Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort

Predicting contralateral extraprostatic extension in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer: a multicentric external validation study

PURPOSE

Accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial for decision-making in radical prostatectomy (RP), especially in nerve-sparing strategies. Martini et al. introduced a three-tier algorithm for predicting contralateral EPE in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of the study is to externally validate this model in a multicentric European cohort of patients.

METHODS

The data from 208 unilateral high-risk PCa patients diagnosed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic biopsies, treated with RP between January 2016 and November 2021 at eight referral centers were collected. The evaluation of model performance involved measures such as discrimination (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) following TRIPOD guidelines. In addition, a comparison was made with two established multivariable logistic regression models predicting the risk of side specific EPE for assessment purposes.

RESULTS

Overall, 38%, 48%, and 14% of patients were categorized as low, intermediate, and high-risk groups according to Martini et al.'s model, respectively. At final pathology, EPE on the contralateral prostatic lobe occurred in 6.3%, 12%, and 34% of patients in the respective risk groups. The algorithm demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC 0.68), comparable to other multivariable logistic regression models (p = 0.3), adequate calibration and the highest net benefit in DCA. The limitations include the modest sample size, retrospective design, and lack of central revision.

CONCLUSION

Our findings endorse the algorithm's commendable performance, supporting its utility in guiding treatment decisions for unilateral high-risk PCa patients.

A comparative evaluation of radical prostatectomy using laparoscopic and open method in view of surgical margins

Introduction

A positive surgical margin (PSM) in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen is associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and the need for adjuvant radiation therapy, and is an analysis of surgical procedure quality. We present data describing the identification, anatomy, and management of PSM after RP performed via an open operation and laparoscopically. The aim of the study was to compare assessment of RP (open vs. laparoscopic) in terms of analysis of PSM in postoperative histopathological tissue.

Material and methods

Patients with pT1 to pT3b prostate cancer with detailed surgical margin parameters and BCR status were analysed. The patients were divided into groups depending on the stage of neoplastic disease and the choice of operative procedure.

Results

In total, we obtained data from 140 PC patients. Positive surgical margins were confirmed in 11 cases treated with open surgery and in 7 cases treated with laparoscopic procedure. There was no statistically significant (p >0.05) relationship between the frequency of positive margins and the type of procedure. There was no statistically significant (p >0.05) relationship between the frequency of positive margins and the type of procedure in subgroups according to the Gleason score. There was a statistically significant (p <0.05) relationship between the clinical stage of the tumor and the type of margin. This particularly refers to tumours with stage T3b (more numerous in the group of open surgeries) and T2c (more numerous in the laparoscopic group).

Conclusions

There was no statistically significant correlation between the type of surgery and the incidence of a positive surgical margin.

Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5

BACKGROUND

The effect of positive surgical margins (PSM) on cancer specific mortality (CSM) in high/very high-risk (HR/VHR) prostate cancer (PCa) with aggressive Gleason Grade Group (GGG) is unknown. We tested PSM effect on CSM in this setting, in addition to testing of radiotherapy (RT) benefit in PSM patients.

METHODS

We relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), focusing on HR/VHR patients with exclusive GGG 4-5 at radical prostatectomy (RP). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the relationship between PSM and CSM. Moreover, the effect of RT on CSM was explored in PSM patients.

RESULTS

Of 3383 HR/VHR patients, 15.1% (n = 511) exhibited PSM. Patients with PSM harbored higher rates of GGG 5 (60.1% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001), pathologic tumor stage T3a (69.1% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (14.1% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001), relative to patients without PSM. PSM rates decreased over time (2010-2015) from 16.0% to 13.6%. Seven-year CSM-free survival rates were 91.6% versus 95.7% in patients with and without PSM, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, PSM was an independent predictor of CSM (hazard ratio = 1.6, p = 0.040) even after adjustment for age, prostate specific antigen, pathologic tumor stage and lymph node status. Finally, in PSM patients, RT delivery did not reduce CSM in either univariable or multivariable Cox regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

In HR/VHR PCa patients with exclusive GGG 4-5, PSM at RP adversely affect survival. Moreover, RT has no protective effect on CSM. In consequence, lowest possible PSM rates are crucial in such patients.

