Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4+ T cells in a human in-vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

Boost of innate immunity cytokines as biomarkers of response to extracorporeal photopheresis in patients with leukaemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has emerged as a systemic first-line immunomodulatory therapy in leukaemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (L-CTCL) and is now beginning to be utilized in other T-cell-mediated diseases. Although ECP has been used for nearly 30 years, its mechanisms of action are not sufficiently understood, and biomarkers for response are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of ECP on cytokine secretion patterns in patients with L-CTCL, to help elucidate its mechanism of action.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients with L-CTCL and 15 healthy donors (HDs) were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Concentrations of 22 cytokines were simultaneously quantified by using multiplex bead-based immunoassays. Neoplastic cells in patients' blood were evaluated by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Firstly, we observed a distinct cytokine profile pattern difference between L-CTCLs and HDs. There was a significant loss of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and significant increase of interleukins (IL)-9, IL-12 and IL-13 in the sera of patients with L-CTCL compared with HDs. Secondly, patients with L-CTCL who received ECP were classified as treatment responders and nonresponders according to the quantitative reduction of malignant burden in their blood. We evaluated cytokine levels in culture supernatants from patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and 27 weeks after ECP initiation. Strikingly, PBMCs purified from ECP responders released statistically higher concentrations of innate immune cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and TNF-α in comparison with ECP nonresponders. In parallel, responders showed clearance of erythema, reduction of malignant clonal T cells in the blood, and a potent boost of relevant innate immune cytokines in individual patients with L-CTCL.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our results demonstrate that ECP stimulates the innate immune network, and facilitates redirection of the tumour-biased immunosuppressive microenvironment towards proactive antitumour immune responses. The alterations of IL-1α, IL-1β, GM-CSF and TNF-α can be used as biomarkers of response to ECP in patients with L-CTCL.

Extracorporeal photopheresis as an immunomodulatory treatment modality for chronic GvHD and the importance of emerging biomarkers

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the treatment of choice for malignant haematological diseases. Despite continuous improvements in pre- and post-transplantation procedures, the applicability of allo-HSCT is limited by life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), engraftment failure, and opportunistic infections. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is used to treat steroid resistant GvHD with significant success. However, the molecular mechanisms driving its immunomodulatory action, whilst preserving immune function, require further understanding. As ECP is safe to administer with few significant adverse effects, it has the potential for earlier use in the post-HSCT treatment of GvHD. Thus, further understanding the immunomodulatory mechanisms of ECP action may justify more timely use in clinical practice, as well as identify biomarkers for using ECP as first line or pre-emptive GvHD therapy. This review aims to discuss technical aspects and response to ECP, review ECP as an immunomodulatory treatment modality for chronic GvHD including the effect on regulatory T cells and circulating vs. tissue-resident immune cells and consider the importance of emerging biomarkers for ECP response.

Refractory pemphigus vulgaris and high-intensity extracorporeal photopheresis: A case report

A 41-year-old man with oral pemphigus vulgaris (PV) presented to our clinic with a history of no response to numerous immunosuppressant agents and was referred for extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy. Although the patient underwent a high-intensity ECP regimen for five months, which included two different photopheresis systems, his oral dysesthesia continued to interfere with oral intake, leading to continued weight loss and other adverse events. The intervention was associated with changes in several immune cell subpopulations without modifying the anti-epidermal antibody titers, aligned with his poor clinical outcome. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report to examine immunophenotyping of a PV patient who was refractory to previous immunosuppression and recalcitrant to high-intensity ECP therapy.

A simplified extracorporeal photopheresis procedure based on single high-dose ultraviolet A light irradiation shows similar in vitro efficacy

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the most widely used and effective cell-based therapies for the treatment of T-cell-mediated diseases. The patients' white blood cells (WBCs) are collected by apheresis and exposed to the photosensitizer 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and ultraviolet A (UVA) light before retransfusion. The UVA/8-MOP combination has been in use in ECP for more than 4 decades; however, whether ECP can be simplified by UVA light irradiation only has never been analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were treated with classical ECP or different UVA light doses only (UVA^only ). Treatment efficacy was investigated by apoptosis induction in WBC subsets, inhibition of T-cell proliferation, and the ability of monocytes to induce allogeneic T-cell expansion and to respond to lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ stimulation in vitro.

