1
|
Levea SL, Prasadh JG, Wang BK, Salcedo-Betancourt JD, Matevish L, Sanchez Vivaldi J, Lieber SR, Shah JA, Hwang CS, Wojciechowski D, Vagefi PA, Patel MS. A Contemporary Analysis of Mental Well-being Among Living Donor Kidney Applicants. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1631. [PMID: 38757049 PMCID: PMC11098232 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Living donation is paramount for expanding the donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess changes over time in self-reported mental health of living donor kidney applicants in efforts to inform patient-centered discussions with potential donors. Methods Kidney donor applications from 2017 through 2021 were compiled. Data included age, gender, race, ethnicity, applicant-recipient relationship, medical history, and medications. Trends over time were analyzed and post hoc analyses were performed. Results During the study period, 2479 applicants to the living donor kidney program were evaluated; 73% of applicants were female individuals. More than half of applicants were not related to their intended recipient; this fraction increased from 46% in 2017 to 58% in 2021 (P < 0.01). A similar decline in family relations was not present among Black and Latino applicants. Of all applicants, 18% reported depression and 18% reported anxiety; 20% reported taking antidepressants or anxiolytics. Depression and anxiety increased 170% (P < 0.001) and 136% (P < 0.001) from 2018 to 2019, respectively; antidepressant and anxiolytic use rose 138% (P < 0.001) between 2018 and 2020. Conclusions The profile of living donor applicants has changed in recent years, with approximately 1 in 5 requiring antidepressants or anxiolytics. Predonation counseling and postdonation monitoring are imperative to decrease adverse psychological outcomes for living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swee-Ling Levea
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jai G. Prasadh
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Benjamin K. Wang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Lauren Matevish
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jorge Sanchez Vivaldi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Sarah R. Lieber
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jigesh A. Shah
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Christine S. Hwang
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Parsia A. Vagefi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Madhukar S. Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cholin LK, Ramos EF, Yahr J, Schold JD, Poggio ED, Delvalle CL, Huml AM. Psychosocial characteristics of potential and actual living kidney donors. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25:31. [PMID: 38267875 PMCID: PMC10807153 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The psychosocial assessment is an essential component of the living kidney donor (LKD) evaluation. However, it remains uncertain how specific psychosocial factors impact LKD eligibility. We performed a retrospective chart review of LKD candidates who initiated the evaluation process and who had completed a required, in-person licensed social work (LSW) visit. LSW notes were reviewed for frequency of psychosocial factors that may impact the success of LKD candidate approval by the selection committee. 325 LKD candidates were included in the study: 104 not-approved and 221 approved. Not-approved LKD candidates were more likely to receive a negative family reaction to wanting to donate than approved LKD candidates (8.7% vs 1.4%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, Black race, history of psychiatric illness, highest level of education being high school, and high psychosocial risk score assignment were all associated with a lower odds ratio of being approved. The majority of not-approved LKD candidates were disqualified for medical reasons (N = 76, 73.1%). In conclusion, psychosocial factors impact donation even after LKD candidates make it to an in-person evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza K Cholin
- Department of Nephrology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 300 W 10Th Ave, Columbus, OH, #1150, USA.
