The effectiveness of age on HbA1c as a criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes in Chinese different age subjects

Reconsidering the HbA1c Cutoff for Diabetes Diagnosis Based on a Large Chinese Cohort

INTRODUCTION

The HbA1c has been considered as the 'gold standard' in diabetes diagnosis and management, however, age, gender and body mass index (BMI) might have certain effects on HbA1c. We are aiming to further investigate the correlation between age and HbA1c, and whether it was affected by gender and BMI.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey including 135,893 nondiabetic individuals who took the physical examination between 2013 and 2017 was conducted. The subjects were grouped by gender, age and BMI, and the interactive and independent effects of the 3 factors on the HbA1c were detected. The median and 95% confidence interval (CI) of HbA1c levels were calculated.

RESULTS

The HbA1c levels gradually increased along with age, both in female and male, and there is a positive association between BMI and the HbA1c. The difference on HbA1c in gender was associated with both age and BMI, the age-related increase in HbAlc was accentuated in the subgroup with higher BMI, and there was a marked accentuation of the positive association between BMI and HbA1c as age increased. In almost all the young and middle-aged (aged 20-59) subgroups, the 97.5^th percentiles of HbA1c levels were lower than 6.5%, suggesting that the single HbA1c cutoff value is probably not applicable to the young and middle-aged population.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that the effects of age, gender and BMI should be taken into consideration when using HbA1c for the diagnosis and management of diabetes, especially in the young and middle-aged population.

Sex and age discrepancy of HbA1c and fetal hemoglobin determined by HPLC in a large Chinese Han population

BACKGROUND

It is accepted that HbA1c is an effective indicator to evaluate glycemic control. Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) is seldom measured because traditional detection is inconvenient. In this regard, there may be an advantage in using HPLC autoanalysis of HbA1c as a surrogate method for HbF detection. The aim of the present study was to explore the distribution of HbA1c and HbF in a large Chinese Han population.

METHODS

In all, 70 553 blood samples were collected between January 2012 and June 2016. Study subjects were inpatients undergoing routine medical care and were divided into four groups based on age: Group A, 20-39 years; Group B, 40-59 years; Group C, 60-79 years; and Group D, ≥80 years. Blood HbA1c and HbF concentrations were measured by HPLC using a Tosho Bioscience (Tokyo, Japan) G8 analyzer.

RESULTS

There was a positive association between HbA1c and age, and a negative association between HbF and age. The concentration range of HbF was narrow and HbF concentrations were significantly higher in females than males, regardless of age (median 0.7% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). There was a low degree of correlation between HbF and HbA1c (r = 0.181, P < 0.0001). Although median HbA1c levels were higher in male than female subjects aged 20-59 years (5.5% vs 5.4%, respectively, in Group A; 5.9% vs 5.8%, respectively in Group B), in the 60-79 years group, HbA1c levels were lower in males than females (6.1% vs 6.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that sex and age should be considered in clinical interpretation of HbA1c.

Re-examining the sensitivity of HbA1c to screen for diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

One of the laboratory tests recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) to screen for diabetes mellitus (DM) is HbA1c, and it is particularly suitable for segments of the population that cannot or are unwilling to fast for a screening test. The aim of this study was to determine whether HbA1c would be a useful tool to screen for DM in a real-world setting if ADA guidelines for repeat testing to confirm the diagnosis of DM are strictly adhered to.

METHODS

A retrospective database study was performed by extracting demographic and laboratory data from a chronic disease registry that collects data on adults from three tertiary hospitals and nine large primary care clinics in Singapore. Data were extracted and analyzed for adults not previously known to have DM whose data was captured in the registry between 2005 and 2016 with HbA1c and at least two diagnostic tests for DM (fasting plasma glucose or 2-h plasma glucose) performed within 4 weeks after HbA1c determination.

RESULTS

In all, 3928 adults were included in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for HbA1c at a threshold of 6.5% were 85.2%, 82.3%, and 0.914, respectively. A higher sensitivity was found in female adults, younger adults, and those of non-Chinese ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of HbA1c as a screening test for DM in this study was significantly higher than that reported previously. This work provides additional evidence supporting the inclusion of HbA1c as one of the screening tests for DM.

HbA1c Cutoff for Prediabetes and Diabetes Based on Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Obese Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a traditional diagnostic tool for diabetes. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is an alternative method used in adults; however, its application in youths has been controversial. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of HbA1c and determined optimal cutoff points for detecting prediabetes and diabetes in youth.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 389 obese children (217 boys, 55.8%) who had undergone simultaneous OGTT and HbA1c testing at six hospitals, Korea, between 2010 and 2016. Subjects were diagnosed with diabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L; 2-hour glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L) or prediabetes (fasting glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/L; 2-hour glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/L). The diagnostic performance of HbA1c for prediabetes and diabetes was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

At diagnosis, 197 (50.6%) subjects had normoglycemia, 121 (31.1%) had prediabetes, and 71 (18.3%) had diabetes. The kappa coefficient for agreement between OGTT and HbA1c was 0.464. The optimal HbA1c cutoff points were 5.8% (AUC, 0.795; a sensitivity of 64.1% and a specificity of 83.8%) for prediabetes and 6.2% (AUC, 0.972; a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 93.7%) for diabetes. When HbA1c (≥ 6.2%) and 2-hour glucose level were used to diagnose diabetes, 100% were detected.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric criteria for HbA1c remain unclear, therefore, we recommend the combination of fasting and 2-hour glucose levels, in addition to HbA1c, in the diagnosis of childhood prediabetes and diabetes.

