Changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover in patients on 'drug holiday' following bisphosphonate therapy: real-life clinic setting

Bisphosphonate drug holidays in osteoporosis according to fracture risk profile

We analyzed the incidence of fractures and changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in 264 patients who discontinued bisphosphonates. Fractures were recorded in 12.3%. Half were clinical vertebral fractures. We identified patients with a high-risk profile who should not discontinue treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The optimal length of bisphosphonate discontinuation is unknown, as is the type of patient who could benefit from this approach. The objectives of the study were to analyze, in clinical practice, the incidence of fractures and associated risk factors, changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) after discontinuation of bisphosphonates.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study included 264 patients from 14 Spanish rheumatology departments. Postmenopausal women or men with osteoporosis received alendronate or risedronate for ≥ 5 years or zoledronate for ≥ 3 years and had discontinued treatment for ≥ 1 year or ≥ 2 years, respectively. Spinal X-rays were obtained before discontinuation and in suspected clinical vertebral fracture during follow-up. BMD and BTMs were determined before discontinuation and at different time points.

RESULTS

The mean discontinuation time was 2.7 (± 6.7) years. Thirty-two patients (12.3%) had 36 fractures, mainly clinical vertebral fractures. The main risk factor for fracture was a high-risk profile (femoral neck T-score ≤ -2.5 and/or a history of fracture and/or multiple fractures [≥ 5 years]) before discontinuation. At 12 months, 10.41% of patients with high-risk profile experienced a fracture, being 0.8% and 1.08% in moderate- and low-risk patients, respectively. Significant BMD loss at the femoral neck and total hip was detected, with duration of discontinuation being the key factor. PINP was the marker with the greatest changes.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a profile of patients with osteoporosis who should not discontinue bisphosphonates, owing to the possibility of fractures, especially vertebral, which are already evident the first year after discontinuation.

Osteoporosis: Investigations and Monitoring

Background

Osteoporosis is characterized by microarchitectural disruption of the bone, decrease in bone mineral density, and increased skeletal fragility and risk of fracture. Osteoporosis occurs due to the decoupling of bone formation and bone resorption, with a significant increase in resorption. This review article focuses on the role of laboratory investigations in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment in patients with osteoporosis.

Methods

This review article collected literature from various databases using keywords such as 'Laboratory investigations', 'Osteoporosis', 'Diagnosis', 'Monitoring', and 'Bone turnover markers'.

Results and Discussion

Laboratory investigations, including serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D, and parathormone, are commonly performed tests to exclude secondary causes of osteoporosis and monitor the response to therapy. The biochemical markers of bone turnover are newly emerged tests for monitoring individual patients with osteoporosis. These markers are classified as bone formation and resorption markers, measurable in both serum and urine. The use of these markers is limited by biological and analytical variability. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the International Osteoporosis Foundation recommend serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide as the bone formation marker and β-form of C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTx-1/β-CrossLaps) as the marker of choice, using standardized procedures. However, in specific cases, such as patients with chronic renal disease, CTx-1 is replaced by the resorption marker tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, as its levels are not affected by renal excretion.

Conclusion

Bone turnover markers have emerged as tools for the assessment of osteoporosis, using standardized procedures, and are useful in monitoring therapy and treatment compliance.

Bone mineral density response to long-term bisphosphonate treatment and discontinuation in a real-world clinical service

OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonate treatment does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) in all subjects particularly at the femoral neck (FN). Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between response to oral bisphosphonate (oBP) at the FN and change in BMD following discontinuation.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from postmenopausal women on oBP for ≥3 years, attending a real-world metabolic clinic at initiation of oBP, discontinuation, and 1-2 years post discontinuation. Improvement in BMD ≥4% in the FN and ≥5% for the lumbar spine (LS) were deemed clinically meaningful and used as least significant change (LSC) values. We divided subjects based on FN BMD response and compared outcomes between responders and non-responders after oBP discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of the 213 subjects, 32.1% showed an increase ≥LSC at the FN compared to 57.1% at the LS on treatment (p<0.0001). FN responders had lower BMD levels at pre-treatment baseline than non-responders both at the FN (0.58 vs. 0.62 g/cm²; p=0.003) and LS (0.76 vs 0.79 g/cm²; p=0.044). Off-treatment, more subjects lost BMD ≥LSC at FN in the responder group than in the non-responder group (37.5% vs. 14.2%; p<0.001). BMD remained above pre-treatment levels in responders after a median follow-up of 1.52 years.

