Diagnostic accuracy of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the prediction of malignancy in nodules with atypia and follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytologies

Thyroid Nodules with Nuclear Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS-Nuclear) Hold a Two-Times-Higher Risk of Malignancy than AUS-Other Nodules Regardless of EU-TIRADS Class of the Nodule or Borderline Tumor Interpretation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The 2023 revision of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) simplified the subcategorization of category III into two groups: "AUS-nuclear" and "AUS-other". The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of individual BSRTC categories with a particular emphasis on the "AUS-nuclear" and "AUS-other" subcategories and to check whether the low-risk follicular-cell-derived thyroid neoplasm (LRTN) interpretation or EU-TIRADS class of the nodule modify ROM.

METHODS

The analysis covered the FNA results of 18,225 nodules in 12,470 patients. The rate of malignancy (the upper limit of ROM) was established on the basis of the assessment of 1660 nodules treated surgically in 978 patients.

RESULTS

In the broadest variant, with all LRTNs regarded as malignant, the ROM for subsequent categories was as follows: I: 0.4-3.5%, II: 0.1-1.3%, III: 3.8-17.7%, IV: 23.3-27.8%, V: 79.6-90.1%, and VI: 86.3-100.0%. In AUS-nuclear nodules, the ROM was 10.5-28.9%, while in AUS-other nodules, it was 2.2-12.2%. The exclusion of NIFTP or all LRTNs from cancers mainly affected the ROM of AUS-nuclear nodules: 9.4-25.9% or 8.6-23.7%, respectively. EU-TIRADS 5 class increases the ROM in AUS-nuclear nodules to 78.3%, OR: 15.7 and in AUS-other to 40.7%, OR: 6.6.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 BSRTC is a welcome step towards simplification of the way nodules are classified within category III. The AUS-nuclear subcategory is associated with a two-times-higher incidence of malignancy than the AUS-other regardless of LRTN interpretation and EU-TIRADS class of the nodule. The EU-TIRADS 5 class of the nodule is helpful in the identification of category III nodules with a high risk of malignancy.

Utility of Six Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems in the Diagnosis of AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodules

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To estimate the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound (US)-based risk stratification systems (RSSs) (American Thyroid Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Association Medici Endocrinology Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules, European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults [EU-TIRADS], American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [ACR-TIRADS], Chinese Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules [C-TIRADS], and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Developed by Kwak et al [Kwak-TIRADS]) for atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 514 consecutive AUS/FLUS nodules in 481 patients with final diagnosis. The US characteristics were reviewed and classified using the categories defined by each RSS. The diagnostic performance was evaluated and compared using a generalized estimating equation method.

RESULTS

Of the 514 AUS/FLUS nodules, 148 (28.8%) were malignant and 366 (71.2%) were benign. The calculated malignancy rate increased from the low-risk to high-risk categories for all RSSs (all P < .001). Interobserver correlation for both US features and RSSs showed substantial to almost perfect agreement. The diagnostic efficacy of Kwak-TIRADS (AUC=0.808) and C-TIRADS (AUC=0.804) were similar (P = .721) and higher than those of other RSSs (all P < .05). The EU-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS exhibited similar sensitivity (86.5% vs 85.1%, P = .739) and were only higher than that of the C-TIRADS (all P < .05). The specificity of C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS were similar (78.1% vs 72.1%, P = .06) and were higher than those of other RSSs (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Currently used RSSs can provide risk stratification for AUS/FLUS nodules. Kwak-TIRADS and C-TIRADS have the highest diagnostic efficacy in identifying malignant AUS/FLUS nodules. A detailed knowledge of the benefits and shortcomings of the various RSSs is essential.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound risk stratification systems on thyroid nodules cytologically classified as indeterminate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US) risk stratification systems (RSSs) are increasingly being utilized for the optimal management of thyroid nodules, including those with indeterminate cytology. The goal of this study was to evaluate the category-based diagnostic performance of US RSSs in identifying malignancy in indeterminate nodules.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021266195). PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched through December 1, 2022. Original articles reporting data on the performance of US RSSs for indeterminate nodules were included. The numbers of nodules classified as true negative, true positive, false negative, and false positive were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies evaluating 7,225 indeterminate thyroid nodules were included. The diagnostic accuracy was quantitatively synthesized using a Bayesian bivariate model based on the integrated nested Laplace approximation in R. For the intermediate- to high-risk category, the sensitivity levels of the American College of Radiology, the American Thyroid Association, the European Thyroid Association, the Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, and Kwak et al. were found to be 0.80, 0.72, 0.76, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. The corresponding specificity measurements were 0.36, 0.50, 0.49, 0.28, and 0.17. Furthermore, for the high-risk category, the sensitivity values were 0.40, 0.46, 0.55, 0.47, and 0.10, while the specificity levels were 0.91, 0.90, 0.71, 0.91, and 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall diagnostic performance of the US RSSs was moderate in the differentiation of indeterminate nodules.

