Effect of flecainide derivatives on sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release suggests a lack of direct action on the cardiac ryanodine receptor

Inhibitors of Intracellular RyR2 Calcium Release Channels as Therapeutic Agents in Arrhythmogenic Heart Diseases

Ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) is the principal intracellular calcium release channel in the cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Pathological RyR2 hyperactivity generates arrhythmia risk in genetic and structural heart diseases. RYR2 gain-of-function mutations cause catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. In structural heart diseases (i.e., heart failure), posttranslation modifications render RyR2 channels leaky, resulting in pathologic calcium release during diastole, contributing to arrhythmogenesis and contractile dysfunction. Hence, RyR2 represents a therapeutic target in arrhythmogenic heart diseases. We provide an overview of the structure and function of RyR2, and then review US Food and Drug Administration-approved and investigational RyR2 inhibitors. A therapeutic classification of RyR2 inhibitors is proposed based on their mechanism of action. Class I RyR2 inhibitors (e.g., flecainide) do not change SR calcium content and are primarily antiarrhythmic. Class II RyR2 inhibitors (e.g., dantrolene) increase SR calcium content, making them less effective as antiarrhythmics but preferable in conditions with reduced SR calcium content such as heart failure.

Flecainide Specifically Targets the Monovalent Countercurrent Through the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor, While a Dominant Opposing Ca2+/Ba2+ Current Is Present

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a highly arrhythmogenic syndrome triggered by stress, primarily linked to gain-of-function point mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2). Flecainide, as an effective therapy for CPVT, is a known blocker of the surface-membrane Na+ channel, also affecting the intracellular RyR2 channel. The therapeutic relevance of the flecainide-RyR2 interaction remains controversial, as flecainide blocks only the RyR2 current flowing in the opposite direction to the physiological Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). However, it has been proposed that charge-compensating countercurrent from the cytosol to SR lumen plays a critical role, and its reduction may indeed suppress excessive diastolic SR Ca2+ release through RyR2 channels in CPVT. Monitoring single-channel properties, we examined whether flecainide can target intracellular pathways for charge-balancing currents carried by RyR2 and SR Cl- channels under cell-like conditions. Particularly, the Tris+ countercurrent flowed through the RyR2 channel simultaneously with a dominant reverse Ca2+/Ba2+ current. We demonstrate that flecainide blocked the RyR2-mediated countercurrent without affecting channel activity. In contrast, the SR Cl- channel was completely resistant to flecainide. Based on these findings, it is reasonable to propose that the primary intracellular target of flecainide in vivo is the RyR2-mediated countercurrent.

Pediatric flecainide pharmacogenomics: a roadmap to delivering precision-based care to pediatrics arrhythmias

Flecainide acetate is a Class 1c anti-arrhythmic with a potent sodium voltage gated channel blockade which is utilized for the second-line treatment of tachyarrhythmias in children and adults. Given its narrow therapeutic index, the individualization of drug therapy is of utmost importance for clinicians. Despite efforts to improve anti-arrhythmic drug therapy, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the impact of variation in the genes relevant to flecainide's disposition and response. This variability is compounded in developing children whose drug disposition and response pathways may remain immature. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to outline flecainide's disposition and response pathways while simultaneously highlighting opportunities for prospective investigation in the pediatric population.

Ventricular Tachycardia Due to Triggered Activity: Role of Early and Delayed Afterdepolarizations

Most forms of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) are caused by re-entry, resulting from altered myocardial conduction and refractoriness secondary to underlying structural heart disease. In contrast, VT caused by triggered activity (TA) is unrelated to an abnormal structural substrate and is often caused by molecular defects affecting ion channel function or regulation of intracellular calcium cycling. This review summarizes the cellular and molecular bases underlying TA and exemplifies their clinical relevance with selective representative scenarios. The underlying basis of TA caused by delayed afterdepolarizations is related to sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium overload, calcium waves, and diastolic sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium leak. Clinical examples of TA caused by delayed afterdepolarizations include sustained right and left ventricular outflow tract tachycardia and catecholaminergic polymorphic VT. The other form of afterpotentials, early afterdepolarizations, are systolic events and inscribe early afterdepolarizations during phase 2 or phase 3 of the action potential. The fundamental defect is a decrease in repolarization reserve with associated increases in late plateau inward currents. Malignant ventricular arrhythmias in the long QT syndromes are initiated by early afterdepolarization-mediated TA. An understanding of the molecular and cellular bases of these arrhythmias has resulted in generally effective pharmacologic-based therapies, but these are nonspecific agents that have off-target effects. Therapeutic efficacy may need to be augmented with an implantable defibrillator. Next-generation therapies will include novel agents that rescue arrhythmogenic abnormalities in cellular signaling pathways and gene therapy approaches that transfer or edit pathogenic gene variants or silence mutant messenger ribonucleic acid.