CONCLUSION

BMD response at FN is suboptimal in patients on oBP and is much less common than LS response. FN responders tend to lose the accumulated bone quickly off-treatment, though BMD remains above pre-treatment levels. These observations suggest that new approaches may be needed to optimise osteoporosis management in real-world patients.

Impact of treatment with active vitamin D calcitriol on bone turnover markers in people with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 chronic kidney disease

People with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are predisposed to bone mineral disorders and increased fracture risk. There is limited data on the effect of calcitriol on bone turnover markers (BTMs) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and stage 3 CKD. In a pre-specified secondary endpoint analysis of a 48-week randomized placebo controlled double-blind trial, we studied the effects of oral calcitriol 0.25 μg once daily on circulating BTMs that included osteocalcin (OCN), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTXI), procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23). Inclusion criteria were people with T2DM with stable stage 3 CKD stage and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) >30 pg/ml. In total, 127 people [calcitriol (n = 64), placebo (n = 63)] were eligible for analyses. Baseline median (interquartile range) age of the cohort was 67 (60.5-70) years, iPTH (median range) 73.9 (55, 105) pg/ml and eGFR 40 (33, 48.5) ml/min. Calcitriol treatments resulted in a significant fall in iPTH, CTX, PINP and OCN levels and rise FGF-23, with mean (95 % confidence interval) between group differences in iPTH [-27.8 pg/ml; 95 % CI (-42.3 to -13.2); p < 0.001], FGF-23 [30.6 pg/ml; 95 % CI (14.8 to 46.3); p < 0.001], CTX [0.12 μg/l; 95 % CI (-0.19 to -0.06); (p < 0.001) and OCN [-4.03 ng/ml; 95 % CI (-7.8 to -0.27); p = 0.036]. Similarly we observed with calcitriol, as between treatment percentage change, a reduction of -38 % for iPTH, -34 % for CTX, and -28 % for OCN levels respectively (p < 0.05 for all). In people with T2DM and stage 3 CKD, calcitriol reduces the levels of CTX, OCN, PINP and iPTH. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical significance of our findings and the related long term impact on bone health.

Effects of early estradiol valerate administration on bone turnover markers in surgically induced menopausal women

Background

Compared with a natural process, surgically induced menopausal women have a higher bone loss rate. This study aims to evaluate early treatment with estradiol valerate on bone turnover markers after surgically induced menopause.

Methods

This prospective study included 41 pre and perimenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy with oophorectomy for benign gynecologic conditions. Two weeks after the operation, all participants were assessed for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) indications. Estrogen therapy was prescribed for those who had indications and accepted treatment (hormone treatment group). The others who had no MHT indication were allocated to the no-treatment group. Serum CTX and P1NP levels at preoperative and 12 weeks postoperative were measured and set as the primary outcome. Within the same group, serum CTX and P1NP before and after surgical menopause were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ANCOVA was used to compare serum CTX and P1NP at 12 weeks after surgical menopause between the two groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient analysis analyzed the correlation between age and baseline bone turnover markers. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

At 12 weeks after surgery, there were no significant differences in serum CTX and P1NP levels in the hormone treatment group compared to baseline. In contrast, serum CTX and P1NP levels were significantly elevated among women who did not receive hormone treatment (p-value < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Serum CTX and P1NP at 12 weeks were significantly different between the two groups (p-value < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively).

Conclusion

Early estrogen administration with oral estradiol valerate could significantly suppress the high bone remodeling in surgically induced menopausal women.

Trial registration Thai Clinical Trial Registry identification number TCTR20190808004, retrospective registered since 2019-08-08. http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20190808004.

Early changes in bone turnover and bone mineral density after discontinuation of long-term oral bisphosphonates: a post hoc analysis

This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis found that there were early increases in bone turnover markers and decreases in bone mineral density after discontinuation of long-term alendronate. These findings might help guide treatment decisions, including monitoring after alendronate withdrawal.

INTRODUCTION

The short-term effects of discontinuing long-term bisphosphonates are poorly characterized. This post hoc analysis investigated 1-12-month changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) after alendronate (ALN) discontinuation.

METHODS

Data were from a randomized, double-blind trial of MK-5442 (calcium-sensing receptor antagonist) following oral bisphosphonates, with placebo and continued ALN controls ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00996801). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis had received oral bisphosphonate (≥ 3-4 preceding years; ALN for the 12 months pre-screening), continuing on ALN 70 mg/week (n = 87) or placebo (n = 88).