| | - Everly F Ramos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Jordana Yahr
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery and Transplant, University of CO Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,, USA
| | - Emilio D Poggio
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Anne M Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong W, Ding Z, Wu X, Wan R, Liu Y, Pei L, Zhu W. The association between neuropeptide oxytocin and neuropsychiatric disorders after orthopedic surgery stress in older patients. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:416. [PMID: 37420191 PMCID: PMC10329356 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03989-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health outcomes of geriatric patients exposed to surgery were found to be enhanced by social support and stress management. The aim of this study was to characterise the relationship between oxytocin and neuropsychiatric disorders after surgery. METHODS A total of 132 geriatric patients aged ≥ 60 years received orthopedic surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (Harbin, China) were enrolled in the present study. The salivary levels of stress hormone cortisol and oxytocin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the screening of the stress state and oxytocin function. Moreover, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were conducted to identify the severity of anxiety and depression. The association between oxytocin and mental health was performed by linear regression analyses in older patients receiving orthopedic surgery. Finally, the Duke Social Support Index (DSSI) was selected to measure the social support and the potential link to mental outcomes. RESULTS The scores from questionnaires showed that female patients with higher social support and higher levels of oxytocin demonstrated better stress-reducing responses as reflected by lower cortisol and decreased anxiety and depression symptoms. Regression analyses revealed that there was a significant association between oxytocin and scores in DASS, GAI, GDS, MADRS and DSSI, suggesting a potential link between peripheral oxytocin function and mood outcomes after orthopedic surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reveal that oxytocin enhances the stress-protective effects of social support and reduces anxiety and depression states under stressful circumstances, particularly in older women receiving orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanru Dong
- Drug Safety Evaluation Center, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150040, China
| | - Zengbo Ding
- National Institute On Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Xiao Wu
- National Institute On Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Ran Wan
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China
| | - Ying Liu
- College of Pharmacy, Hainan Medical College, Haikou, 570100, China
| | - Liubao Pei
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
| | - Weili Zhu
- National Institute On Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winterling J, Pahnke S, Lagnebjörk J, Hägglund H, Larfors G, Lenhoff S, Kisch AM. Worries and Psychological Well-Being in Potential Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors Before Donation-A Swedish National Study. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:242-248. [PMID: 36528407 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The physical risks involved in donating hematopoietic stem cells have been thoroughly studied, but little is known about the psychological risks potential donors might face before donation. The aim of this study was to describe potential the pre-donation worries and psychological well-being of hematopoietic stem cell donors and investigate possible associations between donor characteristics and psychological well-being. METHODS In a cross-sectional, national cohort study, we describe pre-donation worries and psychological well-being and investigate possible associations between donor characteristics and psychological well-being. A questionnaire was sent to prospective adult hematopoietic stem cells donors. RESULTS The study included 210 participants, 47% of whom were related and 53% unrelated to the recipient. Of the participants, 39% reported great worry about the recipient and 12% great worry about themselves as potential donors. Symptoms of anxiety were expressed by 21%, whereas symptoms of depression were uncommon and perceived general mental health was slightly lower than in the Swedish population. Great worry about oneself, lower age, and female sex were related to increased anxiety and lower mental health. CONCLUSION This study highlighted that some potential donors report high levels of pre-donation worry and that greater worry about oneself, lower age, and female sex are associated with lower psychological well-being. Although further studies are needed to investigate this psychological risk over time, it is clear that some potential donors are particularly vulnerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Winterling
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Medical unit HHLH, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simon Pahnke
- Unit of Haematology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johanna Lagnebjörk
- Unit of Haematology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hans Hägglund
- Unit of Haematology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Larfors
- Unit of Haematology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stig Lenhoff
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Annika M Kisch
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Institute of Health Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pronk MC, Zuidema WC, Weimar W, Van De Wetering J, Ismail SY, Massey EK. Twenty Years of Unspecified Kidney Donation: Unspecified Donors Looking Back on Their Donation Experiences. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10959. [PMID: 36925946 PMCID: PMC10011065 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
The Netherlands was the first European country to implement unspecified kidney donation in 2000. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the experiences of unspecified kidney donors (UKDs) in our transplant institute to improve the care for this valuable group of donors. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 106 UKDs who donated between 2000-2016 (response rate 84%). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and independently coded by 2 researchers in NVivo using thematic analysis. The following 14 themes reflecting donor experiences were found: Satisfaction with donation; Support from social network; Interpersonal stress; Complaints about hospital care; Uncertainty about donor approval; Life on hold between approval and actual donation; Donation requires perseverance and commitment; Recovery took longer than expected; Normalization of the donation; Becoming an advocate for living kidney donation; Satisfaction with anonymity; Ongoing curiosity about outcome or recipient; Importance of anonymous communication; Anonymity is not watertight. The data reinforced that unspecified kidney donation is a positive experience for donors and that they were generally satisfied with the procedures. Most important complaints about the procedure concerned the length of the assessment procedure and the lack of acknowledgment for UKDs from both their recipients and health professionals. Suggestions are made to address the needs of UKDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde C Pronk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willij C Zuidema
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Van De Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sohal Y Ismail
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emma K Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Psychosocial and Ethical Behaviors and Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in the Clinical Setting of Living Kidney Donors: A Qualitative Study. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1750-1758. [PMID: 35985877 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several psychosocial and ethical issues surrounding the decision making of living kidney transplant donors. This study aimed to determine what health care professionals (HPs) consider in their clinical practice and their attitudes toward donors' decision-making processes. METHODS Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 HPs. A thematic analysis was performed to categorize the thematic elements of the transcripts. All procedures were approved by the relevant review board and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. RESULTS Six main categories-maintaining family relationships, improving donor understanding, supporting voluntary decision making, setting the environment for the examination, having different attitudes toward the donor's intentions, and resisting confirmation of intent-were identified. The HPs provided diverse considerations to respect the donors' autonomy. CONCLUSION In clinical practice, there is a lack of practical methods to confirm living donors' levels of understanding and spontaneity, suggesting that these methods need to be established. Factors related to family functioning may reflect the unique culture of Japan, and this may be indicative of the need to consider treatment based on cultural values.
