First-line treatment in older patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare population-based study

Overall survival and causes of death in elderly patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a Norwegian population-based case-control study

Elderly Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are poorly characterized and under-represented in studies. In this national population- based study, we investigated cause-specific survival using competing-risk analysis in elderly HL patients compared to the normal population. Patients ≥60 years of age diagnosed between 2000-2015 were identified by the Cancer Registry of Norway, and records were reviewed in detail and compared to data from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry for patients and cancer-free controls. Of 492 patients, 81 (17%) were ineligible for treatment directed specifically towards HL, mostly because of an underlying other lymphoma entity, whereas 74 (15%) and 337 (69%) were treated with palliative or curative intent, respectively. Median overall survival in patients ineligible for assessment of HL-directed therapies was 0.5 years (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.4-0.6), and for palliatively and curatively treated patients 0.8 (0.4-1.2) and 9.1 (7.5-10.7) years, respectively. After correction of discrepancies in registry data, with 359 deaths, 108 (30%) died of HL, the most common cause of death. In curatively treated patients, treatment-related mortality was 6.5% and the risk difference of dying from HL compared to controls was 28% (95% CI: 23-33%) after ten years. These numbers indicate disease control in a majority of elderly patients eligible for curative treatment, compared to risk differences for death from HL of 59% (48-71%) and 42% (31-53%) after ten years in the palliative and ineligible groups, respectively. There was an increased risk of dying from hematologic malignancies other than HL in all groups, but not from other competing causes of death, showing no excess mortality from long-term treatment complications.

Brentuximab vedotin with dacarbazine or nivolumab as frontline cHL therapy for older patients ineligible for chemotherapy

ABSTRACT

Older patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have inferior outcomes compared with younger patients, potentially due to comorbidities and frailty. This noncomparative phase 2 study enrolled patients aged ≥60 years with cHL unfit for conventional chemotherapy to receive frontline brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.8 mg/kg) with dacarbazine (DTIC; 375 mg/m2) (part B) or nivolumab (part D; 3 mg/kg). In parts B and D, 50% and 38% of patients, respectively, had ≥3 general comorbidities or ≥1 significant comorbidity. Of the 22 patients treated with BV-DTIC, 95% achieved objective response, and 64% achieved complete response (CR). With a median follow-up of 63.6 months, median duration of response (mDOR) was 46.0 months. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 47.2 months; median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. Of 21 patients treated with BV-nivolumab, 86% achieved objective response, and 67% achieved CR. With 51.6 months of median follow-up, mDOR, mPFS, and mOS were not reached. Ten patients (45%) with BV-DTIC and 16 patients (76%) with BV-nivolumab experienced grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events; sensory peripheral neuropathy (PN; 27%) and neutropenia (9%) were most common with BV-DTIC, and increased lipase (24%), motor PN (19%), and sensory PN (19%) were most common with BV-nivolumab. Despite high median age, inclusion of patients aged ≤88 years, and frailty, these results demonstrate safety and promising durable efficacy of BV-DTIC and BV-nivolumab combinations as frontline treatment, suggesting potential alternatives for older patients with cHL unfit for initial conventional chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01716806.

Hodgkin lymphoma treatment for older persons in the modern era

There has been a renewed effort globally in the study of older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, generating a multitude of new data. For prognostication, advancing age, comorbidities, altered functional status, Hispanic ethnicity, and lack of dose intensity (especially without anthracycline) portend inferior survival. Geriatric assessments (GA), including activities of daily living (ADL) and comorbidities, should be objectively measured in all patients. In addition, proactive multidisciplinary medical management is recommended (eg, geriatrics, cardiology, primary care), and pre-phase therapy should be considered for most patients. Treatment for fit older HL patients should be given with curative intent, including anthracyclines, and bleomycin should be minimized (or avoided). Brentuximab vedotin given sequentially before and after doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (AVD) chemotherapy for untreated patients is tolerable and effective, and frontline checkpoint inhibitor/AVD platforms are rapidly emerging. Therapy for patients who are unfit or frail, whether due to comorbidities and/or ADL loss, is less clear and should be individualized with consideration of attenuated anthracycline-based therapy versus lower-intensity regimens with inclusion of brentuximab vedotin +/- checkpoint inhibitors. For all patients, there should be clinical vigilance with close monitoring for treatment-related toxicities, including neurotoxicity, cardiopulmonary, and infectious complications. Finally, active surveillance for "postacute" complications 1 to 10 years post therapy, especially cardiac disease, is needed for cured patients. Altogether, therapy for older HL patients should include anthracycline-based therapy in most cases, and novel targeted agents should continue to be integrated into treatment paradigms, with more research needed on how best to utilize GAs for treatment decisions.