RESULTS

At 12 months, least-squares mean percent changes from baseline BMD (placebo vs. ALN) were lumbar spine (LS): - 0.36 vs. 1.29, total hip: - 1.44 vs. 0.46, and femoral neck (FN): - 1.26 vs. - 0.08 (all P < 0.05). BTM levels increased by 1-3 months, to 12 months, with placebo vs. ALN (P < 0.001). FN BMD decline was greater in the placebo subgroup with higher urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen/creatinine [uNTx/Cr] (P < 0.01), and higher serum N-terminal pro-peptide of type 1 collagen [P1NP] levels (P < 0.05), at baseline. There was a trend toward greater FN BMD loss with higher BTM levels at 3 and/or 6 months. Younger age and higher LS BMD at baseline were associated with greater LS BMD loss at 12 months (P = 0.04 and < 0.01, respectively); higher baseline FN BMD predicted greater FN BMD loss (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Early changes in BTM levels and BMD were observed after discontinuation of long-term ALN. Further characterization of factors associated with patients' risk of bone loss upon bisphosphonate discontinuation is warranted.

Update on Rare Adverse Events from Osteoporosis Therapy and Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays

Bisphosphonates remain a first-line treatment for osteoporosis and decrease vertebral and hip fractures without side effects in most patients. With extended treatment, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture occur rarely, but fear of side effects has led to not starting or discontinuing treatment. Atrial fibrillation and uveitis are less appreciated by the general public, but their rare incidence must be recognized. A strategy for safe long-term treatment is provided based on 2 major studies. Interruption of treatment after 3 to 5 years is possible for some patients, but those remaining at high fracture risk require longer term therapy.

Real-world bone turnover marker use: impact on treatment decisions and fracture

The use of bone turnover marker (BTM) testing for patients with osteoporosis in the USA has not been well characterized. This retrospective US-based real-world data study found BTM testing has some association with treatment decision-making and lower fracture risk in patients with presumed osteoporosis, supporting its use in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to characterize bone turnover marker (BTM) testing patterns and estimate their clinical utility in treatment decision-making and fragility fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis using a retrospective claims database.

METHODS

Data from patients aged ≥ 50 years with newly diagnosed osteoporosis enrolled in the Truven MarketScan^® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental and Co-ordination of Benefits databases from January 2008 to June 2018 were included. Osteoporosis was ascertained by explicit claims, fragility fracture events associated with osteoporosis, or prescribed anti-resorptive or anabolic therapy. BTM-tested patients were 1:1 propensity score matched to those untested following diagnosis. Generalized estimating equation models were performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for testing versus no testing on both treatment decision-making and fragility fracture.

RESULTS

Of the 457,829 patients with osteoporosis, 6075 were identified with ≥ 1 BTM test following diagnosis; of these patients, 1345 had a unique treatment decision made ≤ 30 days from BTM testing. The percentage of patients receiving BTM tests increased significantly each year (average annual % change: + 8.1%; 95% CI: 5.6-9.0; p = 0.01). Patients tested were significantly more likely to have a treatment decision (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.13-1.15), and testing was associated with lower odds of fracture versus those untested (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.88).

CONCLUSION

In this large, heterogeneous population of patients with presumed osteoporosis, BTM testing was associated with treatment decision-making, likely leading to fragility fracture reduction following use.

Bone Health Management After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Bone health disturbances commonly occur after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) foremost among them. BMD loss is related to pretransplantation chemotherapy and radiation exposure and immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and results from deficiencies in growth or gonadal hormones, disturbances in calcium and vitamin D homeostasis, as well as osteoblast and osteoclast dysfunction. Although the pathophysiology of AVN remains unclear, high-dose glucocorticoid exposure is the most frequent association. Various societal treatment guidelines for osteoporosis exist, but the focus is mainly on menopausal-associated osteoporosis. HCT survivors comprise a distinct population with unique comorbidities, making general approaches to bone health management inappropriate in some cases. To address a core set of 16 frequently asked questions (FAQs) relevant to bone health in HCT, the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines convened a panel of experts in HCT, adult and pediatric endocrinology, orthopedics, and oral medicine. Owing to a lack of relevant prospective controlled clinical trials that specifically address bone health in HCT, the answers to the FAQs rely on evidence derived from retrospective HCT studies, results extrapolated from prospective studies in non-HCT settings, relevant societal guidelines, and expert panel opinion. Given the heterogenous comorbidities and needs of individual HCT recipients, answers to FAQs in this article should be considered general recommendations, with good medical practice and judgment ultimately dictating care of individual patients. Readers are referred to the Supplementary Material for answers to additional FAQs that did not make the core set.

