Influence of family history on risk of second primary cancers and survival in patients with squamous cell skin cancer

Host and primary tumor factors for the development of multiple cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas among a retrospective cohort in Rhode Island

INTRODUCTION

Risk factors for a primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) are well-established; however, the host and primary tumor risk factors for subsequent CSCC have not been fully explored.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with CSCC in an academic dermatology clinic in Rhode Island from 2016-2019. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between host factors and multiple CSCC and between primary tumor characteristics and the risk of subsequent CSCC. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1312 patients with CSCC diagnoses were included. Host risk factors significantly associated with multiple CSCCs included: aged >80 years (aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.46-3.31); history of: solid organ transplant (aOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.20-4.80); skin cancer (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.52-2.54); other cancer (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.00); family history of skin cancer (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03-1.78); and actinic keratosis (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.18-1.95). Tumor location, diameter, histologic differentiation, and treatment were not significant predictors of subsequent CSCCs.

LIMITATIONS

Study patients were predominantly White and from a single institution, limiting the generalizability of results.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain host characteristics were associated with the development of subsequent CSCC, which may inform clinical guidelines for follow-up.

Family History of Cancer is associated with poorer prognosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the family history of cancer (FHC) in predicting survival and clinicopathological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institution study utilized data from 610 patients undergoing surgery from 2014 to 2020 that was prospectively collected and cataloged for research purposes. All patients underwent standard surgery with/without radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We statistically evaluated whether FHC was associated with changes in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

Among 610 patients, 141 (23.1%) reported a family history of cancer. The distribution of clinicopathological characteristics was balanced between FHC-positive and FHC-negative OSCC patients. FHC-positive patients had decreased DFS (P=0.005) and DSS (P=0.018) compared to FHC-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FHC-positive OSCC patients have a poorer prognosis. FHC positivity is an independent predictor of negative outcomes based on DFS and DSS. FHC should be a consideration in screening, evaluating, counseling, and treating OSCC patients.

Familial risks between giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis and other autoimmune diseases in the population of Sweden

Giant cell arteritis (GCA, also called temporal arteritis) is a rare and Takayasu arteritis (TA) is an even rarer autoimmune disease (AID), both of which present with inflammatory vasculitis of large and medium size arteries. The risk factors are largely undefined but disease susceptibility has been associated with human leukocyte antigen locus. Population-level familial risk is not known. In the present nation-wide study we describe familial risk for GCA and for GCA and TA with any other AID based on the Swedish hospital diagnoses up to years 2012. Family relationships were obtained from the Multigeneration Register. Familial standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for offspring whose parents or siblings were diagnosed with GCA, TA or any other AID. The number of GCA patients in the offspring generation was 4695, compared to 209 TA patients; for both, familial patients accounted for 1% of all patients. The familial risk for GCA was 2.14, 2.40 for women and non-significant for men. GCA was associated with 10 other AIDs and TA was associated with 6 other AIDs; both shared associations with polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis. The results showed that family history is a risk factor for GCA. Significant familial associations of both GCA and TA with such a number of other AIDs provide evidence for polyautoimmunity among these diseases.

A cohort study of personal and family history of skin cancer in relation to all-cause and cancer-specific mortality

PURPOSE

Even though the fatality rate from skin cancers is low, evidence from a few cohort studies has raised the possibility that people with a personal history of skin cancer may have a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with those without a personal history of skin cancer. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential links between a personal history or family history of skin cancer and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality METHODS: A prospective cohort (n = 8,622) was assembled within the NHANES I follow-up study. Cox Proportional Hazard Regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association for personal and family history of skin cancer and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

After adjustment for several potential confounding variables, a personal history of skin cancer was associated with decreased risk for all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85), whereas the results for cancer-specific mortality were consistent with a null association (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74-1.27). A family history of skin cancer was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76-1.24) or cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.38-1.24).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study do not support the hypothesis that a personal history or family history of skin cancer is associated with an increased risk of all-cause or cancer-specific mortality. The high prevalence of skin cancer adds to the public health significance of this question, providing a strong rationale for further research to resolve this question.