Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis associated with urticarial vasculitis in pregnancy

Acquired Perforating Dermatosis: Clinical and Histopathological Analysis of 95 Patients From One Center

INTRODUCTION

Acquired perforating dermatosis (APD) is a disease group characterized by transepidermal elimination of dermal connective tissue materials such as collagen, elastic fibers, and keratin through the epidermis and observed with pruritic skin lesions.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aim to clarify the clinical, histopathological, and dermoscopic characteristics of APD, identify the associated systemic disease, and figure out treatment options.

METHODS

This study was designed as a single-center retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. We evaluated all accessible APD cases between January 2004 and June 2022 in a tertiary care hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients with confirmed APD were included in the study. Sixty percent of the patients were women and 40% were men. The median age at diagnosis was 63.1 years (35-85 years). The most common site of lesions was the lower extremities which were detected in 86.31% of the patients. The concomitant systemic disease was identified in 84.21% of the patients. The most common systemic disease was type 2 diabetes mellitus (65.26%). Antihistamines and topical corticosteroids were the most commonly prescribed treatment agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Transepidermal elimination of dermal connective tissue components is a feature of APD and the disease usually presents with pruritic papules and nodules with central keratotic crust or plug. The diagnosis of APD requires a clinical examination and histological investigation. APD is usually accompanied by systemic comorbidities. There are several topical and systemic medications available for APD, however, sometimes the therapy might be challenging.

Evaluation of clinicopathological and treatment characteristics of 80 patients with acquired perforating dermatosis

Acquired perforating dermatosis (APD) is a group of a rare dermatological disorder characterized by elimination of dermal connective tissue through epidermis. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients diagnosed with APD and to determine the differences in comorbidities according to subtypes of APD. A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was designed. Patients diagnosed with APD between January 2008 and January 2019 were reviewed. Eighty patients were included in the study. 61.2% (n = 49) of the patients were female and 38.8% (n = 31) were male with a mean age of 58.4 ± 12.5 years. 82.5% (n = 66) of the patients were diagnosed with reactive perforating collagenosis (RPC) and 17.5% (n = 14) of perforating folliculitis (PF). The most common concomitant disease was diabetes mellitus (82.5%). 5.0% of the patients had malignancy. The comorbidity rate in RPC group was higher than PF (P < .05). Topical steroid was the most frequently (90.0%) used treatment. Complete response was obtained 55.0% of patients. Exitus was observed in 23.8% (n = 19) of patients in a mean 17.6 ± 25.7 months follow-up period. APD may be associated with many diseases. Comorbidities are more frequent in RPC group. This situation warns us to evaluate patients with RPC in more detail for underlying diseases. High mortality rate related to the underlying systemic diseases suggests being careful in terms of mortality in patients diagnosed with APD.

Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (ARPC) is a rare skin disorder, which is associated with various internal diseases and even malignant neoplasms. A comprehensive knowledge of the concomitant diseases in ARPC patients is helpful to decrease the misdiagnosis. Although the treatment of ARPC is challenging, systemic assessment of existing regimens is not available.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 50-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital due to cutaneous pruritus and papules all over the body.

DIAGNOSIS

Physical examination showed various sized papules on the lower limbs, buttocks, back, chest, and upper arms with keratotic plugs in the center. Histopathology showed typical collagenous fiber perforation. The diagnosis of ARPC was made according to histopathology, onset age and typical skin lesions. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic renal failure (CRF), and hypothyroidism simultaneously presented in this patient.

INTERVENTIONS

This patient was initially treated with topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines for the skin lesion and pruritus. Medications for glucose control and recovery of renal and thyroid functions were also applied. On the second admission, the combined therapy of topical retinoic acid, Chinese medicinal herb-Qingpeng ointment, and Zinc oxide ointment was added.

OUTCOMES

Papules and pruritus were improved significantly after the second hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of ARPC associated with T2DM, CRF, and hypothyroidism, which has rarely been described. There is no standardized treatment for ARPC. Co-administration of two or more agents for dermatologic interventions and treatment for associated diseases may help to improve skin symptoms.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acquired perforating dermatosis: A case report

Acquired perforating dermatosis (APD) is an uncommon skin disease characterized by umbilicated hyperkeratotic lesions, and involves the transepidermal elimination of dermal components, including collagen and elastic fibers. The disease can affect patients with systemic disorders, especially those with chronic renal failure or diabetes mellitus. The current paper described four cases of patients with APD and investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of APD, as well as its possible link with systemic disorders. In each of the four cases, the patient had systemic disorders before the onset of APD, three had concomitant renal and thyroid disorders and one had hepatocirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C. The results of the present study showed that APD occurred after the transient worsening of the original systemic disease. Furthermore, it was revealed that dermatosis symptoms were alleviated upon remission of the original systemic disorder, without specific dermatological treatment. Dermatosis symptoms improved in all four patients, indicating that the management of the associated systematic diseases was essential for the successful clinical outcomes of APD.

Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis: A report of a typical case

BACKGROUND

Reactive perforating collagenosis (RPC) is a rare form of transepithelial elimination, in which altered collagen is extruded through the epidermis. There are 2 types of RPC, acquired RPC (ARPC) and inherited RPC, while the latter is extremely rare. Here we report on 1 case of ARPC.

METHODS

A 73-year-old female was presented with strongly itchy papules over her back and lower limbs for 3 months. She denied the history of oozing or vesiculation. A cutaneous examination showed diffusely distributed multiple well-defined keratotic papules, 4 to 10 mm in diameter, on the bilateral lower limbs and back as well as a few papules on her chest and forearm. Scratching scars were over the resolved lesions while Koebner phenomenon was negative. The patient had a history of type 2 diabetes for 15 years. Laboratory examinations showed elevated blood glucose level. Skin lesion biopsy showed a well-circumscribed area of necrosis filled with a keratotic plug. Parakeratotic cells and lymphocytic infiltration could be seen in the necrosed area. In dermis, sparse fiber bundles were seen perforating the epidermis. These degenerated fiber bundles were notarized as collagen fiber by elastic fiber stain, suggesting a diagnosis of RPC.

RESULTS

Then a diagnosis of ARPC was made according to the onset age and the history of diabetes mellitus. She was treated with topical application of corticosteroids twice a day and oral antihistamine once a day along with compound glycyrrhizin tablets 3 times a day. And the blood glucose was controlled in a satisfying range. Two months later, a significant improvement was seen in this patient.

CONCLUSION

Since there is no efficient therapy to RPC, moreover, ARPC is considered to be associated with some systemic diseases, the management of the coexisting disease is quite crucial. The patient in this case received a substantial improvement due to the control of blood glucose and application of compound glycyrrhizin tablets.