Clinicopathological Significances of Positive Surgical Resection Margin after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostatic Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: This study aims to elucidate the positive rate and the clinicopathological significance of surgical margin after radical prostatectomy (RP) through a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis finally used 59 studies, including the information about the positive surgical margin (PSM) and those clinicopathological significances after RP. The subgroup analysis for the estimated rates of PSM was evaluated based on types of surgery, grade groups, and pathological tumor (pT) stages. We compared the clinicopathological correlations between positive and negative surgical margins (NSM). Results: The estimated PSM rate was 25.3% after RP (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-29.0%). The PSM rates were 26.0% (95% CI 21.5-31.1%) 28.0% (95% CI 20.2-37.5%) in robot-assisted RP and nerve-sparing RP, respectively. The PSM rate was significantly higher in high-grade groups than in low-grade groups. In addition, the higher pT stage subgroup had a high PSM rate compared to the lower pT stage subgroups. Patients with PSM showed significantly high PSA levels, frequent lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and extraprostatic extension. Biochemical recurrences (BCRs) were 28.5% (95% CI 21.4-36.9%) and 11.8% (95% CI 8.1-16.9%) in PSM and NSM subgroups, respectively. Patients with PSM showed worse BCR-free survival than those with NSM (hazard ratio 2.368, 95% CI 2.043-2.744%). Conclusions: Our results showed that PSM was significantly correlated with worse clinicopathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence-free survival. Among the results in preoperative evaluations, grade group and tumor stage are useful for the prediction of PSM.

The Effect of Adverse Surgical Margins on the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy are associated with a greater risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, not all PSM harbour the same prognosis for recurrence. We aim to determine the impact of different PSM characteristics and their coexistence on the risk of BCR. This retrospective study included 333 patients that underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 2015−2020 at a single institution. The effect of PSM and their adverse characteristics on the risk of BCR was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Kaplan−Meier was used to represent BCR-free survival stratified by margin status. With a median follow-up of 34.5 months, patients with PSM had a higher incidence of BCR, higher risk of relapse and lower BCR-free survival than negative margins (p < 0.001). We established as adverse characteristics: PSM length ≥ 3 mm, multifocality and Gleason at margin > 3. PSM ≥ 3 mm or multifocal PSM were associated with an increased risk for BCR compared to favourable margins (HR 3.50; 95% CI 2.05−5.95, p < 0.001 and HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.09−4.37, p = 0.028, respectively). The coexistence of these two adverse features in the PSM also conferred a higher risk for biochemical relapse and lower BCR-free survival. Adverse Gleason in the margin did not confer a higher risk for BCR than non-adverse margins in our models. We concluded that PSM are an independent predictor for BCR and that the presence of adverse characteristics, such as length and focality, and their coexistence in the PSM are associated with a greater risk of recurrence. Nevertheless, subclassifying PSM with adverse features did not enhance the model’s predictive performance in our cohort.

Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

There is no clear consensus on the optimal treatment with curative intent for patients with positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions and treatment patterns of Korean urologists regarding the resection margin after RP.

METHODS

A preliminary questionnaire was prepared by analyzing various studies on resection margins after RP. Eight experienced urologists finalized the 10-item questionnaire. In July 2019, the final questionnaire was delivered via e-mail to 105 urologists in Korea who specialize in urinary cancers.

RESULTS

We received replies from 91 of the 105 urologists (86.7%) in our sample population. Among them, 41 respondents (45.1%) had performed more than 300 RPs and 22 (24.2%) had completed 500 or more RPs. In the question about whether they usually performed an additional biopsy beyond the main specimen, to get information about surgical margin invasion during surgery, the main opinion was that if no residual cancer was suspected, it was not performed (74.7%). For PSMs, the Gleason score of the positive site (49.5%) was judged to be a more important prognostic factor than the margin location (18.7%), multifocality (14.3%), or margin length (17.6%). In cases with PSMs after surgery, the prevailing opinion on follow-up was to measure and monitor prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels rather than to begin immediate treatment (68.1%). Many respondents said that they considered postoperative radiologic examinations when PSA was elevated (72.2%), rather than regularly (24.4%). When patients had PSMs without extracapsular extension (pT2R1) or a negative surgical margin with extracapsular extension (pT3aR0), the response 'does not make a difference in treatment policy' prevailed at 65.9%. Even in patients at high risk of PSMs on preoperative radiologic screening, 84.6% of the respondents said that they did not perform neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Most respondents (75.8%) indicated that they avoided nerve-sparing RP in cases with a high risk of PSMs, but 25.7% said that they had tried nerve-sparing surgery. Additional analyses showed that urologists who had performed 300 or more prostatectomies tended to attempt more nerve-sparing procedures in patients with a high risk of PSMs than less experienced surgeons (36.6% vs. 14.0%; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The most common response was to monitor PSA levels without recommending any additional treatment when PSMs were found after RP. Through this questionnaire, we found that the perceptions and treatment patterns of Korean urologists differed considerably according to RP resection margin status. Refined research and standard practice guidelines are needed.

