Tamsulosin and placebo vs tamsulosin and tadalafil in male lower urinary tract symptoms: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial

Early investigational agents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia'

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), as a clinical entity that affects many people, has always been in the forefront of interest among researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and physicians. Patients with BPH exhibit a diverse range of symptoms, while current treatment options can occasionally cause adverse events. All the aforementioned have led to an increased demand for more effective treatment options.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the outcomes of new medications used in a pre-clinical and clinical setting for the management of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/BPH and provides information about ongoing trials and future directions in the management of this condition. More specifically, sheds light upon drug categories, such as reductase‑adrenoceptor antagonists, drugs interfering with the nitric oxide (NO)/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) signaling pathway, onabotulinumtoxinA, vitamin D3 (calcitriol) analogues, selective cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonists, talaporfin sodium, inhibitor of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), drugs targeting the hormonal control of the prostate, phytotherapy, and many more.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials are being conducted on a number of new medications that may emerge as effective therapeutic alternatives in the coming years.

A Review of Combined Phosphodiesterase-5-Inhibitors and α-Blockers versus Phosphodiesterase-5-Inhibitors Alone for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) present conflicting recommendations regarding combination therapy of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) with α-blockers to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Use of PDE5is is widespread in the population of patients with LUTS/BPH. In this scoping review, we examine the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of combined PDE5is and α-blockers compared to PDE5i medications alone. A search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify manuscripts discussing the safety of PDE5i and α-blockers in combination or comparing this combination to PDE5is alone in the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Study designs, data, and conclusions were qualitatively analyzed. Combination therapy was found to be safe across all studies; importantly, no evidence documents increased risk of hypotension. Most studies reported added improvement in symptom and quality of life scores compared to PDE5i alone, with additional International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) change ranging from -1.30 to -8.50 and IPSS quality of life score change ranging from -0.15 to -1.50. Objective metrics such as postvoid residual volumes and maximum flow rate were inconsistently reported. Taken together, the current body of data suggests that combining PDE5i α-blocker therapy is safe and that there are opportunities for additional symptomatic improvement, though it should be utilized for select patients. Situations with particular utility could include patients with comorbid erectile dysfunction or without sufficient improvement on monotherapy.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Plus Tadalafil Compared With Tamsulosin Alone in Treating Males With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostrate Hyperplasia

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostrate hyperplasia (BPH) are common geriatric diseases, and its incidence rises with age. The treatment of BPH and LUTS is becoming a burden for health care. The meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy (tamsulosin plus tadalafil) compared with tamsulosin alone in treatment of males with LUTS/BPH. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were utilized to conduct this study. There were several databases available for literature retrieval, including Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science databases, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. To improve the comprehensiveness of the search, related references were also searched. Finally, six randomized controlled trials including 441 patients were included. The combination therapy had significant improvements in total International Prostate Symptom Score (p < .0001), quality of life score (p = .003), maximum urine flow rate (p < .00001), and International Index of Erectile Function (p < .00001) compared with the tamsulosin monotherapy, but there was no obvious difference in postvoid residual volume (p = .06). In terms of safety, the combination group had comparable rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (p = .19) than the monotherapy group except for pain symptoms (p < .0001). The combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil provided a preferable therapeutic effect compared with the tamsulosin alone in treating males with BPH/LUTS, and both therapy regimens were well tolerated by the patients.

[Medical treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms: what's new?]

Decades after the introduction of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, new data of practical relevance related to their desired and adverse effects continues to emerge. Some of these novel findings are to be taken seriously but are insufficiently established, for instance associations between drug use and depression or dementia. Multiple combination treatments have been tested. While combination treatment was often statistically superior to monotherapy, the difference was mostly in the range of 1 IPSS point, which raises doubts on the clinical relevance of the findings at the group level. The new evidence enables further personalisation of the treatment of male lower urinary tract dysfunction, but also makes individual risk-benefit considerations more complex.