Flecainide Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Arrhythmic Events in a Large Cohort of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

In severely affected patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, beta-blockers are often insufficiently protective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether flecainide is associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmic events (AEs) when added to beta-blockers in a large cohort of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS

From 2 international registries, this multicenter case cross-over study included patients with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in whom flecainide was added to beta-blocker therapy. The study period was defined as the period in which background therapy (ie, beta-blocker type [beta1-selective or nonselective]), left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients and was divided into pre-flecainide and on-flecainide periods. The primary end point was AEs, defined as sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The association of flecainide with AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming negative binomial distribution and random effects for patients.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients (123 [50%] females; median age at start of flecainide, 18 years [interquartile range, 14-29]; median flecainide dose, 2.2 mg/kg per day [interquartile range, 1.7-3.1]) were included. At baseline, all patients used a beta-blocker, 70 (28%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 21 (9%) had a left cardiac sympathetic denervation. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4-7.2), 41 patients (17%) experienced 58 AEs (annual event rate, 5.6%). During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.0-6.0), 23 patients (9%) experienced 38 AEs (annual event rate, 4.0%). There were significantly fewer AEs after initiation of flecainide (incidence rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.38-0.83]; P=0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or during the pre-flecainide period (n=167), flecainide was associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31-0.77]; P=0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on beta-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was also associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, adding flecainide to beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of AEs in the overall cohort, in symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs while on beta-blocker therapy.

Insights on the mechanism of flecainide in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome characterized by defective cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) calcium release during times of adrenergic stimulation, resulting in bidirectional or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Flecainide is a class 1c anti-arrhythmic drug that has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in treating CPVT. However, its mechanism of action remains disputed. One group proposes a direct effect of flecainide on RyR2-mediated calcium release, while another proposes an indirect effect via sodium channel blockade and modulation of intracellular calcium dynamics. In light of recent studies, this commentary aims to explore and discuss the evidence base for these potential mechanisms.

Flecainide induces a sustained countercurrent dependent effect on RyR2 in permeabilized WT ventricular myocytes but not in intact cells

Background and purpose: While flecainide is now an accepted treatment for arrhythmias associated with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), its mechanism of action remains controversial. In studies on myocytes from CPVT mice, inhibition of proarrhythmic Ca2+ waves was initially attributed to a novel action on the type-2 ryanodine receptor (RyR2). However, subsequent work on wild type (WT) myocytes questioned the conclusion that flecainide has a direct action on RyR2. In the present study, the effects of flecainide were compared in intact and permeabilized WT myocytes. Experimental approach: Intracellular Ca2+ was measured using confocal microscopy in intact or saponin permeabilized adult rat ventricular myocytes (ARVM). In some experiments on permeabilized cells, flecainide was studied following partial inhibition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) counter-current. Key results: Flecainide induced sustained changes Ca2+ sparks and waves in permeabilized ARVM, which were comparable to those reported in intact or permeabilized myocytes from CPVT mice. However, a relatively high level of flecainide (25 μM) was required to induce these effects. Inhibition of the SR counter-current potentiated the effects of flecainide on SR Ca2+ waves. In intact field stimulated ARVM, prolonged exposure to 15 μM flecainide decreased wave frequency but RyR2 dependent effects on Ca2+ sparks were absent; higher drug concentrations blocked field stimulation, consistent with inhibition of Nav1.5. Conclusions and implications: In intact ARVM, the absence of effects on Ca2+ sparks suggests that the intracellular flecainide concentration was insufficient to influence RyR2. Wave inhibition in intact ARVM may reflect secondary effects of Nav1.5 inhibition. Potentiation of flecainide's action by counter-current inhibition can be explained if transient polarization of the SR membrane during SR Ca2+ release facilitates its action on RyR2.

