Establishing reproductive potential and advances in fertility preservation techniques for XY individuals with differences in sex development

Efficacy of Video-based Education in Improving Understanding of Pediatric Fertility Preservation

Eighty percent of children diagnosed with cancer in childhood survive into adulthood. Fertility preservation (FP) is an important consideration, and procedures are available to reduce the risk of infertility following gonadotoxic therapies. Discussing FP options eases decision-making and minimizes regret; however, poor comprehension of these topics remains a challenge. This study evaluates if video-based educational tools increase understanding of FP options among pediatric patients and families. Videos were first tested among participants not at risk of infertility to ensure objective utility and optimize quality. In part 1, parents of pediatric surgical patients were randomized to view 2 publicly available educational videos on FP in differing orders. Each group completed pre-surveys and post-surveys assessing the comprehension and perception of video quality. In part 2, the parent and patient participants completed a comprehension assessment before and after viewing our institution-specific educational video, designed based on participant feedback from part 1. Part 1 results demonstrated a significant increase in participant knowledge and perceived understanding after viewing the videos ( P <0.001), regardless of order. In part 2, the post-test comprehension scores were significantly improved for all participants and all subgroups, P <0.01. Results suggest that video-based educational tools may help to reduce barriers to FP in pediatric oncology.

Gonadal tumors in a contemporary cohort of patients with differences in sex development undergoing surgery - A multi-site study from the Pediatric Urologic Oncology Working Group of the societies for pediatric urology

BACKGROUND

Disturbances in gonadal development lead to increased risk of gonadal malignancy in some but not all patients with differences in sex development (DSD). However, the natural history of these tumors is poorly described, and the literature remains sparse.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and germ cell tumor (GCT) in a contemporary cohort of patients with DSD undergoing surgery and to provide long-term oncologic outcomes for these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with DSD who have undergone gonadectomy or gonadal biopsy were identified at four institutions. Clinical characteristics, pathology, and treatment details were obtained retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk categories based on DSD diagnosis. Oncologic treatment and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics are reported using parametric methods.

RESULTS

83 patients were identified. Distribution of diagnoses is summarized in the summary table. 14 (16.9%) patients underwent gonadal biopsy, and 71 (85.5%) patients underwent gonadectomy (50/71 gonadectomies were bilateral). 8/83 (9.6%) patients had GCNIS or GCT (7 GCNIS, 1 GCT). Median age at surgery was 2.95 years (y) (interquartile range [IQR] 0.6-12.2) and 14y (IQR 0.85-16.9) in patients without and with GCNIS/GCT, respectively. All 8 patients with GCNIS/GCT had high or intermediate risk DSD diagnoses (4 mixed gonadal dysgenesis, 3 Turner with Y, 1 partial gonadal dysgenesis). Of the patients with high-risk diagnoses, 8/54 (15%) had GCNIS/GCT. No patient received adjuvant therapy, no patient had a recurrence, and all patients were living with mean follow up 6.4y.

DISCUSSION

The risk of gonadal malignancy is heterogeneous in the DSD population and can vary based on DSD diagnosis as well as maturation, testicularization, and location of the gonads. The most recent consensus recommendations on gonadal management emphasize risk stratification and consideration of gonadal surveillance based on gender of rearing, but supporting literature remains sparse. In this contemporary cohort of DSD patients who underwent gonadal surgery, most patients did not have evidence of adverse pathology, all patients with malignant or premalignant pathology had a high/intermediate risk DSD diagnosis, and all patients with GCNIS/GCT were treated with surgery alone without recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of patients with premalignant and malignant gonadal pathology and DSD in this cohort aligns with prior literature, and oncologic outcomes were excellent. These data add valuable information to the current literature and highlight the necessity to develop appropriate screening regimens for retained gonads.

Consensus guide on prophylactic gonadectomy in different sex development

The risk of suffering from gonadal germ cell tumors (GCT) is increased in some patients with different sexual development (DSD), mainly in those with Y chromosome material. This risk, however, varies considerably depending on a multitude of factors that make the decision for prophylactic gonadectomy extremely difficult. In order to make informed recommendations on the convenience of this procedure in cases where there is potential for malignancy, this consensus guide evaluates the latest clinical evidence, which is generally low, and updates the existing knowledge in this field.

Management of a Girl With Delayed Puberty and Elevated Gonadotropins

A girl presenting with delayed puberty and elevated gonadotropins may have a range of conditions such as Turner syndrome (TS), primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), and 46,XY disorders of sexual development (DSD). An organized and measured approach to investigation can help reach a timely diagnosis. Management of young people often requires specialist multidisciplinary input to address the endocrine and nonendocrine features of these complex conditions, as well as the psychological challenges posed by their diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing within the research setting has revealed several genetic causes of POI and 46,XY DSD, which may further facilitate an individualized approach to care of these young people in the future. Pubertal induction is required in many and the timing of this may need to be balanced with other issues specific to the condition (eg, allowing time for information-sharing in 46,XY DSD, optimizing growth in TS). Shared decision-making and sign-posting to relevant support groups from the outset can help empower young people and their families to manage these conditions. We describe 3 clinical vignettes of girls presenting with delayed puberty and hypergonadotropic amenorrhea and discuss their clinical management in the context of current literature and guidelines.

