Regulation of glycolytic genes in human macrophages by oxysterols: a potential role for liver X receptors

Exploring the Roles of Liver X Receptors in Lipid Metabolism and Immunity in Atherosclerosis

Hypercholesterolemia causes atherosclerosis by inducing immune cell migration and chronic inflammation in arterial walls. Recent single-cell analyses reveal the presence of lipid-enriched foamy macrophages, as well as other macrophage subtypes, neutrophils, T cells, and B cells, in atherosclerotic plaques in both animal models and humans. These cells interact with each other and other cells, including non-immune cells such as endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. They thereby regulate metabolic, inflammatory, phagocytic, and cell death processes, thus affecting the progression and stability of atherosclerotic plaques. The nuclear receptors liver X receptor (LXR)α and LXRβ are transcription factors that are activated by oxysterols and regulate lipid metabolism and immune responses. LXRs regulate cholesterol homeostasis by controlling cholesterol's transport, absorption, synthesis, and breakdown in the liver and intestine. LXRs are also highly expressed in tissue-resident and monocyte-derived macrophages and other immune cells, including both myeloid cells and lymphocytes, and they regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses. Interestingly, LXRs have immunosuppressive and immunoregulatory functions that are cell-type-dependent. In animal models of atherosclerosis, LXRs have been shown to be involved in both progression and regression phases. The pharmacological activation of LXR enhances cholesterol efflux from macrophages and promotes atherosclerosis progression. Deleting LXR in immune cells, especially myeloid cells, accelerates atherosclerosis by increasing monocyte migration, macrophage proliferation and activation, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs); furthermore, the deletion of hematopoietic LXRs impairs the regression of atherosclerotic plaques. Therefore, LXRs in immune cells may be a potent therapeutic target for atherosclerosis.

Inhibition of LXR Signaling in Human Foam Cells Impairs Macrophage-to-Endothelial Cell Cross Talk and Promotes Endothelial Cell Inflammation

BACKGROUND

During atherogenesis, macrophages turn into foam cells by engulfing lipids present within the atheroma plaques. The shift of foam cells toward proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotypes, a critical step in disease progression, is still poorly understood. LXRs (liver X receptors) play a pivotal role in the macrophage response to lipid, promoting the expression of key genes of cholesterol efflux, mitigating intracellular cholesterol accumulation. LXRs also exert balanced actions on inflammation in human macrophages, displaying both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects.

METHODS

Our study explored the role of LXRs in the functional response of human macrophage to lipid-rich plaque environment. We used primary human macrophages treated with atheroma plaque extracts and assessed the impact of pharmacological LXR inhibition by GSK2033 on cholesterol homeostasis and inflammatory response. Ultimately, we evaluated macrophage and endothelial cell cross talk by assessing the impact of macrophage-conditioned supernatants on the human endothelial cell.

RESULTS

LXR inhibition by GSK2033 resulted in increased levels of cholesterol and oxysterols in human macrophages, alongside notable changes in the cholesterol ester profile. This was accompanied by heightened secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL (interleukin)-6 and TNFα (tumor necrosis factor-α), despite a transcriptional repression of IL-1β. Conditioned media from GSK2033-treated macrophages more effectively activated ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1) and CCL2 (C-C motif ligand 2) expression in endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrate the intricate relationship between LXR function, cholesterol metabolism, and inflammation in human macrophages. While LXR is required for the proper handling of plaque lipids by macrophages, the differential regulation of IL-1β versus IL-6/TNFα secretion by LXRs could be challenging for potential pharmacological interventions.

Liver X receptor inverse agonist SR9243 attenuates rheumatoid arthritis via modulating glycolytic metabolism of macrophages