RESULTS

High-dose UVA^only treatment (5 J/cm² ) was as efficient as ECP to induce apoptosis within 48 hours. UVA^only treatment modulated the composition of the surviving cells by improving monocyte survival and promoting CD8⁺ T-cell apoptosis. Both ECP and UVA^only treatment inhibited anti-CD3/anti-CD28 triggered T-cell proliferation. Interestingly, whereas ECP-treated monocytes exhibited a markedly reduced capacity to respond to stimulation and to induce allogeneic T-cell proliferation, UVA^only treatment preserved monocyte functionality to some degree.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose UVA^only and standard ECP showed comparable efficacy in inducing apoptosis and inhibiting direct T-cell proliferation. Hence, UVA^only treatment can be a simplified alternative to ECP therapy. Furthermore, increased monocyte survival with partially preserved functionality after UVA^only treatment may provide a novel method for immunoregulation.

European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - part 1

Background

Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi‐disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.

Materials and methods

In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.

Results and conclusion

These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐versus‐host disease and acute graft‐versus‐host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis: A Case of Immunotherapy Ahead of Its Time

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a cell-based immunotherapy that involves the reinfusion of autologous leukocytes after exposure to psoralen and UVA. The treatment has been used for over 30 years, at first on patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and later for the management of patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), sclerosing disorders, atopic dermatitis, and other diseases that may share the common driving factor of a pathogenic T-cell clone or clones in blood circulation. Patients with clinical improvement mount an antigen-specific immune response that may have tolerance traits in the case of GvHD or anticlonal cytotoxic characteristics in the case of CTCL. The exact mechanisms that dictate one response or the other are not fully understood, but the evidence accumulated so far indicates that multiple events occur simultaneously and consequentially contribute to the end result. These include contact of cells with the outside (plastics and tubing of the ECP apparatus), exposure to psoralen and UVA that activates platelets, monocytes, and other myeloid cells, the release of damage-associated molecular patterns, differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells, and generation and successive presentation of numerous antigens after the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Once reintroduced, the ECP product increases the frequency and activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs), shifts the systemic cytokine balance, and promotes extravasation of immune cells that together shape the effects of this treatment. In this review, we summarize the seminal work and most recent literature of the therapeutic mechanisms and reflect on future avenues of improvements and applications of ECP.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) and the Potential of Novel Biomarkers in Optimizing Management of Acute and Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD)

As the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become a more widespread and effective treatment for hematological malignant and non-malignant conditions, the need to minimize the harmful effects of graft- vs.-host disease (GvHD) has become more important in achieving good outcomes. With diagnosis of GvHD reliant on its clinical manifestations, research into biomarkers for the diagnosis, progression, and even for the prediction of disease, is imperative to combating the high levels of morbidity and mortality post-HSCT. Despite the development of novel treatment approaches to GvHD, corticosteroids remain the standard first-line treatment, with immunosuppressant therapies as second-line options. These strategies however have significant limitations and associated complications. Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) has shown to be effective and safe in treating patients with symptomatic GvHD. ECP has been shown to have varied effects on multiple parts of the immune system and does not appear to increase the risk of relapse or infection in the post HSCT setting. Even so, ECP can be logistically more complex to organize and requires patients to be sufficiently stable. This review aims to summarize the potential role of biomarkers to help guide individualized treatment decisions in patients with acute and chronic GvHD. In relation to ECP, robust biomarkers of GvHD will be highly useful in informing patient selection, intensity and duration of the ECP schedule, monitoring of response and other treatment decisions alongside the concurrent administration of other GvHD therapies. Further research is warranted to establish how GvHD biomarkers are best incorporated into ECP treatment pathways with the goal of tailoring ECP to the needs of individual patients and maximizing benefit.