Optimization of the Management of Category III Thyroid Nodules Using Repeat FNA and TIRADS

The aim of the study was to examine the benefits of the joint use of repeat FNA (rFNA) and EU-TIRADS in category III nodules in relation to the kind of atypia: nuclear vs. architectural (denoted by AUS and FLUS respectively). The study included 127 AUS and 1739 FLUS nodules with a known category of EU-TIRADS. Repeat FNA was performed in 82 AUS and 934 FLUS nodules of which 57 and 515 were excised, respectively. AUS nodules had higher malignancy risk than FLUS nodules. EU-TIRADS showed higher accuracy for AUS nodules, the opposite to rFNA, that had higher accuracy for FLUS nodules. The combined criterion for AUS nodules (at least rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-4) maximized sensitivity (92.3%) with acceptable specificity (70.0%); OR: 28.0. In the case of FLUS nodules, the combined criterion (rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-5) maximized specificity (95.2%) with 57.7% sensitivity and a low percentage (13.9%) of positive nodules, OR: 27.0. In both types of nodules, the low risk category in EU-TIRADS and benign result of rFNA excluded cancer. Concluding, category III nodules with and without nuclear atypia differ in their risk of malignancy and, consequently, diagnostic criteria adopted for the evaluation of these nodules with rFNA and EU-TIRADS should be specific to AUS and FLUS nodules.

Performance of current ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules in patients with follicular neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of the currently used ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification systems for thyroid neoplasms (ATA, AACE/ACE/AME, K-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS) in distinguishing follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) from follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA). Additionally, we evaluated the ability of these systems in correctly determining the indication for biopsy.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-nine follicular neoplasms with definitive postoperative histopathology were included. The nodules were categorized according to each of six stratification systems, based on ultrasound findings. We dichotomized nodules into the positive predictive group of FTC (high and intermediate risk) and negative group of FTC based on the classification results. Missed biopsy was defined as neoplasms that were diagnosed as FTCs but for which biopsy was not indicated based on lesion classification. Unnecessary biopsy was defined as neoplasms that were diagnosed as FTAs but for whom biopsy was considered indicated based on classification. The diagnostic performance and missed and unnecessary biopsy rates were evaluated for each stratification system.

RESULTS

The area under the curve of each system for distinguishing follicular neoplasms was < 0.700 (range, 0.511-0.611). The missed biopsy rates were 9.0-22.4%. The missed biopsy rates for lesions ≤ 4 cm and lesions sized 2-4 cm were 16.2-35.1% and 0-20.0%, respectively. Unnecessary biopsy rates were 65.3-93.1%. In ≤ 4 cm group, the unnecessary biopsy rates were 62.2-89.7%.

CONCLUSION

The malignancy risk stratification systems can select appropriate nodules for biopsy in follicular neoplasms, while they have limitations in distinguishing follicular neoplasms and reducing unnecessary biopsy. Specific stratification systems and recommendations should be established for follicular neoplasms.