The effect of vitamin D replacement in patients with lower urinary tract complaint/erectile dysfunction resistant to Tadalafil 5 mg treatment: A pilot clinical study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vitamin D replacement in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/erectile dysfunction (ED) who did not respond to tadalafil 5 mg treatment. Patients who applied to the Andrology Clinic with LUTS/ED between September 2017 and August 2020 and used 5 mg Tadalafil daily for treatment and did not benefit from treatment for 1 month were included in the study. Vitamin D levels of the patients were analysed and Vitamin D3 100,000 IU/week oral therapy was administered for a month to the patients with low levels of Vitamin D(<20 ng/ml).The values of the patients before and after Vitamin D replacement were compared. A total of 84 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 49.175 ± 11.63(28-70) years and the mean BMI was 25.93 ± 6.82(18.26-37.87). Testosterone levels of the examined patients were 3.45 ± 0.99 ng/ml. After 1 month of Vitamin D replacement + Tadalafil 5 mg/d treatment, the international index of erectile function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) (pre-treatment: 10.73 ± 6.12, post-treatment: 24.18 ± 4.87; p = 0.001) and International Prostate Symptom Score (pre-treatment: 9.12 ± 7.16, post-treatment: 3.11 ± 1.08; p = 0.003) scores of the patients improved significantly. Evaluation of Vitamin D levels is important to improve treatment response, especially in patients who do not respond to PDE-5 inhibitors.

Discontinuation Rates of Tadalafil Alone and in Combination with a-Blockers in the Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms with or without Coexisting Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

We examined the discontinuation rates of tadalafil alone and in combination with a-blockers (ABs) for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with or without erectile dysfunction (ED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies published until May 15, 2022. The discontinuation rates associated with LUTS medications were subsequently analyzed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies, including 1724 discontinued patients, were included. The combined discontinuation rate was 12.78% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.89-15.98%), and the discontinuation rates because of adverse events and lack of efficacy were 4.56% (95% CI 3.39-5.90%) and 3.30% (95% CI 1.53-5.72%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The discontinuation rate of tadalafil alone or in combination with ABs for LUTS with or without ED was relatively low and varied according to the study type. Patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy were similarly likely to abandon treatment. Treatment with a fixed-dose combination was associated with better persistence than with a free-dose combination. These data may help guide clinicians in selecting drug regimens when making decisions. Factors associated with treatment withdrawal need to be determined through high-quality clinical studies to reduce the drug discontinuation rate, which will ultimately reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of 12-week Monotherapy With Once Daily 5 mg Tadalafil for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evidence-based Analysis

Background: Tadalafil has been approved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for nearly 10 years. However, there are insufficient evidence-based studies of the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in treating lower urinary tract symptoms of BPH (LUTS/BPH). Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect and clinical safety of tadalafil monotherapy (5 mg once daily for 12 weeks) for LUTS/BPH. Methods: A total of 13 studies (15 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]) were extracted from the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Web of Science for the period up to July 2021. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated independently by two authors, who, respectively, extracted data according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses principles. Conflicts were settled by a discussion with two-third of senior authors. All data analyses were conducted by the Review Manager, version 5.4. Results: Regarding efficacy, 12-week trials indicated that 5 mg once daily tadalafil showed a significantly lower and, consequently, better total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) than the placebo did (mean difference [MD]: -1.97, 95% CI: -2.24 to -1.70; P < 0.00001). In addition, significant differences were found between the tadalafil regimen and the placebo in the IPSS voiding subscore (MD: -1.30, 95% CI: -1.48 to -1.11; P < 0.00001), the IPSS storage subscore (MD: -0.70, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.58; P < 0.00001), the IPSS quality of life (MD: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.22; P < 0.00001), and BPH impact index (MD: -0.58, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.40; P < 0.00001). The safety analysis did not show a significant difference in serious adverse events between the two groups (risk ratio: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.80-2.01; P = 0.31), although the adverse events occurred at a higher incidence in the tadalafil group than in the placebo. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that once daily 5 mg tadalafil is a potentially effective and safe treatment choice with excellent tolerability for patients with LUTS/BPH. Systematic Review Registration: Identifier (CRD42021228840).

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Comprising Tamsulosin and PDE5-Is, Relative to Monotherapies, in Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis

We report safety and efficacy of a combination therapy, comprising tamsulosin and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is), relative to monotherapy, to ascertain its potential in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) after 3 months’ treatment. We screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases, for randomized controlled trials, and obtained eight articles comprising 1144 participants. Results showed that the combination group had superior outcomes with regard to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Qmax, compared to the other two groups. The combination group also had superior efficacy with regard to International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) than the tamsulosin group, but not over the PDE5-Is group. Further, the combination group showed better efficacy in IPSS voiding and quality of life (QoL) compared to the PDE5-Is group. An analysis of safety outcomes revealed extremely high adverse events (AEs) and pain in the combination group. However, therapy discontinuation due to pain and AEs did not increase with increase in AEs. Overall, our findings indicate that a combination of tamsulosin and PDE5-Is is superior to individual tamsulosin and PDE5-Is monotherapy, with regard to improving LUTS and ED secondary to BPH.