1
|
Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Saffati G, Wahlstedt E, Chaput M, Patel SR, Salgado-Garza G, Kronstedt S, Segall MR, Angulo-Lozano JC, Jones JA, Taylor JM, Slawin JR. Oncologic outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy vs. Standard radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:275-285. [PMID: 39395865 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Radical Cystectomy is indicated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and select cases of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Women often undergo additional reproductive organ removal, greatly impacting sexual function and quality of life. Pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy aims to mitigate these effects, but its oncologic outcomes are not well-defined. This presents a meta-analysis of available literature on oncological outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy in women with muscle invasive disease. METHODS A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies comparing oncological outcomes between pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and standard radical cystectomy in women with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or high-risk or recurrent nonmuscle invasive cancer. The search included English or Spanish studies, statistically comparing overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis used Review Manager, employing fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Six retrospective studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 597 patients of which 303 received pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy and 294 received standard radical cystectomy. Overall Survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.05 [0.77, 1.43]; P = 0.77). Cancer-Specific Survival also was found to be not different between the 2 groups (HR 1.27 [0.86, 1.87]; P = 0.22). Additionally, recurrence-free survival was not different between the 2 groups (HR 0.85 [0.41, 1.75]; P = 0.65. Four of the included studies exhibited a moderate risk of bias, with 1 study demonstrating low risk and the remaining study manifesting a serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION The comparison showed no significant differences in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, or recurrence-free survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gal Saffati
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Eric Wahlstedt
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Madeline Chaput
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Sagar R Patel
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Shane Kronstedt
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Michal R Segall
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Juan C Angulo-Lozano
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey A Jones
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jennifer M Taylor
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeremy R Slawin
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pignot G, Barthélémy P, Borchiellini D. Sex Disparities in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4100. [PMID: 39682286 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Gender differences in prevalence, tumor invasiveness, response to treatment, and clinical outcomes exist in different types of cancer. The aim of this article is to summarize the sex disparities in bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment and try to suggest areas for improvement. Although men are at a higher risk of developing bladder tumors, women tend to be diagnosed with more advanced stages at diagnosis and are more likely to present with upfront muscle-invasive disease. Non-urothelial histological subtypes are more frequently reported in women. Regarding non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), several studies have shown that women have a higher risk of disease recurrence after treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, due to different immunogenicities. In localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy are less likely to be performed on women and sexual-sparing procedures with neobladder diversion are rarely offered. Finally, women appear to have a poorer prognosis than men, potentially due to the sex-associated intrinsic features of hosts and tumors that may drive differential therapeutic responses, particularly to immune-based therapies. Women are also more likely to develop severe adverse events related to systemic therapies and are underrepresented in randomized studies, leading to a gap between the real world and trials. In conclusion, studies investigating the role of sex and gender are urgently needed to improve the management of urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Géraldine Pignot
- Department of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, ICANS, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nseyo U, Ginsberg D. Functional Outcomes of Orthotopic Neobladder in Women. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:277-285. [PMID: 39198336 PMCID: PMC11366725 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01223-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review paper summarizes the available literature on the evolution of surgical approach to radical cystectomy in female bladder cancer patients and its impact on functional outcomes in orthotopic neobladder. RECENT FINDINGS Traditionally, radical cystectomy in female bladder cancer patients has been maximally extirpative with pelvic exenteration. Recently, new techniques which include pelvic organ-sparing, nerve-sparing and vaginal-sparing have demonstrated improved rates of urinary incontinence and retention. Additional techniques include prophylactic apical suspension which reduces the likelihood of pelvic organ prolapse, a risk factor for voiding dysfunction in the setting of orthotopic neobladder. Surgical management of bladder cancer in female patients has evolved to include surgical approaches which center quality of life and functional outcomes that are unique to female patients who have undergone radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder and can be optimized based on considerations regarding an approach that limits pelvic floor and pelvic nerve disruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Ginsberg
- Department of Urology. Keck School of Medicine of USC, 1441 Eastlake Ave Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
You C, Cheng L, Fang Q, Qing L, Li Q, Liu S, Wang Y, Li R, Dong Z. Comparative evaluation of reproductive organ-preserving versus standard radical cystectomy in female: a meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:5041-5052. [PMID: 39009729 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11074-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of reproductive organ-preserving radical cystectomy (ROPRC) compared to standard radical cystectomy (SRC) in the treatment of female bladder cancer. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in November 2023 across several scientific databases. We executed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest, adhering to the PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024501522). RESULTS The meta-analysis included 10 studies with a total of 2015 participants. ROPRC showed a significant reduction in operative time and postoperative fasting period compared to SRC (MD - 45.69, 95% CI - 78.91 ~ - 12.47, p = 0.007, and MD - 0.69, 95% CI - 1.25 ~ - 0.13, p = 0.02, respectively). Functional outcomes, both daytime continence rate (OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.53 ~ 15.91, p = 0.008) and nighttime continence rate (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.94 ~ 18.01, p = 0.002), and sexual function measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (MD 5.72, 95% CI 0.19 ~ 11.26, p = 0.04), were significantly improved in the ROPRC group. There were no significant differences between ROPRC and SRC in terms of estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, minor complications or major complications. Oncologically, both procedures showed comparable outcomes with no significant differences in positive surgical margins, tumor recurrence rates, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, or progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS ROPRC is a viable and effective alternative to SRC in female bladder cancer patients, offering enhanced functional outcomes and similar oncological safety. These findings suggest that ROPRC can improve the quality of life in female bladder cancer patients without compromising the efficacy of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyu You
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Long Cheng
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Qixiang Fang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Liangliang Qing
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Qingchao Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Yanan Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Rongxin Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China
| | - Zhilong Dong
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stangl FP, Buehler OD, Wuethrich PY, Furrer MA, Burkhard FC. Sex Does Not Affect Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison in a Homogenous Contemporary Radical Cystectomy Cohort. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:171-180. [PMID: 38008691 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether biological sex affects oncological outcome after extended pelvic lymph node dissection, radical cystectomy, and urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and to identify risk factors impacting outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study with prospective data collection with a propensity score matched population. A total of 1165 consecutive patients from 2000 to 2020, (317 women and 848 men) scheduled for open extended pelvic lymph node dissection, radical cystectomy, and urinary diversion for urothelial bladder cancer were included in the final analysis. Overall Survival (OS), Cancer-Specific-Survival (CSS), and Recurrence-Free-survival (RFS) were assessed with multivariable weighted Cox regression analysis as well as with propensity score matched Cox-Regression. RESULTS No significant difference was found between sexes regarding OS (HR 1.18, [0.93-1.49], P = .16), CSS (HR 0.87, [0.64-1.18], P = .38), or RFS (HR 0.80, [0.59-1.07], P = .13). These results were confirmed after propensity score matching: female sex was not associated with inferior OS (HR 1.20, [0.91-1.60], P = .19), CSS (HR 1.01, [0.75-1.35], P = .97) or RFS (HR 0.98, [0.75-1.27], P = .86). CONCLUSIONS We did not find a significant difference in cancer-related outcomes or overall survival after extended pelvic lymph node dissection, open radical cystectomy, and urinary diversion for urothelial cancer between males and females even after adjustment with propensity matching score for multiple factors including oncological parameters, smoking status, and renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian P Stangl
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver D Buehler
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wuethrich
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marc A Furrer
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fiona C Burkhard
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boehm D, Rosenfeld J, Ji E, Lee Z. A Review of Bowel-based Urinary Diversions for the Colorectal Surgeon. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2023.100960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
|
7
|
Gupta N, Kucirka L, Semerjian A, Pierorazio PM, Loeb S, Bivalacqua TJ. Practice Patterns Regarding Female Reproductive Organ-Sparing and Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy Among Urologic Oncologists in the United States. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023:S1558-7673(23)00032-0. [PMID: 36801170 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female reproductive organ-sparing (ROS) and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy (RC) techniques have been shown to be oncologically safe and to improve sexual function outcomes among select patients with organ-confined disease. We sought to characterize practice patterns regarding female ROS and nerve-sparing RC among US urologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Society of Urologic Oncology to assess provider-reported frequency of ROS and nerve-sparing RC in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer that failed intravesical therapy or clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. RESULTS Among 101 urologists, 80 (79.2%) reported that they routinely resect the uterus/cervix, 68 (67.3%) the neurovascular bundle, 49 (48.5%) the ovaries, and 19 (18.8%) a portion of the vagina when performing RC in premenopausal patients with organ-confined disease. When asked about changes to approach in postmenopausal patients, 71 participants (70.3%) reported that they were less likely to spare the uterus/cervix, 44 (43.6%) were less likely to spare the neurovascular bundle, 70 (69.3%) were less likely to spare the ovaries, and 23 (22.8%) were less likely to spare a portion of the vagina. CONCLUSION We identified significant gaps in adoption of female ROS and nerve-sparing RC techniques for patients with organ-confined disease, despite evidence that ROS and nerve-sparing techniques are oncologically safe and can optimize functional outcomes in select patients. Future efforts should improve provider training in and education about ROS and nerve-sparing RC to improve postoperative outcomes among female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Gupta
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York City, NY.