Impact of positive surgical margins on secondary treatment, palliative radiotherapy and prostate cancer-specific mortality. A population-based study of 13 198 patients

BACKGROUND

The results of studies evaluating the impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality have been inconsistent. We, therefore, evaluated the impact of surgical margin status on subsequent secondary treatment, palliative radiotherapy, and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

METHODS

A total of 14 837 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) during the period 2001 to 2015 were identified from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Of those, 13 198 (89%) patients had complete data on the preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, pathological T-category, Gleason score in the prostatectomy specimen, and margin status. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk, and flexible parametric models for the cumulative incidence were fitted to predict the probabilities of secondary treatment (salvage radiotherapy or prophylactic breast radiation), palliative radiotherapy, and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 5.2 years (3591 patients with ≥8 years of follow-up), positive surgical margins (PSMs) were independently predictive of secondary treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.21-2.66) and palliative radiotherapy (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.03-2.05). After 10 years, the absolute increased risk for palliative radiotherapy in patients with PSMs after RP varied between 0.1% in pT2 tumors with a Gleason score of 6, to 12% for pT3b tumors with a Gleason score of 9 to 10. PSMs were not independently associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.82-1.59).

CONCLUSION

PSMs were associated with increased application of secondary treatment and palliative radiotherapy but were not predictive of prostate cancer-specific mortality. As the use of palliative radiotherapy was only marginally increased in patients with PSMs and the lowest-risk disease characteristics, avoiding PSMs may be of greatest prognostic relevance in patients with higher-risk disease characteristics.

Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score versus actual risk stratification practice in making treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with adverse pathologic features, pT3 or positive surgical margins who underwent RP in 2010-2014 at Renji hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. RNA was quantified from paraffin-embedded RP specimens. The CCP score was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15 housekeeper genes. The prognostic utility of the CCP score was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among the 100 men identified, 5-year BCR-free survival for the low- (< 0), intermediate- (0-1) and high- (> 1) CCP score groups was 89.3%, 38.8%, and 12.9%, respectively. In multivariable models adjusting for clinical and pathological variables with the cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score, both continuous CCP score [hazard ratio (HR) 1.373 per unit score, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.006-1.874; p = 0.046) and the categorized CCP score (p < 0.001)were independent predictors of BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides insights into the role the CCP score plays in risk stratification of this cohort and in determining candidacy for deferred secondary treatment. From our perspective, the CCP score allows better stratification and can help identifying patients at lower risk of disease recurrence who could benefit from a wait-and-see policy.

Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on the risk of metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

To identify PSM features associated with recurrence in a stage-by-stage analysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1757 PCa patients treated with RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Patients were stratified according to the presence of PSM and to margins characteristics in three groups: no versus favourable (single margin <3mm) versus unfavourable (≥3mm or multifocal margin) PSMs.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Predictors of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CR) were assessed using semiparametric Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 285 (16%) patients had PSMs; 146 (51%) had a unifocal PSM, while 139 (49%) had a multifocal PSM. The median length of a PSM was 1mm. Overall, 120 (42%) versus 165 (58%) patients had favourable versus unfavourable PSMs. In patients with ≤pT3a and pathologic grade group ≤3 disease (n=1351), favourable (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-4.22) and unfavourable (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.49-4.84) PSMs significantly increased the risk of BCR (p<0.01). However, they were not associated with CR (all p>0.05). Conversely, in patients with pT3b/4 and/or pathologic grade group 4-5 and/or pN1 (n=406), only an unfavourable PSM was associated with both BCR (HR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.19-4.22) and CR (HR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.07-6.30; all p≤0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the presence of PSMs was associated with an increased risk of BCR in all stages, only men with adverse pathologic characteristics and an unfavourable PSM were at an increased risk of experiencing metastases as compared with their counterparts with no or a single margin shorter than 3mm.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we defined a new category of unfavourable positive surgical margins (namely, ≥3mm and/or multifocal), which confers a higher risk of developing metastasis in men with more aggressive pathologic features.

Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

Background and purpose

Positive surgical margins (PSMs) correlate with adverse outcomes in numerous solid tumours. However, the prognostic value of PSMs in prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy remains unclear. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between PSMs and the prognostic value for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in PCa patients.