Liver X receptors (LXRs) which link lipid metabolism and inflammation, were overexpressed in experimental rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rats as observed in our previous studies, while suppression of LXRα by silybin ameliorates arthritis and abnormal lipid metabolism. However, the role of LXRs in RA remains undefined. In this study, we investigated the inhibition role of LXRs in the polarization and activation of M1 macrophage by using a special LXRs inverse agonist SR9243, which led to ameliorating the progression of adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) in rats. Mechanistically, SR9243 disrupted the LPS/IFN-γ-induced Warburg effect in M1 macrophages, while glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG attenuated the inhibition effect of SR9243 on M1 polarization and the cytokines expression of M1 macrophages including iNOS, TNF-α, and IL-6 in vitro. Furthermore, SR9243 downregulated key glycolytic enzymes, including LDH-A, HK2, G6PD, GLUT1, and HIF-1α in M1 macrophages, which is mediated by increased phosphorylation of AMPK (Thr172) and reduced downstream phosphorylation of mTOR (Ser2448). Importantly, gene silencing of LXRs compromises the inhibition effect of SR9243 on M1 macrophage polarization and activation. Collectively, for the first time, our findings suggest that the LXR inverse agonist SR9243 mitigates adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis and protects against bone erosion by inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization and activation through modulation of glycolytic metabolism via the AMPK/mTOR/HIF-1α pathway.

Inhibition of LXR controls the polarization of human inflammatory macrophages through upregulation of MAFB

Monocyte-derived macrophages contribute to pathogenesis in inflammatory diseases and their effector functions greatly depend on the prevailing extracellular milieu. Whereas M-CSF primes macrophages for acquisition of an anti-inflammatory profile, GM-CSF drives the generation of T cell-stimulatory and pro-inflammatory macrophages. Liver X Receptors (LXRα and LXRβ) are nuclear receptors that control cholesterol metabolism and regulate differentiation of tissue-resident macrophages. Macrophages from rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory pathologies exhibit an enriched LXR pathway, and recent reports have shown that LXR activation raises pro-inflammatory effects and impairs the acquisition of the anti-Inflammatory profile of M-CSF-dependent monocyte-derived macrophages (M-MØ). We now report that LXR inhibition prompts the acquisition of an anti-inflammatory gene and functional profile of macrophages generated within a pathological environment (synovial fluid from Rheumatoid Arthritis patients) as well as during the GM-CSF-dependent differentiation of human monocyte-derived macrophages (GM-MØ). Mechanistically, inhibition of LXR results in macrophages with higher expression of the v-Maf Avian Musculoaponeurotic Fibrosarcoma Oncogene Homolog B (MAFB) transcription factor, which governs the macrophage anti-inflammatory profile, as well as over-expression of MAFB-regulated genes. Indeed, gene silencing experiments on human macrophages evidenced that MAFB is required for the LXR inhibitor to enhance the anti-inflammatory nature of human macrophages. As a whole, our results demonstrate that LXR inhibition prompts the acquisition of an anti-inflammatory transcriptional and functional profile of human macrophages in a MAFB-dependent manner, and propose the use of LXR antagonists as potential therapeutic alternatives in macrophage re-programming strategies during inflammatory responses.

LXRα Regulates oxLDL-Induced Trained Immunity in Macrophages

Reprogramming of metabolic pathways in monocytes and macrophages can induce a proatherosclerotic inflammatory memory called trained innate immunity. Here, we have analyzed the role of the Liver X receptor (LXR), a crucial regulator of metabolism and inflammation, in oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL)-induced trained innate immunity. Human monocytes were incubated with LXR agonists, antagonists, and oxLDL for 24 h. After five days of resting time, cells were restimulated with the TLR-2 agonist Pam3cys. OxLDL priming induced the expression of LXRα but not LXRβ. Pharmacologic LXR activation was enhanced, while LXR inhibition prevented the oxLDL-induced inflammatory response. Furthermore, LXR inhibition blocked the metabolic changes necessary for epigenetic reprogramming associated with trained immunity. In fact, enrichment of activating histone marks at the IL-6 and TNFα promotor was reduced following LXR inhibition. Based on the differential expression of the LXR isoforms, we inhibited LXRα and LXRβ genes using siRNA in THP1 cells. As expected, siRNA-mediated knock-down of LXRα blocked the oxLDL-induced inflammatory response, while knock-down of LXRβ had no effect. We demonstrate a specific and novel role of the LXRα isoform in the regulation of oxLDL-induced trained immunity. Our data reveal important aspects of LXR signaling in innate immunity with relevance to atherosclerosis formation.

