Altered circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with keloid

Endothelial Dysfunction in Keloid Formation and Therapeutic Insights

Keloids are benign fibroproliferative tumors that cause significant physical and mental morbidity owing to their disfiguring appearance, chronic symptoms, and resistance to treatment. Although fibroblast hyperproliferation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition have been extensively studied, less attention has been paid to the role of vascular dysregulation and endothelial dysfunction (ED) in keloid pathogenesis. Emerging evidence highlights abnormal angiogenesis, vascular irregularities, and endothelial injury as critical drivers of fibrosis in keloids. This review explores the direct and indirect mechanisms of ED in keloid progression, including endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition, inflammation, immune cell crosstalk, and hypoxia. In addition, various treatment strategies targeting angiogenesis and ED, such as drugs, radiotherapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, compression, and laser treatments, are comprehensively reviewed. This review explores keloids through the lens of vasculature and endothelium, emphasizing the critical roles of vascular dysregulation and ED. It aims to provide insights into the mechanisms of keloid formation and serve as a reference for developing future therapeutic strategies.

Update on the Pathogenesis of Keloid Formation

Keloids are abnormal skin growths occurring in a significant portion of the global population. Despite their pervasiveness, the underlying pathophysiology of this scarring process is yet to be fully understood. In this review article, we delve into the current literature on the pathophysiological mechanisms of keloids. We take a top-down approach, first looking at host factors such as genetics and endocrine factors and then taking a more granular approach describing specific control factors such as germline keloid predisposition variants, epigenetics and transcriptomics, inflammatory and immune dysregulation, and the role of profibrotic and angiogenic cell signaling pathways. We then discuss current knowledge gaps, propose further research avenues, and explore potential future treatment options considering our increased understanding of keloid pathogenesis.

Keloidal pathophysiology: Current notions

INTRODUCTION

Keloids are pathological scars that are notorious for their chronic and relentless invasion into adjacent healthy skin, with commonly seen post-therapeutic recurrence after monotherapies.

METHODS

An English literature review on keloid pathophysiology was performed by searching the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases, to find out the up-to-date relevant articles. The level of evidence was evaluated based on the included studies with the highest level of evidence first.

RESULTS

Keloid morphology, signs, symptoms and the histopathological changes that occur in the local cells and extracellular matrix components are described. The theories on the pathophysiology of keloidogenesis that have been proposed to date are also covered; these include endocrinological, nutritional, vascular, and autoimmunological factors. In addition, we describe the local mechanical forces (and the mechanosignalling pathways by which these forces shape keloid cell activities) that promote keloid formation and determine the direction of invasion of keloids and the body sites that are prone to them.

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of this pathological entity, particularly its mechanobiology, will aid the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for use in the clinic to prevent, reduce or even reverse the growth of this pathological scar.

LAY SUMMARY

Keloids are skin scars that are famous for their chronic invasion into healthy skin, with commonly seen recurrence after surgeries. Cells such as lymphocytes, macrophages, mast cells and endothelial cells are involved in keloid growth. Particularly, endocrinological, nutritional, vascular, autoimmunological and mechanical factors actively take part in keloid progression.

Keloid patients have higher peripheral blood endothelial progenitor cell counts and CD34+ cells with normal vasculogenic and angiogenic function that overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8

BACKGROUND

One suggested reason for aberrant wound healing in keloid scars is chronic inflammation of the dermis. We hypothesized that excessive blood vessel formation and high capillary density in keloid tissue is caused by dysfunction of endothelial progenitor cells.

METHODS

We compared the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and vasculogenic and angiogenic capacity, as well as secretory function, of circulating CD34⁺ cells in keloid patients and healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Compared to mononuclear cell cultures from healthy donors, cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from keloid patients showed a more than twofold increase in the number of peripheral blood EPCs (fibronectin-adhering cells that phagocytized acetylated low-density lipoprotein and bound Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I lectin). However, there was no difference in colony-forming ability and participation in in vitro angiogenesis between circulating CD34⁺ cells isolated from keloid patients and healthy individuals. This means that circulating CD34⁺ /endothelial progenitor cells in keloid patients have normal vasculogenic and angiogenic function. However, CD34⁺ cells derived from keloid patients demonstrated a more than sevenfold expression of the interleukin-8 gene and a more than fivefold expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene than CD34⁺ cells derived from healthy individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the role of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8 in increased recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells in keloid patients.

Foreign body reactions may not influence the keloid recurrence

PURPOSE

The foreign body reactions are comprised of macrophages and foreign body giant cells and are considered possible risk factors for recurrence in several conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pathologically proven foreign body reactions on the recurrence of the auricular keloids.

METHODS

This study was carried out in 76 cases in 70 patients reaching the pathologic diagnosis of auricular keloids from March 2006 to February 2012. Patients with auricular keloids were included in the study according to the following criteria: The keloid scar was caused by ear piercing and confirmed pathologically; surgical excision with primary closure was performed; and female patients who have not underwent any previous treatments. To compare any differences of recurrence rate between categorical variables (the presence/absence of foreign body reactions), Fisher's exact tests were used. All patients completed the treatment protocol with a follow-up interval of 18 months.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 90.9% (69 keloids) had successful irradication of their auricular keloids, whereas 9.2% (seven keloids) had recurrences. Of the seven recurrent cases, two exhibited foreign body reactions at pathology, while five revealed no foreign body reactions (28.6% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.092).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of foreign body reactions in keloid tissue may not predict recurrence in auricular keloids.