Materials and methods

According to the PRISMA statement, online databases PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies published prior to February 2018. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the relationship between PSMs and PCa.

Results

Ultimately, 32 cohort studies that met the eligibility criteria and involved 141,222 patients (51–65,633 per study) were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that PSMs were significantly predictive of poorer BRFS (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.28–1.48, p < 0.001), CSS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.16–1.90, p = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.20, p = 0.014). In addition, PSMs were significantly associated with higher risk of CSM (HR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16–1.30, p < 0.001) and OM (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16, p = 0.009) in patients with PCa.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the presence of a histopathologic PSM is associated with the clinical outcomes BRFS, CSS, OS, CSM and OM in patients with PCa, and PSMs could serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with PCa.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-018-2333-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ki-67 expression predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the setting of positive surgical margins

Background

Positive surgical margin (PSM) is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Attempts to stratify PSM based on linear length, Gleason score, location and number have failed to add to predictive models using margin status alone. We evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 expression in this setting.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 was done on prostatectomy specimens from 117 patients who had a PSM. Ki67 expression was measured at the margin and in the index lesion. Patients were dichotomized based on Ki-67 expression into three groups. Group 1 with no Ki-67 expression, Group 2 with Ki-67 ≤ 2%, and Group 3 with Ki-67 ≥ 3%.

To eliminate the impact of the adjuvant treatment (AT) on the outcome, data were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards in which AT was Considered as a time-dependent covariate.

Results

The discordance rate of Ki-67 expression between matched index lesion and margin specimens was 44/117 (37.6%). There was a trend for higher risk of BCR (HR:2.06, (0.97–4.43), P = 0.06) in patients expressing high Ki67 at the surgical margin although this was not statistically significant. However High Ki-67 expression in the index lesion was an independent predictive factor for BCR in this subset of patients. (HR:4, (1.64–9.80), P = 0.002).

Conclusion

High Ki67 expression in the index prostate cancer lesion is an independent predictor of BCR in patients with positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy. Our findings need to be validated in a larger cohort.

Image-guided surgery in cancer: A strategy to reduce incidence of positive surgical margins

Primary treatment for many solid cancers includes surgical excision or radiation therapy, with or without the use of adjuvant therapy. This can include the addition of radiation and chemotherapy after primary surgical therapy, or the addition of chemotherapy and salvage surgery to primary radiation therapy. Both primary therapies, surgery and radiation, require precise anatomic localization of tumor. If tumor is not targeted adequately with initial treatment, disease recurrence may ensue, and if targeting is too broad, unnecessary morbidity may occur to nearby structures or remaining normal tissue. Fluorescence imaging using intraoperative contrast agents is a rapidly growing field for improving visualization in cancer surgery to facilitate resection in order to obtain negative margins. There are multiple strategies for tumor visualization based on antibodies against surface markers or ligands for receptors preferentially expressed in cancer. In this article, we review the incidence and clinical implications of positive surgical margins for some of the most common solid tumors. Within this context, we present the ongoing clinical and preclinical studies focused on the use of intraoperative contrast agents to improve surgical margins. This article is categorized under: Laboratory Methods and Technologies > Imaging.

Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder neck preservation (BNP) during radical prostatectomy (RP) has been proposed as a method to improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. However, there is concern over a possible increase in the risk of positive surgical margins and prostate cancer recurrence rate. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported improved early recovery and overall long-term urinary continence without compromising oncologic control. The aim of our study was to perform a critical review of the literature to assess the impact on bladder neck and base margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We carried out a systematic review of the literature using Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane library databases in May 2017 using medical subject headings and free-text protocol according to PRISMA guidelines. We used the following search terms: bladder neck preservation, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy and surgical margins. Studies focusing on positive surgical margins (PSM) in bladder neck sparing RP pertinent to the objective of this review were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, we found 15 relevant studies reporting overall and site-specific positive surgical margins rate after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. This included two RCTs, seven prospective comparative studies, two retrospective comparative studies and four case series. All studies were published between 1993 and 2015 with sample sizes ranging between 50 and 1067. Surgical approaches included open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The overall and base-specific PSM rates ranged between 7-36% and 0-16.3%, respectively. Mean base PSM was 4.9% in those patients where bladder neck sparing was performed, but only 1.85% in those without sparing. Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy may increase base-positive margins. Further studies are needed to better investigate the impact of this technique on oncological outcomes. A future paradigm could include modification of intended approach to bladder neck dissection when anterior base lesions are identified on pre-operative MRI.