Phase II study of HCVIDD/MA in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Comparison of first-line treatments of peripheral T-cell lymphoma according to regimen: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are known to have an aggressive clinical course and grave prognosis. Several recommended first-line treatment regimens are available, but identification of the superior treatment remain elusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine which study-level factors and group of regimens affect survival outcomes. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to January 2021, and phase II or III clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens were included. Random effects models were used to estimate 3-year overall survival rate, complete remission rate, and subgroup differences. Meta-regressions were carried out with adjustments for relevant covariates. Overall, 34 cohorts from 28 studies comprising 1424 PTCL patients were included in the pooled analysis. Chemotherapy regimens were divided into four groups: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), CHOP plus etoposide, gemcitabine-based, and others. The pooled 3-year overall survival rate was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.54) for CHOP, 0.61 (95% CI 0.52-0.70) for CHOP plus etoposide, 0.39 (95% CI 0.30-0.47) for gemcitabine-based, and 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.78) for others. CHOP plus etoposide was significantly better than CHOP, with the latter used as a reference (coefficient of 0.11; p = 0.035), with adjustment for the proportion of International Prognostic Index score 4-5 in meta-regression analysis. Although grossly divided groups were pooled and analyzed, among four regimen groups for frontline PTCL treatment CHOP plus etoposide showed better survival than CHOP.

Systemic ALCL Treated in Routine Clinical Practice: Outcomes Following First-Line Chemotherapy from a Multicentre Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Brentuximab vedotin (BV)-CHP is the new standard regimen for first-line treatment of systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). We undertook a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients diagnosed with sALCL, treated in routine practice, to serve as a benchmark analysis for comparison BV-CHP efficacy in routine practice.

METHODS

Patients aged 16 years or older with sALCL treated in seven UK and Australian centres and from 14 additional centres from the UK Haematological Malignancy Research Network database (n = 214). Treatment allocation was clinician choice and included best supportive care (BSC). Main outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis for predictors of both TTF and OS was also undertaken.

RESULTS

The median age 52 years (range 16-93), 18% ECOG ≥ 3 and 40% of cases were ALK positive. CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisolone) was employed in 152 (71%) of patients and CHOEP (CHOP + etoposide) in 4% of patients. For CHOP-treated patients overall response rate (ORR) was 65% and complete response (CR) 47%. Only 9% of patients underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). With 57 months median follow-up, 4-year TTF and OS were 41.2% (95% CI 33.1-49.1) and 58.9% (95% CI 50.3-66.5) respectively. Multivariable analysis showed ALK+ status was independently associated with superior TTF (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.63) but not OS (0.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.07).

DISCUSSION

We present a retrospective analysis with mature follow-up of one of the largest multicentre populations of sALCL available, comparable to similar large retrospective studies. ALK status remains a strong predictor of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

These data serve as a robust benchmark for BV-CHP as the new standard of care for sALCL. Similar real-world evidence with BV-CHP will be desirable to confirm the findings of ECHELON-2.

How to manage lymphoid malignancies during novel 2019 coronavirus (CoVid-19) outbreak: a Brazilian task force recommendation

The novel Coronavirus (CoVid-19) outbreak is now consider a world pandemic, affecting more than 1,300,000 people worldwide. Cancer patients are in risk for severe disease, including a higher risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for invasive ventilation or death. Management of patients with lymphoid malignancies can be challenging during the outbreak, due to need of multiple hospital visits and admissions, immunosuppression and need for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and stem cell transplantation. In this article, we will focus on the practical management of patients with lymphoid malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on minimizing the risk for patients.

