Long-term data from a phase 3 study of radotinib versus imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed, chronic myeloid leukaemia in the chronic phase (RERISE)

A safety review of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib, the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has reached excellent survival expectancies. Long survival rates bring about issues regarding TKI safety.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to compare the side effects of current TKIs both in the first and later lines and outline a safety andprofile of CML treatment. Seminal studies on TKIs and other newer drugs and extended follow-up of these studies; real-life data of each drug were usedduring the course of this. PubMed was used as a search database and onlyarticles in English were included.

EXPERT OPINION

With longer follow-up CML patients, resistant slowgrade adverse events seem to be the major obstacle in the way of treatmentefficacy. If efficacy is the priority, vigorous treatment of side effect and administration of full dose TKI are reasonable. But when treatment goals are reached, dose modifications or alternative treatment regimens may be acceptedpossible. More studies are needed on dose modification protocols and potential benefits and safety of treatment-free remission.

Exploration of treatment-free remission in CML, based on molecular monitoring

BACKGROUND

Typical chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by t(9; 22)(q34; q11) translocation. This chromosomal translocation forms the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. The tyrosine kinase encoded by the BCR::ABL1 is considered to be the main pathogenic diver. BCR::ABL1 is not only a therapeutic target, but also a monitoring target. Monitoring of BCR::ABL1 reveals the progression of the disease and guides the next treatment. Now for CML, the target of treatment has been focused on treatment-free remission (TFR).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review of current developments of treatment-free remission and molecular monitoring methods.

RESULTS

More effective and sensitive CML monitoring methods such as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS) have further studied the measurable residual disease (MRD) and clonal heterogeneity, which provides strong support for the exploration of TFR. We discussed some of the factors that may be related to TFR outcomes at the molecular level, along with some monitoring strategies.

CONCLUSION

Currently, predictive indicators for treatment-free remission outcomes and recurrence are lacking in clinical practice. In future, treatment-free remission research should focus on combining the clinical indicators with molecular monitoring and biological markers to personalize patient conditions and guide clinicians to develop individualized treatment plans, so that more patients with CML can achieve safer and stabler treatment-free remission.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, from Pathophysiology to Treatment-Free Remission: A Narrative Literature Review

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is one of the most common leukemias occurring in the adult population. The course of CML is divided into three phases: the chronic phase, the acceleration phase, and the blast phase. Pathophysiology of CML revolves around Philadelphia chromosome that constitutively activate tyrosine kinase through BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), CML patients now have a similar life expectancy to people without CML, and it is now very rare for CML patients to progress to the blast phase. Only a small proportion of CML patients have resistance to TKI, caused by BCR-ABL1 point mutations. CML patients with TKI resistance should be treated with second or third generation TKI, depending on the BCR-ABL1 mutation. Recently, many studies have shown that it is possible for CML patients who achieve a long-term deep molecular response to stop TKIs treatment and maintain remission. This review aimed to provide an overview of CML, including its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, the role of stem cells, CML treatments, and treatment-free remission.

BCR/ABL1ΔE7-8-9 isoform contributes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, the involvement of the BCR/ABL1 isoform in tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistance has attracted lots of attention. In this work, a novel isoform that encoded truncated protein due to the deletion of ABL1 exon7, 8, and 9 was reported and named BCR/ABL1ΔE7-8-9 here. This isoform was detected only in 10.2% of CML patients with inadequate responses to TKIs. BCR/ABL1Δexon7-8-9 isoform promoted S phase cell proliferation and reduced the expression of fusion gene and ABL1 phosphorylation level more slowly than that of control cells after TKIs treatment. The novel isoform has the qualities of a functional tyrosine kinase, localized in the cytoplasm, and could not be imported into the nucleus by TKIs. These results indicated that BCR/ABL1Δexon7-8-9 showed poorer sensitivity to imatinib and nilotinib than wild-type BCR/ABL1. According to molecular docking studies, nilotinib and imatinib present different binding sites and have a lower binding capacity with BCR/ABL1ΔE7-8-9 protein than the wild type. Our findings suggested that the novel isoform BCR/ABL1ΔE7-8-9 may contribute to TKIs resistance in CML due to its weakened TKIs binding ability. It enriched the mechanism of spliceosome involved in TKIs resistance. Monitoring the expression of BCR/ABL1ΔE7-8-9 helps guide the treatment of CML patients in the clinic.