Collapse
|
8
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
9
|
Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW, Sanders JS, Dam R, van der Pant KAMI, Wierdsma J, Wellink H, Ulrichts P, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB, Evers AW. Combining transplant professional's psychosocial donor evaluation and donor self-report measures to optimise the prediction of HRQoL after kidney donation: an observational prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e045249. [PMID: 35236728 PMCID: PMC8895930 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Living donor kidney transplantation is currently the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. The psychosocial evaluation of kidney donor candidates relies mostly on the clinical viewpoint of transplant professionals because evidence-based guidelines for psychosocial donor eligibility are currently lacking. However, the accuracy of these clinical risk judgements and the potential added value of a systematic self-reported screening procedure are as yet unknown. The current study examined the effectiveness of the psychosocial evaluation by transplant professionals and the potential value of donor self-report measures in optimising the donor evaluation. Based on the stress-vulnerability model, the predictive value of predonation, intradonation and postdonation factors to impaired longer term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of kidney donors was studied. DESIGN An observational prospective multicentre study. SETTING Seven Dutch transplantation centres. PARTICIPANTS 588 potential donors participated, of whom 361 donated. Complete prospective data of 230 donors were available. Also, 1048 risk estimation questionnaires were completed by healthcare professionals. METHODS Transplant professionals (nephrologists, coordinating nurses, social workers and psychologists) filled in risk estimation questionnaires on kidney donor candidates. Furthermore, 230 kidney donors completed questionnaires (eg, on HRQoL) before and 6 and 12 months after donation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES HRQoL, demographic and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative health characteristics, perceived support, donor cognitions, recipient functioning and professionals risk estimation questionnaires. RESULTS On top of other predictors, such as the transplant professionals' risk assessments, donor self-report measures significantly predicted impaired longer term HRQoL after donation, particularly by poorer predonation physical (17%-28% explained variance) and psychological functioning (23%). CONCLUSIONS The current study endorses the effectiveness of the psychosocial donor evaluation by professionals and the additional value of donor self-report measures in optimising the psychosocial evaluation. Consequently, systematic screening of donors based on the most prominent risk factors provide ground for tailored interventions for donors at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Wirken
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Dam
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Wierdsma
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske Wellink
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC VUMC Site, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Ulrichts
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Andrea W Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Psychological and Socioeconomic Outcomes Among Directed and Non-directed Living Kidney Donors. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00314-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
Loiselle MM, Gulin S, Rose T, Burker E, Bolger L, Smith P. The relationship between marijuana use and psychosocial variables in living kidney donor candidates. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14248. [PMID: 33555627 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigate whether marijuana use in living kidney donor candidates is associated with psychosocial risk factors that place donors at higher risk for adverse outcomes and the unique associations between marijuana use and donor candidacy. METHODS Medical records of 757 living kidney donor candidates were reviewed. Patients were grouped into marijuana users/abstainers; demographic, psychiatric, and substance use variables were compared. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the independent association of marijuana use on committee approval for donation. RESULTS Marijuana use was associated with lack of health insurance, legal history, lower education level, active and history of substance use disorder, active psychiatric disorder, history of multiple psychiatric diagnoses, and history of suicidality. Marijuana users were also more likely to be young, male, unmarried, and less likely to be approved for donation by the multidisciplinary selection committee. This latter association persisted in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to show that marijuana use is associated with psychosocial factors that could impact behavioral adherence following kidney donation, while reducing chances of committee approval for kidney donation. Special attention to potential overlay between psychosocial risk factors and marijuana use should be considered when evaluating kidney donors, particularly in context of increasingly legal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marci M Loiselle
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shaina Gulin
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Terra Rose
- Department of Allied Health Sciences and Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eileen Burker
- Department of Allied Health Sciences and Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lauren Bolger