A comprehensive SEER registry analysis of elderly patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma based on treatment era and race

We conducted a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER-18) registry analysis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients more than 60 years old and compared outcomes of those diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 (cohort 1) to those identified between 2011 and 2015 (cohort 2) based on treatment era and race. Cohort 1 had a median overall survival (OS) of 4 years and cohort 2 had a median OS of 4.75 years [hazard ratio (HR): 0.92 (0.85-1.00); p = 0.052]. Non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) had a similar 5-year OS compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) of 48.6% vs. 50.2% (HR: 0.95 [0.79-1.15]; p > 0.99); on the contrary, Hispanics had worse 5-year OS of 41.8% vs. 48.6% (HR: 1.24 [1.09-1.41]; p < 0.001). NHW was the only race that had improvement in 5-year OS in 2011-2015 compared to 2006-2010 (51% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.002). In the multivariable analysis, older age, male gender, stage III-IV, unmarried status, Hispanic race, lack of chemotherapy, and diagnosis in 2006-2010 were associated with worse OS. Lymphoma was the most common cause of death in 60% of patients. In conclusion, elderly cHL patients diagnosed after 2010 had improved OS by nine months that was most prevalent in NHWs, and disparity in OS existed between NHWs and Hispanics throughout the study period.

Older patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma: Walking the tightrope of efficacy and toxicity

Since its initial description, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) portends a greatly improved prognosis and the goal of treatment in most patients is cure with minimisation of toxicity from treatment. Outcomes in older patients (>60 years old) lag behind those of their younger counterparts however, and cure remains achievable mostly for those who can tolerate full doses of conventional chemotherapy. This review addresses the difference in biology between younger and older patients with cHL and examines the impact of frailty and comorbidities on outcomes. The toxicities of conventional chemotherapy in anthracycline-fit and -unfit patients are examined, with a particular focus on pulmonary toxicity associated with bleomycin in older patients. New advances are discussed, including the possibility of using more targeted therapies such as the anti-CD30 antibody brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors as a method of reducing dependency on conventional chemotherapy for those less well able to tolerate it. Treatment of older patients with cHL remains an area of unmet need in hematological research, and efforts to rectify this knowledge gap should continue.

Nomogram model and risk score predicting overall survival and guiding clinical decision in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma: an observational study using SEER population-based data

INTRODUCTION

This study developed a prognostic nomogram of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) for purpose of discussing independent risk factors for HL patients with Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

We collected data of HL patients from 2010 to 2015 from the SEER database and divided it into two cohorts: the training and the verification cohort. Then the univariate and the multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted in the training, the verification as well as the total cohort, after which the intersection of variables with statistical significance was taken as independent risk factors to establish the nomogram. The predictive ability of the nomogram was validated by the Concordance Index. Additionally, the calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic curve were implemented to evaluate the accuracy and discrimination. Finally, we obtained 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates of HL patients.

RESULTS

10 912 patients were eligible for the study. We discovered that Derived American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage Group, lymphoma subtype, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were four independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of HL patients. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates for high-risk patients were 85.4%, 79.9% and 76.0%, respectively. It was confirmed that patients with stage I or II had a better prognosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy had a positive impact on HL outcomes. However, patients with lymphocyte-depleted HL were of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram we constructed could better predict the prognosis of patients with HL. Patients with HL had good long-term outcomes but novel therapies are still in need for fewer complications.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities on the Risk of Second Malignant Neoplasm Among Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors

Background

Hodgkin lymphoma survivors are at risk for second malignant neoplasm (SMN). How race/ethnicity affects the risk remains unclear.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 22,415 patients diagnosed with primary Hodgkin lymphoma from January 1992 to December 2015 in 13 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based registries and divided patients into four groups: non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/others. Taking non-Hispanic whites as a reference, both the proportional subdistribution hazard (PSH) and the cause-specific hazard (CSH) methods were used to calculate the SMN hazard ratio for other racial/ethnic groups with and without considering the competing mortality risk.

Results

1,778 patients developed SMN with a median follow-up of 11.63 years. In the adjusted PSH model, Hispanic, Asian/others, and non-Hispanic black patients had 26% (PSH, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.87), 20% (PSH, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64–1.01), and 12% (PSH, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75–1.03) decreased overall SMN hazard, respectively. Moreover, the PSH method revealed the racial/ethnic difference in the SMN risk in the skin, the respiratory system, and the endocrine system. These hazards were slightly higher and different with the use of the CSH approach. In addition to the aforementioned overall SMN and subtypes, adjusted CSH analysis also revealed the racial/ethnic disparities in the risk of subsequent female breast cancer, digestive cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Conclusions

The subtype and SMN risk among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors varied by race/ethnicity. The use of CSH and PSH provides a dynamic view of racial/ethnic effects on SMN risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

Association of Treatment Intensity With Survival in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma

IMPORTANCE

Hodgkin lymphoma is an aggressive blood cancer that is highly curable in younger patients who receive multiagent chemotherapy. Worse survival in older patients may reflect less-aggressive treatment, competing risks of death, or different disease biological factors.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between treatment intensity and cause-specific mortality among older adults with Hodgkin lymphoma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a population-based cohort study of patients aged 65 years or older with Medicare Part A and B fee-for-service coverage who received a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma from 2000 to 2013. The association between treatment intensity and cause-specific mortality was estimated separately for early-stage and advanced-stage disease with Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable adjustment and propensity score weighting helped control for confounding. Data are from the 1999 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to June 2021.