Developing therapeutic approaches for chronic myeloid leukemia: a review

Modern clinical therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with TKIs is highly efficacious in most CML patients, while it is not remedial and generally confined due to intolerance or resistance. CML is currently considered a severe disease. Interestingly, stem cell transplantation in the past decade was an attractive clinical therapeutic option in CML patients, but it is not successful due to independently more death rates in older patients. So, the targeting of BCR::ABL oncoprotein is extensively used to enhance the reduction in a higher percentage of CML patients by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, resistance or intolerance responses to these inhibitors are responsible for future deterioration and further development of disease. At this point, the clinical treatment of CML is a major challenge, and the lack of molecular responses to TKIs are not succeeded with chemotherapy alone. So, the considerable efficacious clinical necessities remain unmet. Therefore, continuous efforts are needed to explore new potential treatment strategies with an increasing understanding of CML biology. Therefore, this review deals with the investigation of TKI treatment with interferon, chemotherapy (Hydroxyurea, Homoharringtonine, Omacetaxine, Cytarabine), and several other new TKIs under beneficial clinical trials. Additionally, the approaches towards TKIs-resistant or intolerant CML cells where the respective signaling pathway gets up-regulated are also targeted with its inhibitor. This review presents evidence that new TKIs under clinical and pre-clinical trials may improve the chemotherapy of CML.

A clinician perspective on the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have vastly improved long-term outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). After imatinib (a first-generation TKI), second- and third-generation TKIs were developed. With five TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib) targeting BCR::ABL approved in most countries, and with the recent approval of asciminib in the USA, treatment decisions are complex and require assessment of patient-specific factors. Optimal treatment strategies for CML continue to evolve, with an increased focus on achieving deep molecular responses. Using clinically relevant case studies developed by the authors of this review, we discuss three major scenarios from the perspective of international experts. Firstly, this review explores patient-specific characteristics that affect decision-making between first- and second-generation TKIs upon initial diagnosis of CML, including patient comorbidities. Secondly, a thorough assessment of therapeutic options in the event of first-line treatment failure (as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European LeukemiaNet guidelines) is discussed along with real-world considerations for monitoring optimal responses to TKI therapy. Thirdly, this review illustrates the considerations and importance of achieving treatment-free remission as a treatment goal. Due to the timing of the writing, this review addresses global challenges commonly faced by hematologists treating patients with CML during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in CML, this review also discusses the advent of newer therapies such as asciminib. This article may be a useful reference for physicians treating patients with CML with second-generation TKIs and, as it is focused on the physicians' international and personal experiences, may give insight into alternative approaches not previously considered.

An evaluation of asciminib for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with ≥2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

: To date, five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in clinical practice. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients will ultimately develop failure to approved TKIs due to intolerance or resistance. Consequently, new treatment approaches are still required in this unmet clinical need. Asciminib, a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 inhibitor Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), has the potential to overcome resistance/intolerance to prior TKI treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic profile and clinical data of asciminib based on available information from laboratory studies, clinical trials and real world evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent approval of asciminib will require positioning of this drug in the treatment algorithm of CML patients failing initial TKI therapy. Available data support the lack of cross-intolerance of asciminib with other TKIs and its favorable cardiovascular toxicity profile. In addition, asciminib has demonstrated considerable efficacy in CML patients who have failed at least two TKIs, although preliminary data suggest that this efficacy may be lower in those previously exposed to ponatinib. The introduction of asciminib in clinical practice may represent an important step forward in the management of CML.

Development of Asciminib, a Novel Allosteric Inhibitor of BCR-ABL1

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is driven by a translocation event between chromosomes 9 and 22, leading to the formation of a constitutively active BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. Approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML inhibit BCR-ABL1 by competitively targeting its adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding site, which significantly improves patient outcomes. However, resistance to and intolerance of TKIs remains a clinical challenge. Asciminib is a promising investigational agent in development that allosterically targets BCR-ABL1 in a non-ATP-competitive manner. It binds to the ABL1 myristoyl-binding pocket and is effective against most ABL1 kinase domain mutations that confer resistance to ATP-competitive TKIs, including the T315I mutation. This review discusses unmet needs in the current CML treatment landscape, reports clinical data from asciminib trials that support the use of single-agent asciminib as third-line therapy and beyond, and explores the potential benefit of asciminib in combination with approved TKIs in earlier lines.