Adolescent Fertility Preservation: Where Do We Stand Now

Adolescence is a period of flux for many body systems. While fertility potential typically increases after menarche, there are diseases where the opposite occurs and fertility preservation options need to be considered early. In cases of cancer, options vary by pubertal status and can include ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, sperm cryopreservation, and testicular tissue cryopreservation. Much remains to be learned about fertility and preservation options in those with differences in sexual development (DSDs); however, depending on the form of DSD, fertility preservation may not be necessary. Similarly, traditional fertility counseling in children with galactosemia may need to be changed, as data suggest that fertility rates attributed to other causes of premature ovarian insufficiency may not be as applicable to this disease. Adolescents with Turner's syndrome are at high risk for premature ovarian failure; therefore, it is important to consider options as early as possible since ovarian reserves are depleted quickly. On the other hand, transgender and gender diverse adolescents may even be able to undergo fertility preservation after starting hormone therapy. In all cases, there are additional ethical components including technical/surgical risks in childhood, offering experimental therapies without creating false hope and evaluating children's consent and assent capabilities that must be considered.

The ethics of offering fertility preservation to pediatric patients: A case-based discussion of barriers for clinicians to consider

Decisions about fertility preservation can be difficult in general but the recent application of preservation techniques to pediatric patients has ushered in a host of new ethical considerations. Fertility preservation (FP) may be considered for all patients who are at risk for infertility due to their medical diagnosis or treatment, including those undergoing gonadotoxic chemotherapy, those with differences of sex development (DSD) undergoing gonadectomy,^1-3 and transgender patients undergoing gender affirming surgery. The focus of this paper is to review the ethical issues involved in offering FP to pediatric oncology patients and, to a lesser extent, the new ethical issues that apply to patients with DSD. Some of the techniques and approach to counseling will also apply to transgender individuals, although that is beyond the scope of this work. We aim to discuss several barriers to offering FP and to advise how to counsel families in the setting of rapid changes in this field. Families should be educated about:Specific guidance for clinicians regarding some of these points was recently published in an American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Report,¹ and we will illustrate the use of these guidelines in four case presentations.

Risk of gonadal neoplasia in patients with disorders/differences of sex development

BACKGROUND

Patients with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), especially those possessing the Y chromosome, have a higher risk of gonadal germ-cell tumours (GCTs). We aimed to examine the incidence of different types of gonadal neoplasia and associated risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 1040 DSD patients aged ≥16 years participated in a cross-sectional multicentre European study (dsd-LIFE). Data on medical history were gathered from the patients' archival medical documents. A web-based questionnaire was filled out individually by the participants. A physical examination was performed in all, while ultrasonography of gonads was carried out in 214 and semen analysis was performed for 53 patients.

RESULTS

Germ-cell neoplasia was present in 12 % of patients with DSD and in 14 % of those with XY DSD. The highest risk (36 %) was observed in 46,XY patients with gonadal dysgenesis (GD): complete GD (33 %) and partial GD (23 %), but also in mixed GD (8 %) and complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) (6%). It was not reported in partial AIS, XX male, 46,XX DSD and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Turner and Klinefelter syndromes, or in androgen biosynthesis defects. Benign sex cord-stromal tumours (Sertoli- and Leydig-cell tumours) were noted only in patients with complete AIS (3.1 %) and Klinefelter syndrome (14.3 %). A relationship between risk factors for GCT and gonadal neoplasia appearance, other than the Y chromosome, was not found.

CONCLUSION

Adult patients with GD and the Y chromosome have the highest risk of GCT and should be kept under thorough medical control and receive special medical follow-up to prevent the development of gonadal tumours.

Disorders of Sex Development-Novel Regulators, Impacts on Fertility, and Options for Fertility Preservation

Disorders (or differences) of sex development (DSD) are a heterogeneous group of congenital conditions with variations in chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex. Impaired gonadal development is central to the pathogenesis of the majority of DSDs and therefore a clear understanding of gonadal development is essential to comprehend the impacts of these disorders on the individual, including impacts on future fertility. Gonadal development was traditionally considered to involve a primary 'male' pathway leading to testicular development as a result of expression of a small number of key testis-determining genes. However, it is increasingly recognized that there are several gene networks involved in the development of the bipotential gonad towards either a testicular or ovarian fate. This includes genes that act antagonistically to regulate gonadal development. This review will highlight some of the novel regulators of gonadal development and how the identification of these has enhanced understanding of gonadal development and the pathogenesis of DSD. We will also describe the impact of DSDs on fertility and options for fertility preservation in this context.