Predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: 10 year oncologic outcomes from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Registry

Exploiting Interdata Relationships in Prostate Cancer Proteomes: Clinical Significance of HO-1 Interactors

Prostate cancer (PCa) cells display abnormal expression of proteins resulting in an augmented capacity to resist chemotherapy and colonize distant organs. We have previously shown the anti-tumoral role of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) in this disease. In this work, we undertook a mass spectrometry-based proteomics study to identify HO-1 molecular interactors that might collaborate with its modulatory function in PCa. Among the HO-1 interactors, we identified proteins with nuclear localization. Correlation analyses, using the PCa GSE70770 dataset, showed a significant and positive correlation between HMOX1 and 6 of those genes. Alternatively, HMOX1 and YWHAZ showed a negative correlation. Univariable analyses evidenced that high expression of HNRNPA2B1, HSPB1, NPM1, DDB1, HMGA1, ZC3HAV1, and HMOX1 was associated with increased relapse-free survival (RFS) in PCa patients. Further, PCa patients with high HSPB1/HMOX1, DDB1/HMOX1, and YWHAZ/HMOX1 showed a worse RFS compared with patients with lower ratios. Moreover, a decrease in RFS for patients with higher scores of this signature was observed using a prognostic risk score model. However, the only factor significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse was high YWHAZ. Multivariable analyses confirmed HSPB1, DDB1, and YWHAZ independence from PCa clinic-pathological parameters. In parallel, co-immunoprecipitation analysis in PCa cells ascertained HO-1/14-3-3ζ/δ (protein encoded by YWHAZ) interaction. Herein, we describe a novel protein interaction between HO-1 and 14-3-3ζ/δ in PCa and highlight these factors as potential therapeutic targets.

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review on the association between surgeon or hospital volume and oncological and nononcological outcomes following RP for PCa.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. All comparative studies for nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP published between January 1990 and May 2020 were included. For inclusion, studies had to compare hospital or surgeon volume, defined as caseload per unit time. Main outcomes included oncological (including prostate-specific antigen persistence, positive surgical margin [PSM], biochemical recurrence, local and distant recurrence, and cancer-specific and overall survival) and nononcological (perioperative complications including need for blood transfusion, conversion to open procedure and within 90-d death, and continence and erectile function) outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were undertaken. Both a narrative and a quantitative synthesis were planned if the data allowed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Sixty retrospective comparative studies were included. Generally, increasing surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with lower rates of mortality, PSM, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. Combining group size cut-offs as used in the included studies, the median threshold for hospital volume at which outcomes start to diverge is 86 (interquartile range [IQR] 35-100) cases per year. In addition, above this threshold, the higher the caseload, the better the outcomes, especially for PSM. RoB and confounding were high for most domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher surgeon and hospital volumes for RP are associated with lower rates of PSMs, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. This association becomes apparent from a caseload of >86 (IQR 35-100) per year and may further improve hereafter. Both high- and low-volume centres should measure their outcomes, make them publicly available, and improve their quality of care if needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the literature to determine whether the number of prostate cancer operations (radical prostatectomy) performed in a hospital affects the outcomes of surgery. We found that, overall, hospitals with a higher number of operations per year have better outcomes in terms of cancer recurrence and complications during or after hospitalisation. However, it must be noted that surgeons working in hospitals with lower annual operations can still achieve similar or even better outcomes. Therefore, making hospital's outcome data publicly available should be promoted internationally, so that patients can make an informed decision where they want to be treated.

Cause of Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy and the Impact of Comorbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study in Korea

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the causes of death in Korean patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and investigate the relationship between comorbidity and mortality.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study including 4,064 consecutive patients who had prostate cancer and underwent radical prostatectomy between January 1998 and June 2013. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM). Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated to assess the comorbidities of each patient.

Results

Of 4,064 patients, 446 (11.0%) died during follow-up. The cause of death was prostate cancer in 132 patients (29.6%), other cancers in 121 patients (27.1%), and vascular disease in 57 patients (12.8%) in our cohort. The overall 10-year CSM rate was lower than the OCM rate (4.6% vs. 10.5%). The 10-year CSM rate was lower than the OCM rate in low- to intermediate-risk group patients (1.2% vs. 10.6%), whereas they were similar in high-risk group patients (11.8% vs. 10.1%). In the multivariable analysis, CCI was independently associated with all-cause mortality after radical prostatectomy, regardless of age and pathologic features.

Conclusion

Death from prostate cancer was rare in Korean men who underwent radical prostatectomy. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer in men with significant comorbidity. Our findings may help to facilitate counseling and plan management in this patient group.