Future Directions in Chronic Phase CML Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will focus on recent and emerging treatment paradigms in chronic phase CML. The discussion of each novel treatment or drug combination will include a brief overview of scientific rational and pre-clinical data, followed by recently published or ongoing clinical trial efforts. The review will be divided into three focus areas in CML treatment: new frontline approaches and approaches to deepen remission, second treatment-free remission studies, and the treatment of refractory disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The section on new frontline approaches will highlight several strategies of combination therapy. These can be grouped into immunomodulatory approaches with interferons and immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeting of leukemia stem cells with compounds such as venetoclax and pioglitazone, and BCR-ABL1-intrinsic combination therapy with asciminib. The chance at a second treatment-free remission is an important emerging clinical trial concept, and again combination approaches are under investigation. Lastly, in advanced disease, the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains a major focus. This review will provide an overview and perspective of treatment strategies on the horizon for chronic phase CML. Despite the already excellent clinical outcomes for most patients, challenges remain with regard to deepening initial responses, prolonging treatment-free remission, and providing efficacious and tolerable options for patients with refractory disease and resistance mutations.

Comparison of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular assays for early assessment of long-term clinical impact after BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia

To compare the clinical significance of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular monitoring, we analyzed 1,410 paired cytogenetic and molecular data from 705 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Based on early cytogenetic response (ECyR, Ph+≤35 %) and molecular response (EMR, BCR-ABL1^IS≤10 %) at 3 months, the patients were divided into four groups (group 1: ECyR + EMR, n = 560; group 2: no ECyR + EMR, n = 27; group 3: ECyR + no EMR, n = 55; group 4: no ECyR + no EMR, n = 63). By 10 years, major molecular response (MMR), deep molecular response (MR4.5), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were significantly high in group 1 (P < 0.001). Comparing groups 2 and 3, the MMR (P = 0.096), MR4.5 (P = 0.945), OS (P = 0.832), and PFS (P = 0.627) rates tended to be higher in group 2, although not significantly. Thus, the cytogenetic assay can not only be useful but its addition may also provide a more precise prediction of MR4.5.

Precision medicine in myeloid malignancies

Myeloid malignancies have always been at the forefront of an improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer. In accordance, over the last years, basic research focusing on the aberrations underlying malignant transformation of myeloid cells has provided the basis for precision medicine approaches and subsequently has led to the development of powerful therapeutic strategies. In this review article, we will recapitulate what has happened since in the 1980s the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), as a first targeted cancer therapy, has changed one of the deadliest leukemia subtypes, acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), into one that can be cured without classical chemotherapy today. Similarly, imatinib, the first molecularly designed cancer therapy, has revolutionized the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Thus, targeted treatment approaches have become the paradigm for myeloid malignancy, but many questions still remain unanswered, especially how identical mutations can be associated with different phenotypes. This might be linked to the impact of the cell of origin, gene-gene interactions, or the tumor microenvironment including the immune system. Continuous research in the field of myeloid neoplasia has started to unravel the molecular pathways that are not only crucial for initial treatment response, but also resistance of leukemia cells under therapy. Ongoing studies focusing on leukemia cell vulnerabilities do already point to novel (targetable) "Achilles heels" that can further improve myeloid cancer therapy.

Chronic myeloid leukemia-from the Philadelphia chromosome to specific target drugs: A literature review

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm and was the first neoplastic disease associated with a well-defined genotypic anomaly - the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. The advances in cytogenetic and molecular assays are of great importance to the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and monitoring of CML. The discovery of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR)-Abelson murine leukemia (ABL) 1 fusion oncogene has revolutionized the treatment of CML patients by allowing the development of targeted drugs that inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (known as TKIs) are the standard therapy for CML and greatly increase the survival rates, despite adverse effects and the odds of residual disease after discontinuation of treatment. As therapeutic alternatives, the subsequent TKIs lead to faster and deeper molecular remissions; however, with the emergence of resistance to these drugs, immunotherapy appears as an alternative, which may have a cure potential in these patients. Against this background, this article aims at providing an overview on CML clinical management and a summary on the main targeted drugs available in that context.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) which results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22] that gives rise to a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is a highly effective first-line treatment option for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic phase CML.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2020

New insights have emerged from maturing long-term academic and commercial clinical trials regarding optimum management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Velocity of response has unexpectedly proved less important than hitherto thought, does not predict survival, and is of unclear relevance for treatment-free remission (TFR). Serious and cumulative toxicity has been observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors that had been expected to replace imatinib. Generic imatinib has become cost-effective first-line treatment in chronic phase despite chronic low-grade side-effects in many patients. Earlier recognition of end-phase by genetic assessment might improve prospects for blast crisis (BC). TFR has become an important new treatment goal of CML. To reflect this new situation ELN has recently revised and updated its recommendations for treating CML. After a brief review of 175 years of CML history this review will focus on recent developments and on current evidence for treating CML in 2020.

European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia

The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR.