1
|
Hoque SS, Ahern S, O'Connell HE, Romero L, Ruseckaite R. Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104454. [PMID: 38142984 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) typically undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh implants; however, transvaginal mesh surgery is associated with many adverse events including post-surgical pain. Assessment of pain as a symptom is necessary using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This scoping review aimed to describe and compare existing PROMs previously used to measure pain in women with PFDs. A scoping search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Ovid PsycInfo, and grey literature was conducted. Studies published in English describing the development, implementation, and application of PFD-associated pain PROMs among adult women before and after pelvic floor surgery were included. From each article, a descriptive summary organised by study first author, publication year, country, setting, aim, study characteristics, and results were extracted. From 2,604 articles identified, 54 studies were included, describing 44 PROMs. Most studies described at least 2 to 3 instruments. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 was most commonly described by 12 studies followed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Of the 44 PROMs, 27 were condition-specific, of which 9 included items on pain; 17 generic PROMs, 4 of which contained items on pain; and 6 pain-specific PROMs. PROMs identified in our review measured pain not related to PFDs or pelvic floor surgery and quantified the pain experienced. These PROMs did not measure all areas of pain including region, sensation, impact, and triggers. The findings of this review will assist with developing a new pain-specific PROM in this population. PERSPECTIVE: Women with pelvic floor disorders often undergo surgery involving transvaginal mesh, from which they experience debilitating pain. Pain is a major issue impacting women's lives. Patient-reported outcome measures can be used to assess the pain; however, it is unclear whether existing instruments are relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheymonti S Hoque
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen E O'Connell
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lorena Romero
- The Ian Potter Library, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rasa Ruseckaite
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruseckaite R, Jayasinghe R, Bavor C, Dean J, Daly O, Ahern S. Evaluation and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic organ prolapse procedures. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:624. [PMID: 37312203 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09540-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) captures clinical and surgical data in women undergoing pelvic floor procedures. The inclusion of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the APFPR is a critical activity providing the additional patient perspective of their condition prior to surgery as well as monitoring beyond the usual post-surgical follow-up time. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of seven PROMs for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to determine the most suitable instrument for the APFPR. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with women with POP (n = 15) and their treating clinicians (n = 11) in Victoria, Australia. Interview topics covered appropriateness, content, and acceptability of seven POP-specific instruments identified through the literature to determine their suitability and acceptability for inclusion in the APFPR. We analysed the interview data using conventional content analysis. RESULTS All study participants agreed that PROMs were needed for the APFPR. Both women and clinicians suggested that some of the instruments were ambiguous, too long and confusing. The Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire was accepted widely amongst women and clinicians and recommended for inclusion in the APFPR. All participants agreed it would be appropriate to capture PROMs before surgery, and then followed up post-surgically. Email, phone call or postal mail-out were the preferred options for PROMs data collection. CONCLUSION Most women and clinicians supported incorporating PROMs in the APFPR. Study participants believed that capturing PROMs would have potential use in individual care and improve outcomes of women with POP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Randi Jayasinghe
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Claire Bavor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Joanne Dean
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Oliver Daly
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ralphsmith M, Ahern S, Dean J, Ruseckaite R. Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:2325-2334. [PMID: 35233681 PMCID: PMC9427903 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. METHODS We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisie Ralphsmith
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Joanne Dean