Lipidomic profiling of exosomes from colorectal cancer cells and patients reveals potential biomarkers

Strong evidence suggests that differences in the molecular composition of lipids in exosomes depend on the cell type and has an influence on cancer initiation and progression. Here, we analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) the lipidomic signature of exosomes derived from the human cell lines normal colon mucosa (NCM460D), and colorectal cancer (CRC) nonmetastatic (HCT116) and metastatic (SW620), and exosomes isolated from the plasma of nonmetastatic and metastatic CRC patients and healthy donors. Analysis of this exhaustive lipid study highlighted changes in some molecular species that were found in the cell lines and confirmed in the patients. For example, exosomes from primary cancer patients and nonmetastatic cells compared with healthy donors and control cells displayed a common marked increase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) 34 : 1, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) 36 : 2, sphingomyelin (SM) d18 : 1/16 : 0, hexosylceramide (HexCer) d18 : 1/24 : 0 and HexCer d18 : 1/24 : 1. Interestingly, these same lipids species were decreased in the metastatic cell line and patients. Further, levels of PE 34 : 2, PE 36 : 2, and phosphorylated PE p16 : 0/20 : 4 were also significantly decreased in metastatic conditions when compared to the nonmetastatic counterparts. The only molecule species found markedly increased in metastatic conditions (in both patients and cells) when compared to controls was ceramide (Cer) d18 : 1/24 : 1. These decreases in lipid species in the extracellular vesicles might reflect function‐associated changes in the metastatic cell membrane. Although these potential biomarkers need to be validated in a larger cohort, they provide new insight toward the use of clusters of lipid biomarkers rather than a single molecule for the diagnosis of different stages of CRC.

Cholesterol and HIF-1α: Dangerous Liaisons in Atherosclerosis

HIF-1α exerts both detrimental and beneficial actions in atherosclerosis. While there is evidence that HIF-1α could be pro-atherogenic within the atheromatous plaque, experimental models of atherosclerosis suggest a more complex role that depends on the cell type expressing HIF-1α. In atheroma plaques, HIF-1α is stabilized by local hypoxic conditions and by the lipid microenvironment. Macrophage exposure to oxidized LDLs (oxLDLs) or to necrotic plaque debris enriched with oxysterols induces HIF-1α -dependent pathways. Moreover, HIF-1α is involved in many oxLDL-induced effects in macrophages including inflammatory response, angiogenesis and metabolic reprogramming. OxLDLs activate toll-like receptor signaling pathways to promote HIF-1α stabilization. OxLDLs and oxysterols also induce NADPH oxidases and reactive oxygen species production, which subsequently leads to HIF-1α stabilization. Finally, recent investigations revealed that the activation of liver X receptor, an oxysterol nuclear receptor, results in an increase in HIF-1α transcriptional activity. Reciprocally, HIF-1α signaling promotes triglycerides and cholesterol accumulation in macrophages. Hypoxia and HIF-1α increase the uptake of oxLDLs, promote cholesterol and triglyceride synthesis and decrease cholesterol efflux. In conclusion, the impact of HIF-1α on cholesterol homeostasis within macrophages and the feedback activation of the inflammatory response by oxysterols via HIF-1α could play a deleterious role in atherosclerosis. In this context, studies aimed at understanding the specific mechanisms leading to HIF-1α activation within the plaque represents a promising field for research investigations and a path toward development of novel therapies.

β-cell-specific deletion of PFKFB3 restores cell fitness competition and physiological replication under diabetogenic stress

HIF1α and PFKFB3 play a critical role in the survival of damaged β-cells in type–2 diabetes while rendering β-cells non-responsive to glucose stimulation. To discriminate the role of PFKFB3 from HIF1α in vivo, we generated mice with conditional β-cell specific disruption of the Pfkfb3 gene on a human islet pancreatic polypeptide (hIAPP^+/−) background and a high-fat diet (HFD) [PFKFB3^βKO + diabetogenic stress (DS)]. PFKFB3 disruption in β-cells under DS led to selective purging of hIAPP-damaged β-cells and the disappearance of insulin- and glucagon positive bihormonal cells. PFKFB3 disruption induced a three-fold increase in β-cell replication as evidenced by minichromosome maintenance 2 protein (MCM2) expression. Unlike high-, lower DS or switch to restricted chow diet abolished HIF1α levels and reversed glucose intolerance of PFKFB3^βKO DS mice. Our data suggest that replication and functional recovery of β-cells under DS depend on β-cell competitive and selective purification of HIF1α and PFKFB3-positive β-cells.

β-cell specific deletion of PFKFB3 results in removal of bihormonal cells and increase in β-cell replication, suggesting that this could lead to β-cell replenishment in type–2 diabetes.