How are granulocytes for transfusion best used? The past, the present and the future

Should granulocyte transfusion therapy for septic neutropenic neonates be resurrected?

Nearly half a century ago, granulocyte transfusions were trialed in critically ill, septic, neutropenic neonates and showed improved survival when used concurrently with antimicrobials. Benefits were particularly noteworthy for Gram-negative and fungal infections. The introduction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor into clinical medicine in 1991 and inherent problems associated with granulocyte procurement for transfusion caused granulocyte transfusions to become nearly extinct for this patient population. Simultaneous technological and clinical management advancements have enabled the survival of younger neonates, who are at the highest risk for neutropenia and neonatal sepsis. These infants have well-documented developmental deficiencies in the number and functional capabilities of their neutrophils compared to older patients. A continued surge in antimicrobial resistance and an increasing number of Gram-negative infections have created an urgent need for clinicians to rethink old therapies and consider new ones. This review details the evolution of granulocyte transfusions and whether they should be resurrected in neonatal patients.

Granulocytapheresis Donor Deferrals Pattern at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

Granulocyte transfusion is used to manage refractory infections in patients with severe neutropenia. One of the main challenges in providing granulocyte products is the availability of a suitable donor. This study was designed to analyse deferral patterns to appropriately create a pool of granulocyte donors. A retrospective analysis was done to study the deferral pattern among donors who presented to our pediatric tertiary care hospital during the last year (August 2022-August 2023) for granulocyte apheresis. The donor selection criteria are like any apheresis donor in addition to having appropriate veins in both the arms and donor providing consent for mobilization (Dexamethasone). A total of 181 donors with a mean age of 31.3 ± 6.7 years (males 93.9%) were screened for granulocytapheresis. 61 donors (33.7%; 51 Male 10 Female) were deferred. Common reasons for deferral were poor venous access (34.4%), low platelets (24.5%), the difference in blood group between donor and recipient (19.6%), low hemoglobin (1.6%) and transfusion-transmitted infection (all HBV) reactivity (6.5%). Our study highlights a higher rate of donors deferred for granulocyte donations when compared to whole blood donations. Analysing the deferral pattern can help us identify appropriate donor groups to motivate and recruit for granulocyte donations.

Optimized high-dose granulocyte transfusions for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high-dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high-dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high-dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

A retrospective chart review (2018-2021) was conducted for all patients who received high-dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre- and post-absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves/log-rank/regression testing.

RESULTS

Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G-CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre-transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions.

DISCUSSION

Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high-dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G-CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible.

Invasive fusariosis in patients with leukaemia in the era of mould-active azoles: increasing incidence, frequent breakthrough infections and lack of improved outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Historically, patients with leukaemia and invasive fusariosis (IF) have experienced poor outcomes in the setting of persistent immunosuppression. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed the incidence, presentation and outcomes of IF that are scarcely studied in contemporary cohorts of leukaemia patients.

METHODS

We identified adult leukaemia patients with proven or probable IF at MD Anderson Cancer Center during 2009-21. Independent risk factors for 42 day mortality after IF diagnosis were determined using a multivariable logistic regression model. Combined with historical data, the annual IF incidence density over the past 23 years was estimated using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 140 leukaemia patients with IF (114 proven), 118 patients (84%) had relapsed/refractory leukaemia and 124 (89%) had neutropenia at IF diagnosis. One hundred patients (71%) had pulmonary IF, 88 (63%) had disseminated IF and 48 (34%) had fungaemia. Coinfections were common (55%). Eighty-nine patients (64%) had breakthrough IF to mould-active triazoles. Most patients (84%) received combination antifungal therapy. Neutrophil recovery [adjusted OR (aOR), 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.14; P < 0.0001], pulmonary IF (aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.11-9.70; P = 0.032) and high SOFA score (aOR, 1.91 per 1-point increase; 95% CI, 1.47-2.50; P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of 42 day mortality outcomes. From 1998 to 2021, IF incidence density increased significantly at an annual ratio of 1.03 (95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IF is predominantly seen in patients with relapsed/refractory leukaemia and increasingly seen as a breakthrough infection to mould-active triazoles. Despite frequent combination antifungal therapy, high mortality rates have persisted in patients with lasting neutropenia.