KEY POINTS

• Current ultrasound-based malignancy risk stratification systems of thyroid nodules had low efficiency in the characterization of follicular neoplasms. • The adopted stratification systems showed acceptable performance for selecting FTC for biopsy but unsatisfactory performance for reducing unnecessary biopsy.

2021 Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations

Incidental thyroid nodules are commonly detected on ultrasonography (US). This has contributed to the rapidly rising incidence of low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma over the last 20 years. The appropriate diagnosis and management of these patients is based on the risk factors related to the patients as well as the thyroid nodules. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) published consensus recommendations for US-based management of thyroid nodules in 2011 and revised them in 2016. These guidelines have been used as the standard guidelines in Korea. However, recent advances in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules have necessitated the revision of the original recommendations. The task force of the KSThR has revised the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and recommendations for US lexicon, biopsy criteria, US criteria of extrathyroidal extension, optimal thyroid computed tomography protocol, and US follow-up of thyroid nodules before and after biopsy. The biopsy criteria were revised to reduce unnecessary biopsies for benign nodules while maintaining an appropriate sensitivity for the detection of malignant tumors in small (1-2 cm) thyroid nodules. The goal of these recommendations is to provide the optimal scientific evidence and expert opinion consensus regarding US-based diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules.

Diagnosing thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology with the deep convolutional neural network

To compare the diagnostic performances of physicians and a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) predicting malignancy with ultrasonography images of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) results on fine-needle aspiration (FNA). This study included 202 patients with 202 nodules ≥ 1 cm AUS/FLUS on FNA, and underwent surgery in one of 3 different institutions. Diagnostic performances were compared between 8 physicians (4 radiologists, 4 endocrinologists) with varying experience levels and CNN, and AUS/FLUS subgroups were analyzed. Interobserver variability was assessed among the 8 physicians. Of the 202 nodules, 158 were AUS, and 44 were FLUS; 86 were benign, and 116 were malignant. The area under the curves (AUCs) of the 8 physicians and CNN were 0.680–0.722 and 0.666, without significant differences (P > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the AUCs for the 8 physicians and CNN were 0.657–0.768 and 0.652 for AUS, 0.469–0.674 and 0.622 for FLUS. Interobserver agreements were moderate (k = 0.543), substantial (k = 0.652), and moderate (k = 0.455) among the 8 physicians, 4 radiologists, and 4 endocrinologists. For thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, the diagnostic performance of CNN to differentiate malignancy with US images was comparable to that of physicians with variable experience levels.

Ultrasonography and Fine-Needle Aspiration in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Sonographic risk criteria may assist in further prognostication of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Our aim was to determine whether sonographic criteria could further delineate the post-test probability of malignancy in ITNs.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

METHODS

A systematic review of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL was performed from inception to April 15, 2021. Eligible studies included those which reported ultrasonographic evaluations with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) or the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) in adult patients with ITNs. ATA or TIRADS were scored as low (negative) or high (positive) malignancy risk using a previously validated binary classification. Primary outcomes included pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio for all sonographic criteria. Studies were appraised using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies and the data were pooled using bivariate random-effects models.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. For Bethesda III, ATA had a specificity (0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.94), but a sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.25-0.77). Conversely, K-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity (0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89) with a specificity of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.31-0.74). Furthermore, American College of Radiology and EU TIRADS had specificities of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.36-0.80) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87) with sensitivities of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.37-0.90) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20-0.60), respectively. There were few studies with Bethesda IV nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

Though dependent on malignancy rates, Bethesda III nodules with low-suspicion TIRADS features may benefit from clinical observation, whereas nodules with high-suspicion ATA features may require molecular testing and/or surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2021.