Effect of age on the diagnostic efficiency of HbA1c for diabetes in a Chinese middle-aged and elderly population: The Shanghai Changfeng Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% (or 48mmol/mol) has been recommended as a new diagnostic criterion for diabetes; however, limited literature is available regarding the effect of age on the HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes and the causes for this age effect remain unknown. In this study, we investigated whether and why age affects the diagnostic efficiency of HbA1c for diabetes in a community-based Chinese population.

METHODS

In total, 4325 participants without previously known diabetes were enrolled in this study. Participants were stratified by age. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted for each age group and the area under the curve (AUC) represented the diagnostic efficiency of HbA1c for diabetes defined by the plasma glucose criteria. The area under the ROC curve in each one-year age group was defined as AUCage. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify factors inducing the association between age and AUCage based on the changes in the β and P values of age.

RESULTS

The current threshold of HbA1c (≥6.5% or 48mmol/mol) showed low sensitivity (35.6%) and high specificity (98.9%) in diagnosing diabetes. ROC curve analyses showed that the diagnostic efficiency of HbA1c in the ≥75 years age group was significantly lower than that in the 45-54 years age group (AUC: 0.755 vs. 0.878; P<0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the AUCage of HbA1c was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.557, P = 0.001). When adjusting the red blood cell (RBC) count in the multiple regression model, the negative association between age and AUCage disappeared, with the regression coefficient of age reversed to 0.001 and the P value increased to 0.856.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic efficiency of HbA1c for diabetes decreased with aging, and this age effect was induced by the decreasing RBC count with age. HbA1c is unsuitable for diagnosing diabetes in elderly individuals because of their physiologically decreased RBC count.

Decreased Glycemic Difference Between Diabetes and Nondiabetes in the Elderly Leads to the Reduced Diagnostic Accuracy of Hemoglobin A1c for Diabetes Screening in an Aged Chinese Population

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the impact of age on the accuracy of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for diabetes screening and explored the possible cause(s).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 3,050 Chinese participants 25-75 years of age without known diabetes in a population-based cross-sectional survey were analyzed. Diabetes was diagnosed by the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The performance of HbA1c for detecting OGTT-defined diabetes in tertile groups (divided by age) was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The effect of age on the difference in glucose levels between participants with and without diabetes and the impact of this difference on the performance of HbA1c were evaluated.

RESULTS

In young (25-41 years old), middle-aged (41-53 years old), and old (55-72 years old) participants, the ROC AUC (95% confidence interval) of HbA1c for detecting OGTT-defined diabetes was 0.958 (0.915, 1.000), 0.891 (0.852, 0.930), and 0.861 (0.821, 0.901), respectively (P = 0.005). The difference of fasting plasma glucose between participants with diabetes and those without diabetes decreased with increasing age: 3.01 (2.80, 3.22) mmol/L, 2.90 (2.71, 3.09) mmol/L, and 2.33 (2.16, 2.50) mmol/L in the three consecutive age groups, respectively. A similar pattern was found in 2-h postprandial plasma glucose. The impact of age on the diagnostic power of HbA1c diminished after data were rearranged to artificially increase the difference between participants without diabetes and those with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of HbA1c for detecting OGTT-defined diabetes declines with age. This is largely due to the decreased separation in glycemic levels between participants with diabetes and without diabetes in the elderly.

Association between glycated hemoglobin A1c levels with age and gender in Chinese adults with no prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus

The present cross-sectional study consisted of 18,265 Chinese patients not previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and who underwent physical examination at the Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen between June 2014 and May 2015 (mean patient age, 51.312±15.252 years). The study was composed of 11,770 males and 6,495 females. The aim was to investigate the association between glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, gender and age. HbA1c values were measured using a Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II HbA1c Reorder Pack. All data was collected for analysis of the HbA1c levels in different gender and age groups, in order to investigate the association between HbA1c levels and age. Analysis of the 18,265 total cases and 16,734 cases with HbA1c levels <6.5%, demonstrated a positive correlation between levels of HbA1c and patient age. Linear regression for patient age and HbA1c levels demonstrated that HbA1c (%) = 0.020 × age (years) + 4.523 (r=0.369, P<0.0001) and HbA1c (%) = 0.014 × age (years) + 4.659 (r=0.485, P<0.0001), respectively. HbA1c levels of the male group were significantly higher than those of the female group (P<0.0001). Furthermore, in different gender groups, HbA1c levels gradually rose with increasing age. Therefore, HbA1c levels are associated with age and gender in Chinese populations, and this should be considered when selecting HbA1c as a criterion for future diabetes screening.

The cutoffs and performance of glycated hemoglobin for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes in a young and middle-aged population and in an elderly population

The aims were to compare the appropriate cutoffs of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in a population of varying ages and to evaluate the performance of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes. A total of 1064 participants in the young and middle-aged group and 1671 in the elderly group were included and underwent HbA1c testing and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the optimal HbA1c cutoffs. Kappa coefficients were used to test for agreement between HbA1c categorization and OGTT-based diagnoses. The optimal HbA1c cutoffs for diagnosing diabetes were 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) in the young and middle-aged group with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 86.7%, and AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.686, 0.955) and 5.9% (41 mmol/mol) in the elderly group with a sensitivity of 80.4%, specificity of 73.3%, and AUC of 0.831 (0.801, 0.861). The optimal cutoffs for diagnosing prediabetes were 5.6% (38 mmol/mol) and 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) in the young and middle-aged group and in the elderly group, respectively. Agreement between the OGTT-based diagnosis of diabetes or prediabetes and the optimal HbA1c cutoff was low (all kappa coefficients <0.4). The combination of HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose increased diagnostic sensitivities or specificities. In conclusion, age-specific HbA1c cutoffs for diagnosing diabetes or prediabetes were appropriate. Furthermore, the performance of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes was poor. HbA1c should be used in combination with traditional glucose criteria when detecting and diagnosing diabetes or prediabetes.