Asciminib for chronic myeloid leukaemia: Next questions

Management of chronic-phase CML in later lines: a Hong Kong consensus recommendation

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) usually requires long-term therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While these agents have markedly advanced the clinical management and prognosis of CML, a subset of patients experience treatment resistance or suboptimal response, necessitating multiple lines of TKI therapy. Few treatment options exist for patients who are resistant or intolerant to first- and second-line therapies. To provide guidance for the management of patients in chronic-phase failing at least two lines of treatment, a literature review followed by consensus generation from an expert panel with a modified Delphi process was conducted. This was followed by a meeting in person and subsequent online iterations for the establishment of a list of consensus guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of respondents selecting either 'accept completely' or 'accept with some reservation'. Overall, 17 statements were formulated covering five topics - defining treatment failure and acceptable treatment response, in terms of efficacy and intolerance; sequencing therapy to prevent disease progression and improve quality of life; managing patients with broad resistance, specific mutations, and risk of cardiovascular events; considering timing of cytogenetic or molecular response; and mitigating risk when using novel therapies and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations will assist clinicians in managing their patients with CML in third and later lines of treatment.

Real-World Disproportionality Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database for Asciminib

INTRODUCTION

Asciminib is primarily utilized for treating Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in its chronic phase among patients harboring the T315I mutation or those who have been previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The safety profile of asciminib across a broad patient population over an extended timeframe remains unverified. This study uses a real-world pharmacovigilance database to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) linked with asciminib, providing valuable insights for clinical drug safety.

METHODS

Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, spanning from October 2021 to December 2023, served as the basis for this analysis. The extent of disproportional events was assessed using sophisticated metrics such as the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, information component, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean.

RESULTS

Within the specified period, the FAERS database documented 3,913,574 AE reports, with asciminib being associated with 966 incidents. Reactions to asciminib spanned 27 system organ categories. Utilizing four distinct analytical algorithms, 663 significant preferred terms exhibiting disproportional frequencies were identified. Notably, this investigation uncovered 26 significant AEs linked to off-label asciminib use, encompassing conditions such as gynecomastia, nephrotic syndrome, orchitis, pyelonephritis, hepatotoxicity, and pancreatitis. The median onset time for asciminib-related AEs was 52.5 days, ranging from 17 to 122.75 days.

CONCLUSION

The study sheds light on additional potential AEs associated with asciminib use, warranting further research to confirm these findings.

A safety review of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib, the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has reached excellent survival expectancies. Long survival rates bring about issues regarding TKI safety.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to compare the side effects of current TKIs both in the first and later lines and outline a safety andprofile of CML treatment. Seminal studies on TKIs and other newer drugs and extended follow-up of these studies; real-life data of each drug were usedduring the course of this. PubMed was used as a search database and onlyarticles in English were included.

EXPERT OPINION

With longer follow-up CML patients, resistant slowgrade adverse events seem to be the major obstacle in the way of treatmentefficacy. If efficacy is the priority, vigorous treatment of side effect and administration of full dose TKI are reasonable. But when treatment goals are reached, dose modifications or alternative treatment regimens may be acceptedpossible. More studies are needed on dose modification protocols and potential benefits and safety of treatment-free remission.

Italian Physicians' Perceptions about the Role of Asciminib in Later Lines Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Clinical Practice: A GIMEMA Survey

Unmet needs remain in later lines chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the response rate and the overall survival of resistant patients in the chronic phase who changed a second-generation TKI in the second line with another TKI with similar action are usually poor, while the off-target toxicities and the potential development of mutations increase. The recent approval of asciminib, a STAMP inhibitor, in the third line, has the potential to soon change the therapeutic algorithm for this subset of patients. Here, we report the results of a GIMEMA survey assessing the number of patients currently treated in the third line in Italy, the current approach in later lines by Italian physicians, and the future role of this drug according to the reason to switch to asciminib (resistance and/or intolerance), as well as the perceptions about the future position of this agent.

Case report: Co-existing chronic myeloid leukemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-A clinically important but challenging scenario

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are two common myeloid neoplasms with overlapping morphologic features. We report a patient initially diagnosed with CML and treated with Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) but who then developed persistent monocytosis and worsening thrombocytopenia one year later. Repeat bone marrow biopsies only showed CML at the molecular level. However, markedly hypercellular bone marrow, megakaryocytic dysplasia, and SRSF2, TET2, and RUNX1 mutations by NextGen sequencing pointed to a diagnosis of CMML. For CML patients with persistent monocytosis and cytopenia, a mutational profile by NGS is helpful to exclude or identify the coexisting CMML.

Efficacy and safety of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients who failed to achieve a treatment-free remission period after imatinib discontinuation: Results of the French Nilo post-STIM study

Molecular recurrence (MRec) occurs in about half of all patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in sustained deep molecular response. A second TKI discontinuation has been attempted in some patients who regain the discontinuation criteria after resuming treatment. Nilotinib treatment affords faster and deeper molecular responses than imatinib as first-line therapy. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib (300 mg twice daily) in chronic-phase CML patients who experienced MRec, after imatinib discontinuation and analysed the probability of TFR after a new attempt in patients treated for 2 years with sustained MR^4.5 for at least 1 year. A total of 31 patients were included in the study between 2013 and 2018. Seven (23%) patients experienced serious adverse events after a median of 2 months of nilotinib treatment leading to discontinuation of treatment. One patient was excluded from the study for convenience. Among the 23 patients treated for 2 years with nilotinib, 22 maintained their molecular response for at least 1 year (median: 22 months) and stopped nilotinib. The TFR rates at 24 and 48 months after nilotinib discontinuation were 59.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.7%-83.7%) and 42.1% (95% CI: 25%-71%) respectively (NCT #01774630).