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Patrick Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Menjivar A, Torres X, Manyalich M, Fehrman-Ekholm I, Papachristou C, de Sousa-Amorim E, Paredes D, Hiesse C, Yucetin L, Oppenheimer F, Kondi E, Peri JM, Kvarnström N, Ballesté C, Dias L, Frade IC, Lopes A, Diekmann F, Revuelta I. Psychosocial risk factors for impaired health-related quality of life in living kidney donors: results from the ELIPSY prospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21343. [PMID: 33288792 PMCID: PMC7721886 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78032-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Living kidney donors' follow-up is usually focused on the assessment of the surgical and medical outcomes. Whilst the psychosocial follow-up is advocated in literature. It is still not entirely clear which exact psychosocial factors are related to a poor psychosocial outcome of donors. The aim of our study is to prospectively assess the donors' psychosocial risks factors to impaired health-related quality of life at 1-year post-donation and link their psychosocial profile before donation with their respective outcomes. The influence of the recipient's medical outcomes on their donor's psychosocial outcome was also examined. Sixty donors completed a battery of standardized psychometric instruments (quality of life, mental health, coping strategies, personality, socio-economic status), and ad hoc items regarding the donation process (e.g., motivations for donation, decision-making, risk assessment, and donor-recipient relationship). Donors' 1-year psychosocial follow-up was favorable and comparable with the general population. So far, cluster-analysis identified a subgroup of donors (28%) with a post-donation reduction of their health-related quality of life. This subgroup expressed comparatively to the rest, the need for more pre-donation information regarding surgery risks, and elevated fear of losing the recipient and commitment to stop their suffering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Menjivar
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Torres
- Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Service, Institut Clinic de Neurociencies, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marti Manyalich
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Transplant Assessorial Unit, Medical Direction, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ingela Fehrman-Ekholm
- Karolinska Institutet, Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Papachristou
- Department for Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloníki, Greece
| | - Erika de Sousa-Amorim
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Donation and Transplant Coordination Section, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian Hiesse
- Service de Néphrologie et de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes Cedex, France
| | - Levent Yucetin
- Organ Transplant Coordination, Antalya Medical Park Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Federico Oppenheimer
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Entela Kondi
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Transplant Assessorial Unit, Medical Direction, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Peri
- Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Service, Institut Clinic de Neurociencies, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Niclas Kvarnström
- Department of Transplantation, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Chloë Ballesté
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonidio Dias
- Nephrology and Transplant Departments, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês C Frade
- Liaison-Psychiatry and Health Psychology Unit, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Alice Lopes
- Liaison-Psychiatry and Health Psychology Unit, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplant, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leal-Costa C, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Martínez Zaragoza F, Bernabeu Juan P, Rodríguez-Marín J, Ruzafa-Martínez M, van-der Hofstadt Román CJ. Personality and psychopathology in potential live kidney donors: A cluster analysis of personality features. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221222. [PMID: 31412089 PMCID: PMC6693753 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The previous psychosocial evaluation of the potential living kidney donors (PLKD) requires a detailed understanding of the psychosocial benefits and the possible damages of the act of donation. Objective The aim was to create clusters by using the clinical patterns of personality and to evaluate their influence on psychopathological variables. Methods Observational, analytical and cross-sectional study that included the PLKD from February 2009 to March 2017. The patients were referred to the Hospital Psychology Unit by the Transplant Coordination Unit. The total sample was composed of 100 participants. The socio-demographic characteristics, the relationship with the recipient and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory were included. Results The final sample was composed by 100 PLKD. The mean age of the participants was 45.70, and most were women (70%). The analysis showed a final result of 3 personality clusters that best represented the data, in agreement with the DSM-5 classification. The PLKD from cluster 3 obtained greater scores in all the clinical syndromes. Conclusions The personality evaluation of the PLKD could help with the planning of monitoring protocols of the participants who were classified to cluster 3, in order to improve their post-transplant psychosocial adjustment. This result makes us consider the usefulness of the psychosocial evaluation to preserve the psychological health of the PLKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Leal-Costa
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL—Fundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Jesús Rodríguez-Marín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL—Fundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain
- Health Psychology Department, Miguel Hernandez University (UMH), Elche, Spain
- Hospital Psychology Unit, University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Javier van-der Hofstadt Román
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL—Fundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain
- Health Psychology Department, Miguel Hernandez University (UMH), Elche, Spain