EXPOSURES

First-line treatment categorized as (1) full chemotherapy regimen, (2) partial chemotherapy regimen, (3) single chemotherapy agent or radiotherapy, or (4) no treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was 3-year Hodgkin lymphoma-specific and other-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 2686 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.9] years; 1333 men [50%]), 1307 had early-stage disease and 1379 had advanced-stage disease. For Hodgkin lymphoma-specific mortality in patients with early-stage disease, hazard ratios (HRs) were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.57) or no treatment (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.79) than for full regimens; there was no difference between single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy and full regimens. For other-cause mortality in patients with early-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.33), or no treatment (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.95-3.78) than for full regimens. For Hodgkin lymphoma-specific mortality in patients with advanced-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.44-4.35), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.98-4.11), or no treatment (HR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.06-5.37) than for full regimens. For other-cause mortality in patients with advanced-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.32-2.33), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.15-2.37), or no treatment (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.71-2.94) than for full regimens.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found variability in the magnitude of the association between treatment intensity and mortality by stage and cause-specific mortality, possibly reflecting competing risks of death. However, full chemotherapy regimens were associated with lower mortality and could be considered for older adults who can tolerate them.

Multicenter analysis of geriatric fitness and real-world outcomes in older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis across 10 US academic medical centers to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes in patients age ≥60 years with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) from 2010-2018. Among 244 eligible patients, median age was 68, 63% had advanced stage (III/IV), 96% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-2, and 12% had documented loss of ≥1 activity of daily living (ADL). Medical comorbidities were assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G), where n = 44 (18%) had total scores ≥10. Using multivariable Cox models, only ADL loss predicted shorter progression-free (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] 2.13, P = .007) and overall survival (OS; HR 2.52, P = .02). Most patients (n = 203, 83%) received conventional chemotherapy regimens, including doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD; 56%), AVD (14%), and AVD with brentuximab vedotin (BV; 9%). Compared to alternative therapies, conventional regimens significantly improved PFS (HR 0.46, P = .0007) and OS (HR 0.31, P = .0003). Survival was similar following conventional chemotherapy in those ages 60-69 vs ≥70: PFS HR 0.88, P = .63; OS HR 0.73, P = .55. Early treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was more common with CIRS-G ≥10 (28% vs 12%, P = .016) or documented geriatric syndrome (28% vs 13%, P = .02). A competing risk analysis demonstrated improved disease-related survival with conventional therapy (HR 0.29, P = .02) and higher mortality from causes other than disease or treatment with high CIRS-G or geriatric syndromes. This study suggests conventional chemotherapy regimens remain a standard of care in fit older patients with cHL, and highlights the importance of geriatric assessments in defining fitness for cHL therapy going forward.

Development and validation of a prediction model for 1-year mortality among older adults with Hodgkin Lymphoma who receive dose-intense chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Older adults with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) have poorer outcomes than younger patients. There are little data about which baseline patient and disease factors inform prognosis among older patients. We sought to create a prediction model for 1-year mortality among older patients with new HL who received dose-intense chemotherapy.

METHODS

We included adults ≥65 years old with a new diagnosis of classical HL between 2000-2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset who received full-regimen chemotherapy. Through a non-random 2:1 split, we created development and validation cohorts. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Using stepwise selection and logistic regression, we identified predictive variables for 1-year mortality. The model was applied to the validation cohort. A final model was then fit in the full cohort.

RESULTS

We included 1315 patients. In the development cohort (n = 813), we identified significant predictors of 1-year mortality including age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), B symptoms at diagnosis, and advanced stage at diagnosis. The c-statistic was 0.70. When this model was applied to the validation cohort (n = 502), the c-statistic was 0.65. Predictors of 1-year mortality in the final model were CCI (OR = 1.41), B symptoms (OR = 1.54), advanced stage (OR = 1.44), and older age at diagnosis (OR = 1.33).

CONCLUSION

We present a prediction model for use among older adults with HL who receive intensive chemotherapy. We identify risk factors for death within 1 year of diagnosis. Future work will build upon prognostication and shared decision-making after diagnosis for this population.