Feasibility of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in Predicting Thyroid Malignancy

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) in the estimation of malignancy and assess the concordance between TIRADS and the histopathology results of the postoperative specimens. Consecutive ultrasound imaging records of patients with multinodular goiter from January 2010 to December 2017 who underwent surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The risk of malignancy of each TIRADS category was determined, and correlation with pathology was assessed. The patients with malignant cytology findings (Bethesda 6) who were categorized TIRADS 6 were excluded from the study. The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the TIRADS classification were calculated on a 2 x 2 table with their own formulas. A total of 1457 patients were evaluated, and 1122 of these were included in the study. The risk of malignancy for nodules evaluated as TIRADS 2 was 0.6 per cent, TIRADS 3 was 13.1 per cent, TIRADS 4a was 20 per cent, TIRADS 4b was 61.1 per cent, TIRADS 4c was 85.7 per cent, and TIRADS 5 was 93.3 per cent. The positive predictive value of TIRADS classification was found to be 43.4 per cent, negative predictive value was found to be 90.7 per cent, sensitivity was found to be 78 per cent, specificity was found to be 68.4 per cent, and accuracy was found to be 70.7 per cent for our institution. The TIRADS classification based on suspicious ultrasound findings is reliable in predicting thyroid malignancy and can be routinely used in daily practice.

Approaching Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules in the Absence of Molecular Markers: "The BETH-TR Score"

CONTEXT

Given the lack of easy access to molecular markers for indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda (BETH) category III, IV), the clinician can either decide to get a second opinion from an expert high-volume thyroid cytopathologist, redo the FNAC after a period of 3-6 months, or send the patient for a diagnostic hemithyroidectomy. Reviewing the sonographic risk features is also one way of triaging these nodules. The ACR-TIRADS (TR) is an objective method of sonographic risk assessment and is superior to other forms of sonographic classification.

AIM

We propose combining the scoring of the TR category and BETH category (both expressed as a numerical value and summated) and look at the score which could potentially guide the clinician in deciding whom to send for surgery.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Observational prospective collection of consecutive patient data from the thyroid FNAC clinic.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The BETH categories were represented numerically and summated with the TR category. The categorical outcome variables of benign and malignant nodules and the summated score was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

We analyzed 450 FNAC data, out of which 403 were thyroid nodule aspirates. Out of these nodules, 96 of them underwent surgery and 64% of these nodules were malignant on final histopathology (malignant = 62 and benign = 34). The mean size of the benign nodules was 3.6 ± 2.2 cm compared to 2.8 ± 1.8 cm of the malignant nodules. After excluding those with BETH 1 (n = 4), the mean BETH-TR score for benign nodules was 6 ± 1.4 and malignant nodules 9.4 ± 2.1 (P < 0.0001). The BETH-TR score progressively increased from 7.3 ± 0.92 in follicular thyroid cancers (FTC) to 8.6 ± 1.4 in follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer (FVPTC) to 10 ± 1.3 in classic papillary thyroid cancers (PTC). Among the indeterminate nodules (BETH III and IV; n = 40), the BETH-TR score of benign nodules was 6.75 ± 1 and malignant nodules was 7.5 ± 0.72 (P value = 0.01). A BETH-TR score ≥7 gave a sensitivity of 92% specificity of 74% and correctly identified malignant nodules in 86% of cases (likelihood ratio 3.5; ROC area: 0.8841; CI 0.79-0.94).

CONCLUSION

A combined sonocytological BETH-TR score is one way to triage the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. A BETH-TR score ≥7 gave a sensitivity of 92% specificity of 74% and correctly identified malignant nodules in 86% of cases.