- Hospital Psychology Unit, University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sommerer C, Estelmann S, Metzendorf NG, Leuschner M, Zeier M. Gender disparity in health-related quality of life and fatigue after living renal donation. BMC Nephrol 2018; 19:377. [PMID: 30587146 PMCID: PMC6307222 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1187-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of living kidney donors is mostly not detrimental, but some donors experience impairment after donation. Gender-specific effects of living kidney donors was evaluated. Methods Clinical outcome was assessed in living kidney donors and HRQoL was obtained by self-reporting validated test systems as the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Results Two hundred and eleven (211) living renal donors were evaluated (female 62.2%). Response rate was 80.8%. In both genders, a decrease of renal function of 26% was observed after donation. De novo antihypertensives were introduced in 28.3% of women and 36.5% of men. HRQoL was comparable in female and male donors, except for mental HRQoL, which was lower in 51- to 60-year-old female donors, compared to age-matched male donors and to the female general population. Female donors aged 40–59 years demonstrated more fatigue than the age-matched general population. A low mental HRQoL (MCS; SF-36) was associated with higher values for fatigue (General Fatigue Score; MFI-20) in both genders. Multiple regression analysis detected the General Fatigue score of the MFI-20 questionnaire and depression identified by the PHQ-9 score as independent variables predicting MCS of the SF-36 in both genders. Lower age at time of donation contributed to a lower MCS in female donors. Conclusions Overall, HRQoL in living kidney donors exceeds that of the general population. Inferior mental health status and fatigue seem to be a problem, especially in middle-aged female donors, but not in all female donors. Psychological evaluation pre donation and psychological support post donation are required. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-1187-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Sommerer
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 162, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sarah Estelmann
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 162, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicole G Metzendorf
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 162, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maren Leuschner
- Department of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 162, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rodrigue JR, Schold JD, Morrissey P, Whiting J, Vella J, Kayler LK, Katz D, Jones J, Kaplan B, Fleishman A, Pavlakis M, Mandelbrot DA. Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1397-1407. [PMID: 29206349 PMCID: PMC5988866 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Prior studies demonstrate that most living kidney donors (LKDs) report no adverse psychosocial outcomes; however, changes in psychosocial functioning at the individual donor level have not been routinely captured. We studied psychosocial outcomes predonation and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postdonation in 193 LKDs and 20 healthy controls (HCs). There was minimal to no mood disturbance, body image concerns, fear of kidney failure, or life dissatisfaction, indicating no incremental changes in these outcomes over time and no significant differences between LKDs and HCs. The incidence of any new-onset adverse outcomes postdonation was as follows: mood disturbance (16%), fear of kidney failure (21%), body image concerns (13%), and life dissatisfaction (10%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that LKDs with more mood disturbance symptoms, higher anxiety about future kidney health, low body image, and low life satisfaction prior to surgery were at highest risk of these same outcomes postdonation. It is important to note that some LKDs showed improvement in psychosocial functioning from pre- to postdonation. Findings support the balanced presentation of psychosocial risks to potential donors as well as the development of a donor registry to capture psychosocial outcomes beyond the mandatory 2-year follow-up period in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Rodrigue
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - JD Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - P Morrissey
- Transplant Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - J Whiting
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - J Vella
- Maine Transplant Center, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - LK Kayler
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, Bronx, NY,Regional Center of Excellence for Transplantation & Kidney Care, Erie County Medical Center, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - D Katz
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - J Jones
- Organ Transplantation Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - B Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ,School for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
| | - A Fleishman
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - M Pavlakis
- The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - DA Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Potts S, Vitinius F, Erim Y, Gazdag G, Gribble R, Ismail SYS, Massey EK, Maldonado J, Mucsi I, Novak M, Niazi SK, Schneekloth TD, Syngelakis M, Zimbrean P. Mental health assessment of altruistic non-directed kidney donors: An EAPM consensus statement. J Psychosom Res 2018; 107:26-32. [PMID: 29502760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Potts
- University of Edinburgh, Dept. Of Psychological Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsklinikum Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, D - 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Yesim Erim
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany
| | - Gabor Gazdag
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Jahn Ferenc Hospital, Koves ut 1, 1204 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Balassa utca 6, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Robert Gribble
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Haberfield, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Y Sohal Ismail
- Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Office NA-2013, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Emma K Massey
- Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Office 510, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose Maldonado
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5718, United States
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University of Toronto, Kidney Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue 11PMB-188, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
| | - Marta Novak
- Division of Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry, UHN - Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Shehzad Khan Niazi
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, United States.