How does flecainide impact RyR2 channel function?

Flecainide, a cardiac class 1C blocker of the surface membrane sodium channel (NaV1.5), has also been reported to reduce cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2)-mediated sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release. It has been introduced as a clinical antiarrhythmic agent for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), a condition most commonly associated with gain-of-function RyR2 mutations. Current debate concerns both cellular mechanisms of its antiarrhythmic action and molecular mechanisms of its RyR2 actions. At the cellular level, it targets NaV1.5, RyR2, Na+/Ca2+ exchange (NCX), and additional proteins involved in excitation-contraction (EC) coupling and potentially contribute to the CPVT phenotype. This Viewpoint primarily addresses the various direct molecular actions of flecainide on isolated RyR2 channels in artificial lipid bilayers. Such studies demonstrate different, multifarious, flecainide binding sites on RyR2, with voltage-dependent binding in the channel pore or voltage-independent binding at distant peripheral sites. In contrast to its single NaV1.5 pore binding site, flecainide may bind to at least four separate inhibitory sites on RyR2 and one activation site. None of these binding sites have been specifically located in the linear RyR2 sequence or high-resolution structure. Furthermore, it is not clear which of the inhibitory sites contribute to flecainide's reduction of spontaneous Ca2+ release in cellular studies. A confounding observation is that flecainide binding to voltage-dependent inhibition sites reduces cation fluxes in a direction opposite to physiological Ca2+ flow from SR lumen to cytosol. This may suggest that, rather than directly blocking Ca2+ efflux, flecainide can reduce Ca2+ efflux by blocking counter currents through the pore which otherwise limit SR membrane potential change during systolic Ca2+ efflux. In summary, the antiarrhythmic effects of flecainide in CPVT seem to involve multiple components of EC coupling and multiple actions on RyR2. Their clarification may identify novel specific drug targets and facilitate flecainide's clinical utilization in CPVT.

Moving in the right direction: elucidating the mechanisms of interaction between flecainide and the cardiac ryanodine receptor

Flecainide is used to treat catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), an arrhythmia caused by disrupted cellular Ca²⁺ handling following β-adrenergic stimulation. The clinical efficacy of flecainide in this context involves complex effects on multiple ion channels that may be influenced by the disease state. A compelling narrative has been constructed around flecainide's nonselective block of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) lumen-to-cytoplasm Ca²⁺ release through intracellular calcium release channels (RyR2). However, ion fluxes across the SR membrane during heart contraction are bidirectional, and here, we review experimental evidence that flecainide's principal action on RyR2 involves the partial block of ion flow in the cytoplasm-to-lumen direction (i.e., flecainide inhibits RyR2-mediated SR 'countercurrent'). Experimental approaches that could advance new knowledge on the mechanism of RyR2 block by flecainide are proposed. Some impediments to progress in this area, that must be overcome to enable the development of superior drugs to treat CPVT, are also considered.

The Antiarrhythmic Mechanisms of Flecainide in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a severe yet rare inherited arrhythmia disorder. The cornerstone of CPVT medical therapy is the use of β-blockers; 30% of patients with CPVT do not respond well to optimal β-blocker treatment. Studies have shown that flecainide effectively prevents life-threatening arrhythmias in CPVT. Flecainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic drug blocking cardiac sodium channels. RyR2 inhibition is proposed as the principal mechanism of antiarrhythmic action of flecainide in CPVT, while it is highly debated. In this article, we review the current progress of this issue.