Position Statement on the Use of Bone Turnover Markers for Osteoporosis Treatment

Current evidences continue to support the clinical application of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The limitations of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiomet especially emphasize the beneficial roles of BTMs, such as serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and serum procollagen type I N-propeptide, as monitoring tools to assess the responses to treatment. Therefore, the proper application and assessment of BTM in clinical practice is very important. However, their use in Korea is still insufficient. Therefore, the BTM committee has set up by the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research have been constituted and provided a position statement which will suggest on the clinical application of BTM for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Korea.

Pharmacology of bisphosphonates

The biological effects of the bisphosphonates (BPs) as inhibitors of calcification and bone resorption were first described in the late 1960s. In the 50 years that have elapsed since then, the BPs have become the leading drugs for the treatment of skeletal disorders characterized by increased bone resorption, including Paget's disease of bone, bone metastases, multiple myeloma, osteoporosis and several childhood inherited disorders. The discovery and development of the BPs as a major class of drugs for the treatment of bone diseases is a paradigm for the successful journey from "bench to bedside and back again". Several of the leading BPs achieved "blockbuster" status as branded drugs. However, these BPs have now come to the end of their patent life, making them highly affordable. The opportunity for new clinical applications for BPs also exists in other areas of medicine such as ageing, cardiovascular disease and radiation protection. Their use as inexpensive generic medicines is therefore likely to continue for many years to come. Fifty years of research into the pharmacology of bisphosphonates have led to a fairly good understanding about how these drugs work and how they can be used safely in patients with metabolic bone diseases. However, while we seemingly know much about these drugs, a number of key aspects related to BP distribution and action remain incompletely understood. This review summarizes the existing knowledge of the (pre)clinical and translational pharmacology of BPs, and highlights areas in which understanding is lacking.

Augmentation of musculoskeletal regeneration: role for pluripotent stem cells

The rise in the incidence of musculoskeletal diseases is attributed to an increasing ageing population. The debilitating effects of musculoskeletal diseases, coupled with a lack of effective therapies, contribute to huge financial strains on healthcare systems. The focus of regenerative medicine has shifted to pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), namely, human embryonic stem cells and human-induced PSCs, due to the limited success of adult stem cell-based interventions. PSCs constitute a valuable cell source for musculoskeletal regeneration due to their capacity for unlimited self-renewal, ability to differentiate into all cell lineages of the three germ layers and perceived immunoprivileged characteristics. This review summarizes methods for chondrogenic, osteogenic, myogenic and adipogenic differentiation of PSCs and their potential for therapeutic applications.

Clinical analysis of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws: A growing severe complication in China

Background/purpose

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is an unusual but quite serious complication. However, its mechanism remains unclear, and its treatment protocol is still controversial.

Materials and methods

Our study involved 201 osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) patients from September 2006 to March 2017. We analyzed risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatment, etc., by comparing MRONJ with other ONJs.

Results

Among 201 patients, MRONJ accounted for 14.71% and it presented a consistent increase tendency. In comparison with other ONJs, we considered advanced age, maxilla lesion, diabetes mellitus, tooth extraction, especially multi-teeth extraction as risk factors (P < 0.0125). Our study demonstrated that maxillary lesion was associated with an advanced stage and it was inclined to worse prognoses. We also found MRONJ had little correlation to Actinomyces infection. Surgical treatment could improve patients' condition successfully (P > 0.05). 81.3% patients with advanced stage showed complete or partial healing lesions after surgery.

Conclusion

Advanced age, maxilla lesion, diabetes mellitus, tooth extraction seem to be important triggering factors for MRONJ. Clinicians and surgeons should pay attention to maxillary lesions as it is related to severe symptoms and unfavorable prognosis. Once diagnosed as MRONJ, surgery is an effective treatment for patients with advanced stage.

Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Evaluating the Balance of Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Osteoporosis Therapies

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that requires life-long strategies to reduce fracture risk. Few trials have investigated the balance of benefits and risk with long-term use of osteoporosis therapies, and fewer still have investigated the consequences of treatment discontinuation. The best available evidence suggests that up to 10 years of treatment with an oral bisphosphonate maintains the degree of fracture risk reduction observed in the 3-year registration trials. With denosumab, 10 years of therapy appears to provide fracture risk reduction similar to or better than that observed in the 3-year registration trial. Available data suggest an increasing but low risk of fractures with atypical features with increasing duration of bisphosphonate therapy. Published data linking duration of therapy to osteonecrosis of the jaw are lacking for bisphosphonates and denosumab. Other side effects associated with denosumab or bisphosphonates do not appear to be related to therapy duration. The antifracture benefits of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab in appropriately selected patients outweigh the low risk of serious side effects.