Research priorities and identification of a health-service delivery model for psoriasis from the UK Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership

Qualitative exploration of the experiences and perceptions of diet in psoriasis management among UK adults

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the use, experiences and perceptions of diet in psoriasis management among adults with lived experience in the UK.

DESIGN

Qualitative. Data were analysed thematically using a reflexive thematic approach.

SETTING

Online discussions with adults living with psoriasis in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine adults (two men, seven women) ≥18 years of age, living in the UK, English speaking, with a diagnosis of psoriasis of any severity.

RESULTS

Four key themes were generated: (1) impact of diet, (2) dietary modification, (3) dietary information and (4) dietary support. Overall, the majority (n=8) perceived that diet had an impact on their psoriasis. Most participants (n=7) reported trying restrictive diets including dairy free, gluten free and 'cleanses' to help manage their psoriasis with limited success. A perceived lack of dietary support resulted in participants relying on social media and online forums for dietary information. Participants reported a high cognitive burden due to the lack of reliable nutrition guidance and insufficient dietary support from healthcare professionals (HCPs).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants rely on social media and online forums for dietary information, which suggest unsubstantiated restrictive diets that could negatively impact health. Participants felt overwhelmed by dietary recommendations and wanted more relevant dietary support. In the absence of evidence-based dietary information for psoriasis, HCPs need to be able to provide basic dietary support and combat misinformation. Larger studies aimed at understanding how best to support people with psoriasis are needed.

Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare ultimately aims to eradicate diseases and restore normality to people's lives. However, until this is achieved for every person, there is a need to support and assist patients with psoriasis using non-pharmacological interventions. These 'adjuvant' approaches have received little attention, whereas dermatologists and researchers strive for better pharmacological therapy. Here, we aimed to perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

SETTING

All healthcare settings.

SEARCH STRATEGY

EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to June 2022. Irrespective of the study type, the studies included non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis. This theme was extracted from the included articles. Two reviewers independently screened and analysed the data.

RESULTS

From 1322 initial records, 71 studies were identified and analysed. Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis include two levels: organisational and individual. The organisational non-pharmacological interventions included the nationwide healthcare model (PsPSP, ProvenCare, German PsoHealth and Psoriasis Network, IMPROVE model and PsoWell clinic), innovative teledermatology models (mHealth app, electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis study and therapist-guided internet-based cognitive and behavioural treatments) and multidisciplinary interventions. The individual non-pharmacological interventions included educational interventions (therapeutic patient education, psychoeducational intervention and self-management education), psychosocial interventions (cognitive and behavioural treatments, self-help and peer-to-peer support programmes) and others (happify and motivational interviewing-based training).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on previous literature, a nationwide healthcare model protocol was constructed for patients with psoriasis. This provided the direction for developing a new psoriasis healthcare model and a basis for summarising the non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis, which helps them adjust to changes in the skin disease.

Involving children and young people in paediatric research priority setting: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is twofold: first, to describe the methods used when involving children and young people (CYP) in developing a paediatric research agenda and, second, to evaluate how the existing literature describes the impact of involving CYP. We distinguish three forms of impact: impact on the research agenda (focused impact), impact on researchers and CYP (diffuse impact) and impact on future research (research impact).

DESIGN

A narrative review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted from October 2016 to January 2022. The included studies involved at least one CYP in developing a research agenda and were published in English.

RESULTS

22 studies were included; the CYP involved were aged between 6 years and 25 years. Little variation was found in the methods used to involve them. The methods used were James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach (n=16), focus groups (n=2), workshop (n=2), research prioritisation by affected communities (n=1) and combined methods (n=1). Impact was rarely described: focused impact in nine studies, diffuse impact in zero studies and research impact in three studies.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that the JLA approach is most frequently used to involve CYP and that all methods used to involve them are rarely evaluated. It also concludes that the reported impact of involving CYPs is incomplete. This study implies that to convince sceptical researchers of the benefits of involving CYPs and to justify the costs, more attention should be paid to reporting these impacts.