RYR2 Channel Inhibition Is the Principal Mechanism of Flecainide Action in CPVT

RATIONALE

The class Ic antiarrhythmic drug flecainide prevents ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), a disease caused by hyperactive RyR2 (cardiac ryanodine receptor) mediated calcium (Ca) release. Although flecainide inhibits single RyR2 channels in vitro, reports have claimed that RyR2 inhibition by flecainide is not relevant for its mechanism of antiarrhythmic action and concluded that sodium channel block alone is responsible for flecainide's efficacy in CPVT.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether RyR2 block independently contributes to flecainide's efficacy for suppressing spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca release and for preventing ventricular tachycardia in vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We synthesized N-methylated flecainide analogues (QX-flecainide and N-methyl flecainide) and showed that N-methylation reduces flecainide's inhibitory potency on RyR2 channels incorporated into artificial lipid bilayers. N-methylation did not alter flecainide's inhibitory activity on human cardiac sodium channels expressed in HEK293T cells. Antiarrhythmic efficacy was tested utilizing a Casq2 (cardiac calsequestrin) knockout (Casq2-/-) CPVT mouse model. In membrane-permeabilized Casq2-/- cardiomyocytes-lacking intact sarcolemma and devoid of sodium channel contribution-flecainide, but not its analogues, suppressed RyR2-mediated Ca release at clinically relevant concentrations. In voltage-clamped, intact Casq2-/- cardiomyocytes pretreated with tetrodotoxin to inhibit sodium channels and isolate the effect of flecainide on RyR2, flecainide significantly reduced the frequency of spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca release, while QX-flecainide and N-methyl flecainide did not. In vivo, flecainide effectively suppressed catecholamine-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias in Casq2-/- mice, whereas N-methyl flecainide had no significant effect on arrhythmia burden, despite comparable sodium channel block.

CONCLUSIONS

Flecainide remains an effective inhibitor of RyR2-mediated arrhythmogenic Ca release even when cardiac sodium channels are blocked. In mice with CPVT, sodium channel block alone did not prevent ventricular tachycardia. Hence, RyR2 channel inhibition likely constitutes the principal mechanism of antiarrhythmic action of flecainide in CPVT.

Safety and efficacy of flecainide for patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Owing to reports of recurrent cardiac events in some catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) patients using β-blockers, safer alternatives are being investigated. Flecainide is an alternative adjunctive anti-arrhythmic agent known to provide incomplete protection to CPVT patients.

METHODS

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of flecainide, we searched 4 databases for retrospective cohort studies (RCs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of flecainide for CPVT patients. Data were extracted and analyzed (risk ratio [RR] or mean difference [MD]) using RevMan software. Seven RCs and 1 RCT (333 CPVT patients; 152 patients treated with flecainide) were identified.

RESULTS

Flecainide monotherapy was superior to standard therapy in alleviating the risk of arrhythmic events (RR = 0.46, confidence interval [CI] = [0.38, 0.56], P < .00001) and exercise-induced arrhythmia scores (MD = -0.39, CI = [-0.74, -0.05], P = .03). Combination therapy of flecainide and β-blockers was superior to β-blocker monotherapy in reducing the risk of arrhythmic and symptomatic events (RR = 0.29, CI = [0.13, 0.69], P = .005; RR = 0.36, CI = [0.20, 0.62], P = .0003, respectively), peak heart rate (MD = -16.81, CI = [-28.21, -5.41], P = .004), and exercise-induced arrhythmia scores (MD = -1.87, CI = [-2.71, 1.04], P < .0001). Flecainide did not increase the risk of all side effects (RR = 0.76, CI = [0.42, 1.40], P = .38) compared to that with β-blockers alone. No deaths were reported among patients treated with flecainide.

CONCLUSIONS

Flecainide is an effective and safe anti-arrhythmic agent, and its use as a monotherapy might be a good alternative for CPVT patients with β-blocker intolerance. Combination therapy was superior to β-blocker monotherapy. More randomized clinical trials are required to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of flecainide in these patients.