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ye Y, Wang Y, Tian W, Zhang Z, Liang S, Song X, Guo J, Gao Q, Shi H, Sun Z, Chen J, Lang J, Zhu L. Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a 14-year prospective follow-up. SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2022; 65:1667-1672. [PMID: 35079957 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-021-2042-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of Burch colposuspension (BC) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In this prospective cohort study, 84 patients with SUI undergoing BC were enrolled from February 2004 to January 2010. Data on long-term subjective success and postoperative complications were collected at clinic visits and by telephone follow-up. During a mean follow-up period of 14.2 years, 68% (57/84) patients completed the follow-up. A total of 68.4% of patients (39/57) reported absence of SUI symptoms, 73.6% (42/57) were subjectively satisfied according to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and 68.4% (39/57) reported subjective success regarding urinary symptoms via the Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form. However, 28.1% (16/57) suffered at least one long-term postoperative complication and incident. Specifically, 1 in 25 (4.0%) sexually active patients reported dyspareunia, 3 patients (5.3%) had de novo overactive bladder, and 6 patients (10.5%) reported voiding dysfunction. Four patients (7.0%) reported new onset prolapse symptoms, and 3 patients (5.3%) underwent secondary urinary incontinence surgery. Our study indicated that Burch colposuspension is an effective procedure for SUI, and the cure effect was largely maintained for the 14-year follow-up period, with relatively low complication rates. BC should be considered a surgical option for SUI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Ye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Weijie Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhibo Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Shuo Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaochen Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jianbin Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qianqian Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Honghui Shi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhijing Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Juan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jinghe Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32:3113-3130. [PMID: 34037813 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04839-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The objective was to overview the literature on the existing pelvic floor procedure registries and databases and to identify patient demographic, clinical and/or patient-reported data items for inclusion in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) Minimum Data Set (MDS). METHODS We conducted a literature search on the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies in the period January 2008 to January 2020. All were English studies of registries and databases on female adults undergoing surgery for pelvic floor disorders including stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Studies were assessed on demographic and clinical patient characteristics, procedure or treatment type, health-related quality of life, adverse events and safety outcomes, captured by pelvic floor procedure registries or databases that have been established to date. RESULTS From 1662 studies, 29 publications describing 22 different pelvic floor registries and databases were included for analysis, 12 (55%) of which were multicentre. Six (27%) registries and databases involved solely SUI, eight (36%) were regarding POP, and the remaining eight (36%) focussed on both conditions. The majority of registries and databases captured similar details on patient characteristics, comorbidities and other clinical features, procedure or treatment type, health-related quality of life, adverse events, safety and efficacy. CONCLUSION The findings of this scoping review will assist in determining the MDS for the APFPR, an initiative of the Australian government, to improve health and quality of life outcomes of women who undergo pelvic floor reconstructive procedures.
Collapse
|
6
|
Toia B, Unterberg S, Sihra N, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Ockrim JL, Greenwell TJ. Functional outcomes of vaginal surgery for urethral extrusion of mid-urethral tape in women. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 33:2251-2256. [PMID: 33822257 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04774-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS We aim to determine the presentation of and immediate and longer-term outcomes of vaginal surgical excision of urethral extrusion of mid-urethral tape (MUT). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with urethral extrusion of MUT having vaginal surgical excision between 2007 and 2018. The MUT was removed either partially (via vaginal approach) or completely (via combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach). Functional outcomes and any re-interventions are described. RESULTS Thirty-four patients of median age 53 (range 34-82) years were identified. Preoperative symptomatic recurrent/persistent urinary incontinence was present in 29/34(85%) with 24/34(71%) women having recurrent/persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence (s-MUI) on urodynamics. Vaginal surgical excision was performed alone in 33/34(97%) women and in combination with laparoscopic removal of abdominopelvic MUT in 1/34(3%) woman. In the longer term vaginal/urethral pain resolved or improved in all 15/15(100%) patients presenting with this complaint whilst patient reported poor flow resolved in 8/9 (89%) women. Twenty-eight of 34 women (82%) had persistent/recurrent SUI or s-MUI following MUT excision. Twenty-four of 34 women (71%) had further SUI surgery with cure or improvement of SUI in 20/24 (83%) patients. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of vaginal surgical excision of the MUT was cure or improvement of pain in 100% and resolution of poor flow in 89% women. Recurrent/persistent SUI or s-MUI was present in 82% following removal as compared to 71% women prior to removal. Of the 71% of women electing to have further surgery for recurrent/persistent SUI/s-MUI, 83% were dry or improved afterwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Toia
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK.
| | - Stephen Unterberg
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| | - Neha Sihra
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| | - Mahreen Pakzad
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| | - Rizwan Hamid
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| | - Jeremy L Ockrim
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| | - Tamsin J Greenwell
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mathieson R, Kippen R, Manning T, Brennan J. Stress urinary incontinence in the mesh complication era: current Australian trends. BJU Int 2020; 128:95-102. [PMID: 33226698 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine available data relating to the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in Australia before, during and after a well-publicized Senate Inquiry into transvaginal mesh use and to consider outcomes in the context of global guideline changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS The annual number of surgical procedures for the management of SUI by procedure type and age group for the years 2008/2009-2017/2018 was obtained from the Australian Government Department of Human Services database using Medicare Benefits Schedule item numbers. The data extracted were limited to women aged 25 years and older. These data were used to calculate age-specific and age-standardized rates, so as to accurately analyse trends in the usage of different procedures. Hospital Episode Statistics for mid-urethral sling (MUS) insertions were obtained for England's National Health Service from the Health and Social Care Information Centre for the years 2008/2009-2016/2017. These data were also used to calculate annual age-standardized rates for comparison purposes. RESULTS Rates declined for most SUI procedures over time (MUS, colposuspension, fascial slings) except for urethral bulking agents. The absolute number of MUSs implanted in 2008/2009 was 5729, which decreased to 3127 in the 2017/2018 financial year. Over the decade, the annual rate for MUS implantation per 100 000 population halved from 78 to 36. Over this same period, the rate of usage of bulking agents doubled, although represented a low volume of procedures (overall numbers increased from 304 to 698, representing an increase from four to eight procedures per 100 000 population). The age-specific peak rate for MUS and Burch colposuspension changed over the decade from 55-64 years to 65-74 years, suggesting that women are deferring surgical treatment until later in life. Over the last decade, the total number of surgical procedures performed in Australia to treat SUI has decreased markedly from 6812 to 4279. This represents a decrease in the annual rate per 100 000 population from 93 to 49. CONCLUSIONS There are clear changes evident for SUI management in the past decade in Australia, including an overall decline in operative numbers, which correlate with international advisory notifications and local investigations. The results of the Australian Senate inquiry, including removal of single-incision mini-slings, greater availability of patient resources, and greater regulation of SUI procedures, will probably have ongoing effects. Surgeons need to ensure that sufficient training and patient education continue in order to maintain appropriate access to treatment of SUI in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Kippen
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Janelle Brennan
- Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.,School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Vic., Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giarenis I, Anding R, Chermansky C, Greenwell T, Cardozo L, Harding C. Do we have adequate data to construct a valid algorithm for management of synthetic midurethral sling complications? ICI-RS 2019. Neurourol Urodyn 2020; 39 Suppl 3:S122-S131. [PMID: 32022954 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synthetic midurethral sling (MUS) procedures, purported for the last two decades as the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence, have been in creasingly scrutinized in recent years with regard to the rate and severity of complications. METHODS During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society meeting held in Bristol, UK, in 2019, a multidisciplinary panel held a think tank and discussed the contemporary evidence pertaining to the classification, investigation, and treatment of MUS complications. RESULTS The current classification system of mesh-related complications was discussed, and shortcomings were identified. The lack of a standardized clinical pathway was noted, and the value of clinical investigations and surgical treatments was difficult to fully evaluate. The paucity of high-level evidence was a common factor in all discussions, and the difficulties with setting up relevant randomized-controlled trials were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of the think-tank discussions is summarized with a set of recommendations designed to stimulate future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Giarenis
- Department of Urogynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Ralf Anding
- Department of Neurourology/Urology, Bonn and Neurological Rehabilitation Center "Godeshöhe" e.V., University Clinic, Friedrich Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christopher Chermansky
- Department of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Urology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tamsin Greenwell
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Linda Cardozo
- Department of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christopher Harding
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|