| | - Terry D Schneekloth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Markos Syngelakis
- Division of Psychosomatic Medicine, First Psychiatric Clinic, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paula Zimbrean
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 20 York St Fitkin 611, New Haven, CT 06510, United States; Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery (Transplant), 20 York St Fitkin 611, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ehlers M, Vitinius F, Langenbach M. Altruistic nondirected kidney donation: attitudes, characteristics and ethical implications. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2018; 22:584-587. [PMID: 28857843 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Altruistic nondirected kidney donation involves a person donating one of their kidneys to an unknown recipient. The donor's mental health and motives are frequently questioned. We want to highlight this topic and also encourage discussions about ethical implications. RECENT FINDINGS The main topics are the mental health of altruistic nondirected kidney donors and the general attitude towards the practice of this form of donation as well as the willingness of the public to donate this way. Soliciting organ donation via social networks or financial support is debated extensively in the media. SUMMARY There is a lack of studies on altruistic nondirected kidney donation. Most studies focus on related donors. Studies with larger samples should be performed on altruistic nondirected kidney donors to learn more about their motives and assess their mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Ehlers
- aDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne bDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, GFO Clinics Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hosseini K, Omorou AY, Hubert J, Ngueyon Sime W, Ladrière M, Guillemin F. Nephrectomy Complication Is a Risk Factor of Clinically Meaningful Decrease in Health Utility among Living Kidney Donors. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:1376-1382. [PMID: 29241897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinically relevant change in health state utility (HSU) in living kidney donors and whether this change value is constant across measures and clinical conditions and is useful for health economics studies. We aimed to 1) measure the change in the HSU score for living kidney donors from before donation to 3 months after donation and 2) estimate the minimal important decrease (MIDe) in the HSU score for living kidney donors and its associated clinical factors. METHODS Data from a prospective multicenter observational study measuring quality of life of kidney donors by the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the six-dimensional health state short form (SF-6D) before donation and at 3 months after donation provided HSU scores. Two methods were used to derive the MIDe: the anchor-based method and the distribution-based (standard error of measurement) method. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical factors associated with the MIDe after donation. RESULTS In total, 228 and 216 donors completed the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D, respectively. Mean HSU scores were 0.932 and 0.823 before donation and 0.895 and 0.764 at 3 months after donation. HSU scores were significantly decreased at 3 months, and 18.5% of donors rated their global health as "somewhat worse." By the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D, the MIDe was estimated at -0.113 and -0.116 with the anchor-based method and -0.075 and -0.077 with the distribution-based method. Risk of decreased HSU score was significantly associated with clinical complications but only marginally with surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS A short-term clinically relevant decrease in HSU was significantly associated with clinical complications in kidney donors. Preventing perioperative complications is of prime importance in kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kossar Hosseini
- INSERM, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, CHRU Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, University Paris Descartes, EA 4360 Apemac, Nancy, France
| | - Abdou Y Omorou
- INSERM, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, CHRU Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, University Paris Descartes, EA 4360 Apemac, Nancy, France.