| | - Lauren Kucirka
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York City, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park JS, Yuk HD, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Comparison of functional and oncological outcomes between uterus-sparing radical cystectomy and standard radical cystectomy in females: A retrospective study. Investig Clin Urol 2022; 63:612-622. [PMID: 36347550 PMCID: PMC9643730 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20220220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the functional and oncological outcomes of females who underwent uterus-sparing radical cystectomy (USRC) and standard radical cystectomy (SRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2009 and December 2020, 90 female patients who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion were included in this study, comprising the USRC and SRC groups. Functional outcomes were assessed in 63 patients who only underwent radical cystectomy with neobladder formation. Questionnaire scores, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) rate, and urinary continence rate were analyzed. Oncological outcomes were assessed in 86 patients, regardless of the urinary diversion type. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. RESULTS CIC rate was significantly lower in the USRC group than in the SRC group (14.7% vs. 48.0%; p=0.005). The continence rate was significantly higher in the USRC group than in the SRC group (85.3% vs. 40.0%; p=0.001). There were no significant differences in OS (p=0.890), CSS (p=0.700), or RFS (p=0.270) between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, uterine preservation did not significantly increase the hazard ratio (HR) of OS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18-2.11; p=0.450), CSS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.22-4.40; p=0.990), or RFS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.19-1.11; p=0.840). CONCLUSIONS USRC resulted in higher continence rates and lower CIC rates than SRC without negatively affecting oncological outcomes. Hence, with thorough deliberation, USRC should be considered for females undergoing radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Suk Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeong Dong Yuk
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jin HJ, Shim JS, Kwon TG, Kim TH, Jeon SH, Lee SH, Kang SG, Nam JK, Kim WS, Jeong BC, Oh JJ, Lee SC, Lee JY, Hong SH, Rha KH, Han WK, Ham WS, Lee YG, Lee YS, Park SY, Yoon YE, Ku JH, Kang SH. Gender-related outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A multi-institutional study. Investig Clin Urol 2022; 63:53-62. [PMID: 34983123 PMCID: PMC8756158 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) optimizes patient recovery and has outcomes comparable with those of open surgery. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RARC in female and male patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study of the Korean Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Study Group database from 2007 to 2019 identified 749 patients (111 females and 638 males). Female were matched 1:1 to male by propensity score matching using a logistic regression. We compared perioperative outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and complications between the two groups. RESULTS The female group had comparable perioperative outcomes to the male group in terms of operation time, lymph node yield, positive surgical margin, blood transfusion rate, and hospitalization days. Complication rate and grade were not significantly different between the two groups. The most common complication was infection in female and gastrointestinal complications in male. We compared the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival of female and male: 58.2% vs. 68.0% (p=0.495), 75.7% vs. 79.3% (p=0.645), and 40.8% vs. 53.5% (p=0.913), respectively. On multivariable analysis, T stage (>T2), postoperative complications, and positive surgical margin were prognostic factors of poor outcome. Sex was not an independent predictor of the three survivals. CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that RARC in female has comparable perioperative and oncologic outcomes to those in male. The complication rate of RARC in female was comparable to that in male, but the type of complications differed by sex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jung Jin
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Sung Shim
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Gyun Kwon
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, KyungHee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Urology, KyungHee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gu Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Kil Nam
- Department of Urology, Busan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Wan Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Chul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Youl Lee
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Koon Ho Rha
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Kyu Han
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Sik Ham
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Goo Lee
- Department of Urology, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Seong Lee
- Department of Urology, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Yul Park
- Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Eun Yoon
- Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Seok Ho Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Radical Cystectomy. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
11
|
Stangl FP, Thalmann GN. Continent diversion: five decades of developments and evolution. BJU Int 2020; 126:653-660. [PMID: 32916771 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a chronological overview of the evolution of continent urinary diversion (CUD) over the last 50 years and to highlight important milestones. METHODS We performed an extensive literature review and analysed different forms of urinary diversion worldwide. After the evaluation of surgical techniques, we assessed the advantages and disadvantages of assorted CUD approaches based on published long-term follow-up data. RESULTS A wide variety of surgical options for CUD is available and feasible to date, although consensus among urologists regarding the 'gold standard' is still lacking. Several forms of orthotopic bladder substitutes and continent cutaneous urinary reservoirs have been shown to provide excellent long-term results. CONCLUSION The last 50 years of CUD have seen constant evolution and refinement of techniques, but the best surgical approach remains unclear and there is no 'one-size-fits-all' option, but rather tailor-made approaches are necessary to ensure patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian P Stangl
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gupta N, Rasmussen SEVP, Haney N, Smith A, Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH, Hoffman-Censits J, Bivalacqua TJ. Understanding Psychosocial and Sexual Health Concerns Among Women With Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy. Urology 2020; 151:145-153. [PMID: 32853645 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand the physical and psychosocial components of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) among women undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). METHODS We conducted semistructured individual interviews and a focus group with pre- and post-RC female patients and their partners regarding the impact of RC on sexual health and psychosocial wellbeing. Themes were inductively identified by 2 independent coders and subsequently organized into themes and subthemes using qualitative description and constant comparison. RESULTS In the preoperative cohort, 6 women and 1 partner participated (50% contact rate, 75% participation rate). In the postoperative cohort, 16 women and 2 partners participated (61% contact rate, 64% participation rate). Major themes that emerged in interviews with both cohorts included concerns about changes to body image, the psychological impact of BCa diagnosis and treatment, concerns about the impact of RC on sexual function, and inadequacies in provider-led sexual health counseling. Participants varied in the importance they placed on sexual function, with factors such as age, relationship status, and oncologic concerns impacting prioritization, although both younger and older patients expressed a desire to retain the option of sexual function. CONCLUSION Female patients with BCa undergoing RC experience changes in body image, psychological distress, physical disruptions in sexual function, and inadequacies in sexual health counseling and education. Future efforts should be directed towards improving sexual health counseling and psychosocial support resources for women with BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Gupta
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | | | - Nora Haney
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Armine Smith
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael H Johnson
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jean Hoffman-Censits
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|