Introduction to biological complexity as a missing link in drug discovery

INTRODUCTION

Despite a burgeoning knowledge of the intricacies and mechanisms responsible for human disease, technological advances in medicinal chemistry, and more efficient assays used for drug screening, it remains difficult to discover novel and effective pharmacologic therapies. Areas covered: By reference to the primary literature and concepts emerging from academic and industrial drug screening landscapes, the authors propose that this disconnect arises from the inability to scale and integrate responses from simpler model systems to outcomes from more complex and human-based biological systems. Expert opinion: Further collaborative efforts combining target-based and phenotypic-based screening along with systems-based pharmacology and informatics will be necessary to harness the technological breakthroughs of today to derive the novel drug candidates of tomorrow. New questions must be asked of enabling technologies-while recognizing inherent limitations-in a way that moves drug development forward. Attempts to integrate mechanistic and observational information acquired across multiple scales frequently expose the gap between our knowledge and our understanding as the level of complexity increases. We hope that the thoughts and actionable items highlighted will help to inform the directed evolution of the drug discovery process.

Multiple targets for flecainide action: implications for cardiac arrhythmogenesis

Flecainide suppresses cardiac tachyarrhythmias including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia and arrhythmic long QT syndromes (LQTS), as well as the Ca2+ -mediated, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). However, flecainide can also exert pro-arrhythmic effects most notably following myocardial infarction and when used to diagnose Brugada syndrome (BrS). These divergent actions result from its physiological and pharmacological actions at multiple, interacting levels of cellular organization. These were studied in murine genetic models with modified Nav channel or intracellular ryanodine receptor (RyR2)-Ca2+ channel function. Flecainide accesses its transmembrane Nav 1.5 channel binding site during activated, open, states producing a use-dependent antagonism. Closing either activation or inactivation gates traps flecainide within the pore. An early peak INa related to activation of Nav channels followed by rapid de-activation, drives action potential (AP) upstrokes and their propagation. This is diminished in pro-arrhythmic conditions reflecting loss of function of Nav 1.5 channels, such as BrS, accordingly exacerbated by flecainide challenge. Contrastingly, pro-arrhythmic effects attributed to prolonged AP recovery by abnormal late INaL following gain-of-function modifications of Nav 1.5 channels in LQTS3 are reduced by flecainide. Anti-arrhythmic effects of flecainide that reduce triggering in CPVT models mediated by sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+ release could arise from its primary actions on Nav channels indirectly decreasing [Ca2+ ]i through a reduced [Na+ ]i and/or direct open-state RyR2-Ca2+ channel antagonism. The consequent [Ca2+ ]i alterations could also modify AP propagation velocity and therefore arrhythmic substrate through its actions on Nav 1.5 channel function. This is consistent with the paradoxical differences between flecainide actions upon Na+ currents, AP conduction and arrhythmogenesis under circumstances of normal and increased RyR2 function.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Spotlight on Small Molecules in Cardiovascular Diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.8/issuetoc.

Effect of flecainide derivatives on sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release suggests a lack of direct action on the cardiac ryanodine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flecainide is a use-dependent blocker of cardiac Na(+) channels. Mechanistic analysis of this block showed that the cationic form of flecainide enters the cytosolic vestibule of the open Na(+) channel. Flecainide is also effective in the treatment of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia but, in this condition, its mechanism of action is contentious. We investigated how flecainide derivatives influence Ca(2) (+) -release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through the ryanodine receptor channel (RyR2) and whether this correlates with their effectiveness as blockers of Na(+) and/or RyR2 channels.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We compared the ability of fully charged (QX-FL) and neutral (NU-FL) derivatives of flecainide to block individual recombinant human RyR2 channels incorporated into planar phospholipid bilayers, and their effects on the properties of Ca(2) (+) sparks in intact adult rat cardiac myocytes.

KEY RESULTS

Both QX-FL and NU-FL were partial blockers of the non-physiological cytosolic to luminal flux of cations through RyR2 channels but were significantly less effective than flecainide. None of the compounds influenced the physiologically relevant luminal to cytosol cation flux through RyR2 channels. Intracellular flecainide or QX-FL, but not NU-FL, reduced Ca(2) (+) spark frequency.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Given its inability to block physiologically relevant cation flux through RyR2 channels, and its lack of efficacy in blocking the cytosolic-to-luminal current, the effect of QX-FL on Ca(2) (+) sparks is likely, by analogy with flecainide, to result from Na(+) channel block. Our data reveal important differences in the interaction of flecainide with sites in the cytosolic vestibules of Na(+) and RyR2 channels.