The Usefulness of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Determining Thyroid Malignancy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the effect of a modified Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System (TIRADS) in predicting malignancy in surgically treated nodules.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

This study was carried out at a tertiary care center from July 2016 to July 2017. Patients were included if they had a thyroid nodule that had an ultrasound assessment with subsequent fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) as well as surgical resection. Patients were excluded if they had previous head and neck surgery. Patients were stratified into those who had a formal modified TIRADS report by the radiologist versus those who had an ultrasound report without TIRADS reporting. FNAB results were reported as per Bethesda Thyroid Cytology Criteria, and the final pathology report was nominalized as malignant or benign.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria listed above were included within the study. Thirty one patients (25%) had a modified TIRADS report from the radiologist, whereas 93 patients (75%) did not. There was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of: gender (P = .24), age (P = .77), FNAB results (P = .95), final surgical pathology (P = .90), or incidental findings of malignancy (P = .09). Comparative analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the concordance of FNAB and a final pathological diagnosis of malignancy (P = .91).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the known diagnostic utility of the TIRADS in relation to FNAB results and its widespread use, this study shows that the overall detection of malignancy is not statistically different in those who received a modified TIRADS report.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130: 2087-2091, 2020.

Interobserver agreement and efficacy of consensus reading in Kwak-, EU-, and ACR-thyroid imaging recording and data systems and ATA guidelines for the ultrasound risk stratification of thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

To investigate the interobserver agreement (IA) and the impact of consensus reading using four risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules (TN).

METHODS

Four experienced specialists independently rated US images of 80 TN according to the Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA Guidelines. The cases were randomly extracted from a prospectively acquired database (n > 1500 TN). The observers were blinded to clinical data. This study was divided into two sessions (S1 and S2) with 40 image sets each. After every session, a consensus reading was carried out (C1, C2). Subsequently, the effect of C1 was tested in S2 with 40 new cases followed by C2. Fleiss' kappa (κ) was calculated for S1 and S2 to estimate the IA and learning curves. The results of C1 and C2 were used as reference for diagnostic accuracy calculations.

RESULTS

IA significantly increased (p < 0.01) after C1 with κ values of 0.375 (0.615), 0.411 (0.596), 0.321 (0.569), and 0.410 (0.583) for the Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA Guidelines in S1 (S2), respectively. ROC analysis (C1 + C2) revealed similar areas under the curve (AUC) for the Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, ACR TI-RADS, and ATA Guidelines (0.635, 0.675, 0.694, and 0.654, respectively, n.s.). AUC did not increase from C1 (0.677 ± 0.010) to C2 (0.632 ± 0.052, n.s.). ATA Guidelines were not applicable in five cases.

CONCLUSIONS

IA and diagnostic accuracy were very similar for the four investigated risk stratification systems. Consensus reading sessions significantly improved the IA but did not affect the diagnostic accuracy.

ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology

BACKGROUND

Cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules currently present a challenge for clinical decision-making. The main aim of our study was to determine whether the classifications, American College of Radiology (ACR) TI-RADS and 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, in association with The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), could be used to stratify the malignancy risk of indeterminate thyroid nodules and guide their clinical management.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study of a cohort of 140 thyroid nodules in 139 patients who were referred to ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from January 2012 to June 2016 with indeterminate cytological results (44 Bethesda III, 52 Bethesda IV and 44 Bethesda V) and in whom pre-FNAC thyroid US images and histological results after surgery were available. Each included nodule was classified by one radiologist blinded to the cytological and histological diagnoses according to the ACR TIRADS scores and the US patterns as recommended in the 2015 ATA guidelines. The risk of malignancy was estimated for Bethesda, TI-RADS scores, ATA US patterns and their combination.

RESULTS

Of the 140 indeterminate thyroid nodules examined, 74 (52.9%) were histologically benign. A different rate of malignancy (p < 0.001) among Bethesda III, IV and V was observed. The rate of malignancy increased according to the US suspicion categories (p < 0.001) in both US classifications (TI-RADS and ATA). Thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda III and the lowest risk US categories (very low, low and intermediate suspicion by ATA and 2, 3 and 4a by TI-RADS) displayed a sensitivity of 95.3% for both classifications and a negative predictive value of 94.3 and 94.1%, respectively. The highest risk US categories (high suspicion by ATA and 4b,4c and 5 by TI-RADS) were significantly associated with cancer (odds ratios [ORs] 14.7 and 9.8, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound classifications, ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, may help guide the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules, suggesting a conservative approach to nodules with low-risk US suspicion and Bethesda III, while molecular testing and surgery should be considered for nodules with high-risk US suspicion and Bethesda IV or V.

Ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules facilitate interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda system III/IV thyroid nodules and inform therapeutic schedule

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to explore whether ultrasound of thyroid nodules facilitates the interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules to inform further therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed patient records in which the results of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) were classified by the Bethesda III/IV in our institution between January 2016 and June 2018. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Chinese VIP. The odds ratio (OR) was used to measure associations between risk factors and thyroid nodule malignancy.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine cases of Bethesda III/IV with corresponding surgeries were included, and the malignancy risk was 54.2%. Meta-analysis revealed irregular borders, solitary nodules, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, and being taller than wide, all of which increased the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Combined ORs for these factors were 4.08 (95% CI: 2.34-7.14, P < .001), 2.18 (95% CI: 1.39-3.42, P = .001), 2.02 (95% CI: 1.35-3.01, P = .001), 3.21 (95% CI: 2.26-4.56, P < .001), and 4.35 (95% CI: 3.07-6.15, P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

As the risk of malignancy for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is high, when any one of the five ultrasound features of malignancy were confirmed, repeated FNA is recommended to confirm PTC-type malignancy, even though nodules were Bethesda III/IV classification. However, repeated FNA should be avoided when none of these ultrasound features are identified because repeated FNA does not contribute to identifying non-PTC type malignancies, such as follicular thyroid carcinoma and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Validation of web-based thyroid imaging reporting and data system in atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) show variable malignancy risk. We validated the web-based predictive models and the scoring system by the American College of Radiology (ACR) for AUS/FLUS nodules to stratify the malignancy risk.

METHODS

From January 2011 to November 2014, 275 consecutive nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS were enrolled. The discrimination and calibration ability of a web-based scoring with inclusion of biopsy result and sonographic features, old web-based scoring model without biopsy result, and ACR models were assessed.

RESULTS

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the validation set were 0.670 for the new web-based model, 0.710 for the old web-based model, and 0.732 for the ACR scoring risk-stratification model. All models were well calibrated.

CONCLUSION

The web-based scoring risk-stratification model using the combined information of ultrasonography features and biopsy result for AUS/FLUS nodules to stratify malignancy risk presents an acceptable predictive accuracy.

Clinical Parameter for Deciding the BRAFV600E Mutation Test in Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Thyroid Nodules: US Features According to TIRADS

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) to select thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) cytology for additional BRAF mutation testing. Three hundred three thyroid nodules were included. Statistical analysis was performed at both patient and nodule levels according to BRAF mutation positivity and clinical factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent associations between BRAF mutation positivity and clinical factors. Of 303 AUS/FLUS nodules, 16 (5.3%) of 303 nodules had the BRAF mutation. The frequency of the BRAF mutation according to the TIRADS was 35.7% for category 5, 10.8% for category 4c, 2.5% for category 4b, 1.1% for category 4a, and 0% for category 3 nodules (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BRAF mutation positivity was significantly associated with high suspicion on the TIRADS (odds ratio, 15.247; P < 0.001). In conclusion, the ultrasonography patterns of the TIRADS can be used as a clinical parameter for deciding the BRAF mutation test in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology.

TIRADS score is of limited clinical value for risk stratification of indeterminate cytological results

CONTEXT

Thyroid nodules with cytological indeterminate results represent a daily and recurrent issue for patient management.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to determine if TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) could be used to stratify the malignancy risk of these nodules and to help in their clinical management. Secondary objective was to estimate if this risk stratification would change after reclassification of encapsulated non-invasive follicular variant of papillary carcinomas (FVPTC) as non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm (NIFTP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of a cohort of 602 patients who were referred for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration from January 2010 to December 2016 with an indeterminate cytological result and in whom histological results after surgery were available. TIRADS score was prospectively determined for all patients included. Nodules that had been classified as FVPTC were submitted to a rereading of histological report and reclassified as NIFTP when judged relevant. A table of malignancy risk crossing Bethesda and TIRADS results was built before and after this reclassification.