[Outcomes of 33 patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma treated after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

目的

探讨造血干细胞移植治疗间变大细胞淋巴瘤（ALCL）的疗效及预后。

方法

回顾性分析全国八家三甲医院2005年1月至2017年12月收治的33例接受造血干细胞移植（HSCT）的ALCL患者临床资料，评价自体造血干细胞移植（auto-HSCT）和异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）治疗ALCL的生存率、复发率和影响预后的相关因素。

结果

33例接受HSCT的ALCL患者的中位发病年龄为31（12~57）岁，男23例，女10例，间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性（ALK⁺）和阴性（ALK⁻）分别为24例（72.7%）和9例（27.3%）。25例患者接受auto-HSCT（ALK⁺患者19例，ALK⁻患者6例），8例患者接受allo-HSCT（ALK⁺患者5例，ALK⁻患者3例）。移植后中位随访时间18.7（4.0~150.0）个月。移植前疾病缓解状态：完全缓解6例（均行auto-HSCT），部分缓解16例（auto-HSCT组14例，allo-HSCT组2例），复发难治11例（auto-HSCT组5例，allo-HSCT组6例）。疾病进展死亡7例，其中auto-HSCT组5例（20.0%），allo-HSCT组2例（25.0%）。移植相关死亡（TRM）5例，其中auto-HSCT组2例（8.0%），allo-HSCT组3例（37.5%）。auto-HSCT后中位无进展生存（PFS）和总生存（OS）时间均为15个月，allo-HSCT后中位PFS时间为3.7（1.0~90.0）个月，中位OS时间为4.6（1.0~90.0）个月，两组生存曲线差异无统计学意义（OS及PFS P值分别为0.247和0.317）。auto-HSCT和allo-HSCT组的2年OS率分别为72%和50%，5年OS率分别为36%和25%。

结论

ALCL化疗反应率高，有不良预后因素的情况下化疗后序贯auto-HSCT为重要治疗措施，高危患者或可从allo-HSCT中获益。

Prognostic factors and the impact of frontline therapy in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: 10 years of 'real-world' experience from Western Australia

We present an analysis of 98 consecutive patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated over a 10-year period within Western Australia. The most common frontline therapies were CHO(E)P (47%), HyperCVAD (21%), and reduced intensity therapy or supportive care alone (19%). Median and 4-year overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 1.59 years and 34%. Amongst CHO(E)P and HyperCVAD-treated patients, elevated LDH, advanced stage, IPI >1, and non-ALK + ALCL histology predicted inferior progression-free survival (PFS). Inferior OS was predicted by elevated LDH, age >60, IPI >1, and non-ALK + ALCL histology. Response rates and PFS were not significantly different between patients treated with CHO(E)P or HyperCVAD. OS was longer in the HyperCVAD group, however this was not significant on multivariable analysis and appears to relate to the younger age and more aggressive therapy at relapse in this group. Our data confirmed the prognostic utility of the IPI in patients with PTCL and do not demonstrate a clear benefit of HyperCVAD.

Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Contemporary Concepts and Optimal Management

Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphomas (ALCL) are clinically aggressive and pathologically distinct lymphoid neoplasms that originate from a mature post-thymic T-cell. The contemporary World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematologic Malignancies recognizes two distinct subtypes of systemic ALCL: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-negative, and ALK-positive. An additional unique subtype of ALCL is known to arise after prolonged exposure to breast implants, known as Breast Implant Associated ALCL (BIALCL). While histologic features of ALCL subtypes have significant overlap, genomic studies suggest the unique pathophysiology and molecular events of tumorigenesis. As a group, ALCLs are rare among non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprising 1-3% overall. There seems to be age and geographic predilection with ALK-positive ALCL affecting younger individuals and being diagnosed more frequently in North America than Europe. Both subtypes are quite uncommon in Hispanic and Asian populations. ALK-positive ALCL patients have a better overall prognosis than those with ALK-negative ALCL, and clinical features at presentation (i.e., International Prognostic Index, IPI) define the outcome in both subtypes. Molecular events affecting DUSP22 and TP63 have been reported to predict survival outcomes as well, with former being favorable, and the latter an unfavorable prognostic marker. Multiagent CHOP-like chemotherapy remains a standard of care for newly diagnosed ALCL patients treated with curative intent and provide a chance of cure for the majority of ALK-positive ALCL patients, and at least half of the ALK-negative ALCL patients. The role of consolidative high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains unclear. Novel targeted agents are actively being investigated for their role in initial therapy. New immunoconjugates, targeted kinase inhibitors, and transgenic autologous T-cells are being studied in patients with relapsed and refractory disease. This review will discuss contemporary concepts in pathogenesis and management of systemic ALCL. The biology and management of primary cutaneous ALCL will be discussed elsewhere.