| | | | | | | | - Francis Guillemin
- INSERM, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, CHRU Nancy, France; University of Lorraine, University Paris Descartes, EA 4360 Apemac, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Calvo-Calvo MÁ, Morgado Almenara I, Gentil Govantes MÁ, Moreno Rodríguez A, Puertas Cruz T, García Álvarez T, Carmona Vílchez MD. Socio-sanitary profile and information for living kidney donors and recipients in three Andalusian hospitals. Nefrologia 2017; 38:304-314. [PMID: 29129387 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 08/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information provided by health professionals to potential donors and recipients is essential for an autonomous and objective decision to make a living kidney donation. OBJECTIVES To determine the characteristics of the information received by living kidney donors and recipients, to find out their socio-sanitary profile, their socio-demographics, financial and labour characteristics, health and the caregiving activity of these donors and recipients. METHODS Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study of the population of living kidney donors and recipients from the University Hospitals Puerta del Mar (Cádiz), Virgen del Rocío (Seville), and the University Hospital Complex of Granada, between 08/04/2014 and 08/06/2015. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS According to the 40 living kidney donors and their 40 recipients surveyed, it is mainly nephrologists who make people aware and provide information about living kidney donation. Almost half of recipients require more information so the evaluation processes and pre-donation information should be updated. In general, the living kidney donor is female, aged 50, with primary/secondary education, lives with a partner and is related to the kidney recipient. Also, the living kidney donor is in paid employment, is overweight, perceives her health as very good or good, and does not smoke or drink alcohol. However, the typical living kidney recipient is male, aged 44 and has completed secondary school studies and vocational training. Furthermore, he does not work, perceives his health as good or regular, and he is an independent person for activities of daily living.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel-Ángel Calvo-Calvo
- Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología y Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España.
| | - Isabel Morgado Almenara
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología y Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | | | | | - Teresa Puertas Cruz
- Servicio de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sher Y, Zimbrean P. Psychiatric Aspects of Organ Transplantation in Critical Care: An Update. Crit Care Clin 2017; 33:659-679. [PMID: 28601140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2017.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Transplant patients face challenging medical journeys, with many detours to the intensive care unit. Before and after transplantation, they have significant psychological and cognitive comorbidities, which decrease their quality of life and potentially compromise their medical outcomes. Critical care staff are essential in these journeys. Being cognizant of relevant psychosocial and mental health aspects of transplant patients' experiences can help critical care personnel take comprehensive care of these patients. This knowledge can empower them to understand their patients' psychological journeys, recognize patients' mental health needs, provide initial interventions, and recognize need for expert consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelizaveta Sher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, 401 Quarry Road, Suite 2320, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Paula Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale New Haven Hospital, 20 York Street, Fitkin 611, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Larson DB, Jacobs C, Berglund D, Wiseman J, Garvey C, Gillingham K, Ibrahim HN, Matas AJ. Return to normal activities and work after living donor laparoscopic nephrectomy. Clin Transplant 2016; 31. [PMID: 27740731 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Transplant programs inform potential donors that they should be able to return to normal activities within ~2 weeks and to work by 6 weeks after laparoscopic nephrectomy. We studied actual time. Between 10/2004 and 9/2014, 911 donors having laparoscopic nephrectomy were surveyed 6 months post-donation. Surveys asked questions specific to their recovery experience, including time to return to normal activities and work and a description of their recovery time relative to pre-donation expectations. Of the 911, 646 (71%) responded: mean age at donation was 43.5±10.6 years; 65% were female, 95% were white, 51% were biologically related to their recipient, and 83% reported education beyond high school. Of the 646 respondents, a total of 35% returned to normal activities by 2 weeks post-donation; 79% by 4 weeks post-donation; 94% by 5-6 weeks; however, 6% took >6 weeks. Of the 646, 551 (85%) were working for pay; of these, mean time to return to work was 5.3±2.8 weeks; median, 5 weeks. Of the 551, a total of 14% returned to work in 1-2 weeks, 46% by 3-4 weeks, and 76% by 5-6 weeks. Importantly, 24% required >6 weeks before returning to work with the highest rates for donors in manual labor or a skilled trade. Significantly longer return to work was reported by females (vs males; P=.01), those without (vs those with) post-high school education (P=.010, those with longer hospital stay (P=.01), and those with a postoperative complication (P=.02). Of respondents, 37% described their recovery time as longer than expected. During the donor informed consent process, additional emphasis on realistic expectations around recovery to baseline activities and return to work is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn B Larson
- Department of Social Work, MHealth, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Cheryl Jacobs
- Division of Renal Diseases & Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Catherine Garvey
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Hassan N Ibrahim
- Division of Renal Diseases & Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|