The experience of the International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in monitoring minimal residual disease in acute promyelocytic leukaemia

Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.

External quality assessment for PML-RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia: Findings and summary

BACKGROUND

The confirmation of clinical diagnosis, molecular remission, and sequential minimal residual disease monitoring required PML-RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The current status of PML-RARα detection in various laboratories remains unknown.

METHODS

In 2018, external quality assessment (EQA) for PML-RARα detection was carried out in China. Three EQA sample panels for PML-RARα isoform L/S/V were prepared by different mock leukocyte samples. The performances of PML-RARα detection, including admission screening, and qualitative and quantitative detection by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), were assessed based on APL simulated clinical case.

RESULTS

The mock leukocyte samples met the requirements of a clinically qualified sample for PML-RARα EQA panel. Among the laboratories, 13/50 (26.0%) were "competent," 21/50 (42%) classified as "acceptable," and 16/50 (32.0%) classified as "improvable." One (1/50, 2.0%) laboratory reported one screening mistake. Twenty-six (26/50, 52.0%) laboratories reported 29 false-positive and 19 false-negative results. Twenty-three (23/50, 46.0%) laboratories reported 42 quantitative incorrect results.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences were not found in PML-RARα detection performance among laboratories that used different extraction methods. The performances of qualitative and quantitative RT-qPCR detection were worse accurate for PML-RARα isoform V. Quantitative variation was higher for low-level samples. Further continuous external assessment and education are needed in the management of PML-RARα detection.