The risk of central nervous system relapses in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma

We performed a retrospective analysis to identify risk factors and survival outcome for central nervous system (CNS) relapse of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) by histologic type. Records of 600 PTCL patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2014 were analyzed including PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, 174 patients), angoimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, 144), ALK+anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, 74), ALK-ALCL (103), extranodal NK-cell lymphoma (ENKL, 54), or others (51). With a median follow up of 57 months, 13 patients (4 PTCL-NOS, 1 AITL, 4 ALK+ALCL, 2 ALK-ALCL, 2 ENKL) experienced CNS relapse. One-year and 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse were 1.5% (95%CI: 0.7–2.8%) and 2.1% (95%CI: 1.1–3.5%), respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 1.8% in PTCL-NOS, 0.7% in AITL, 5.4% in ALK+ALCL, 2.1% in ALK-ALCL and 3.7% in ENKL. Extranodal involvement >1 site was the only significant factor associated with higher chance of CNS relapse (HR: 4.9, 95%CI: 1.6–15.0, p = 0.005). Patients with ALK+ALCL who had extranodal involvement >1 (N = 19) had very high risk of CNS relapse with one year cumulative incidence of 17% (95%CI: 4%-37%), all occurring within six months after diagnosis. All patients with CNS relapse eventually died (median, 1.5 months; range, 0.1–10.1 months). CNS relapse in patients with PTCL is rare event but the risk varies by subtype. ALK+ALCL patients with extranodal involvement >1 site have a very high risk of early CNS relapse, and thus evaluation of CNS involvement at the time of diagnosis and possible CNS-directed prophylaxis may be considered.

The survival outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

Survival outcome of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) who experience disease progression/relapse remains very poor. A total of 321 patients, newly diagnosed with PTCL-NOS (n = 180) or AITL (n = 141) between 1999 and 2015, were analysed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of first disease progression (FFS1, OS1), from second disease progression (FFS2, OS2) and from third progression (FFS3, OS3). With a median follow-up duration of 52 months, 240 patients (135 PTCL-NOS, 105 AITL) experienced progression/relapse. In patients with PTCL-NOS, the median durations of FFS1, FFS2 and FFS3 were 3·1, 2·5 and 2·1 months, respectively. In patients with AITL, they were 5·5, 2·9 and 2·3 months, respectively. There was no improvement in FFS1 and OS1 by the time of recurrence during this period (1999-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015). The median FFS after pralatrexate and romidepsin was only 3·0 and 2·5 months, respectively. The 5-year OS rates after salvage autologous and allogeneic transplant were 32% and 52%, respectively; while the 5-year OS rates for patients who did not undergo transplant was 10%. Further research for novel therapeutic approaches with higher efficacy and better safety profile are needed.

Investigational drugs for T-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies frequently associated with a poor outcome. The frontline treatment strategy for PTCL relies mostly on CHOP or CHOP-like regimens, which are associated with a high failure rate and frequent relapses.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors present recently registered drugs and their positioning in the therapeutic armamentarium against PTCL and new drugs currently in development. The successful results in CD30-positive anaplastic large cell lymphomas suggest that a better characterization of these lymphomas could open new areas of efficient drug development.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in the field of molecular biology have started to unravel the anomalies associated with T-cell malignancies. Recent knowledge on potential epigenetic modifiers like IDH2, which is frequently mutated in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, opens new areas of research and confirms that epigenetic drugs could represent an attractive area of clinical research. The recently developed immune checkpoints regulators might represent another area of potential interest.