Adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Understanding Factors that Influence Prognosis and Response to Therapy in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

In this review, we highlight and contextualize emerging morphologic prognostic and predictive factors in renal cell carcinoma. We focus on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common histologic subtype. Our understanding of the molecular characterization of ccRCC has dramatically improved in the last decade. Herein, we highlight how these discoveries have laid the foundation for new approaches to prognosis and therapeutic decision-making for patients with ccRCC. We explore the clinical relevance of common mutations, established gene expression signatures, intratumoral heterogeneity, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid morphology and PD-L1 expression, and discuss their impact on predicting response to therapy.

Adjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents a therapeutic challenge due to 20-40% relapse risk post-nephrectomy. There has been substantial interest in utilizing immunotherapy interrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in the perioperative space, especially in the adjuvant setting, in order to minimize such risk.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a PubMed search using the terms 'adjuvant' and 'RCC.' We begin by examining landmark studies in the postoperative space for locally advanced RCC, with special emphasis on immunotherapeutic biologics. Important considerations are outlined in an effort to explain the conflicting data on the benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy as well as to adequately assess the magnitude of potential benefit of the recently approved adjuvant pembrolizumab. Relevant contemporary challenges and opportunities as well as future directions of the field are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Systemic immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis likely holds promise, either alone or potentially in combinations, in minimizing recurrence risk for locally advanced RCC. However, emphasis on post-protocol care, robust endpoint selection, and continued work and validation on predictive biomarkers are needed to confidently select those patients that may benefit the most and minimize biologic and financial toxicity.