necessary for gynecologists and primary care physicians to ensure early diagnosis, management, and referral for optimal patient outcomes.

Insights into the Pathogenesis of HS and Therapeutical Approaches

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, chronic, (auto)inflammatory disease primarily affecting apocrine gland-rich areas of the body. Although pathogenic mechanisms responsible for HS have not yet been fully elucidated, it is a multifactorial process whose main target is the terminal follicle. The role of the inflammatory process (and consequently of cytokine milieu) and of several other factors (genetics, lifestyle, hormonal status, microbiome, innate and adaptive immune systems) involved in HS pathogenesis has been investigated (and often defined) over the years with a view to transferring research results from bench to bedside and describing a unique and universally accepted pathogenetic model. This review will update readers on recent advances in our understanding of HS pathogenesis and novel (potential) medical therapies for patients with moderate-to-severe HS.

Treatment Outcomes of IL-17 Inhibitors in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review

The IL-17 pathway is a potential therapeutic target shown to be implicated in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), however, it remains unclear whether evidence from mechanistic studies may translate into clinical practice. This systematic review summarizes available treatment outcomes of IL-17 inhibitors in patients with HS. Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov were comprehensively searched on February 26, 2021 to include 16 original studies representing 128 patients with HS (mean age: 36.5 years; age range: 21-47 years; male: 50.0%). Treatment outcomes were reported for the following biologics: secukinumab (n = 105), brodalumab (n = 22), and ixekizumab (n = 1). Patients were classified as responders or non-responders according to achievement of a positive response/improvement based on criteria established for each included study. For secukinumab 57.1% (n = 60/105) of patients were responders in a mean response period of 16.2 weeks and 42.9% (n = 45/105) were non-responders; for brodalumab, 100.0% (n = 22/22) of patients were responders within 4.4 weeks; and the one patient treated with ixekizumab was a responder within 10 weeks. In conclusion, IL-17 inhibitors may serve as an effective therapeutic target in approximately two-thirds of patients with HS and can be considered in those who are refractory to other treatment modalities. We also stress the importance of consistent outcome measures to enhance evidence synthesis, decrease reporting bias, provide potential for future meta-analysis, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes for patients with HS.

[Hidradenitis suppurativa /acne inversa-surgical options, reconstruction and combinations with drug therapies-an update]

Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa (HS/AI) ist eine chronisch-entzündliche Hauterkrankung, deren Behandlung sowohl konservative als auch chirurgische Behandlungsmöglichkeiten umfasst. In den Hurley-Stadien II und III ist die chirurgische Resektion irreversibel zerstörten Gewebes anzustreben. Hierzu existieren verschiedene Resektionstechniken, die sich vor allem in ihrer Invasivität und Rezidivneigung unterscheiden. Bis heute gibt es keinen allgemein akzeptierten Konsens hinsichtlich verschiedener Resektions- und Rekonstruktionstechniken sowie der Einbeziehung medikamentöser Therapien in das therapeutische Gesamtkonzept.

[Systemic treatment of moderate/severe hidradenitis suppurativa]

Systemic treatment together with radical surgical excision is the most important treatment option for all severity grades of hidradenitis suppurativa. Tetracycline in mild-to-moderate forms and clindamycin in combination with rifampicin in moderate-to-severe forms are guideline-compliant first-line therapy with a good clinical response. Other antibiotics such as ertepenem or multiple combinations are recommended as last-line therapy due to a lack of data. Success rate with dapsone and retinoids, on the other hand, are insufficient-only acitretin can be recommended on the basis of the available studies, but with limited success. With the TNF-alpha blocker adalimumab, an effective and safe long-term therapy is available-further biologics are in clinical trials and could significantly expand the treatment portfolio in the future.

Quality of Life in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Knowledge on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is rapidly increasing. HS has a profound impact on patients and their family life. Several factors, such as comorbidities, unemployment and HS severity, make this impact even more severe. The most widely used instrument to measure this impact is the dermatology-specific DLQI. We also identified six HS-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. Of them, HIDRAdisk, HSIA, HiSQOL and HSQoL-24 are better validated but there is still lack of experience of its use. Several treatment methods showed positive effect on patients’ HRQoL. Surgery remains a method with a substantial positive effect on HRQoL. Several studies confirming a positive effect of adalimumab on the HRQoL of patients with HS were published during the last three years. Data on the influence of several other biologics on HRQoL of HS patients are controversial or based on studies with a small number of patients.

A safety review of biologic therapies for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa and unmet needs

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disorder characterized by nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and significant scarring in intertriginous areas rich in apocrine glands. Immunomodulator drugs, including biologics, are a mainstay of treatment for this disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review details the safety profiles of various biologic therapies currently available commercially that have been tried for HS as assessed in clinical trials and observational studies. As the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS, adalimumab is discussed in the most detail. Additional biologic medications, including tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors, interleukin 1 (IL-1) inhibitors, IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors, are discussed as well. Safety concerns in special populations, including pregnant women and children, are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Existing data support excellent short-term and long-term safety profiles for adalimumab, although caution must be taken with use in high-risk patient populations, including those with chronic infections or increased risk of malignancy. Based on their safety data for other indications, additional biologic agents appear safe in HS as well. However, further research is needed to fully understand the safety profiles of these medications in the HS population.

Efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and network meta-analyses of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

We determined the relative efficacy of non-surgical monotherapies for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

METHODS

Network meta-analyses were conducted to determine treatments' surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value (i.e., an estimate that ranks efficacy); pairwise comparisons were conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ten trials were eligible for quantitative analyses; however, all did not have a common endpoint. Outcomes corresponded to pain severity, clinical response, quality of life and abscess count. For pain reduction, infliximab was ranked most efficacious (SUCRA =94%) compared to bermekimab, anakinra and placebo; infliximab reduced pain more significantly (p < 0.05) than anakinra and than placebo. For occurrence of clinical response, bimekizumab had the highest SUCRA (67%) relative to adalimumab, anakinra and placebo; bimekizumab was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For quality of life in mild HS, Botox had the highest SUCRA (94%) compared to adalimumab and placebo; Botox was more efficacious than placebo (p < 0.05). For reduction in abscess count, oral tetracycline had the highest SUCRA (48%) compared to topical clindamycin and vehicle. Our work-being the first NMA study on non-surgical HS monotherapies-contributes to the comparative effectiveness literature for this condition.

Rapid Response to Certolizumab Pegol in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Case Report

Introduction

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of hair follicles which usually affects patients' quality of life negatively. Although there are various therapeutic approaches including topical and systemic antibiotics, retinoids, biological agents, and also surgical modalities, there is no curative treatment option and clinical management of HS is still challenging.

Case Presentation

Herein, we present a 43 year-old man with HS who had used different treatments in 15 years. The patient showed improvement initially with adalimumab, then exhibited secondary unresponsiveness after 18 months. While worsening of HS was recorded due to increased discharge under secukinumab, no additional benefit was observed with methotrexate. He was not willing to undergo surgical procedures due to previous surgical experience. Finally, certolizumab pegol has been started to patient with similar dosing to psoriasis patients. Sartorius, 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), and dermatological life quality index (DLQI) scores regressed from 171 to 105, 9/10 to 3/10, and 27 to 19 after 3 months with certolizumab pegol treatment.

Discussion/Conclusion

Certolizumab pegol is a humanized antigen-binding fragment of a monoclonal antibody which binds to TNF-alpha. However, certolizumab pegol is only approved for plaque psoriasis in dermatology; it is likely to be a promising effective agent for HS, especially in challenging cases.

Skin manifestations in spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) like psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated SpA can present with characteristic skin manifestations. These SpA-associated skin disorders may precede joint involvement, reflect a loss of efficacy of a current systemic treatment or can even be treatment associated. Cutaneous manifestations in SpA not only add additional morbidity with physical impact but also impose a psychosocial burden on affected patients. Psoriasis (PsO) - the main skin disease in SpA - has a variety of clinical presentations, including plaque-type PsO, inverse PsO, guttate PsO, erythrodermic PsO, nail PsO and pustular types. SpA associated with IBD presents with neutrophilic and granulomatous skin disorders, including pyoderma gangrenosum, hidradenitis suppurativa and cutaneous Crohn's disease. Reactive arthritides has a favourable prognosis and may feature keratoderma blenorrhagicum or balanitis circinatum as typical skin manifestations. Immunologically, SpA-associated skin diseases share interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 dysregulation but show distinctive genetic and immunological profiles. Therefore, they vary in their treatment responses to targeted therapies with biologicals or small molecules. In this review, we highlight the clinical presentation of skin manifestations in SpA and discuss therapeutic approaches in this interdisciplinary field.

The IL-23/IL-17 Pathway in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: From Bench to Bedside

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is an essential proinflammatory cytokine, which is mainly secreted by the CD4⁺ helper T cells (Th17 cells) and subsets of innate lymphoid cells. IL-17A is associated with the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, alopecia areata, pityriasis rubra pilaris, pemphigus, and systemic sclerosis. Interleukin-23 (IL-23) plays a pivotal role in stimulating the production of IL-17 by activating the Th17 cells. The IL-23/IL-17 axis is an important pathway for targeted therapy for inflammatory diseases. Emerging evidence from clinical trials has shown that monoclonal antibodies against IL-23, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor are effective in the treatment of patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, pityriasis rubra pilaris, pemphigus, and systemic sclerosis. Here, we summarize the latest knowledge about the biology, signaling, and pathophysiological functions of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in inflammatory skin diseases. The currently available biologics targeting the axis is also discussed.

Immunomodulatory drugs alone and adjuvant to surgery for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa-A narrative review

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) is one of the most debilitating dermatoses with a strong negative impact on every dimension of quality of life. Treatment is dependent on the severity of clinical manifestations and comorbidities. While anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial approaches are recommended for mild and moderate stages, immunomodulatory drugs have gained increasing interest in all stages of HS/AI. We reviewed the available data on this subject in a narrative review and included not only substances with published final outcome but those where either the ongoing trials or experience from case report. Furthermore, we investigated combined surgical therapy and immunomodulatory drugs and raised specific questions to be answered in controlled settings. This aspect seems to be underrepresented. The first approved medical treatment for HS/AI is adalimumab. Other cytokine, interleukin, Janus kinase and C5a inhibitors and antagonists are under investigation. IL-1 inhibitors and antagonists may become an option for mild to moderate HS/AI, while most of the other medical compounds target moderate to severe HS/AI. Despite medical efforts with immunomodulatory agents, surgery remains a cornerstone of efficient HS/AI therapy. Better outcome in advanced disease might be achieved by combining drug therapy and surgery, but more systematic clinical trials are necessary for the optimal combination.