1
|
Loddo M, Hardisty KM, Llewelyn A, Haddow T, Thatcher R, Williams G. Utilisation of semiconductor sequencing for detection of actionable fusions in solid tumours. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0246778. [PMID: 35984852 PMCID: PMC9390944 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncogenic fusions represent compelling druggable targets in solid tumours highlighted by the recent site agnostic FDA approval of larotrectinib for NTRK rearrangements. However screening for fusions in routinely processed tissue samples is constrained due to degradation of nucleic acid as a result of formalin fixation., To investigate the clinical utility of semiconductor sequencing optimised for detection of actionable fusion transcripts in formalin fixed samples, we have undertaken an analysis of test trending data generated by a clinically validated next generation sequencing platform designed to capture 867 of the most clinically relevant druggable driver-partner oncogenic fusions. Here we show across a real-life cohort of 1112 patients with solid tumours that actionable fusions occur at high frequency (7.4%) with linkage to a wide range of targeted therapy protocols including seven fusion-drug matches with FDA/EMA approval and/or NCCN/ESMO recommendations and 80 clinical trials. The more prevalent actionable fusions identified were independent of tumour type in keeping with signalling via evolutionary conserved RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, PLCy/PKC and JAK/STAT pathways. Taken together our data indicates that semiconductor sequencing for detection of actionable fusions can be integrated into routine diagnostic pathology workflows enabling the identification of personalised treatment options that have potential to improve clinical cancer management across many tumour types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Loddo
- Oncologica UK Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (ML); (GW)
| | | | | | | | | | - Gareth Williams
- Oncologica UK Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (ML); (GW)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ogasawara R, Hashimoto D, Kimura S, Hayase E, Ara T, Takahashi S, Ohigashi H, Yoshioka K, Tateno T, Yokoyama E, Ebata K, Kondo T, Sugita J, Onozawa M, Iwanaga T, Teshima T. Intestinal Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Produce R-Spondin3. Sci Rep 2018; 8:10719. [PMID: 30013036 PMCID: PMC6048029 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29100-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The R-Spondin (R-Spo) family regulates WNT signaling and stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of intestinal stem cells (ISCs). R-Spo plays a critical role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, but endogenous producers of R-Spo in the intestine remain to be investigated. We found that R-Spo3 was the major R-Spo family member produced in the intestine and it was predominantly produced by CD45−CD90+CD31+ lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in the lamina propria of the intestinal mucosa. Transcriptome analysis demonstrated that LECs highly expressed R-Spo receptor, Lgr5, suggesting an autocrine stimulatory loop in LECs. LECs were significantly reduced in number, and their R-Spo3 production was impaired in intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The impaired production of R-Spo3 in the intestine may be a novel mechanism of delayed tissue repair and defective mucosal defense in intestinal GVHD. We demonstrate a novel role of intestinal LECs in producing R-Spondin3 to maintain intestinal homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiki Ogasawara
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Daigo Hashimoto
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Shunsuke Kimura
- Laboratory of Histology and Cytology, Department of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Eiko Hayase
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahide Ara
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Takahashi
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ohigashi
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Yoshioka
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tateno
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Emi Yokoyama
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ko Ebata
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kondo
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Junichi Sugita
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Onozawa
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Iwanaga
- Laboratory of Histology and Cytology, Department of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takanori Teshima
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibata M, Iwasaki J, Fujioka Y, Nakagawa K, Darmanin S, Onozawa M, Hashimoto D, Ohba Y, Hatakeyama S, Teshima T, Kondo T. Leukemogenic kinase FIP1L1-PDGFRA and a small ubiquitin-like modifier E3 ligase, PIAS1, form a positive cross-talk through their enzymatic activities. Cancer Sci 2017; 108:200-207. [PMID: 27960034 PMCID: PMC5367148 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Fusion tyrosine kinases play a crucial role in the development of hematological malignancies. FIP1L1‐PDGFRA is a leukemogenic fusion kinase that causes chronic eosinophilic leukemia. As a constitutively active kinase, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA stimulates downstream signaling molecules, leading to cellular proliferation and the generation of an anti‐apoptotic state. Contribution of the N‐terminal FIP1L1 portion is necessary for FIP1L1‐PDGFRA to exert its full transforming activity, but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully characterized. We identified PIAS1 as a FIP1L1‐PDGFRA association molecule by yeast two‐hybrid screening. Our analyses indicate that the FIP1L1 portion of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA is required for efficient association with PIAS1. As a consequence of the association, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA phosphorylates PIAS1. Moreover, the kinase activity of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA stabilizes PIAS1. Therefore, PIAS1 is one of the downstream targets of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. Moreover, we found that PIAS1, as a SUMO E3 ligase, sumoylates and stabilizes FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. In addition, suppression of PIAS1 activity by a knockdown experiment resulted in destabilization of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. Therefore, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA and PIAS1 form a positive cross‐talk through their enzymatic activities. Suppression of sumoylation by ginkgolic acid, a small molecule compound inhibiting a SUMO E1‐activating enzyme, also destabilizes FIP1L1‐PDGFRA, and while the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib suppresses FIP1L1‐PDGFRA‐dependent cell growth, ginkgolic acid or siRNA of PIAS1 has a synergistic effect with imatinib. In conclusion, our results suggest that sumoylation by PIAS1 is a potential target in the treatment of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA‐positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Ibata
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Junko Iwasaki
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Fujioka
- Department of Cell Physiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koji Nakagawa
- Department of Laboratory of Pathophysiology and Therapeutics, Hokkaido University Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Stephanie Darmanin
- Department of Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Masahiro Onozawa
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Daigo Hashimoto
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ohba
- Department of Cell Physiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Hatakeyama
- Department of Biochemistry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takanori Teshima
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kondo
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|