RESULTS

The study included 602 cytologically indeterminate nodules. TIRADS score was positively correlated with the malignancy rate (P < 0.0001). Risk stratification with TIRADS was significant only in Bethesda V nodules (P = 0.0004). However, the risk of malignancy in this Bethesda V category was always above 45%, whatever the TIRADS score.

CONCLUSION

For a clinician facing an indeterminate cytological result for a thyroid nodule, return to TIRADS score is of limited value in most conditions to rule in or rule out malignancy and to guide subsequent management of patients.

Web-based thyroid imaging reporting and data system: Malignancy risk of atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules calculated by a combination of ultrasonography features and biopsy results

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to construct a web-based predictive model using ultrasound characteristics and subcategorized biopsy results for thyroid nodules of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) to stratify the risk of malignancy.

METHODS

Data included 672 thyroid nodules from 656 patients from a historical cohort. We analyzed ultrasound images of thyroid nodules and biopsy results according to nuclear atypia and architectural atypia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict whether nodules were diagnosed as malignant or benign.

RESULTS

The ultrasound features, including spiculated margin, marked hypoechogenicity, calcifications, biopsy results, and cytologic atypia, showed significant differences between groups. A 13-point risk scoring system was developed, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the development and validation sets were 0.837 and 0.830, respectively (http://www.gap.kr/thyroidnodule_b3.php).

CONCLUSION

We devised a web-based predictive model using the combined information of ultrasound characteristics and biopsy results for AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules to stratify the malignant risk.

Use of the Kwak Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic literature review was to assess the usefulness of the Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) classification proposed by Kwak for differentiation of thyroid nodules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four literature databases were searched for relevant articles through early January 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The area under the curve (AUC) from the pooled receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the usefulness of this classification for differentiation of thyroid nodules. Meta-analysis was conducted by using meta-analysis software.

RESULTS

We analysed six publications describing 10,926 nodules. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and AUC for pooled ROC were 0.983 (95 % CI 0.976-0.989), 0.552 (95 % CI 0.542-0.562), 2.666 (95 % CI 1.692-4.198), 0.05 (95 % CI 0.035-0.072), 51.020 (95 % CI 15.241-170.79) and 0.938, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Kwak TIRADS has high sensitivity and low specificity. Thus, it is very useful to discard the benign cases and to reduce the number of biopsies.

KEY POINTS

• Routine, adequate standardization of thyroid nodules ultrasound classification is mandatory. • Kwak TIRADS parameters are accurate for differentiating focal thyroid lesions. • Kwak TIRADS system is simple to apply. • Kwak TIRADS system may become a useful diagnostic tool.

Non-functioning parathyroid cystic tumour: malignant or not? Report of a case

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a very rare endocrine tumour, usually characterized by symptoms such as a neck mass, dysphonia, severe hypercalcemia exceeding 140 mg/L and elevated serum parathyroid hormone levels, even more than 5 times the upper limit of normal. Non-functioning parathyroid cancer is extremely rare and, in this case, its pre-operative diagnosis is often difficult. A 54-year old female patient, referring dysphagia and dysphonia, underwent neck ultrasound and neck CT. A left thyroid nodule, probably cystic, was found. It presented caudal extent on anterior mediastinum causing compression of the left lateral wall of the trachea. The preoperative calcemia was into the normal range. The patient underwent left thyroid lobectomy. Histological exam showed a cystic lesion, immunohistochemically originating from parathyroid that oriented for carcinoma. The 18 months follow-up did not show a residual-recurrent disease. The parathyroid origin of a neck lesion could not be suspected before surgery when specific laboratory tests are not available and clinical effects of hyperparathyroidism syndrome are not present. Histological features are not always sufficient for the differential diagnosis between the parathyroid adenoma and carcinoma. The immunohistochemistry is an useful tool that can aid to reach the definite diagnosis.