Management of men with previous negative prostate biopsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Up to 70% of prostate biopsies are negative in men with suspected prostate cancer. Because of inherent limitations in biopsy strategies, a significant proportion of cancers are missed on initial biopsy. Following negative biopsy, men frequently exhibit persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen - raising concerns for missed diagnosis. We highlight the recent updates in the management of negative prostate biopsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in noninvasive diagnostics are available and assist clinicians in further substratifying risk of prostate cancer. Despite limited data, urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and transmembrane protease serine 2 appear to have a promising predictive value for patients suspected of prostate cancer. The advent of multiparametricMRI allows the visualization of intermediate and high-grade prostate cancer, particularly in the troublesome anterior prostate. This modality may further provide the potential for magnetic resonance-guided targeted biopsies. Current data suggest that in the presence of suspicious radiological findings, magnetic resonance-guided biopsies have superior sensitivity profiles compared with traditional rebiopsy approaches. In the absence of multiparametricMRI or suspicious findings, traditional saturation biopsies are sufficient.

SUMMARY

The management of negative biopsies is evolving rapidly with emerging diagnostics to stratify risk of prostate cancer in men with previous negative biopsies. An increasing body of information supports the use of magnetic resonance-guided biopsies.

Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To describe mortality, cause of death, and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up in a nationwide cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 6857 patients with PCa treated with RP at six different hospitals in Denmark between 1995 and 2011. Data were extracted from the nationwide DaPCa database. Histopathology reports from the RP specimens were manually reviewed. Date and cause of death were obtained from national registries and cross-checked in patient files. The cumulative incidence of PCa specific mortality (PCSM) was analysed with the Aalen-Johansen method for competing risks with non-PCa death as a competing event. Risk of PCSM was analysed in a multivariate Cox regression model using age, preoperative PSA level, surgical margin status, RP Gleason score (GS), pathological T-category, and N-category as explanatory variables.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.4 years. Significant temporal changes in clinicopathological parameters were observed. During the study period, median age at surgery increased from 61.4 to 64.8 years and median preoperative PSA declined from 12.0 to 8.0 ng/ml. The proportion of men with pT2 PCa increased from 65% to 75% whereas the proportion of pT3 cancers decreased from 28% to 25%. The percentage of men with positive surgical margins decreased from 37% to 20%. During follow-up, 644 patients died, whereof 189 (29.3%) died from PCa. The cumulative incidence of PCSM and other-cause mortality after 15 years was 10.3% (95% CI 8.0-12.7) and 18.2% (95% CI 15.4-20.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, RP GS (P ≤ 0.001) and pT-category (P ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of PCSM. Compared with GS ≤6, both GS +4 (HR 1.47), GS 4 + 3 (HR 2.32), GS 8 (HR 4.8) and GS 9 or 10 (HR 5.26) significantly increased the risk of PCa death. T3a PCa and T3b/T4 was also a significant predictor of PCSM with an increased risk of PCa death compared with pT2 of 2.24 and 4.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a complete national cohort of men treated with RP during a 17-year period, we described the incidence of mortality after RP and predictors of PCSM. We demonstrated that RP GS and pT-category are the most significant predictors of PCa mortality. We found that an increasing proportion of men undergo RP for low-risk PCa suggesting that early detection of PCa is indeed undergoing in Denmark despite national recommendations. The Danish national results seem to concur with findings from international single- and multi-institutional reports.

Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?

Purpose

Localised prostate cancer diagnosis and management is increasingly complex due to its heterogeneous progression and prognostic subgroups. Pitfalls in current screening and diagnosis have prompted the search for accurate and invasive molecular and genetic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Such tools may be able to distinguish clinically significant cancers from less aggressive variants to assist with prostate cancer risk stratification and guide decisions and healthcare algorithms. We aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the current prostate cancer biomarkers available and in development.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases searches were conducted to identify articles pertaining to the use of novel biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Results

A growing number of novel biomarkers are currently under investigation. Such markers include urinary biomarkers, serology-based markers or pathological tissue assessments of molecular and genetic markers. While limited clinical data is present for analysis, early results appear promising. Specifically, a combination of serum and urinary biomarkers (Serum PSA + Urinary PCA3 + Urinary TMPRSS2-ERG fusion) appears to provide superior sensitivity and specificity profiles compared to traditional diagnostic approaches (AUC 0.88).

Conclusion

The accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer is critical to ensure appropriate intervention. The development of non-invasive biomarkers can add to the information provided by current screening practices and allows for individualised risk stratification of patients. The use of these biomarkers appears to increase the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of prostate cancer. Further studies are necessary to define the appropriate use and time points of each biomarker and their effect on the management algorithm of prostate cancer.